[tmbchr]™

Consensus Reality and Other Oddities



Tooling around on Wikipedia has given me a bunch of cool things that I want to post. They are only loosely related though, so beware that this is “one of those” type posts…

  • I find 99.99999999% of all people who are into “discordianism” to be supremely irritating. But Wikipedia has a good entry about it. This one passage I want to quote is from the Principia Discordia, which they quote:
      With our concept making apparatus called “mind” we look at reality through the ideas-about-reality which our cultures give us. The ideas-about-reality are mistakenly labeled “reality” and unenlightened people are forever perplexed by the fact that other people, especially other cultures, see “reality” differently. It is only the ideas-about-reality which differ. Real (capital-T True) reality is a level deeper than is the level of concept. We look at the world through windows on which have been drawn grids (concepts). Different philosophies use different grids. A culture is a group of people with rather similar grids. Through a window we view chaos, and relate it to the points on our grid, and thereby understand it. The ORDER is in the GRID. That is the Aneristic Principle. Western philosophy is traditionally concerned with contrasting one grid with another grid, and amending grids in hopes of finding a perfect one that will account for all reality and will, hence, (say unenlightened westerners) be True. This is illusory; it is what we Erisians call the ANERISTIC ILLUSION. Some grids can be more useful than others, some more beautiful than others, some more pleasant than others, etc., but none can be more True than any other. DISORDER is simply unrelated information viewed through some particular grid.
  • This song, “Beautiful” by Snoop Dogg & Pharrell, is really good. This is just an aside though. Let’s get back to the task at hand.
  • Speaking of discordianism, they have a not-that-good entry about Robert Anton Wilson. The only interesting thing in it is this last paragraph:
      In a 2003 interview with High Times magazine, R.A.W. described himself as a “Model Agnostic” - a term physicists use to describe someone who is not committed to any one model of how the world works. Wilson says that he is the first to apply this to the social sciences.

    At first, when I read that, I thought they meant he was a model agnostic, as in like, he was a good role model for other agnostics. But that’s not what they mean.

  • This entry for Consensus Reality is interesting, though nothing in particular jumps out at me to mention. Maybe the “reality enforcers” thing.
  • Same thing with the entry for the Anti-Psychiatry movement. Has a bunch of different good things in it. I’ll come back and quote from that in more detail some other time.
  • The one about Sufism is awesome. Well, it starts out awesome anyway (I especially like the quote from Rumi at the end):
      Sufis believe that their teachings are the essence of every religion, and indeed of the evolution of humanity as a whole. The central concept in Sufism is “love”. Dervishes — the name given to initiates of sufi orders — believe that love is a projection of the essence of God to the universe. God desires to recognize beauty, and as if one looks at a mirror to see oneself, God “looks” at itself within the dynamics of nature. Since everything is a reflection of God, the school of Sufism practices to see the beauty inside the apparent ugly, and to open arms even to the most evil one. This infinite tolerance is expressed in the most beautiful way, perhaps, by the famous Sufi philosopher and poet Mevlana (also known as Rumi) :

      “Come, come, whoever you are. Worshiper, Wanderer, Lover of Leaving; ours is not a caravan of despair. Though you have broken your vows a thousand times…Come, come again, Come.”

  • Also, check out this other link about socially constructed reality.
      …stressing the on-going mass-building of worldviews by individuals in dialectical interaction with society at any time. The numerous realities so formed comprise, according to this view, the imagined worlds of human social existence and activity, gradually crystallised by habit into institutions propped up by language conventions, given ongoing legitimation by mythology, religion and philosophy, maintained by therapies and socialisation, and subjectively internalised by upbringing and education to become part of the identity of social citizens.

    Okay, that’s it for now!







  • (Comments close automatically after five days.)



    SURROUND YOURSELF WITH STRENGTH.