Okay, so I went and gave this Sophia Stewart interview mp3 a listen. You can also read the transcript here: Sophia Stewart: 3-Dimensional Artistic Wisdom from The Astral Plane. I have to say its really confusing. I mean, she says a lot of compelling things, but I feel like the interviewer just doesn’t do a great job of really elucidating what the real issues are for the masses.

Just one of many many examples… she says in passing about how satellites are going to take over the earth in the year 2010. But then she just moves on without explaining it. And the interviewer doesn’t even bat an eyelash. I mean, call me crazy, but if somebody told me they had reason to believe - mystically or otherwise - that satellites were going to rule the earth in 5 years, I would ABSOLUTELY get them to talk more about that. How can you not, really? Like I said, this interview is riddled with items like that where the interviewer already seems to know and agree with all these far out predictions and assertions, and so they are never explained or explored. It’s weird, but that doesn’t mean I’m discounting it. That just means I think the message needs to be distilled and converted so ordinary people can acquire it - that is assuming there is really some kind of mystical content going on here.

Aside from all that, I wanted to put forward my own interpretation of what’s happening here. New World Border touched on this already in an article about Stewart, but it seems worth elaborating on. If I were to interview her, my focus would not be on the copyright infringement stuff at all. It would be on all her mystical stuff. Primary among them is the notion that she seems to espouse that God chose her for the role that she is now playing, and that she is acting as the sort of feminine presence of God acting in history.

I wonder if she believes that her story being stolen was actually a positive thing. That is, if it was foreordained by God that her story would be taken by theft, and turned into a Hollywood blockbuster. What this does is it exposes the message to people far more than she could have done on her own. Then, the second wave comes when the Wachowski Brothers and Warner Bros are publicly exposed as having stolen her idea. This public exposure would then essentially equal the fiction becoming reality. The Matrix being exposed as truth. And that this whole process was ultimately necessary. That’s the main question I’d like to ask her.

The other implication of this case that I’m really interested in is what it will do to Hollywood and big media in general. If they in fact lose the case to Stewart, would this be the death blow of big media - or at least another in a series of critical hits? The loss combined with the complete silence of all mainstream sources so far on the matter, that is. Would this help usher in what I call the Media Reformation, wherein the monolithic mainstream media is forever splintered into small factions, much like happened to the Roman Catholic Church in the Protestant Reformation? The interview linked above talks about that briefly, but its much more in an apocalyptic sense than this.

Anyway, I will continue to follow this story, and perhaps try to get involved in contacting Stewart myself to ask her some of these questions.