<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Silence of Sophia Stewart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/04/08/the-silence-of-sophia-stewart/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/04/08/the-silence-of-sophia-stewart/</link>
	<description>public domain playground. friendly entities welcome.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bret</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/04/08/the-silence-of-sophia-stewart/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 19:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/04/08/the-silence-of-sophia-stewart/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>18 is 6+6+6 the sign of the beast - "we now have proof"- HAHAHAHAHA! 1981 - this is hilarious to listen to - she sounds like she's sucked down one to many Marlboro reds</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>18 is 6+6+6 the sign of the beast - &#8220;we now have proof&#8221;- HAHAHAHAHA! 1981 - this is hilarious to listen to - she sounds like she&#8217;s sucked down one to many Marlboro reds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/04/08/the-silence-of-sophia-stewart/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 17:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/04/08/the-silence-of-sophia-stewart/#comment-52</guid>
		<description>I think she'd be more eagar to take an opportunity to talk exclusively about her philosophy, worldview, etc. instead of the lawsuit.

But... I can't help, but wonder how Grant Morrison fits into all this, as I had been under the impression that he was the one who got ripped off by the Wachowskis (issues of The Invisibles were supposedly strewn on the set.)

http://www.rotten.com/library/culture/the-invisibles/

Having not read either Stewart's or Morrison's comics, I really don't know...

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think she&#8217;d be more eagar to take an opportunity to talk exclusively about her philosophy, worldview, etc. instead of the lawsuit.</p>
<p>But&#8230; I can&#8217;t help, but wonder how Grant Morrison fits into all this, as I had been under the impression that he was the one who got ripped off by the Wachowskis (issues of The Invisibles were supposedly strewn on the set.)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rotten.com/library/culture/the-invisibles/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.rotten.com/library/culture/the-invisibles/'>http://www.rotten.com/library/culture/the-invisibles/</a></p>
<p>Having not read either Stewart&#8217;s or Morrison&#8217;s comics, I really don&#8217;t know&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
