![[tmbchr]™](/journal/popocculture-blog-logo.jpg){kind=logo}
Cardinal Ratzinger - Could the Next Pope Be a Nazi?
With all this talk of the prophecies for the next pope, I’d like to make a little papal prediction of my own. My money happens to be on Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger - mainly because his name has come up time and again in unrelated research over the past year, and he just so happens to be a very scary candidate.
Before I get into any kind of speculation or possible mud-slinging, I’d like to take the opportunity to quote directly from a (not tongue-in-cheek) website titled “The Cardinal Ratzinger Fan Club.” On their front page, it proclaims boldly:
As Grand Inquisitor for Mother Rome, Ratzinger keeps himself busy in service to the Truth: correcting theological error, silencing dissenting theologians, and stomping down heresy wherever it may rear its ugly head […]
Remember - that is from his fan club… The reason they call him “Grand Inquisitor” and talk about him “stamping out heresy” is because in 1981, Pope John Paul II named him as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. In case you’re not familiar with the CDF, they used to be called the Holy Office of the Inquisition (or, according to some: Sacred Congregation of the Universal Inquisition), until their name was changed to something more friendly in 1908 by Pope Pius X.
This rather severe role has landed Ratzinger the nickname “The Enforcer.” From a BBC profile of him:
To others, he is an intimidating “Enforcer”, punishing liberal thinkers, and keeping the Church in the Middle Ages. […]
While many theologians strive for a Catholic Church that is more open and in touch with the world around it, Ratzinger’s mission is to stamp out dissent, and curb the “wild excesses” of this more tolerant era.
He wields the tools of his office with steely efficiency. By influencing diocese budgets, bishops’ transfers and even excommunications, what an opponent calls “symbolic violence”, Ratzinger has clamped down on the more radical contingent of the Church.
He has even claimed the prime position of the Church of Rome over other Christian Churches. Although he has apologised for this, he has never been so contrite about excluding liberation theologians, more progressive priests or those in favour of the ordination of women.
To me, it only makes sense (though I don’t like it by any means) to bring in somebody who is a Fundamentalist Catholic, since the world right now seems to be caught between the Fundamentalist Christianity of America, and the Fundamentalist Islam of the Arab world. A moderate or even - dare I say - progressive pope would be awash in a sea of hard-line all-or-nothing stances and ultimatums.
Ratzinger is also said to be the author of the leaked memorandum last year which laid out the principles under which a bishop or other minister could deny the Sacrament of the Eucharist (Communion) to any politician supporting abortion - namely John Kerry. Here’s an online copy of the Memorandum.
Even more fun than that though is that as a young man, Ratzinger was a member of the Hitler Youth in Bavaria, and was drafted into the Wehrmacht, the Nazi army. And yes it was “mandatory” but that doesn’t absolve people of responsibility for their lives. Also, it’s been pointed out he was never a member formally of the Nazi party. Again, yes and? [For a more detailed analysis of the “Ratzinger Nazi Debate” go here]. Anyway, some claim he deserted the Wehrmacht, but either way, he ended up in an Allied POW camp in 1945. As counterpoint - here’s a Catholic page about how Ratzinger hated the Nazis and resisted them. Also, here’s a thread on the forum on the Ratzinger fan club site about his Nazi past. (It’s also addressed on the FAQ of that site)
Also have a look at this quote from a Washington Post article from November of last year:
Observers said Ratzinger’s views have been heavily influenced by the harrowing experience of two contending ideologies: fascism, which he experienced as a youth in Germany, and the Marxism rife in German universities during the 1960s.
“Having seen fascism in action, Ratzinger today believes that the best antidote to political totalitarianism is ecclesial totalitarianism. In other words, he believes the Catholic Church serves the cause of human freedom by restricting freedom in its internal life, thereby remaining clear about what it teaches and believes,” wrote John Allen, a journalist and biographer of Ratzinger.
In his early years in office, Ratzinger moved to stamp out vestiges of liberation theology, a current of Catholic thought born in the 1960s that emphasized grass-roots organization to free people from poverty. Its association with Marxist groups and revolutionary movements appalled both John Paul II and Ratzinger.
[I also have a post on Liberation Theology, Christian Anarchism & the Emergent Church, for anyone interested.]
This rigid anti-Communist stance fits very much in line with Ratzinger’s involvement also in the Fatima mysteries. If you’ll recall, the Virgin Mary herself supposedly appeared to peasant children in Portugal during the first World War to warn of the rise of Communist Russia. The so-called “Second Secret” she revealed at Fatima went:
“Russia will spread its errors throughout the world, raising up wars and persecutions against the Church. The good will be martyred, the Holy Father will suffer much and various nations will be annihilated.”
On that note, Ratzinger is the titular author under whom the “Third Secret of Fatima” was revealed by the Vatican in 2000. Kept in silence for decades, Ratzinger proclaimed that this secret was a prophesy of the 1981 assassination attempt on Pope John Paul II (coincidentally, this was the year Ratzinger became Grand Inquisitor). The actual substance of the vision though is extremely different from the 1981 incident. Take a look at the actual report on the Third Secret on the Vatican’s own website. The vision goes (in part):
[…] the Holy Father passed through a big city half in ruins and half trembling with halting step, afflicted with pain and sorrow, he prayed for the souls of the corpses he met on his way; having reached the top of the mountain, on his knees at the foot of the big Cross he was killed by a group of soldiers who fired bullets and arrows at him, and in the same way there died one after another the other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious, and various lay people of different ranks and positions. […]
Rather than the 1981 failed assassination attempt, this reminds me much more of the papal prophecy of Malachy, who states the following in regards to the reign of the final pope, nicknamed in Latin, Petrus Romanus (Peter of Rome):
Amidst external persecution, the seat of the Holy Roman Church will be occupied by Peter the Roman, who will feed the sheep in many tribulations, after which the seven-hilled city will be destroyed, and the terrible Judge will judge his people. The End.
Not a perfect match, but rather more interesting and likely - that is if we’re going to dip into the wells of prophecy. I also found this quote from a site on prophecy:
Pope John Paul II, when asked about the Third Secret in Germany, stated that “we must be prepared to undergo great trials in the not too distant future, trials that will require us to be ready to give up our lives…” Pope John Paul II, as Karol Cardinal Wojtyla, elaborated this theme during a visit to the United States in 1976: “We are now standing in the face of the greatest historical confrontation humanity has gone through. I do not think that wide circles of the American Society or wide circles of the Christian Community realize this fully. We are now facing the final confrontation between the Church and the anti-Church, of the Gospel versus the anti-Gospel. It is a trial which the Church must take up.”
Coming back to hard facts though, Wikipedia points out that Cardinal Ratzinger is in charge of both John Paul II’s funeral, as well as the Papal Conclave of 2005, where the next pope will be chosen. At 77, Ratzinger is the oldest of the eligible candidates for pope, but he’s long been considered the Pope’s right hand man. From the Washington Post article quoted above:
“Cardinal Ratzinger is a singular figure in the history of his office and perhaps the church,” said Gianni Baget Bozzo, a theologian who specializes in the Vatican. “He takes the initiative on a wide range of subjects in a way that is usually reserved to the pope. That’s not to say he acts against the pope. He is trusted. But he is a kind of vice pope.”
“He is certainly very visible,” said Thomas J. Reese, editor of the Jesuit magazine America. “He has always been extremely strong, given the pope’s friendship and confidence. He keeps his finger in everything.”
Ratzinger’s visibility and the pope’s frailty have reawakened the question of who is in charge at the Vatican. Some observers predicted that he would be a strong candidate to succeed John Paul II. His conservatism fits with the thinking of most of the cardinal electors picked by John Paul II. But at 77, Ratzinger is the oldest of the so-called papabili, cardinals frequently mentioned as papal candidates.
“In spite of his age, Ratzinger has recently jumped to the top of the list of candidates,” wrote one Vatican watcher, Sandro Magister, in L’Espresso magazine recently. “Some look at him as if he were already de facto pope, the stony defender of the faith in a church under attack from modernity.”
It’s also been suggested (notably in a Time article) that Ratzinger’s age, 77, is a plus, because the Conclave will actually be seeking a shorter-term “transitional” pope, after John Paul II’s unusually long reign. (Here’s a list of the ten longest reigning popes - JP2 is #3) The article Post ends:
Ratzinger, who has sought ways to adapt church governance for modern times, might be willing to agree to an age limit and pass on the job after a few years.
Oh, and speaking of leading a church threatened by modernity, I almost forgot to point out that it’s one of Ratzinger’s deputies, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone who is leading the attack against Dan Brown’s novel The Da Vinci Code.
Whoo! Anyway, for more info on Ratzinger, there’s also a rather good list of articles online about him kept at the official Ratzinger Fan Club site. Bon apetit!
UPDATE!
A wonderful reader also just pointed out the following horrendous tidbit about Ratzinger:
Ratzinger is also the author of a May 2001 letter to bishops stating that the “Crimine solicitationies” law (regarding strict secrecy in sex abuse cases) is still in effect.
For more info on this, we turn to an article on the Guardian’s website. Ratzinger in 2001 reminded everyone this rule was still in effect. It referred back to a 40 year old church document:
The 69-page Latin document bearing the seal of Pope John XXIII was sent to every bishop in the world. The instructions outline a policy of ’strictest’ secrecy in dealing with allegations of sexual abuse and threatens those who speak out with excommunication.
They also call for the victim to take an oath of secrecy at the time of making a complaint to Church officials. It states that the instructions are to ‘be diligently stored in the secret archives of the Curia [Vatican] as strictly confidential. Nor is it to be published nor added to with any commentaries.’
[…] Bishops are instructed to pursue these cases ‘in the most secretive way… restrained by a perpetual silence… and everyone… is to observe the strictest secret which is commonly regarded as a secret of the Holy Office… under the penalty of excommunication’.
They also provide a link to the actual document itself (PDF). I have absolutely no idea why I never heard about this, and why this simply didn’t explode across the media. To me, this pretty much trumps all the other negative things I’ve compiled above about Ratzinger. There’s simply no justifiable reason for priests to be fucking kids, and for anybody to be protecting those who are doing it. Even if this order came from elsewhere, Ratzinger’s name and responsibility are still on it.
The weirdest part of all the Ratzinger stuff, I think, is that I didn’t really even need to dip into any alternative or questionable sources to find it. All this shit is waaay out in the open. I wonder what he’s got on his hands that isn’t such common knowledge?
UPDATE!
Here’s a copy of Ratzinger’s homily for Pope John Paul II’s funeral.
- Who’s the Real Nazi?
- The Ratzinger Nazi Pope Debate
- Another Kind Of Evil
- The One True Faith?
- What’s the cardinal connection?
- Prev: Inner and Outer Conspiracies
- Next: Signs of the Dumbass
April 9th, 2005 at 8:47 pm
Yow! Ratzinger sounds like exactly who needs to be pope. Fascism is en vogue and the ancient accounts of the empire itself cannot be left to chance. We are on the brink of an extremely dark age and all global meme distributors are aligning themselves for battle. With or without us, everybody’s gonna be at the party — including us, figuratively hogtied, blindfolded and our tongues cut out so we don’t miss out.
The mental ports of the people of planet Earth are now open for an update. In another age we might call this a social vacuum. Right now there is a telltale argument going on about just how draconian and severely limiting that update must be — how much poison should be released. I imagine divine hackers clawing at each other to be the one to provide the next routine. Unless of course, they can live in a state of alliance and just hash things out at a secret conference table.
We can always look on the bright side, at least some of the propaganda we’ll get will be cloaked in the ineffable ancientness of the holy church and not the “if the judge should sway from popular techno-puritanistic sentiment I say. . . ahem. . . YEEEHAW kill the faggits!”
The time to look at the bright side, as I was saying, is now. It’s not that bad — yet. We have to preserve civility. We must document what happens here so that we can pass it on. A flip of the social poles is about to occur. A flip when the medium, jacked-in mind will begin resorting to bonafide, permanent, barbarity.
It will be spectator sport.
April 10th, 2005 at 4:42 pm
Ratzinger is also the author of a May 2001 letter to bishops stating that the “Crimine solicitationies” law (regarding strict secrecy in sex abuse cases) is still in effect.
http://tinyurl.com/k9hq
April 10th, 2005 at 6:45 pm
Love your blog, very glad I stumbled across it. I just read your informative post on the Fatima apparitions. I wasn’t aware of Ratzinger’s involvement with that. Nor do I know for sure whether this directly relates to that, but if you’re interested in the profane aspects of how Marian apparition scams work, look into the Medjugorje apparitions in Bosnia. It’s a heady confluence of sex tourism, charismatics, crooked Vatican bankers, renegade Franciscans, and ethnic cleansing by the Croatian Ustasha (Nazis). You can google up all sorts of info on it from various perspectives, it is another case of it being pretty much out in the open but seldom discussed.
April 19th, 2005 at 1:27 pm
[…] r juntos sin haberse casado o el hecho de que cada vez sea más fácil divorciarse. Según TimBoucher.com, Ratzinger formó parte de las Juv […]
April 19th, 2005 at 3:32 pm
[…] hich the Catholic Church controls through their extremely ornate symbology. Then we have Cardinal Ratzinger, who some say is the leading candidate for the […]
April 19th, 2005 at 5:08 pm
[…] Pope Debate
I can already see the battle-lines forming around this issue of Cardinal Ratzinger / Pope Benedict XVI’s supposed Nazi past […]
April 20th, 2005 at 12:13 pm
[…] pe I was going to write about the new Pope today, but all my base are belong to Tim Boucher . This entry was posted […]
April 20th, 2005 at 2:48 pm
[…] So, they felt justified. I wonder what Pope Benedict 16 thought at the time? I found this guy’s weblog while searching for more info. He seems […]
April 24th, 2005 at 12:27 am
[…] Vatican II council, in which he played an instrumental role. Based on what I learned about Ratzinger’s past in my own research, I find the idea of him […]
May 2nd, 2005 at 3:45 am
[…] more positive and awesome role model than our current pope. Rather than having served as Grand Inquisitor for Mother Rome, the Purple Pope has served as G […]
March 2nd, 2006 at 12:51 pm
[…] m a person who is still upset over the motherfucking research I did into the motherfucking Pope’s background. The visitor writes: I agree with the p […]
June 13th, 2006 at 1:03 pm
[…] Yet violence and the threat of violence is deeply embedded in many Christian subcultures. And it’s important to realize how much this is affecting the culture we inhabit. These are dangerous times; we live in a country dominated by fundamentalist Christians, who react violently to a fundamentalist Muslim enemy, and now the Catholics have a fundamentalist Pope. To engage and encompass paradox and conflict in such an increasingly polarized world is frightening but necessary; further polarization leads only to scenarios such as that which Hitler created. […]
November 17th, 2006 at 4:05 am
[…] So, yay for the new pope right? Actually I give that a big thumbs down. I am not the most religous of people let alone a practicing Catholic, though I am baptized as such, Pope Benedicy seems to not be such a great guy. The whole idea of the Pope just is lame nowadays anyways, but shouldn’t this super religous leader be I don’t know, not a born killer? I mean, John Paul sold gas to the Nazis but he wasn’t a Nazi persay, Pope Benedict served time in a US POW camp that held Nazis for being well, a Nazi. Wierd, huh? The Pope that just passed on was the first to declare antisemiticm a sin and the new Pope well, was antisemetic. (FYI, sorry about the spelling. Not sure how to spell it.) Here are a couple sites Ian sent me and take a look at the Spokesman Review from 4-20. (Hitler’s Birthday? Conicidence?)http://www.priestsforlife.org/magisterium/bishops/04-07ratzingerommunion.htmhttp://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/04/09/cardinal-ratzinger-next-pope-nazi/In other news….Sarah was awesome and I want to move out. Sarah made a couple encores that just kept coming and between people tried to leave. Are the main lights on yet? NO!! Sit the Fuck Down!!! I hate old people. She really was amazing and Train Wreck and Possession were WOW. Not to mention her stage set was so cool. It was a big tree and the opening song, world on fire, has a lights in the back that looked like fire so it looked the world really was on fire!!! Or at least the tree. I have also decided I hate work and would rather have a job outside than cooped up in some building looking out at the beautiful days of summer. As for moving out, well, I love my mom, but I just can’t stand it at home anymore. When my dad is home I feel like I have to watch my back and watch what I say. Especially now that my family, or select members of, are figuring out my little secret. Plus I am really antsy to decorate an apartment that I can call my own. If I could find a place for like $100 that wasn’t ghetto I would be so happy, I may even go up to 200 if its nice enough. But since that will never happen I guess I’ll work on setting money aside for the day I can move out.And Fall Out Boy comes out in two weeks and the new Amber Pacific comes out two weeks after that!!!!!!!!!!CHECK THE NEW AMBER PACIFIC HERE: http://www.purevolume.com/amberpacificLater guys! […]
December 3rd, 2007 at 6:55 pm
[…] Collector’s Note: (1) The named of the “Occult Investigator” site was briefly changed to “The Conclave” in 2005 before entering into it’s next incarnation… (2) There is also a section from that era of the site which is still active (because I was too lazy to change it): Occult Tattoos. (3) I got the tattoo on my left arm around the same time I started the Occult Investigator project. (4) My all-time most popular article was written during this period, in which I successfully predicted who would be the next pope two weeks before-hand. My site received over 60,000 visitors in less than 24 hours and was bumped offline as a result. I switched my hosting from Doteasy to Dreamhost as a result of increased visitor load. (4) An article from this period attracted the attention of a company trying to sell me on their augmented reality technology who courted me for a while to come work for them to help them frame the story of their product culturally. Nothing ever came of it. […]
April 21st, 2008 at 7:57 am
[…] RELATED: Although discussion has raged since this afternoon regarding Benedict XVI and his past Nazi affiliations, I find his present to be slightly more worrisome. As Tim Boucher points out in this blog entry: Ratzinger is also the author of a May 2001 letter to bishops stating that the “Crimine solicitationies” law (regarding strict secrecy in sex abuse cases) is still in effect. The law to which Ratzinger’s letter referred was issued by Pope John XXIII 40 years ago (a link to the PDF of the document can be found in Boucher’s entry). The law itself is chilling, as it describes a mandatory condition of secrecy for both the perpetrators and victims of sexual abuse by Catholic priests. The 69-page Latin document bearing the seal of Pope John XXIII was sent to every bishop in the world. The instructions outline a policy of ’strictest’ secrecy in dealing with allegations of sexual abuse and threatens those who speak out with excommunication. They also call for the victim to take an oath of secrecy at the time of making a complaint to Church officials. It states that the instructions are to `be diligently stored in the secret archives of the Curia [Vatican] as strictly confidential. Nor is it to be published nor added to with any commentaries.’ MORE […]
April 21st, 2008 at 8:24 am
[…] RELATED: Although discussion has raged since this afternoon regarding Benedict XVI and his past Nazi affiliations, I find his present to be slightly more worrisome. As Tim Boucher points out in this blog entry: Ratzinger is also the author of a May 2001 letter to bishops stating that the “Crimine solicitationies” law (regarding strict secrecy in sex abuse cases) is still in effect. The law to which Ratzinger’s letter referred was issued by Pope John XXIII 40 years ago (a link to the PDF of the document can be found in Boucher’s entry). The law itself is chilling, as it describes a mandatory condition of secrecy for both the perpetrators and victims of sexual abuse by Catholic priests. The 69-page Latin document bearing the seal of Pope John XXIII was sent to every bishop in the world. The instructions outline a policy of ’strictest’ secrecy in dealing with allegations of sexual abuse and threatens those who speak out with excommunication. They also call for the victim to take an oath of secrecy at the time of making a complaint to Church officials. It states that the instructions are to `be diligently stored in the secret archives of the Curia [Vatican] as strictly confidential. Nor is it to be published nor added to with any commentaries.’ MORE […]
April 22nd, 2008 at 11:23 am
[…] Honestly, I wonder if we wouldn’t be better off without the “Church that we all love dearly today.” I’m personally fascinated by the symbolism and theology of the Catholic Church, but the institution itself, I find to be extraordinarily unbiblical. Whether or not the doctrine of Petrine Supremacy, upon which the ultimate authority of the Bishop of Rome lies is an after-the-fact historical forgery and insertion or not is basically a moot point for me. There are better Biblical passages which illustrate the absurdity of having one earthly man (with a *very* sordid past) stand in for a transpersonal figure such as Jesus Christ. My favorite, which I posted to the comments section of that official pope visit site, but which was never approved for obvious reasons comes from the Gospel according to Matthew: 5 But all their works they do for to be seen of men: they make broad their phylacteries, and enlarge the borders of their garments, […]