<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Defense of Ramtha?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/04/16/in-defense-of-ramtha/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/04/16/in-defense-of-ramtha/</link>
	<description>public domain playground. friendly entities welcome.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Raul</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/04/16/in-defense-of-ramtha/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Raul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2005 23:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/04/16/in-defense-of-ramtha/#comment-153</guid>
		<description>Nice site--I came for Gannon and stayed for Ramtha.  What the Bleep? was one of the most clowning movies that came out last year.  It played in the "alternative" cinemas for close to three months; an unheard of amount of time for almost any movie nowadays, especially such an obscure "documentary" (or indocumentary rather).  It was total New Age propaganda, with horrible acting, bad jokes, and Ramtha--there were some redeeming qualities, but Ramtha's presence gave everything away.  The whole time I'm sitting there wondering who the fuck this lady is?  Then, the credits: channeler of Ramtha.  That made too much sense; I could go on for quite a long time, but I's got things to do.  Peace!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice site&#8211;I came for Gannon and stayed for Ramtha.  What the Bleep? was one of the most clowning movies that came out last year.  It played in the &#8220;alternative&#8221; cinemas for close to three months; an unheard of amount of time for almost any movie nowadays, especially such an obscure &#8220;documentary&#8221; (or indocumentary rather).  It was total New Age propaganda, with horrible acting, bad jokes, and Ramtha&#8211;there were some redeeming qualities, but Ramtha&#8217;s presence gave everything away.  The whole time I&#8217;m sitting there wondering who the fuck this lady is?  Then, the credits: channeler of Ramtha.  That made too much sense; I could go on for quite a long time, but I&#8217;s got things to do.  Peace!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/04/16/in-defense-of-ramtha/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2005 16:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/04/16/in-defense-of-ramtha/#comment-147</guid>
		<description>Ohhh I love your reply, too funny, thanks I needed that! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohhh I love your reply, too funny, thanks I needed that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
