Carlos made an extremely interesting observation on my post about consciously using stories. He suggested that the ego is a representation of the self. This to me is one of the most interesting explanations I’ve heard of the role of the ego. Jung always talked about how the ego and the Self were different, and the goal of individuation is to unify the ego with the greater Self. This is all well and good, but it leaves you with a fuzzy interpretation of just what the ego’s purpose is.
Interpreting Carlos’ suggestion though, the ego serves as the representative of the self. It is sort of a projection or a vehicle for the self to act upon the world. But many people get into the situation where they mistake the vehicle for the reality of the self. This happens while driving too. If someone backs into you in a parking lot, you say, “That bastard hit me!” You don’t say, “That bastard hit my car!” You sort of naturally extend your self-consciousness to include your vehicle. And it’s not a bad thing; it helps you operate more seemlessly. So imagine if you were always in your car your whole life, and that was the only way you’d ever experienced the world (Sort of Plato’s allegory of the cave, but with updated imagery). What’s that Stephen King book where a car comes to life?
Anyway, a lot of mystical traditions talk about “extinguishing” the ego. This always seemed questionable to me at best. But using this idea of the ego as eidolon, as projection, it starts to make more sense. Carlos also suggested that part of the vulnerability of the ego as representation is that it’s subject to outward influence. When you’re identifying with a representation of your self, rather than your actual Self, people can change how you perceive that representation. They can say something mean to you, they can make you believe you’re weak or powerless. And as soon as the representation is changed, you’re changed. But if your identification is with the Self, noone can ever take away your identity or really even modify it all that much.
Which leads me to something Jeremy talked about in relation to the upcoming National ID card. He talked about a concept pioneered by the Critical Art Ensemble, something they call your “data body.” Your data body is essentially your identity, but as it is recorded among the various strands of your official life history: your bills, your medical records, your education, your work history, your purchasing history, your criminal history.
Each strand in the trajectory of each person’s life is recorded and maintained. The total collection of records on an individual is h/er or her data body—a state-and-corporate-controlled doppelgänger. What is most unfortunate about this development is that the data body not only claims to have ontological privilege, but actually does have it. What your data body says about you is more real than what you say about yourself. The data body is the body by which you are judged in society, and the body that dictates your status in the social world. What we are witnessing at this point in time is the triumph of representation over being. The electronic file has conquered self-aware consciousness.
And thus we have the increasing fear of identity theft. If you look at the notion up close, it’s preposterous. No one can “steal” who you are as a person - you’re much too complex. But they can affect the electronic representation of your identity, your data body.
Mystics talk about the fear of ego-loss. But it seems that we’re now taking that a step further as a culture. Supposedly, at one time in history, ego-consciousness as we know it didn’t exist. If you look into polytheistic psychology, you’ll find that many small archetypal centers were juggled through the mind, each controlling various types of activity. At some crucial point of development though, we began to get drawn out of this field of dynamic interplay into a sort of monotheistic realm of the ego. Now, we’re being drawn even further outward. Our representation of ourselves in the world used to just be our ego. But now it’s on the verge of becoming our data body. Not only is this reflected in the mythology of identity theft, but it’s shown quite plainly in the mythology of government surveillance and tracking. “They” are building a data profile on you. “They” are attempting to transform your data body into something sinister. But it’s not you. It’s not even your ego. It’s just a representation of you. I think the trick nowadays is to become aware of this gradual process, this pulling of your identity outside of you, and figure out ways to combat it, and how to turn yourself back towards your Self with a capital S. Any thoughts on how to do that?
- END -
ASSOCIATED CONTENT @TMBCHR (Auto-Generated)
- Attention Trust Principles
- The Death of The Hyperlink
- Flowing Data
- We Create Moments of Perception to Remember
- Dumb Terminals

8 Comments
“What’s that Stephen King book where a car comes to life?”
Maximum Overdrive?? It was about big 18 wheelers coming to life or something… Emilio Estevez was in the movie, I think.
I`ll start with a quote:
“Wherever I go I ask audiences if anybody there would swear that they would tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth to someone who was a government employee. Nobody ever raises their hand! Everybody lies to the government. We all want as little to do with them as possible. So that’s the first level of government corruption; the accumulation of all the lies people tell to people just above them in the hierarchy.â€
- Robert Anton Wilson
Taking that into consideration, one way to subvert a Data Body would be to corrupt it by leaving inconsistant information.
If you track your submitted information, like finding a mole, you can then trace back the origin of the person who is using your Data Body by the cyphered information you left in your data.
If someone is attepmting to use your Data Body against you in court for example, the uncollaborative information would fall inconclusive.
In the end it all depends on the amount of clout that people allow this virtual ego / shadow.
Consider the power we`ve allowed to 2 dimensional data in the past, compaired to the 3 dimensional data with consatant bio, dna, face and movement recongnition that is evolving daily.
man thats a great wilson quote. sometimes that guy really comes through. as far as creating the data body out of intentional lies, i wrote about a technique for that once before, the canary trap. its a way to track where spam originates. its pretty simple too. part of the problem though i think is that people can twist the data body any way they wanted to. like if they wanted to make a court case against you. no problem. seems like a general rule of thumb: the further your identified self gets away from your actual self, the easier it becomes to manipulate.
…the canary trap…
That`s the term I was looking for.
Its not that its necessary to lie to the government, but I think it does lead to an interesting point: that if they are receptive to information from you, it offers you a chance to input information into the system. I experiment with this at work all the time (albeit a much smaller system)– things Ive said to coworkers can work through the system and come back to me, sometimes from the boss himself, and I have a fair degree of certainty that I was the first to introduce the said information.
Even though I am lowest on the ladder, awareness of how information travels, meme transference, pattern recognition, etc gives anyone the ability to ‘program’ a system.
Ever read Gibson’s Neuromancer? A significant part of the plot has to do with the data body as you’ve defined it (although Gibson calls it something else, can’t remember what).
no ive ALWAYS meant to, but never get around to it…
Wow, this is a great entry, Tim.
This presents many beneficial possibilities for the future, too. Something I’ve really garnered from Ramsey Dukes has been that the only thing fearing the future leads to is paranoia. Embrace this and think of it as a gift. When you play a game, back in the day, you used to get one life, one character, one story.
Now unless the people of today are really connecting with the Self, they’re still just playing with that one life, one story. Their representation of themself, as ego, is a constructed reflection of social stimuli and the odd personal experience, adding a touch of flavour. This data body seems interesting from a transhumanist point of view because it allows you to create more than one player for yourself.
While I am intrigues to learn more, as the only way to learn to play with multiple data bodies would be to initially become aware of the Self as pilot, the fragmentation possible by the malleable way of approaching these data bodies should allow for more glimpses between the cracks — more abstractions of perspective and, ultimately, a chance to look beyond the looking glass. Sorta reminds me of the new Nine Inch Nails song, “Right Where It Belongs.”
There can never be absolute oppression of relation to the Self. It’s not possible. Balance seems to be the natural way, and we just have to look at the benefits of using this new development to construct methods of ontological awareness.
Also, I am a firm believer that we are on the verge of downloadable memories, experiences, and such, so the whole notion of how we interact with our egos are about to go to shit anyhow. It’s going to be a Lego session of building up our own stories and as we do so, we’ll become more and more disillusioned what constructs we’re enslaved by.
4 Trackbacks
[...] to do this card for quite some time. But all this talk of National ID cards and the “data body” lead me to create finally the Identity Theft card. In this [...]
[...] at all, only what we come across as; our societal representations. In Tim’s post on the Data Body (discussed later), he brings up the idea (via a reader) of the ego [...]
[...] The other day I came across a nice mythological parallel to our discussion of the “data body” that electronic phantasm, the doppleganger that each of us [...]
[...] Once I started thinking down this road though, a bunch of reference points and symbol systems suddenly collapsed together on me (this is what the Singularity will really mean - massive implosion of reference points). This mirror marketing system that looks like you (data body? avatar?) - well, um, I don’t know how to say this, but uh… this already is you. This is what we mean when we use words like “ego” and “body” and for the most part “mind” (reactive mind maybe would be more precise here? not sure…). Those things already are a completely customized vehicle through which reality is marketed to you in such a way as ONLY YOU will appreciate it, and only you will experience it and those patterns of usage will never be replicated, at least not completely. [...]