Conspiracy Theory As Reformation
Just found a really good article on the value of conspiracy theories:
There is nothing insane or sinister about conspiracy theory research. It is rather matter of fact. A wide range of ordinary people from many walks of life take an interest in the political and economic events of our era. They think things through on their own, use the library, seek for evidence, articulate a theory, communicate with other people with similar interests. It is heartening that some citizens invest time and effort to unearth and expose some of the conspiracies that damage our society, our economy and our government.
But it certainly does seem that some historians and journalists are quite frightened of conspiracy theory and its wide popularity. Those are the two professions whose job it is to interpret our world for us. When ordinary people take on the task of doing this themselves, it must mean that they don’t believe what the authorities say we should. Maybe the professionals feel threatened when amateurs think about political events for themselves.
Perhaps we are in the middle of a new Reformation. The high priests are again losing their monopoly, and they see us sliding into cults and chaos. Something similar happened in 1517, when Martin Luther challenged the Church and translated the Bible into German so that ordinary people could think about theology for themselves. When put on trial, Luther said, “I cannot submit my faith either to the Pope or to the Councils, because it is clear as day they have frequently erred and contradicted each other.” That is exactly what a JFK conspiracy theorist would say about the Warren Commission.
People take on the task of explaining things for themselves when the orthodox experts insist on saying nonsense—for example, that Lee Harvey Oswald acting alone killed JFK. A Reformation is a rebellion against arrogance. If historians and journalists want to understand why they are being displaced by conspiracy theory, it would be most reasonable to examine their own failings first.
Lots of great arguments. Definitely worth checking out.
- A Definition of Conspiracy Theory
- Conspiracy Theory, Parapolitics, Whining
- The Cowardice of Conspiracy
- Conspiracy Eats Itself
- Conspiracy Evangelism
- Prev: Esoteric Jargon
- Next: Conspiracy Theory is the New Sci-Fi?




![[tmbchr]™](/journal/popocculture-blog-logo.jpg)
May 24th, 2005 at 6:58 pm
Is it possible to organise a lobby group to bring official acknowledgement and research to such topics? I am currently sitting in on the start-up of a design think tank in Alberta, Canada, and can’t help but wonder if it’s possible to launch an occult think tank. To formally bring together professionals educated in the occult and such matters, to present our findings to the education, government, and commercial sectors, all the while acting as consultants and an advisory board to such sectors.
It’s doable, at least in Canada, me thinks. The U.S. would be a touch trickier. This also reminds me of an academic journal I read about being put out of Oxford dealing with the study of magic, of which only PhDs could contribute. I’ve never found a copy, but organisation is possible…
May 24th, 2005 at 7:28 pm
man, thats a really awesome idea. i love it, although i havent the foggiest idea how something like that would work. id love to hear more about this plus other people’s responses to it
May 24th, 2005 at 8:01 pm
That is why this think tank is such an exciting experience for me currently. I am learning about setting up committees, working with universities, sponsorships, et cetera. Benefit is that via design and proper marketing, I believe the occult can be properly communicated to a wider audience through an official means, such as this.
If others have ideas or comments, I have been considering throwing up a site dedicated to occult design, marrying the two (each seem to be in dire need of the other in many ways), as a start to something like the aforementioned. Everything from architecture to communication design can benefit from studies into the occult, and the occult field could definitely use a dash of aesthetic and functional know-how.
Plus, it’d be the easiest way to bridge the occult into mainstream research, as far as I can gauge. Any ideas?