http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/06/13/verbal-tech-in-scientology/ public domain playground. friendly entities welcome. Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:40:19 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/06/13/verbal-tech-in-scientology/comment-page-1/#comment-34042 Shaka, when the walls fell… - Pop Occulture Wed, 31 Jan 2007 03:54:14 +0000 http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/06/13/verbal-tech-in-scientology/#comment-34042 [...] “Although with Ascian as their mother tongue, born Ascians don’t understand plain Ascian sentences, unless they are direct quotes from governmental propaganda materials (called approved texts). So, in order to communicate, an Ascian has to know by heart thousands of these quotes (sentences) on many different topics.” In Scientology teachings, the Tech can only be delivered to Scientologists in its original written form. The act of discussing Scientology processes in a spoken manner is called “verbal tech,” and this is believed to be a blemish upon the working of the Tech. Because the actual discussion of the Tech is not coming from Source (Hubbard himself), it is being diluted and it is no longer 100% pure. As a result, engaging in “verbal tech” is forbidden within Scientology. This disallowing of “verbal tech” prevents Scientologists from discussing or explaining the actual workings of what Scientology is and how “it works,” in any form other than the actual study of Source (namely Hubbard’s original writings). [...] [...] “Although with Ascian as their mother tongue, born Ascians don’t understand plain Ascian sentences, unless they are direct quotes from governmental propaganda materials (called approved texts). So, in order to communicate, an Ascian has to know by heart thousands of these quotes (sentences) on many different topics.” In Scientology teachings, the Tech can only be delivered to Scientologists in its original written form. The act of discussing Scientology processes in a spoken manner is called “verbal tech,” and this is believed to be a blemish upon the working of the Tech. Because the actual discussion of the Tech is not coming from Source (Hubbard himself), it is being diluted and it is no longer 100% pure. As a result, engaging in “verbal tech” is forbidden within Scientology. This disallowing of “verbal tech” prevents Scientologists from discussing or explaining the actual workings of what Scientology is and how “it works,” in any form other than the actual study of Source (namely Hubbard’s original writings). [...]

]]> http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/06/13/verbal-tech-in-scientology/comment-page-1/#comment-1499 Occult Investigator Wed, 15 Jun 2005 05:08:02 +0000 http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/06/13/verbal-tech-in-scientology/#comment-1499 yeah ive read some of that stuff in other places. im gonna get those books pretty soon as well. thanks for the tip! yeah ive read some of that stuff in other places. im gonna get those books pretty soon as well. thanks for the tip!

]]> http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/06/13/verbal-tech-in-scientology/comment-page-1/#comment-1498 H.Trismegistus Wed, 15 Jun 2005 05:03:53 +0000 http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/06/13/verbal-tech-in-scientology/#comment-1498 Hey Tim, check out any biographies on John Whiteside Parsons of JPL (Jet Propulsions Labratory) fame.. Sex and Rockets: the Occult world of Jack Parsons by John Carter is a good one.. You'll find some spooky correlations with Hubbard, Parsons and Crowley; black magic an shit.. The orgins of Hubbard's brainchild were fueled by some pretty dark stuff.. Hey Tim, check out any biographies on John Whiteside Parsons of JPL (Jet Propulsions Labratory) fame.. Sex and Rockets: the Occult world of Jack Parsons by John Carter is a good one.. You’ll find some spooky correlations with Hubbard, Parsons and Crowley; black magic an shit.. The orgins of Hubbard’s brainchild were fueled by some pretty dark stuff..

]]>