[tmbchr]™

Drugs Vs. Scientology: A Set-Up?



Holy crap! Garrett just pointed out the craziest possibility to me after reading my posts on the new forced pharmaceutical measures, and Scientology. This is pretty much horrifying. He wrote:

don’t these two things seem to correlate, as if by an emerging design? :

1. New Freedom” Mental Health Commission (pro-pharms)
2. All your Tom Cruise/Celebrity Worship/ Scientology (anti-pharms)

I don’t know how it works. But it seems that part of the archonic gameplay is to set up dualistic, black or white conflicts, that appear opposite but are really part of the same Black Iron Prison. (you know, democrat / republican)?

This is just freaking awful. This theory would indicate that there’s a reason the footage of Tom Cruise decrying psychiatry as “evil” is being circulated so readily online. And it’s not just because it’s creepy, but it’s because of a long-term strategy that is being unfurled.

On the one side, we have the government-medical alliance which is mandating that our children (and eventually all of us) go through mandatory mental screening, and receive mandatory pharmaceutical and psychiatric treatment. On the other side, we have Scientology which is vehemently opposed to psychiatry as a barbaric and “un-scientific” practice (which is funny, coming from them). I originally just thought it was something of an occupational rivalry on the part of Scientology, which relies on “personality tests” and self-improvement as the hooks for membership. Does it really boil down to a trap being set though? You either submit to mandatory drugging by the government, or you join a fanatical religious sect? Either way you’re effectively controlled and contained. This had better not be true…







13 Reader Responses

  1. slomo Says:
    June 14th, 2005 at 9:20 pm

    I hadn’t thought of the good cop / bad cop dynamic being played out in the field of psychopharmacology. (But I generally avoid all things Scientological.) Good catch!

    We should have our antennae up for all such black/white dynamics!

  2. crasspastor Says:
    June 14th, 2005 at 9:58 pm

    See where this takes you guys.

  3. Liberty Jane Adams Says:
    June 14th, 2005 at 11:17 pm

    You know, this whole thing reminds me of a movie I saw a few months ago called Equilibrium. It’s set in a future where in order to avoid wars the government orders all its citizens to take pills that make them devoid of all human emotion. A rebel subculture develops that refuses to take the pills and they’re hunted down like terrorists. A great movie, but in light of recent developments it’s scary as hell.

  4. jp Says:
    June 14th, 2005 at 11:31 pm

    ha ha ha! the black iron prison strikes again! awesome!

  5. jp Says:
    June 14th, 2005 at 11:34 pm

    i thought that’s where you were headed to begin with.

    fwiw, i really dont have a problem with folks who use psychiatric drugs to help deal w/the insanity of civilization. the problem i have is when it becomes forced, or when they’re duped into doing it. i have some personal experience with this matter, and stuff like zoloft/prozac/paxil/etc. can help or harm. i think it’s once again the extremes that cause the problems. more on that later on fp.

  6. jd Says:
    June 15th, 2005 at 12:47 am

    The duality of drugs vs. scientology, Republicans vs. Democrats, etc. are all, I think, the result of a basic human need to cope with existence. If given a choice on test format, schoolkids will always pick multiple choice over short answer and (especially) essay. Very few of us really want to write essays. We don’t understand the vast majority who would much rather close their eyes and guess - not caring what the result might be. You can read all about it in the Tao Te Ching.

    I thought of a good analogy the other day. These fake dualities are like two heads of the same coin. Yes, they are opposite. But not really. They both need the other to survive. Neither is complete without the adversary.

    I don’t think people will be “forced” into psychiatric treatment any more than they are currently “forced” to buy Nike or watch American Idol. People will do what they are told. Those of us who don’t want to “play the game” will just have to be careful. This is not a new thing. It reminds me of the ferryman from “The Outlaw Josie Wales” who says “You have to be able to whistle ‘Dixie’ and ‘The Battle Hymn of the Republic’ with equal enthusiasm.”

  7. crasspastor Says:
    June 15th, 2005 at 1:31 am

    Don’t you know it’s a War of the Worlds?

    Spielberg says new movie reflects post-9/11 unease

    (the picture provided with the story makes clicking the link well worth it)

    Tom Cruise wants to save us. Scientology is the answer. Psychology is a fraud. Katie Holmes is America’s hometown girl. Tom Cruise has always been the storied actor with two settings: On and Off. Who are these people and why the mind games? Are we being too creative by half?

    As for myself, when I was a kid, I used to conflate the identities of George Orwell and Orson Welles and likewise, Orson Welles and HG Wells. Maybe there was more to it all along.

    “All unwittingly, Mr. Orson Welles and the Mercury Theater of the Air have made one of the most fascinating and important demonstrations of all time,” she wrote. “They have proved that a few effective voices, accompanied by sound effects, can convince masses of people of a totally unreasonable, completely fantastic proposition as to create a nation-wide panic.

    “They have demonstrated more potently than any argument, demonstrated beyond a question of a doubt, the appalling dangers and enormous effectiveness of popular and theatrical demagoguery….

    “Hitler managed to scare all of Europe to its knees a month ago, but he at least had an army and an air force to back up his shrieking words.

    “But Mr. Welles scared thousands into demoralization with nothing at all.”

    Link

    It appears we aren’t being shocked into submission, as less technologically savvy audiences were in the past, but that a new, higher form of passive control is being implemented. We’ve all seen that Prophet Yahweh shit over at RI. Is there something here? With tyrannical forced medication coming online and the rush to compare fiction to fact, we are quickly being separated from fact itself. It’s as if purposefully, the powers that be, are literally engaged in a full blown, out in the open, psyops campaign to fully obscure a great crime in the making.

    It appears this is their response to many being so closely onto their crimes thanks in no small part to the transcendent tool of the Internet. Could it be possible, like two Star Destroyers attempting to avoid collision, that the behemoth has engaged in defensive measures? Are they trying to make the emerging global human consciousness insane by supplying all nodes with discursive disinfo and thus destroying all sense of up and down?

    Why would Spielberg at this time in his life and career, a billionaire and a powerful conveyor of archetypal black and white adventure tales for every extant generation today, decide to put out a message of a reactivated societal confusion if what he wants to do is explore what the the implications of 9/11 are? Why the attendant religious chaff from a member of the films cast? Why the uber-public inclusion of Katie Holmes? Why on Oprah? Why?

    Also, why would Harrison Ford sign up to star in the movie about the destruction of Fallujah mere months after the real life instance of it “concluded”? He doesn’t know yet whether he wants his name forever included in the historical account of a “possible” crime against humanity, yet he signs up anyhow.

    What truly is going on?!?!?!

  8. alistair Says:
    June 15th, 2005 at 8:47 am

    yeah……ying and yang,black and white.rene descartes got his duality thing from the same place.maybe it`s the bicameral archetecture of our brains that do it to us.then there is the “we are all part of one single thing” thing.welcome to being alive.clint eastwood,s portrayal of the man with no name helped me through some shit when i was a kid.”y`see,my donkey,he thinks you`re laughing at him…”pure nlp.making your donkey talk to the bad guys.
    we don`t need the fucking drugs or fucking tom cruise or fucking scientology.we need to find shit in life to enjoy.recognise our enjoyment,then re-enjoy it.laughter is the best medicine.find shit to laugh at………or do the drugs or watch tom cruise,creepy little shit.
    do we see portrayals of happy people in the media?sports persons winning……other than that it`s depressed robots stylishly being depressed about consumer products and reproductive modalities.or non-reproductive simulations.or displays of erronious reproductive bonding/copulation.

  9. J. Puma Says:
    June 15th, 2005 at 12:24 pm

    wanna talk layers upon layers?

    the original ‘war of the worlds’ panic never really happened, at least, not to the extent it’s generally been assumed.:

    http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/war_worlds.html

    The broadcast reached a huge audience, demonstrating the enormous reach of radio at that time. Approximately six million people heard it, and out of this number it was long thought that almost one million people panicked. More recent research, however, suggests that the number of people who panicked is probably far lower. In fact, the idea that the broadcast touched off a huge national scare is probably more of a hoax than the broadcast itself, which was never intended to fool anyone (At four separate points during the broadcast, including the beginning, it was clearly stated that what people were hearing was a play). The idea that hundreds of thousands of people panicked arose because the media eagerly pumped up the story in the weeks following the event.

    MUA HA HA HA HAAA!

  10. Occult Investigator Says:
    June 15th, 2005 at 12:31 pm

    yeah it makes more sense that way. i mean, people were used to hearing radio plays all the time back then…

  11. Haeresis Says:
    June 15th, 2005 at 4:33 pm

    Weird, Liberty- we watched that last night.

  12. hf Says:
    June 15th, 2005 at 9:47 pm

    Hmm, Scientology and the New Freedom Commission can certainly use one another even if they don’t coordinate their plans. And some of the media does appear to take orders directly from the White House, don’t they?

  13. alistair Says:
    June 16th, 2005 at 10:05 am

    as marshall mcluhan points out,the radio is a hot medium,rich in information.we would believe a report of aliens via the radio the same way today.the t.v. is, in mcluhan`s terms,cool,meaning that it need`s us to add to it to make it real,and we would doubt the message.
    interestingly,any time information is portrayed via t.v. we tend to criticise it.and we criticise the messenger also.t.v. is the perfect medium for low information,image personalities like bill clinton.tom cruise comes across on t.v.,when he talks specifically,as a nutcase.if he smiled and mumbled generalisations,he would be much more effective in getting people “in” scientology.t.v. is about images….we fill in the dots.liteally.there are approximately 450 lines of definition on the t.v. screen.our pre-convieved ideas about the images do the rest.we go to sleep rapidly watching t.v. because there is nothing there,whereas radio demands our attention.



SURROUND YOURSELF WITH STRENGTH.