<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pop Culture Magick by Taylor Ellwood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/</link>
	<description>public domain playground. friendly entities welcome.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Otherkin&#8221; in the Blogosphere	- 
	skullfood</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/comment-page-1/#comment-8880</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Otherkin&#8221; in the Blogosphere	- 
	skullfood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 22:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/#comment-8880</guid>
		<description>[...] tes on the proliferation of occult authors at Key 23 	Apparently Lupa and her beau Teriel (Taylor Ellwood) are also starting a magazine dedicated to Othe [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tes on the proliferation of occult authors at Key 23 	Apparently Lupa and her beau Teriel (Taylor Ellwood) are also starting a magazine dedicated to Othe [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occult Investigator  &#187; Magickal Pop Culture</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/comment-page-1/#comment-3662</link>
		<dc:creator>Occult Investigator  &#187; Magickal Pop Culture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/#comment-3662</guid>
		<description>[...] od&#8217;s Pop Culture Magick. It features a rather different perspective on the work than the review of it I did myself a few weeks ago. Might be worth  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] od&#8217;s Pop Culture Magick. It features a rather different perspective on the work than the review of it I did myself a few weeks ago. Might be worth  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Conlon</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/comment-page-1/#comment-2627</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Conlon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 17:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/#comment-2627</guid>
		<description>Thank Christ our cable TV is turned off.

-tc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank Christ our cable TV is turned off.</p>
<p>-tc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/comment-page-1/#comment-2626</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 17:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/#comment-2626</guid>
		<description>Well, I understand you're not &lt;em&gt;trying&lt;/em&gt; to be dogmatic ;)

I mean, I understand the point that you need to have some focused discipline to accomplish something, regardless of the structure you choose.

It just seems to me that your rational is shifting a bit.  

You started off talking about the dangers of playing with fire, of "getting burned", which seems to indicate a concern over being unprepared or unitiated to deal with negative results.  On the other hand you've sequed and tried to attach that to this latter idea of the inability of uninitiated non-traditional forms to achieve results to begin with.

Those are both valid, but completely, unrelated criticisms.

If they're just engaging in ego masturbation then there are not potentially harmful negative results to be concerned about.

If they get results, well then, they're not just wanking off.  Though it may have unforeseen negative consequences.

Like I said, two valid concerns/criticisms, but completely distinct from one another. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I understand you&#8217;re not <em>trying</em> to be dogmatic <img src='http://www.timboucher.com/journal/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I mean, I understand the point that you need to have some focused discipline to accomplish something, regardless of the structure you choose.</p>
<p>It just seems to me that your rational is shifting a bit.  </p>
<p>You started off talking about the dangers of playing with fire, of &#8220;getting burned&#8221;, which seems to indicate a concern over being unprepared or unitiated to deal with negative results.  On the other hand you&#8217;ve sequed and tried to attach that to this latter idea of the inability of uninitiated non-traditional forms to achieve results to begin with.</p>
<p>Those are both valid, but completely, unrelated criticisms.</p>
<p>If they&#8217;re just engaging in ego masturbation then there are not potentially harmful negative results to be concerned about.</p>
<p>If they get results, well then, they&#8217;re not just wanking off.  Though it may have unforeseen negative consequences.</p>
<p>Like I said, two valid concerns/criticisms, but completely distinct from one another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occult Investigator  &#187; I Can Do That!</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/comment-page-1/#comment-2625</link>
		<dc:creator>Occult Investigator  &#187; I Can Do That!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 17:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/#comment-2625</guid>
		<description>[...]   	 		 	 		 			I Can Do That! 	 			 					Haeresis left a really good comment on the Pop Culture Magick post: 	The â€˜popâ€™ crowd gets under my sk [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]   	</p>
<p> 			I Can Do That!</p>
<p> 					Haeresis left a really good comment on the Pop Culture Magick post: 	The â€˜popâ€™ crowd gets under my sk [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Ellwood</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/comment-page-1/#comment-2611</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Ellwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 15:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/#comment-2611</guid>
		<description>Haerisis,

I quite agree.  A person should show some dedication to what s/he is doing.  A dedicated practice done daily yields far more than just the occasional result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haerisis,</p>
<p>I quite agree.  A person should show some dedication to what s/he is doing.  A dedicated practice done daily yields far more than just the occasional result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haeresis</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/comment-page-1/#comment-2604</link>
		<dc:creator>Haeresis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 13:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/#comment-2604</guid>
		<description>I hope I'm making sense here.  I'm not trying to be dogmatic, really- but I think there's a difference between true eclecticism (winnowing down to what works) and lazy-ass magical systems that amount to little more than ego-masturbation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope I&#8217;m making sense here.  I&#8217;m not trying to be dogmatic, really- but I think there&#8217;s a difference between true eclecticism (winnowing down to what works) and lazy-ass magical systems that amount to little more than ego-masturbation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haeresis</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/comment-page-1/#comment-2603</link>
		<dc:creator>Haeresis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 13:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/#comment-2603</guid>
		<description>Wel, neither am I- in the end, we're all free to do whatevfer foolishness occurs to us.  That being said, I'd be remiss in not offering a 'heads up'.'  I'm not  real big on the idea of politicking and power play silliness, either..I think the whole idea of the 'new aeon' was supposed to be a release from the necessity of paternal guidance, as it were.

As far as being 'prepared.' that of course has different meaning to different ppl.  The 'pop' crowd gets under my skin because they remind me of the ppl who look at picasso paintings and say, 'that's just scribble, I can do &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt;.'  Even a natural gift for it won't give you the benefit of experience and dedicated practice.  If an 'octarine' ritual gets results, then that's great...but in a lot of cases, these 'do yer own thing' promoters are really broadcasting their own intellectual laziness and lack of stick-to-itiveness. If the silly shit worked, you'd see a better body of work coming from the fairy wicca camp..but one doesn't.

On a 'theoretical' note, I also think that 'established programs' tend to work better, because if you're within [an] established system/s, you've got a ready made 'egregore' to work with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wel, neither am I- in the end, we&#8217;re all free to do whatevfer foolishness occurs to us.  That being said, I&#8217;d be remiss in not offering a &#8216;heads up&#8217;.&#8217;  I&#8217;m not  real big on the idea of politicking and power play silliness, either..I think the whole idea of the &#8216;new aeon&#8217; was supposed to be a release from the necessity of paternal guidance, as it were.</p>
<p>As far as being &#8216;prepared.&#8217; that of course has different meaning to different ppl.  The &#8216;pop&#8217; crowd gets under my skin because they remind me of the ppl who look at picasso paintings and say, &#8216;that&#8217;s just scribble, I can do <em>that</em>.&#8217;  Even a natural gift for it won&#8217;t give you the benefit of experience and dedicated practice.  If an &#8216;octarine&#8217; ritual gets results, then that&#8217;s great&#8230;but in a lot of cases, these &#8216;do yer own thing&#8217; promoters are really broadcasting their own intellectual laziness and lack of stick-to-itiveness. If the silly shit worked, you&#8217;d see a better body of work coming from the fairy wicca camp..but one doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>On a &#8216;theoretical&#8217; note, I also think that &#8216;established programs&#8217; tend to work better, because if you&#8217;re within [an] established system/s, you&#8217;ve got a ready made &#8216;egregore&#8217; to work with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/comment-page-1/#comment-2600</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 12:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/#comment-2600</guid>
		<description>Point taken.  Apologies if I read into or saw something not implied.  

By the same token, true, some people may get burned 'playing with fire' as it were, but I'm not at all interested in playing gatekeeprer or spending any amount of time being concerned about it or evaluating the maturity of others.

Personal inclination and all that...

It's been my experience that those who spend time determining who or what is "suitable" or "prepared" are frequently playing some other game.  It's not as if the provinces of magic or the mind fit easily into some objective criteria [like, say, being "prepared" to run a marathon, or swim a mile...]

 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point taken.  Apologies if I read into or saw something not implied.  </p>
<p>By the same token, true, some people may get burned &#8216;playing with fire&#8217; as it were, but I&#8217;m not at all interested in playing gatekeeprer or spending any amount of time being concerned about it or evaluating the maturity of others.</p>
<p>Personal inclination and all that&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been my experience that those who spend time determining who or what is &#8220;suitable&#8221; or &#8220;prepared&#8221; are frequently playing some other game.  It&#8217;s not as if the provinces of magic or the mind fit easily into some objective criteria [like, say, being "prepared" to run a marathon, or swim a mile...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haeresis</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/comment-page-1/#comment-2594</link>
		<dc:creator>Haeresis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 06:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/#comment-2594</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But, in general, this â€œMagic is not for allâ€ tends to strike me as elitist crap.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

In all faoirness, I did not say that, nor do I buy into that.  I have, however, seen up close and personal, the effects of playing with fire.  To say that magick is suitable only for the prepared is hardly elitist, unless one considers a requirement of maturity 'elitist.'  Promethius brought fire to mankind, but there will always be people who burn themselves up.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But, in general, this â€œMagic is not for allâ€ tends to strike me as elitist crap.</p></blockquote>
<p>In all faoirness, I did not say that, nor do I buy into that.  I have, however, seen up close and personal, the effects of playing with fire.  To say that magick is suitable only for the prepared is hardly elitist, unless one considers a requirement of maturity &#8216;elitist.&#8217;  Promethius brought fire to mankind, but there will always be people who burn themselves up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alistair</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/comment-page-1/#comment-2524</link>
		<dc:creator>alistair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 16:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/#comment-2524</guid>
		<description>and i will defend mr.elwood`s right to redefine the term "pop". any good magician uses all the tools at his disposal, including distortion. if his new paradigm is valid it will become accepted(consumed) and will serve to create. it will become art. i like the ritual of ostentatiously unfolding and flapping ones wings. i like flying best, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and i will defend mr.elwood`s right to redefine the term &#8220;pop&#8221;. any good magician uses all the tools at his disposal, including distortion. if his new paradigm is valid it will become accepted(consumed) and will serve to create. it will become art. i like the ritual of ostentatiously unfolding and flapping ones wings. i like flying best, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alistair</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/comment-page-1/#comment-2522</link>
		<dc:creator>alistair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 16:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/#comment-2522</guid>
		<description>maybe tim`s approach to investigating the occult is voyueristic. i believe if you are going to evaluate things that you are uncertain about you need a strategy for protection. the scientist at the center for disease control uses air locks and protective gear to handle things like ebola and that makes good sense. nobody wants the andromeda strain in thier soup. 
maybe as tim spends time with the practices of the occult and the people who practice them he will try some things. i grew up in the south of england in the 60`s, deep in the understanding of the trees and the moon. others have different experiences. 
we are deep in the new age. it is the old age revisited. we have had religion as a commercial break. we now return to the regularly sceduled program..............just in case you got caught up in the commercials and started thinking they were the show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe tim`s approach to investigating the occult is voyueristic. i believe if you are going to evaluate things that you are uncertain about you need a strategy for protection. the scientist at the center for disease control uses air locks and protective gear to handle things like ebola and that makes good sense. nobody wants the andromeda strain in thier soup.<br />
maybe as tim spends time with the practices of the occult and the people who practice them he will try some things. i grew up in the south of england in the 60`s, deep in the understanding of the trees and the moon. others have different experiences.<br />
we are deep in the new age. it is the old age revisited. we have had religion as a commercial break. we now return to the regularly sceduled program&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..just in case you got caught up in the commercials and started thinking they were the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Ellwood</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/comment-page-1/#comment-2519</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Ellwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 15:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/#comment-2519</guid>
		<description>It seems odd to me that you admit that you haven't done the exercises, either for my book, or for RAW's book.  It strikes me that an investigator would not just read, but actually attempt the exercises, in order to fully investigate the principles involved.  While you're review is valid for the most part, though I would honestly disagree with some points, given your selective focus on the work (for instance while you note I only got one answer to that survey, you didn't note how many peopel didn't respond and that the reason I decided to write about pop culture and magic was the very fact that so many people chose not to respond, indicating a gap in what they knew), I will say that what does make it invalid is that you didn't do the exercises.  So they feel like homework to you?  Okay, fair enough, but that being said, you bill yourself as an investigator...So the real question is this: Have you even fully investigated the work in question, and to me it seems you haven't...so though you're one commentor has said that I've had my ass slayed by your review of my book, I nonetheless argue that you haven't made an airtight argument for your case, without doing the exercises.  That said, I do appreciate the critique and as I am planning on revising this book, and have matured as a writer since I initially wrote the book, I will keep some of your advice in mind when rewriting it.  Best of luck with your writing and continue slaying those asses.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems odd to me that you admit that you haven&#8217;t done the exercises, either for my book, or for RAW&#8217;s book.  It strikes me that an investigator would not just read, but actually attempt the exercises, in order to fully investigate the principles involved.  While you&#8217;re review is valid for the most part, though I would honestly disagree with some points, given your selective focus on the work (for instance while you note I only got one answer to that survey, you didn&#8217;t note how many peopel didn&#8217;t respond and that the reason I decided to write about pop culture and magic was the very fact that so many people chose not to respond, indicating a gap in what they knew), I will say that what does make it invalid is that you didn&#8217;t do the exercises.  So they feel like homework to you?  Okay, fair enough, but that being said, you bill yourself as an investigator&#8230;So the real question is this: Have you even fully investigated the work in question, and to me it seems you haven&#8217;t&#8230;so though you&#8217;re one commentor has said that I&#8217;ve had my ass slayed by your review of my book, I nonetheless argue that you haven&#8217;t made an airtight argument for your case, without doing the exercises.  That said, I do appreciate the critique and as I am planning on revising this book, and have matured as a writer since I initially wrote the book, I will keep some of your advice in mind when rewriting it.  Best of luck with your writing and continue slaying those asses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alistair</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/comment-page-1/#comment-2517</link>
		<dc:creator>alistair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 15:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/#comment-2517</guid>
		<description>i will suggest that we all have to be magicians to function here on earth. when we have our abilities diminished then we get ill, depressed, injured, etc. i think the whole motivational movement of the 70`s was a way for people to get back to personal evocation. maybe that`s why established religion freaked. i know that`s why my baptist friend gets squirrily.
i read somewhere that the vietnam war was a giant magic spell designed to create power using the suffering of innocents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i will suggest that we all have to be magicians to function here on earth. when we have our abilities diminished then we get ill, depressed, injured, etc. i think the whole motivational movement of the 70`s was a way for people to get back to personal evocation. maybe that`s why established religion freaked. i know that`s why my baptist friend gets squirrily.<br />
i read somewhere that the vietnam war was a giant magic spell designed to create power using the suffering of innocents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/comment-page-1/#comment-2506</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 12:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/#comment-2506</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Thereâ€™s a reason this is an initiatory tradition.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

With all due respect, I always kinda figured it was an initiatory tradition, mostly, because that since the advent of the church, going around willy nilly could get you, you know, excommunicated, exiled, burned, jailed, etc.  The initiation process was mostly a screening process to ensure that person could be trusted.

I mean, occult means hidden because the knowledge had to be kept hidden from the powers that me.

Now, I do realize the possible dangers in exposing some folks to techs of psychological change and or manipulation... psychotic breaks/schizophrenia/et al... or if you deal in the spirit model of model, unleashing dangerous entities into the world...

But, in general, this "Magic is not for all" tends to strike me as elitist crap.

I mean, just think how amazing the world would be if everyone was their own magician, enacting their true will on the world and in their life.  I think if the concept of Pop Magic helps make that work, more power to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Thereâ€™s a reason this is an initiatory tradition.</p></blockquote>
<p>With all due respect, I always kinda figured it was an initiatory tradition, mostly, because that since the advent of the church, going around willy nilly could get you, you know, excommunicated, exiled, burned, jailed, etc.  The initiation process was mostly a screening process to ensure that person could be trusted.</p>
<p>I mean, occult means hidden because the knowledge had to be kept hidden from the powers that me.</p>
<p>Now, I do realize the possible dangers in exposing some folks to techs of psychological change and or manipulation&#8230; psychotic breaks/schizophrenia/et al&#8230; or if you deal in the spirit model of model, unleashing dangerous entities into the world&#8230;</p>
<p>But, in general, this &#8220;Magic is not for all&#8221; tends to strike me as elitist crap.</p>
<p>I mean, just think how amazing the world would be if everyone was their own magician, enacting their true will on the world and in their life.  I think if the concept of Pop Magic helps make that work, more power to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occult Investigator  &#187; &#8220;So it&#8217;s mechanical?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/comment-page-1/#comment-2499</link>
		<dc:creator>Occult Investigator  &#187; &#8220;So it&#8217;s mechanical?&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 08:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/#comment-2499</guid>
		<description>[...] tacks. Since then, I&#8217;ve cleared that up with Ellwood, apologized, and written a more thorough critique of his work, without any personal jabs. Whil [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tacks. Since then, I&#8217;ve cleared that up with Ellwood, apologized, and written a more thorough critique of his work, without any personal jabs. Whil [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occult Investigator</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/comment-page-1/#comment-2495</link>
		<dc:creator>Occult Investigator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 06:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/#comment-2495</guid>
		<description>That's another really good definition point for "pop" - something written or put together in a style that's really simple and accessible. It doesn't actually have to be popular at all. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s another really good definition point for &#8220;pop&#8221; - something written or put together in a style that&#8217;s really simple and accessible. It doesn&#8217;t actually have to be popular at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/comment-page-1/#comment-2494</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 06:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/#comment-2494</guid>
		<description>Well, that's a bad example then, though telling in its own way. I had never heard of her until about a year ago, but she basically writes two different series of ongoing magical/vampiric sex soap operas that are really popular with women in their early twenties to late thirties who are or used to be goths. So in a few specific subcultures, she's really popular, but then most people have never heard of her. 

Her novels are "pop" insofar as they're written in a sort of fun, accessible style that doesn't require a lot of thought or esoteric knowledge in order to appreciate them. But they're not "pop culture" because you're not going to find her on the bestseller list wedged between Patterson and Michael Crichton or whoever's a popular writer today. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that&#8217;s a bad example then, though telling in its own way. I had never heard of her until about a year ago, but she basically writes two different series of ongoing magical/vampiric sex soap operas that are really popular with women in their early twenties to late thirties who are or used to be goths. So in a few specific subcultures, she&#8217;s really popular, but then most people have never heard of her. </p>
<p>Her novels are &#8220;pop&#8221; insofar as they&#8217;re written in a sort of fun, accessible style that doesn&#8217;t require a lot of thought or esoteric knowledge in order to appreciate them. But they&#8217;re not &#8220;pop culture&#8221; because you&#8217;re not going to find her on the bestseller list wedged between Patterson and Michael Crichton or whoever&#8217;s a popular writer today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occult Investigator</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/comment-page-1/#comment-2493</link>
		<dc:creator>Occult Investigator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 06:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/#comment-2493</guid>
		<description>See, I don't even know who the hell Laurell K. Hamilton is. But I do like your point about if what you're interested in is the edge or outside of culture, then why use pop culture as a vehicle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, I don&#8217;t even know who the hell Laurell K. Hamilton is. But I do like your point about if what you&#8217;re interested in is the edge or outside of culture, then why use pop culture as a vehicle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/comment-page-1/#comment-2492</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 05:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/#comment-2492</guid>
		<description>I could see how the author might be arguing for "pop" as a particular style of culture, the way Bjork claims to make "pop" music, or the whole "pop art" movement.  But that term has heavy connotations with patterns of mass consumerism. It seems like obfuscation to try to use the term as the opposite of its commonly accepted meaning. And if you're the type of person who is averse to commonly accepted anything, I don't understand why you'd be writing about "pop culture" in the first place. I may have to pick up this book just to better understand what he's doing. 

I love the Wraeththu books, but I agree. Laurell K. Hamilton *shudder* seems like she'd be more appropriate. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could see how the author might be arguing for &#8220;pop&#8221; as a particular style of culture, the way Bjork claims to make &#8220;pop&#8221; music, or the whole &#8220;pop art&#8221; movement.  But that term has heavy connotations with patterns of mass consumerism. It seems like obfuscation to try to use the term as the opposite of its commonly accepted meaning. And if you&#8217;re the type of person who is averse to commonly accepted anything, I don&#8217;t understand why you&#8217;d be writing about &#8220;pop culture&#8221; in the first place. I may have to pick up this book just to better understand what he&#8217;s doing. </p>
<p>I love the Wraeththu books, but I agree. Laurell K. Hamilton *shudder* seems like she&#8217;d be more appropriate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: human?</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/comment-page-1/#comment-2491</link>
		<dc:creator>human?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 05:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/#comment-2491</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;but sorry dressing up like adam ant and dancing around to crappy synthesizer music ainâ€™t it&lt;/em&gt;

i dunno..

seems pretty dark to me, considering the culture of apathy that has evolved &#38; the current state of world affairs...

just because they dont know what the fuck they are doing, doesnt mean they arent doing it.

the whole, dark spirituality argument, thats a non winnable one, so im not gonna try, but IMO, there is dark &#38; light forces...  from a finite perspective of course...

one
human?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>but sorry dressing up like adam ant and dancing around to crappy synthesizer music ainâ€™t it</em></p>
<p>i dunno..</p>
<p>seems pretty dark to me, considering the culture of apathy that has evolved &amp; the current state of world affairs&#8230;</p>
<p>just because they dont know what the fuck they are doing, doesnt mean they arent doing it.</p>
<p>the whole, dark spirituality argument, thats a non winnable one, so im not gonna try, but IMO, there is dark &amp; light forces&#8230;  from a finite perspective of course&#8230;</p>
<p>one<br />
human?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rev max</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/comment-page-1/#comment-2490</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 04:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/#comment-2490</guid>
		<description>BTW, this has always bothered me but who the fuck decide that "goths" were some aspect of "dark spirituality" or that there even needs to be some category called "dark spirituality"

You want dark spirituality go to Jamaica and apprentice with an Obeah-man and learn about necromancy but  sorry dressing up like adam ant and dancing around to crappy synthesizer music ain't it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, this has always bothered me but who the fuck decide that &#8220;goths&#8221; were some aspect of &#8220;dark spirituality&#8221; or that there even needs to be some category called &#8220;dark spirituality&#8221;</p>
<p>You want dark spirituality go to Jamaica and apprentice with an Obeah-man and learn about necromancy but  sorry dressing up like adam ant and dancing around to crappy synthesizer music ain&#8217;t it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: human?</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/comment-page-1/#comment-2489</link>
		<dc:creator>human?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 04:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/#comment-2489</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;i didnt know jay-z was a freemason.&lt;/em&gt;

hehehe, and i dont think im supposed to know that either ;)

but you know, people talk, especially when they are females, tipsy, and trying to prove a point...

&lt;a href="http://www.breakbeatscience.com/images/items/43490_tn.gif" rel="nofollow"&gt;check this image&lt;/a&gt;

there is a reason the Rocafella record labels crew handsign is what it is...  dudes got everyone throwing up the all seeing eye....  

ahhhh man, the occult stories ive got from the music scene are crazy, but there are definitly some things im not about to blow spots on in order to avoid beef...


but word,  as for the wand thing... check this:

http://www.mysticconvergence.com/store/view_product.php?product=AV-HOLLY

&lt;em&gt;Description:
Holly possesses protection qualities which far surpass any other wood and is on record for its overall strength. Holly is the chosen wood for use in performing and guiding dream magic.&lt;/em&gt;

hmmm.....

one
human?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>i didnt know jay-z was a freemason.</em></p>
<p>hehehe, and i dont think im supposed to know that either <img src='http://www.timboucher.com/journal/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>but you know, people talk, especially when they are females, tipsy, and trying to prove a point&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.breakbeatscience.com/images/items/43490_tn.gif" rel="nofollow">check this image</a></p>
<p>there is a reason the Rocafella record labels crew handsign is what it is&#8230;  dudes got everyone throwing up the all seeing eye&#8230;.  </p>
<p>ahhhh man, the occult stories ive got from the music scene are crazy, but there are definitly some things im not about to blow spots on in order to avoid beef&#8230;</p>
<p>but word,  as for the wand thing&#8230; check this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mysticconvergence.com/store/view_product.php?product=AV-HOLLY" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.mysticconvergence.com/store/view_product.php?product=AV-HOLLY'>http://www.mysticconvergence.com/store/view_product.php?product=AV-HOLLY</a></p>
<p><em>Description:<br />
Holly possesses protection qualities which far surpass any other wood and is on record for its overall strength. Holly is the chosen wood for use in performing and guiding dream magic.</em></p>
<p>hmmm&#8230;..</p>
<p>one<br />
human?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occult Investigator</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/comment-page-1/#comment-2488</link>
		<dc:creator>Occult Investigator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 04:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/#comment-2488</guid>
		<description>John: Yeah, see, I LOVED Wilson's exercises... but again, I didn't actually do any of them. And that didn't ruin my appreciation for either the ideas or for the book. 

Max: those are awesome examples of people doing this already, and doing it in a way that doesn't give more power to corporate bullshit. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John: Yeah, see, I LOVED Wilson&#8217;s exercises&#8230; but again, I didn&#8217;t actually do any of them. And that didn&#8217;t ruin my appreciation for either the ideas or for the book. </p>
<p>Max: those are awesome examples of people doing this already, and doing it in a way that doesn&#8217;t give more power to corporate bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rev max</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/comment-page-1/#comment-2487</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 04:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/#comment-2487</guid>
		<description>pop culture can be appropriated for other ends for example, that is how voodoo works, by syncretism, all o fthese different images become masks for the gods. 

of course haiti is totally impoverished but the cast off relics of 1st world culture become altar items for another, e.g., darth vader becomes baron samedi, natassja kinski and the snake becomes damballah the serpent god etc.

they don't buy it though they use what they find</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pop culture can be appropriated for other ends for example, that is how voodoo works, by syncretism, all o fthese different images become masks for the gods. </p>
<p>of course haiti is totally impoverished but the cast off relics of 1st world culture become altar items for another, e.g., darth vader becomes baron samedi, natassja kinski and the snake becomes damballah the serpent god etc.</p>
<p>they don&#8217;t buy it though they use what they find</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/comment-page-1/#comment-2486</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 04:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/#comment-2486</guid>
		<description>slayed. his. ass.

by the book too. he should take a cue from RAW's exercises on Prometheus Rising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>slayed. his. ass.</p>
<p>by the book too. he should take a cue from RAW&#8217;s exercises on Prometheus Rising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occult Investigator</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/comment-page-1/#comment-2485</link>
		<dc:creator>Occult Investigator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 04:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/#comment-2485</guid>
		<description>no, the book never mentions that about "holly wood" which i never realized either - nor does it go into any of that other stuff. you're totally right. i love it. i didnt know jay-z was a freemason. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no, the book never mentions that about &#8220;holly wood&#8221; which i never realized either - nor does it go into any of that other stuff. you&#8217;re totally right. i love it. i didnt know jay-z was a freemason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: human?</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/comment-page-1/#comment-2483</link>
		<dc:creator>human?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 04:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/04/pop-culture-magick-by-taylor-ellwood/#comment-2483</guid>
		<description>does the book ever mention that holly wood is aka a magic wand?

pop culture IS the product of magicians IMO....

and from my observations, pop culture has blatenly become pop occulture, and the magic is very dark.  

has anybody seen what Britney Spears wears nowadays?  geeeezzz.....  or the 2 headed dog logo for MTV2?  or Liminy Snickets A Series of Unfortunate Events?????

Jay Z is a freemason, Madonna is a Kabbalist &#38; Tom Cruise.... well, you know... lol

its all occult (really, all of it...so called "American" culture)...  from money to buildings to television &#38; movies....  we need to start dealing with it all like it really is, like its being conjured up by some very powerful wizards...
 
now im off to check this dudes site.....

one
human?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does the book ever mention that holly wood is aka a magic wand?</p>
<p>pop culture IS the product of magicians IMO&#8230;.</p>
<p>and from my observations, pop culture has blatenly become pop occulture, and the magic is very dark.  </p>
<p>has anybody seen what Britney Spears wears nowadays?  geeeezzz&#8230;..  or the 2 headed dog logo for MTV2?  or Liminy Snickets A Series of Unfortunate Events?????</p>
<p>Jay Z is a freemason, Madonna is a Kabbalist &amp; Tom Cruise&#8230;. well, you know&#8230; lol</p>
<p>its all occult (really, all of it&#8230;so called &#8220;American&#8221; culture)&#8230;  from money to buildings to television &amp; movies&#8230;.  we need to start dealing with it all like it really is, like its being conjured up by some very powerful wizards&#8230;</p>
<p>now im off to check this dudes site&#8230;..</p>
<p>one<br />
human?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
