<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Path of Radical Questioning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/</link>
	<description>public domain playground. friendly entities welcome.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fantastic planet &#187; The Path of Radical Questioning Continued</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-6209</link>
		<dc:creator>fantastic planet &#187; The Path of Radical Questioning Continued</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 17:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-6209</guid>
		<description>[...] Continued  		Tim&#8217;s provided the basis for what we&#8217;ve come to refer to as the Path of Radical Questioning, and I&#8217;d like to continue with so [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Continued</p>
<p> 		Tim&#8217;s provided the basis for what we&#8217;ve come to refer to as the Path of Radical Questioning, and I&#8217;d like to continue with so [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fantastic planet &#187; Twelve AnarchoGnostic Principles</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-6177</link>
		<dc:creator>fantastic planet &#187; Twelve AnarchoGnostic Principles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 19:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-6177</guid>
		<description>[...] Control Systems to dominate one&#8217;s internal experience.  One does so by following the Path of Radical Questioning, the search for Authentic Meaning inste [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Control Systems to dominate one&#8217;s internal experience.  One does so by following the Path of Radical Questioning, the search for Authentic Meaning inste [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pop Occulture  &#187; Ijtihad</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-5635</link>
		<dc:creator>Pop Occulture  &#187; Ijtihad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 20:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-5635</guid>
		<description>[...] d over on Fantastic Planet&#8217;s entry about this, this is an excellent corrolary to the Path of Radical Questioning. Totally excellent stuff.  	 					   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] d over on Fantastic Planet&#8217;s entry about this, this is an excellent corrolary to the Path of Radical Questioning. Totally excellent stuff.  	</p>
<p>  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occult Investigator  &#187; Philosophical vs. Scientific Skepticism</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-3359</link>
		<dc:creator>Occult Investigator  &#187; Philosophical vs. Scientific Skepticism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 01:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-3359</guid>
		<description>[...] re: question things until you can prove them valid or invalid. But in my experience when I put my questioning hat on in a serious way, it&#8217;s hard to take [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] re: question things until you can prove them valid or invalid. But in my experience when I put my questioning hat on in a serious way, it&#8217;s hard to take [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fantastic planet &#187; The Palm Tree Garden</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-2953</link>
		<dc:creator>fantastic planet &#187; The Palm Tree Garden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-2953</guid>
		<description>[...] ism, the exchange of ideas and information and interaction between fellow adherents of the Path of Eternal Questioning.  It&#8217;s a sign that can be worn by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ism, the exchange of ideas and information and interaction between fellow adherents of the Path of Eternal Questioning.  It&#8217;s a sign that can be worn by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gnostic Friends Network - blog  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Permission granted!</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-2764</link>
		<dc:creator>Gnostic Friends Network - blog  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Permission granted!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 22:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-2764</guid>
		<description>[...]  only asking questions. 	Now, extrapolating from context I can see that lately he has been questioning EVERYTHING - even questioning. It began (or at least my [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  only asking questions. 	Now, extrapolating from context I can see that lately he has been questioning EVERYTHING - even questioning. It began (or at least my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-2735</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 04:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-2735</guid>
		<description>
Rational minds are required for our current (ie centralized) civilization. When we all become psychic we won't need it. We will become psychic when we have a different ("organic" (I feel commercial-cooties when I say that)) civilization. What mind will rule? Will they merge? Are these the only two (rational and intuitive? animal and vegetable? physical and etheric? ...?)? Are they the same?


I hope your approaching mind orgasm is good. Though my last one seemed pretty lame, the afterglow just keeps getting better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rational minds are required for our current (ie centralized) civilization. When we all become psychic we won&#8217;t need it. We will become psychic when we have a different (&#8221;organic&#8221; (I feel commercial-cooties when I say that)) civilization. What mind will rule? Will they merge? Are these the only two (rational and intuitive? animal and vegetable? physical and etheric? &#8230;?)? Are they the same?</p>
<p>I hope your approaching mind orgasm is good. Though my last one seemed pretty lame, the afterglow just keeps getting better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occult Investigator  &#187; JUST TRY IT, YOU SNIVELING BITCH!</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-2732</link>
		<dc:creator>Occult Investigator  &#187; JUST TRY IT, YOU SNIVELING BITCH!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 04:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-2732</guid>
		<description>[...] NG BITCH! 	 			 					One more post on this before I move on to greener pastures. Thanks Jeremy for saying what I&#8217;ve either not been able to or people [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] NG BITCH!</p>
<p> 					One more post on this before I move on to greener pastures. Thanks Jeremy for saying what I&#8217;ve either not been able to or people [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inder</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-2729</link>
		<dc:creator>Inder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 03:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-2729</guid>
		<description>Tim,

What a great thought.  Question who or what is doing the questioning as well! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim,</p>
<p>What a great thought.  Question who or what is doing the questioning as well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-2724</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 02:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-2724</guid>
		<description>eh, i dunno-- why bother 'dipping one's toes' into ceremonial magick if it's not for any reason other than to check it out?  that's like saying you can't think about or critique buddhism without shaving your head and spending a season in the himalayas, or like saying you shouldn't write all of these posts about scientology without going in and getting audited, or you shouldn't post on 'fundamentalist' christainity because you haven't protested at a gay person's funeral. if you *really* want to try it, then you'll *do* it.  if not, i say fuck it;  if you wanna do it cause you feel a need or urge to do it, do it.  if not, keep on doing what you're doing, write about what you want to write about, and damn the torpedoes.  i don't see any 'need' or 'non-need.'  as edward gorey said, 'beware of this and that.'

of course, i've always found writing to be a magickal act in and of itself, like back when only certain people knew how to write so it was considered 'magic,' or like in  alan moore's promethea series (one of the very best ever, imho).  again, if you're following the path of pkd, he never went out and practiced ritual magick or anything of the kind, but turned out some of the most insightful, amazing revelations.  your writings on gnosis are some of the best out there at the moment, but you've never attended an eg mass.  there are no hard or fast rules.  i'm not saying you should or shouldn't do any of this stuff, i'm just sayin' it's up to you, and if you dont' do it, so what?  make your own way, mang.  you're not 'right' or 'wrong' one way or the other.

btw, while we're tossing around 'results oriented' books, the best one i can think of is '&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1567184723/qid=1120701805/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/104-3198246-7671963?v=glance&#38;s=books" rel="nofollow"&gt;magical tattwa cards&lt;/a&gt;' by mumford.  that one'll have you seeing alternate realities in less than a week.  the tattwas are some amazing stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eh, i dunno&#8211; why bother &#8216;dipping one&#8217;s toes&#8217; into ceremonial magick if it&#8217;s not for any reason other than to check it out?  that&#8217;s like saying you can&#8217;t think about or critique buddhism without shaving your head and spending a season in the himalayas, or like saying you shouldn&#8217;t write all of these posts about scientology without going in and getting audited, or you shouldn&#8217;t post on &#8216;fundamentalist&#8217; christainity because you haven&#8217;t protested at a gay person&#8217;s funeral. if you *really* want to try it, then you&#8217;ll *do* it.  if not, i say fuck it;  if you wanna do it cause you feel a need or urge to do it, do it.  if not, keep on doing what you&#8217;re doing, write about what you want to write about, and damn the torpedoes.  i don&#8217;t see any &#8216;need&#8217; or &#8216;non-need.&#8217;  as edward gorey said, &#8216;beware of this and that.&#8217;</p>
<p>of course, i&#8217;ve always found writing to be a magickal act in and of itself, like back when only certain people knew how to write so it was considered &#8216;magic,&#8217; or like in  alan moore&#8217;s promethea series (one of the very best ever, imho).  again, if you&#8217;re following the path of pkd, he never went out and practiced ritual magick or anything of the kind, but turned out some of the most insightful, amazing revelations.  your writings on gnosis are some of the best out there at the moment, but you&#8217;ve never attended an eg mass.  there are no hard or fast rules.  i&#8217;m not saying you should or shouldn&#8217;t do any of this stuff, i&#8217;m just sayin&#8217; it&#8217;s up to you, and if you dont&#8217; do it, so what?  make your own way, mang.  you&#8217;re not &#8216;right&#8217; or &#8216;wrong&#8217; one way or the other.</p>
<p>btw, while we&#8217;re tossing around &#8216;results oriented&#8217; books, the best one i can think of is &#8216;<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1567184723/qid=1120701805/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/104-3198246-7671963?v=glance&amp;s=books" rel="nofollow">magical tattwa cards</a>&#8216; by mumford.  that one&#8217;ll have you seeing alternate realities in less than a week.  the tattwas are some amazing stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occult Investigator</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-2722</link>
		<dc:creator>Occult Investigator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 02:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-2722</guid>
		<description>What was?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fell</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-2720</link>
		<dc:creator>Fell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 01:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-2720</guid>
		<description>That was an occult clichÃ©.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was an occult clichÃ©.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: human?</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-2698</link>
		<dc:creator>human?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 00:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-2698</guid>
		<description>maybe you keep drawing back because you have a gut feeling its a trap.

&lt;blockquote&gt;There is no â€œtrickingâ€ per se, as you put it, whe you work with altered states.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

why not? because you cant?

the paths are infinite.

for a species that basically knows nothing, questions seem to be appropriate...

&lt;blockquote&gt;Isnâ€™t there some passage in Exegesis where PKD talk about questioning god or playing some sort of game with god and no matters what he tries the answer is always infinity - god wins
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

this i like.  



Tim, dont let the dogmatists get you down.  thats the lure of the trap "Look at us, we are so happy! We have found the answers! We KNOW something!"

liars.


one
human?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe you keep drawing back because you have a gut feeling its a trap.</p>
<blockquote><p>There is no â€œtrickingâ€ per se, as you put it, whe you work with altered states.</p></blockquote>
<p>why not? because you cant?</p>
<p>the paths are infinite.</p>
<p>for a species that basically knows nothing, questions seem to be appropriate&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Isnâ€™t there some passage in Exegesis where PKD talk about questioning god or playing some sort of game with god and no matters what he tries the answer is always infinity - god wins
</p></blockquote>
<p>this i like.  </p>
<p>Tim, dont let the dogmatists get you down.  thats the lure of the trap &#8220;Look at us, we are so happy! We have found the answers! We KNOW something!&#8221;</p>
<p>liars.</p>
<p>one<br />
human?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haeresis</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-2696</link>
		<dc:creator>Haeresis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 00:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-2696</guid>
		<description>Don't worry about the freak-out.  Practice enough, and you' start doing it in your sleep, or in the HG state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t worry about the freak-out.  Practice enough, and you&#8217; start doing it in your sleep, or in the HG state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occult Investigator</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-2691</link>
		<dc:creator>Occult Investigator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 23:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-2691</guid>
		<description>Thanks guys, I appreciate all this. I really do. It's really kind of amazing sometimes to see the way people respond. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;Maybe floor the pedal until you hit the wall - maybe you will disocver that the wall is some sort of paradox.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, that's what I'm trying to do. It's easier said than done I guess. I'll check out that book too I suppose, although I think I'm almost there in terms of OBE without it. I keep reaching a point where it's just about to happen, I freak out and draw back. It's exactly the criticism everybody's giving me about all this stuff in a larger sense...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks guys, I appreciate all this. I really do. It&#8217;s really kind of amazing sometimes to see the way people respond. </p>
<blockquote><p>Maybe floor the pedal until you hit the wall - maybe you will disocver that the wall is some sort of paradox.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m trying to do. It&#8217;s easier said than done I guess. I&#8217;ll check out that book too I suppose, although I think I&#8217;m almost there in terms of OBE without it. I keep reaching a point where it&#8217;s just about to happen, I freak out and draw back. It&#8217;s exactly the criticism everybody&#8217;s giving me about all this stuff in a larger sense&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haeresis</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-2690</link>
		<dc:creator>Haeresis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 23:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-2690</guid>
		<description>Funny thing, visualizations never worked for me.  (Datura did, but that's not exactly something that's gonna make it into a how-to book...lol)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny thing, visualizations never worked for me.  (Datura did, but that&#8217;s not exactly something that&#8217;s gonna make it into a how-to book&#8230;lol)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rev max</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-2686</link>
		<dc:creator>rev max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 22:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-2686</guid>
		<description>groovy, thanks!

will check out tonite</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>groovy, thanks!</p>
<p>will check out tonite</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fell</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-2684</link>
		<dc:creator>Fell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 22:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-2684</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I'll mail you some when we get em done up. A friend is doing them in his studio in Vancouver, so there'll be no paper trail here. I am basing them off of municipal City of Edmonton bylaw materials, quoting Philip K. Dick's &lt;em&gt;Tractates Cryptica Scriptura&lt;/em&gt;. Nothing too fancy, but they'll get the job done!

And yes, I highly recommend Astral Dynamics. Every other text out there pushes visualisations and such as the exercises to do to bring awareness to the subtle bodies and the manipulation thereof, but Bruce was asked to develop a way to teach these things to a blind man. After some time, he developed what he calls the NEW method to out-of-body. This approach uses tactile stimulation and concentrations to really bring an awareness and control Ã—10 faster than visualisations would ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;ll mail you some when we get em done up. A friend is doing them in his studio in Vancouver, so there&#8217;ll be no paper trail here. I am basing them off of municipal City of Edmonton bylaw materials, quoting Philip K. Dick&#8217;s <em>Tractates Cryptica Scriptura</em>. Nothing too fancy, but they&#8217;ll get the job done!</p>
<p>And yes, I highly recommend Astral Dynamics. Every other text out there pushes visualisations and such as the exercises to do to bring awareness to the subtle bodies and the manipulation thereof, but Bruce was asked to develop a way to teach these things to a blind man. After some time, he developed what he calls the NEW method to out-of-body. This approach uses tactile stimulation and concentrations to really bring an awareness and control Ã—10 faster than visualisations would ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rev max</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-2683</link>
		<dc:creator>rev max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 22:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-2683</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Language just happens to be my poison of choice. Some people are into hookers and cocaine.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Some people are into all three</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Language just happens to be my poison of choice. Some people are into hookers and cocaine.</p></blockquote>
<p>Some people are into all three</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rev max</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-2682</link>
		<dc:creator>rev max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 21:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-2682</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;ps â€” rev max, if itâ€™s the you I know from Enemies.com, I just realised that I still have your logo and weâ€™ll throwing up this sticker campaign this summer. Iâ€™ll send you an e-mail with images here soon.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh yeah! How you doin'? Are you the guy who wrote me about doing a design project parodying civic awareness for Alberta?

 I grew up in Ottowa myself. Well met kind sir, dig yer site BTW.

RE: Astral Dynamics - I own a copy but haven't gotten around to reading it yet. Sounds like its worth doing though?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>ps â€” rev max, if itâ€™s the you I know from Enemies.com, I just realised that I still have your logo and weâ€™ll throwing up this sticker campaign this summer. Iâ€™ll send you an e-mail with images here soon.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh yeah! How you doin&#8217;? Are you the guy who wrote me about doing a design project parodying civic awareness for Alberta?</p>
<p> I grew up in Ottowa myself. Well met kind sir, dig yer site BTW.</p>
<p>RE: Astral Dynamics - I own a copy but haven&#8217;t gotten around to reading it yet. Sounds like its worth doing though?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fell</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-2680</link>
		<dc:creator>Fell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 21:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-2680</guid>
		<description>Fer sure, you've become quite popular with your little soirÃ©e of a site here.

Just keep it in mind when you want to explore an "objective," sensational approach to all of this. Robert Bruce has developed some very good techniques to easily achieve results in dealing with the subtle bodies and exploring the depths of consciousness. It will aid greatly in your journey to understand &lt;em&gt;without&lt;/em&gt; the language.

:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fer sure, you&#8217;ve become quite popular with your little soirÃ©e of a site here.</p>
<p>Just keep it in mind when you want to explore an &#8220;objective,&#8221; sensational approach to all of this. Robert Bruce has developed some very good techniques to easily achieve results in dealing with the subtle bodies and exploring the depths of consciousness. It will aid greatly in your journey to understand <em>without</em> the language.</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.timboucher.com/journal/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laura jane</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-2679</link>
		<dc:creator>laura jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 21:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-2679</guid>
		<description>tim, maybe you need to travel somewhere and meet someone old and wise and/or crazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tim, maybe you need to travel somewhere and meet someone old and wise and/or crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haeresis</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-2678</link>
		<dc:creator>Haeresis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 21:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-2678</guid>
		<description>Because, Tim, some people are better at expressing themselves through language than others. That being said, languiage isn't and never has been a substitute for experience.

I think Fell is right- perhaps you do need to 'take the plunge.'  The book recommend isn't more language, it's a 'how to' guidse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because, Tim, some people are better at expressing themselves through language than others. That being said, languiage isn&#8217;t and never has been a substitute for experience.</p>
<p>I think Fell is right- perhaps you do need to &#8216;take the plunge.&#8217;  The book recommend isn&#8217;t more language, it&#8217;s a &#8216;how to&#8217; guidse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rev max</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-2677</link>
		<dc:creator>rev max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 21:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-2677</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Itâ€™s like if the problem is language, how can I use language to overcome it? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

That seems like one of the big insights of PDK actually - you can take the prison bars and use them to build a ladder out of the prison

Or -  from the POV of tantra -  if the problem is attachment to desire how can I use desire to overcome the attachment?

Are you mapping the  belly of the beast from the inside out? That seems like a good way to discover the limits of its appetites.

Maybe floor the pedal until you hit the wall - maybe you will disocver that the wall is some sort of paradox.

WHat are the limits of intellectual knowledge?

How far can you pursue questioning?

Descartes gave us one solution but its far from the only one.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Itâ€™s like if the problem is language, how can I use language to overcome it? </p></blockquote>
<p>That seems like one of the big insights of PDK actually - you can take the prison bars and use them to build a ladder out of the prison</p>
<p>Or -  from the POV of tantra -  if the problem is attachment to desire how can I use desire to overcome the attachment?</p>
<p>Are you mapping the  belly of the beast from the inside out? That seems like a good way to discover the limits of its appetites.</p>
<p>Maybe floor the pedal until you hit the wall - maybe you will disocver that the wall is some sort of paradox.</p>
<p>WHat are the limits of intellectual knowledge?</p>
<p>How far can you pursue questioning?</p>
<p>Descartes gave us one solution but its far from the only one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occult Investigator</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-2672</link>
		<dc:creator>Occult Investigator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 21:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-2672</guid>
		<description>I trust you, I'm just a little burned out on book recommendations lately. You know? It's like if the problem is language, how can I use language to overcome it? I guess I'm sort of waiting for whatever it is to come from somewhere else altogether. I'll definitely put it on my wishlist though for a time when I feel it's appropriate. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I trust you, I&#8217;m just a little burned out on book recommendations lately. You know? It&#8217;s like if the problem is language, how can I use language to overcome it? I guess I&#8217;m sort of waiting for whatever it is to come from somewhere else altogether. I&#8217;ll definitely put it on my wishlist though for a time when I feel it&#8217;s appropriate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fell</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-2668</link>
		<dc:creator>Fell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 21:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-2668</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Fell, Iâ€™ve been saying just that for weeks. Itâ€™s what brought me to this place. But I think we all are. To say you or somebody else is not is as much of an illusion as anything.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Heheâ€¦

If I might, may I suggest your checking out &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1571741437/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Astral Dynamics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;, by Robert Bruce? Easiest way to get some tangible results in all of this voodoo-hoodoo that we do. Trust me when I say it's worth the $17.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Fell, Iâ€™ve been saying just that for weeks. Itâ€™s what brought me to this place. But I think we all are. To say you or somebody else is not is as much of an illusion as anything.</p></blockquote>
<p>Heheâ€¦</p>
<p>If I might, may I suggest your checking out <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1571741437/" rel="nofollow">Astral Dynamics</a></em>, by Robert Bruce? Easiest way to get some tangible results in all of this voodoo-hoodoo that we do. Trust me when I say it&#8217;s worth the $17.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fell</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-2665</link>
		<dc:creator>Fell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 21:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-2665</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Isnâ€™t there some passage in Exegesis where PKD talk about questioning god or playing some sort of game with god and no matters what he tries the answer is always infinity - god wins&lt;/blockquote&gt;
There is an interesting perspective taken by Scott Adams in his "thought experiment," &lt;em&gt;God's Debris&lt;/em&gt;. The idea that God attempted to destroy itself in an attempt to understand the resultant consequences and possibilities of such an act. And that we're existing backwards in time, consciously, as we head "towards" a re-unification of the Whole. Which sorta strikes with me cuz there is all this talk of radiation "existing 'backwards' in time," for lack of better descriptions, and the idea that the universe is still composed of all this exotic matter and energy we're not privy to except through theory.

ps â€” &lt;strong&gt;rev max&lt;/strong&gt;, if it's the you I know from Enemies.com, I just realised that I still have your logo and we'll throwing up this sticker campaign this summer. I'll send you an e-mail with images here soon. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Isnâ€™t there some passage in Exegesis where PKD talk about questioning god or playing some sort of game with god and no matters what he tries the answer is always infinity - god wins</p></blockquote>
<p>There is an interesting perspective taken by Scott Adams in his &#8220;thought experiment,&#8221; <em>God&#8217;s Debris</em>. The idea that God attempted to destroy itself in an attempt to understand the resultant consequences and possibilities of such an act. And that we&#8217;re existing backwards in time, consciously, as we head &#8220;towards&#8221; a re-unification of the Whole. Which sorta strikes with me cuz there is all this talk of radiation &#8220;existing &#8216;backwards&#8217; in time,&#8221; for lack of better descriptions, and the idea that the universe is still composed of all this exotic matter and energy we&#8217;re not privy to except through theory.</p>
<p>ps â€” <strong>rev max</strong>, if it&#8217;s the you I know from Enemies.com, I just realised that I still have your logo and we&#8217;ll throwing up this sticker campaign this summer. I&#8217;ll send you an e-mail with images here soon. <img src='http://www.timboucher.com/journal/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occult Investigator</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-2662</link>
		<dc:creator>Occult Investigator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 21:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-2662</guid>
		<description>Yeah I have a &lt;a href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/04/12/philip-k-dicks-infinite-theophany/" rel="nofollow"&gt;link to that&lt;/a&gt; Max

&lt;blockquote&gt;I am increasingly coming to believe you are a victom of language&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Fell, I've been saying just that for weeks. It's what brought me to this place. But I think we all are. To say you or somebody else is not is as much of an illusion as anything.

Anyway, I'm a writer. Language just happens to be my poison of choice. Some people are into hookers and cocaine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I have a <a href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/04/12/philip-k-dicks-infinite-theophany/" rel="nofollow">link to that</a> Max</p>
<blockquote><p>I am increasingly coming to believe you are a victom of language</p></blockquote>
<p>Fell, I&#8217;ve been saying just that for weeks. It&#8217;s what brought me to this place. But I think we all are. To say you or somebody else is not is as much of an illusion as anything.</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m a writer. Language just happens to be my poison of choice. Some people are into hookers and cocaine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rev max</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-2660</link>
		<dc:creator>rev max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 21:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-2660</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;as to whether or not itâ€™s really a good idea to try to bypass your rational mind. From one perspective, it seems â€œbadâ€ to be constantly trying to trick yourself.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

this begs the question: is the "rational mind" really your deepest, truest self?

is the rational mind really in control or is it clinging to the illusion of control

in some shamanic paradigms they believe that people have multiple souls or spirits - 2, 7, 9, etc

maybe one is logic, one is emotion, another personal memory, another ancestral memory, another the divine spark, etc

at the very least we do have three brains that are responsible for totally different aspect sof our consciousness, eg teh lizard brain, mammalian brain, neocortex etc

they work together in a symbiotic way to create the illusion of a whiole with a personal and unique  identity.

 But when you strip away all the layers of the onion what is let  in the middle?

The void? The divine spark? Nothing?

&lt;blockquote&gt; I guess thatâ€™s another thing I like about questioning as a path: that it hones your rational mind at the same time that it systematically dismantles it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Isn't there some passage in Exegesis where PKD talk about questioning god or playing some sort of game with god and no matters what he tries the answer is always infinity - god wins</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>as to whether or not itâ€™s really a good idea to try to bypass your rational mind. From one perspective, it seems â€œbadâ€ to be constantly trying to trick yourself.</p></blockquote>
<p>this begs the question: is the &#8220;rational mind&#8221; really your deepest, truest self?</p>
<p>is the rational mind really in control or is it clinging to the illusion of control</p>
<p>in some shamanic paradigms they believe that people have multiple souls or spirits - 2, 7, 9, etc</p>
<p>maybe one is logic, one is emotion, another personal memory, another ancestral memory, another the divine spark, etc</p>
<p>at the very least we do have three brains that are responsible for totally different aspect sof our consciousness, eg teh lizard brain, mammalian brain, neocortex etc</p>
<p>they work together in a symbiotic way to create the illusion of a whiole with a personal and unique  identity.</p>
<p> But when you strip away all the layers of the onion what is let  in the middle?</p>
<p>The void? The divine spark? Nothing?</p>
<blockquote><p> I guess thatâ€™s another thing I like about questioning as a path: that it hones your rational mind at the same time that it systematically dismantles it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Isn&#8217;t there some passage in Exegesis where PKD talk about questioning god or playing some sort of game with god and no matters what he tries the answer is always infinity - god wins</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fell</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/comment-page-1/#comment-2659</link>
		<dc:creator>Fell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 21:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/06/the-path-of-radical-questioning/#comment-2659</guid>
		<description>Albert Einstein once said, "The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift."

Tim, I love your site, but I am increasingly coming to believe you are a victom of language and need to seriously sit down and try a few of these things out that you're exploring. Scholarship and reason only get you so far, &lt;em&gt;especially&lt;/em&gt; in the occult.

There is no "tricking" per se, as you put it, whe you work with altered states. They are heightened, ecstatic states that allows the sorcerer to entrain themselves to brainwaves outside of the normal, everyday beta-wave consiousness. The human mind produces and is enveloped in all sorts of frequencies, these EEGs, and one can see the slight change in consciousness apparent when you watch a movie or are trying to fall asleep: flittering through the twilight phase of alpha waves and the sort of perception &#38; conscious capacities that accompany a relaxed alpha state. Your mind does not start to produce alpha waves when you sit down to watch a movie, but instead it's consciousness that allows itself to become more entrained to the vibratory affect of alpha frequencies.

Generally, people tend to fall asleep as their body slows down and consciousness is drawn into the lower frequencies â€” theta and delta:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Theta is the frequency range from 4.5 Hz to 8 Hz and is associated with drowsiness, childhood, adolescence and young adulthood. This EEG frequency can sometimes be produced by hyperventilation. Theta waves can be seen during hypnagogic states such as trances, hypnosis, deep day dreams, lucid dreaming and light sleep and the preconscious state just upon waking, and just before falling asleep.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ceremonial magic, evocation, states of ecstasy, trance, et ceteraâ€¦ are all ways to coerce the mind under duress to correspond with a state of mind that is not natural to the productive, social mean that we've come to accept in monotonous, "conscious" life.

As I pointed out in another comment from this morning, ceremonial magic exists as an intuitive development between sorcerer and outside intelligences. Just because you need to make some sense of it doesn't mean it's non-sensical. At this point, it is technically just alien to you.

"Intelligence is restricted. It can deal only with facts discoverable by the senses and experiences related to these. It can act only in the area of the visible, the viable." Ceremonial magic is, currently, the best methods we have with opening perceptual doorways to communicate and interact with the cosmos in all their brilliance. Our little minds are only privy to a undescribably small sliver of potentiality and probability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Albert Einstein once said, &#8220;The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.&#8221;</p>
<p>Tim, I love your site, but I am increasingly coming to believe you are a victom of language and need to seriously sit down and try a few of these things out that you&#8217;re exploring. Scholarship and reason only get you so far, <em>especially</em> in the occult.</p>
<p>There is no &#8220;tricking&#8221; per se, as you put it, whe you work with altered states. They are heightened, ecstatic states that allows the sorcerer to entrain themselves to brainwaves outside of the normal, everyday beta-wave consiousness. The human mind produces and is enveloped in all sorts of frequencies, these EEGs, and one can see the slight change in consciousness apparent when you watch a movie or are trying to fall asleep: flittering through the twilight phase of alpha waves and the sort of perception &amp; conscious capacities that accompany a relaxed alpha state. Your mind does not start to produce alpha waves when you sit down to watch a movie, but instead it&#8217;s consciousness that allows itself to become more entrained to the vibratory affect of alpha frequencies.</p>
<p>Generally, people tend to fall asleep as their body slows down and consciousness is drawn into the lower frequencies â€” theta and delta:</p>
<blockquote><p>Theta is the frequency range from 4.5 Hz to 8 Hz and is associated with drowsiness, childhood, adolescence and young adulthood. This EEG frequency can sometimes be produced by hyperventilation. Theta waves can be seen during hypnagogic states such as trances, hypnosis, deep day dreams, lucid dreaming and light sleep and the preconscious state just upon waking, and just before falling asleep.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ceremonial magic, evocation, states of ecstasy, trance, et ceteraâ€¦ are all ways to coerce the mind under duress to correspond with a state of mind that is not natural to the productive, social mean that we&#8217;ve come to accept in monotonous, &#8220;conscious&#8221; life.</p>
<p>As I pointed out in another comment from this morning, ceremonial magic exists as an intuitive development between sorcerer and outside intelligences. Just because you need to make some sense of it doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s non-sensical. At this point, it is technically just alien to you.</p>
<p>&#8220;Intelligence is restricted. It can deal only with facts discoverable by the senses and experiences related to these. It can act only in the area of the visible, the viable.&#8221; Ceremonial magic is, currently, the best methods we have with opening perceptual doorways to communicate and interact with the cosmos in all their brilliance. Our little minds are only privy to a undescribably small sliver of potentiality and probability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
