<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Science, Cut the Shit!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/14/science-cut-the-shit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/14/science-cut-the-shit/</link>
	<description>public domain playground. friendly entities welcome.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Occult Investigator  &#187; God divided the light from the darkness</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/14/science-cut-the-shit/comment-page-1/#comment-3637</link>
		<dc:creator>Occult Investigator  &#187; God divided the light from the darkness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 04:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/14/science-cut-the-shit/#comment-3637</guid>
		<description>[...] u&#8217;ve known for a long time. For example, this linguistic connection between the word &#8220;science&#8221; and the Indo-European root it comes from meaning &#8220;cut&#38; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] u&#8217;ve known for a long time. For example, this linguistic connection between the word &#8220;science&#8221; and the Indo-European root it comes from meaning &#8220;cut&amp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occult Investigator</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/14/science-cut-the-shit/comment-page-1/#comment-3223</link>
		<dc:creator>Occult Investigator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 01:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/14/science-cut-the-shit/#comment-3223</guid>
		<description>well conscience is the same root as science... oh they had a good explanation of how "shit" relates to "cut" in that the shit is separating itself from the body. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well conscience is the same root as science&#8230; oh they had a good explanation of how &#8220;shit&#8221; relates to &#8220;cut&#8221; in that the shit is separating itself from the body.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: human?</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/14/science-cut-the-shit/comment-page-1/#comment-3222</link>
		<dc:creator>human?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 01:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/14/science-cut-the-shit/#comment-3222</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The Online Etymology Dictionary also relates shit to conscience:
etymonline.com on shit&lt;/blockquote&gt;

as opposed to proscience i assume...

makes perfect sense..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The Online Etymology Dictionary also relates shit to conscience:<br />
etymonline.com on shit</p></blockquote>
<p>as opposed to proscience i assume&#8230;</p>
<p>makes perfect sense..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arizona</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/14/science-cut-the-shit/comment-page-1/#comment-3221</link>
		<dc:creator>Arizona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 01:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/14/science-cut-the-shit/#comment-3221</guid>
		<description>The Online Etymology Dictionary also relates &lt;em&gt;shit&lt;/em&gt; to &lt;em&gt;conscience&lt;/em&gt;:
&lt;a href="http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=shit&#38;searchmode=none" rel="nofollow"&gt;etymonline.com on shit&lt;/a&gt;

Yes, it's true: Solomon did use a sword to discern the real mother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Online Etymology Dictionary also relates <em>shit</em> to <em>conscience</em>:<br />
<a href="http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=shit&amp;searchmode=none" rel="nofollow">etymonline.com on shit</a></p>
<p>Yes, it&#8217;s true: Solomon did use a sword to discern the real mother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occult Investigator</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/14/science-cut-the-shit/comment-page-1/#comment-3215</link>
		<dc:creator>Occult Investigator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 22:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/14/science-cut-the-shit/#comment-3215</guid>
		<description>It's also interesting to think about the connection between swords, warfare, colonization and the progress of science and culture through history</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s also interesting to think about the connection between swords, warfare, colonization and the progress of science and culture through history</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occult Investigator</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/14/science-cut-the-shit/comment-page-1/#comment-3214</link>
		<dc:creator>Occult Investigator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 22:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/14/science-cut-the-shit/#comment-3214</guid>
		<description>When I look at Indo-European word origins, my mind starts to sort of fritz... it makes me realize how language develops by taking one word, and creating new shades and colorations of it. But it's like all the offshoots somehow are still connected in this way that makes you realize we're really only using a very limited word-set. I don't know how many words are in the vocabulary, but maybe it's somewhere in the range around or above what dogs understand. I think their max vocab is something like 150, but I'll have to look into that. 

Imagine your dog could understand the differences between:

- "I went for a walk yesterday."
- "I walked home from work."
- "I'll go for a walk tomorrow."
- "Come on boy, let's go for a walk!"

All the dog hears is WALK!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I look at Indo-European word origins, my mind starts to sort of fritz&#8230; it makes me realize how language develops by taking one word, and creating new shades and colorations of it. But it&#8217;s like all the offshoots somehow are still connected in this way that makes you realize we&#8217;re really only using a very limited word-set. I don&#8217;t know how many words are in the vocabulary, but maybe it&#8217;s somewhere in the range around or above what dogs understand. I think their max vocab is something like 150, but I&#8217;ll have to look into that. </p>
<p>Imagine your dog could understand the differences between:</p>
<p>- &#8220;I went for a walk yesterday.&#8221;<br />
- &#8220;I walked home from work.&#8221;<br />
- &#8220;I&#8217;ll go for a walk tomorrow.&#8221;<br />
- &#8220;Come on boy, let&#8217;s go for a walk!&#8221;</p>
<p>All the dog hears is WALK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: human?</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/14/science-cut-the-shit/comment-page-1/#comment-3211</link>
		<dc:creator>human?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 22:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/14/science-cut-the-shit/#comment-3211</guid>
		<description>makes sense.

what a interesting spell......  

no wonder ive never liked the word.

one
human?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>makes sense.</p>
<p>what a interesting spell&#8230;&#8230;  </p>
<p>no wonder ive never liked the word.</p>
<p>one<br />
human?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
