<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Ultra-Rovianistic Innoculation&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/</link>
	<description>public domain playground. friendly entities welcome.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: alistair</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/comment-page-1/#comment-4465</link>
		<dc:creator>alistair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 14:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/#comment-4465</guid>
		<description>albion, i tend to agree that looking behind the curtain is a populist activity, it`s just that, of late, a walk through the video store (rogers video and blockbuster) reveals a panapoly of left-wing conspiracy dressed up as sociological documentaries. the list runs from columbine to the death of suburbia due to escalating gas prices to the deconstruction of corporations to seven or eight "truths" about 9/11. i see this through the eyes of my nine year old who is begining to ask questions driven by comments from his teachers about issues like 9/11, that are opinion presented as fact. tim`s position that conspiracy theory has taken on religion-like elements is borne out by thinking along these lines. it leads to minor neurosis. granted we fill in the gaps when we don`t know, but the media has made an industry out of it which concretises these positions into what used to be trusted as fact. "the most trusted name in news" is now laughable.
 my suggestions to people is to put down the newspapers and turn off the t.v., if the events are important enough someone will tell you about it or you will be able to hear the noise out your door. everything else is entertainment, on one level or another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>albion, i tend to agree that looking behind the curtain is a populist activity, it`s just that, of late, a walk through the video store (rogers video and blockbuster) reveals a panapoly of left-wing conspiracy dressed up as sociological documentaries. the list runs from columbine to the death of suburbia due to escalating gas prices to the deconstruction of corporations to seven or eight &#8220;truths&#8221; about 9/11. i see this through the eyes of my nine year old who is begining to ask questions driven by comments from his teachers about issues like 9/11, that are opinion presented as fact. tim`s position that conspiracy theory has taken on religion-like elements is borne out by thinking along these lines. it leads to minor neurosis. granted we fill in the gaps when we don`t know, but the media has made an industry out of it which concretises these positions into what used to be trusted as fact. &#8220;the most trusted name in news&#8221; is now laughable.<br />
 my suggestions to people is to put down the newspapers and turn off the t.v., if the events are important enough someone will tell you about it or you will be able to hear the noise out your door. everything else is entertainment, on one level or another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/comment-page-1/#comment-4461</link>
		<dc:creator>carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 12:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/#comment-4461</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It is CRITICAL , from my perspective, that we examine and expose such operations and efforts EVERYWHERE â€¦ â€¦ [they] HAVE to be more vigorously discussed and examined.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

We should be finished by 2012. Disappearing up our own arses, that is.

Obviously a disinfo agent.

Seriously, I do think (without any proof) that the x-files took every anomaly it could find and channeled them all into a narrow, easily controlled framework. OTOH, if I were chris carter thatâ€™s exactly how I would make a show like that, by cramming myths (the emotional resonance is money in the bank) in a narrative thatâ€™s easy to manage, after all you have to work with it week after week as you develop the series. If any archonic ideas and agendas arise through that process, or if the writers dredge up something nasty from the colective, it doesnâ€™t necessitate a government conspiracy. Hey, maybe the archetypes (embedded in carter's creativity) created the whole carter/intell thing as a false flag to take the heat off themselves.

And maybe the whole archon / archetype thing is pure fiction (un)intentionally taking the heat off real old-fashioned criminals.

Stranger things have happened.

Maybe I'll stop saying maybe. That would be strange.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It is CRITICAL , from my perspective, that we examine and expose such operations and efforts EVERYWHERE â€¦ â€¦ [they] HAVE to be more vigorously discussed and examined.</p></blockquote>
<p>We should be finished by 2012. Disappearing up our own arses, that is.</p>
<p>Obviously a disinfo agent.</p>
<p>Seriously, I do think (without any proof) that the x-files took every anomaly it could find and channeled them all into a narrow, easily controlled framework. OTOH, if I were chris carter thatâ€™s exactly how I would make a show like that, by cramming myths (the emotional resonance is money in the bank) in a narrative thatâ€™s easy to manage, after all you have to work with it week after week as you develop the series. If any archonic ideas and agendas arise through that process, or if the writers dredge up something nasty from the colective, it doesnâ€™t necessitate a government conspiracy. Hey, maybe the archetypes (embedded in carter&#8217;s creativity) created the whole carter/intell thing as a false flag to take the heat off themselves.</p>
<p>And maybe the whole archon / archetype thing is pure fiction (un)intentionally taking the heat off real old-fashioned criminals.</p>
<p>Stranger things have happened.</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;ll stop saying maybe. That would be strange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: albion</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/comment-page-1/#comment-4458</link>
		<dc:creator>albion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 08:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/#comment-4458</guid>
		<description>alistair, i don't think your "conspiracy theory is anti-american" line holds any water. many conspiricists are right-wing  and consider themselves patriots. in fact the right has long been way ahead of the left in this regard, from the fake shit like the protocols, to the real suppressed history like the rockefellers, mena, ok city, twa flight 800, etc. the interest in peering behind the wizard's curtain is not a &lt;em&gt;leftist &lt;/em&gt;phenomenon, it's a &lt;em&gt;populist &lt;/em&gt;phenomenon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>alistair, i don&#8217;t think your &#8220;conspiracy theory is anti-american&#8221; line holds any water. many conspiricists are right-wing  and consider themselves patriots. in fact the right has long been way ahead of the left in this regard, from the fake shit like the protocols, to the real suppressed history like the rockefellers, mena, ok city, twa flight 800, etc. the interest in peering behind the wizard&#8217;s curtain is not a <em>leftist </em>phenomenon, it&#8217;s a <em>populist </em>phenomenon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LVX23</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/comment-page-1/#comment-4455</link>
		<dc:creator>LVX23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 06:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/#comment-4455</guid>
		<description>It's funny you say that cause I've been studying magick as a system of manipualting memetics. 

For the record, Dawkins defined a meme as a "unit of cultural transmission, or a unit of imitation". So the concept of the wheel is a meme, a succesful logo is a meme, a myth is a meme, etc... Any specific representational structure that manages to replicate itself across many minds. The notion is that an idea is subject to the same evolutionary processes as a gene. Reproduce or die. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny you say that cause I&#8217;ve been studying magick as a system of manipualting memetics. </p>
<p>For the record, Dawkins defined a meme as a &#8220;unit of cultural transmission, or a unit of imitation&#8221;. So the concept of the wheel is a meme, a succesful logo is a meme, a myth is a meme, etc&#8230; Any specific representational structure that manages to replicate itself across many minds. The notion is that an idea is subject to the same evolutionary processes as a gene. Reproduce or die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occult Investigator</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/comment-page-1/#comment-4454</link>
		<dc:creator>Occult Investigator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 01:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/#comment-4454</guid>
		<description>Overuse definitely. I also think it's too mechanistic of a way to look at human culture and interaction. It may or may not be an accurate model on one level, but it takes a certain amount of the magic out of it all for me. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overuse definitely. I also think it&#8217;s too mechanistic of a way to look at human culture and interaction. It may or may not be an accurate model on one level, but it takes a certain amount of the magic out of it all for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LVX23</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/comment-page-1/#comment-4453</link>
		<dc:creator>LVX23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 23:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/#comment-4453</guid>
		<description>Tim, I'm curious why you dislike the term "meme"? Over-use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, I&#8217;m curious why you dislike the term &#8220;meme&#8221;? Over-use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alistair</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/comment-page-1/#comment-4447</link>
		<dc:creator>alistair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 21:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/#comment-4447</guid>
		<description>and propaganda is distinctly different to conspiracy. and i think that john wayne and the boys actually liked america. and old glory bikinis. and apple pie and chevvies. better than digging around looking to find shit to hate. that fat fuck who made the movie about columbine and 9/11? he doesn`t strike me as the teary-eyed patriot trying to rediscover the real america through his art. bit of a commie. imo..........
and lets find a proven link between carter and intel and military o.k?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and propaganda is distinctly different to conspiracy. and i think that john wayne and the boys actually liked america. and old glory bikinis. and apple pie and chevvies. better than digging around looking to find shit to hate. that fat fuck who made the movie about columbine and 9/11? he doesn`t strike me as the teary-eyed patriot trying to rediscover the real america through his art. bit of a commie. imo&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.<br />
and lets find a proven link between carter and intel and military o.k?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occult Investigator</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/comment-page-1/#comment-4446</link>
		<dc:creator>Occult Investigator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 20:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/#comment-4446</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;i dunno why thats dubious&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Albion, I meant to say it was dubious because I didnt have the patience to track down the original source, and wanted to include the possibility that it may be made up because I've not taken the time to check. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>i dunno why thats dubious</p></blockquote>
<p>Albion, I meant to say it was dubious because I didnt have the patience to track down the original source, and wanted to include the possibility that it may be made up because I&#8217;ve not taken the time to check.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alistair</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/comment-page-1/#comment-4442</link>
		<dc:creator>alistair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 17:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/#comment-4442</guid>
		<description>what makes npr not part of the msm? alex merklinger says he`s ad free by choice so that he can be objective and he broadcasts from an airstream trailer. but he`s a millionaire with val kilmer and hanoi jane as niegbours, so his conspiracy "news" is bought wholesale by his listeners looking to be pissed off at america for being the global bully. it`s just another opinion, collective conciousness or not. my opinions come from the same place.(unless it`s only for enviro/peace types)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what makes npr not part of the msm? alex merklinger says he`s ad free by choice so that he can be objective and he broadcasts from an airstream trailer. but he`s a millionaire with val kilmer and hanoi jane as niegbours, so his conspiracy &#8220;news&#8221; is bought wholesale by his listeners looking to be pissed off at america for being the global bully. it`s just another opinion, collective conciousness or not. my opinions come from the same place.(unless it`s only for enviro/peace types)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: albion</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/comment-page-1/#comment-4441</link>
		<dc:creator>albion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 17:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/#comment-4441</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;one of the guys in that show claimed Chris Carter, the showâ€™s producer, was collaborating on plotlines with military &#38; intelligence types&lt;/blockquote&gt;

i dunno why thats dubious since pentagon-hollywood collaborations are pretty well established. ever seen any ww2 flicks? pretty much straight propaganda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>one of the guys in that show claimed Chris Carter, the showâ€™s producer, was collaborating on plotlines with military &amp; intelligence types</p></blockquote>
<p>i dunno why thats dubious since pentagon-hollywood collaborations are pretty well established. ever seen any ww2 flicks? pretty much straight propaganda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Puma</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/comment-page-1/#comment-4437</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Puma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 16:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/#comment-4437</guid>
		<description>man i miss the lone gunmen-- that show was fantastic!  i guess the only good thing about its short run was that i can claim to have seen every episode.

as to the pilot/911 connexion, i think it's silly.  no matter who chose to ram planes into the wtc, they did it because running a plane into the wtc was an obvious choice, and its been an obvious choice since the beginning.  if the lone gunmen terrorists had chosen to fly a plane into, say, &lt;a href="http://www.oregon.com/trips/vista_house.cfm" rel="nofollow"&gt;the oregon vista house&lt;/a&gt; and then terrorists actually did fly a plane into the oregon vista house, well that would be a remarkable indication that the two were comehow connected.  there's also that whole steve jackson 'illuminati' card game that featured smoking twin towers and the destruction of the pentagon.  &lt;a href="http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1753.cfm" rel="nofollow"&gt;some people think&lt;/a&gt; that this PROVES that the illuminati were behind the whole mess, but all it really proves is that anyone who's thinking of attacking the us would pick the wtc and the pentagon as obvious, and the gaming geeks at steve jackson thought of it a long time ago.  but again, if the con wanted to send out secret messages indicating the events of 911, why in hell would they pick some obscure 80's card game played by a few convention-going gameheads to do so?

the 'underlying consciousness' and patterns of connexion are also worth considering, but the only person i've ever seen do so convincingly is &lt;a href="http://www.goroadachi.com/etemenanki/" rel="nofollow"&gt;goro adachi&lt;/a&gt;, and his ideas are far different than any of the other illuminati-heads.  

there's a definite danger in attributing too much to numbers and figures.  like those jokers who sit there with lists and lists of every single measurement taken at the great pyramid, and they're like, 'oh, this design shows that this chamber was being used by an advancxed alien race because it's 360 degrees from this point to this point and 360 is the sacred number of BLAHBLAHBLAH.'  well yeah, but 360 is also the number of degrees in a CIRCLE, boneheads, so of COURSE it's gonna turn up all the time!  i could go into my bathroom right now and mathematically prove based on 'sacred numerology' that my toilet is actually a calendric model of the seasons designed as a microcosmic image of the macrocosm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>man i miss the lone gunmen&#8211; that show was fantastic!  i guess the only good thing about its short run was that i can claim to have seen every episode.</p>
<p>as to the pilot/911 connexion, i think it&#8217;s silly.  no matter who chose to ram planes into the wtc, they did it because running a plane into the wtc was an obvious choice, and its been an obvious choice since the beginning.  if the lone gunmen terrorists had chosen to fly a plane into, say, <a href="http://www.oregon.com/trips/vista_house.cfm" rel="nofollow">the oregon vista house</a> and then terrorists actually did fly a plane into the oregon vista house, well that would be a remarkable indication that the two were comehow connected.  there&#8217;s also that whole steve jackson &#8216;illuminati&#8217; card game that featured smoking twin towers and the destruction of the pentagon.  <a href="http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1753.cfm" rel="nofollow">some people think</a> that this PROVES that the illuminati were behind the whole mess, but all it really proves is that anyone who&#8217;s thinking of attacking the us would pick the wtc and the pentagon as obvious, and the gaming geeks at steve jackson thought of it a long time ago.  but again, if the con wanted to send out secret messages indicating the events of 911, why in hell would they pick some obscure 80&#8217;s card game played by a few convention-going gameheads to do so?</p>
<p>the &#8216;underlying consciousness&#8217; and patterns of connexion are also worth considering, but the only person i&#8217;ve ever seen do so convincingly is <a href="http://www.goroadachi.com/etemenanki/" rel="nofollow">goro adachi</a>, and his ideas are far different than any of the other illuminati-heads.  </p>
<p>there&#8217;s a definite danger in attributing too much to numbers and figures.  like those jokers who sit there with lists and lists of every single measurement taken at the great pyramid, and they&#8217;re like, &#8216;oh, this design shows that this chamber was being used by an advancxed alien race because it&#8217;s 360 degrees from this point to this point and 360 is the sacred number of BLAHBLAHBLAH.&#8217;  well yeah, but 360 is also the number of degrees in a CIRCLE, boneheads, so of COURSE it&#8217;s gonna turn up all the time!  i could go into my bathroom right now and mathematically prove based on &#8217;sacred numerology&#8217; that my toilet is actually a calendric model of the seasons designed as a microcosmic image of the macrocosm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occult Investigator</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/comment-page-1/#comment-4436</link>
		<dc:creator>Occult Investigator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 16:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/#comment-4436</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And there is strong preponderance of evidence that 9/11 was an inside jobâ€¦&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I've always thought this myself. But is there really a "strong preponderance of evidence" or is that one of many compelling interpretations? Part of the reason I &lt;em&gt;do&lt;/em&gt; like this whole thing about cultural coincidence goes back to what Ran said about about &lt;a href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/03/poking-holes-in-reality/" rel="nofollow"&gt;poking holes in reality, and challenging the official narrative&lt;/a&gt;. How much do we poke holes in reality, and how much should we create alternative narratives to explain these holes? Is there any way to create these holes without coming up with narratives to explain them? Can we just present them as holes and anomalies? What's the benefit of framing them in a narrative, which may turn out to be as untrue as the official one? Truth isn't really what we're after, is it - or at least not facts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And there is strong preponderance of evidence that 9/11 was an inside jobâ€¦</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ve always thought this myself. But is there really a &#8220;strong preponderance of evidence&#8221; or is that one of many compelling interpretations? Part of the reason I <em>do</em> like this whole thing about cultural coincidence goes back to what Ran said about about <a href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/03/poking-holes-in-reality/" rel="nofollow">poking holes in reality, and challenging the official narrative</a>. How much do we poke holes in reality, and how much should we create alternative narratives to explain these holes? Is there any way to create these holes without coming up with narratives to explain them? Can we just present them as holes and anomalies? What&#8217;s the benefit of framing them in a narrative, which may turn out to be as untrue as the official one? Truth isn&#8217;t really what we&#8217;re after, is it - or at least not facts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occult Investigator</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/comment-page-1/#comment-4435</link>
		<dc:creator>Occult Investigator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 16:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/#comment-4435</guid>
		<description>I think the key thing this person on the forum neglected is that whether it was a coincidence or some kind of crazy cultural "innoculation", what are you going to do about it? The only question becomes ... so? Are you going to then spend your life trying to decode messages of evil, thinking you're beating the bad guys? Are you going to be able to stop another 9/11, or when one happens are you just going to sit back with your hands on your head and say, "SEE...? I told you so." There's no way out here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the key thing this person on the forum neglected is that whether it was a coincidence or some kind of crazy cultural &#8220;innoculation&#8221;, what are you going to do about it? The only question becomes &#8230; so? Are you going to then spend your life trying to decode messages of evil, thinking you&#8217;re beating the bad guys? Are you going to be able to stop another 9/11, or when one happens are you just going to sit back with your hands on your head and say, &#8220;SEE&#8230;? I told you so.&#8221; There&#8217;s no way out here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ran</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/comment-page-1/#comment-4434</link>
		<dc:creator>Ran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 15:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/#comment-4434</guid>
		<description>I agree with Hebrides: the event was floating in the collective consciousness, or in some mind space we don't understand yet, and manifesting in various ways. Happens all the time, and it's neither meaningless coincidence, nor as meaningful as the paranoids like to think. The meaning is not "these two things are specially connected," but &lt;em&gt;everything&lt;/em&gt; is connected.

&lt;blockquote&gt;When you can prove 9/11 was an inside job, then you can prove it was secretly put forth into media ahead of time for a nefarious psyops agenda.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

In investigating "conspiracy theory", I don't need proof. Proof beyond reasonable doubt is the standard in court to send someone to prison. The practical standard for living my life is not proof but preponderance of evidence. And there is strong preponderance of evidence that 9/11 was an inside job... and no good evidence that it was secretly put forth in the media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Hebrides: the event was floating in the collective consciousness, or in some mind space we don&#8217;t understand yet, and manifesting in various ways. Happens all the time, and it&#8217;s neither meaningless coincidence, nor as meaningful as the paranoids like to think. The meaning is not &#8220;these two things are specially connected,&#8221; but <em>everything</em> is connected.</p>
<blockquote><p>When you can prove 9/11 was an inside job, then you can prove it was secretly put forth into media ahead of time for a nefarious psyops agenda.</p></blockquote>
<p>In investigating &#8220;conspiracy theory&#8221;, I don&#8217;t need proof. Proof beyond reasonable doubt is the standard in court to send someone to prison. The practical standard for living my life is not proof but preponderance of evidence. And there is strong preponderance of evidence that 9/11 was an inside job&#8230; and no good evidence that it was secretly put forth in the media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alistair</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/comment-page-1/#comment-4431</link>
		<dc:creator>alistair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 14:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/#comment-4431</guid>
		<description>rabbit holes, people. stay the fuck out of the rabbit holes. there is no escape and you can`t live on  carrots alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rabbit holes, people. stay the fuck out of the rabbit holes. there is no escape and you can`t live on  carrots alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darkshadow</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/comment-page-1/#comment-4430</link>
		<dc:creator>Darkshadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 13:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/#comment-4430</guid>
		<description>I know someone already answered what MIHOP is, but I thought I'd post this anyway.  There's a website that names acronyms - I use it whenever I don't know what the heck someone is trying to say.  Anyway, I thought it was sorta funny what it says about MIHOP:

MIHOP	Made It Happen on Purpose (9/11 attack conspiracy theory)

The place doesn't generally put stuff in parenthesis after a definition.

&lt;a href="http://www.acronymfinder.com/af-query.asp?String=exact&#38;Acronym=MIHOP&#38;Find=Find" rel="nofollow"&gt;Acronym Finder Search: What does MIHOP stand for?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know someone already answered what MIHOP is, but I thought I&#8217;d post this anyway.  There&#8217;s a website that names acronyms - I use it whenever I don&#8217;t know what the heck someone is trying to say.  Anyway, I thought it was sorta funny what it says about MIHOP:</p>
<p>MIHOP	Made It Happen on Purpose (9/11 attack conspiracy theory)</p>
<p>The place doesn&#8217;t generally put stuff in parenthesis after a definition.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.acronymfinder.com/af-query.asp?String=exact&amp;Acronym=MIHOP&amp;Find=Find" rel="nofollow">Acronym Finder Search: What does MIHOP stand for?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hebrides</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/comment-page-1/#comment-4429</link>
		<dc:creator>hebrides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 13:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/#comment-4429</guid>
		<description>It was about a month after 9/11 that the plane went down in Queens.  I was living in Astoria at the time and I remember a friend of mine in California calling to see if I was okay and if I wanted to leave the city and come live with her.  I forget now what the official cause was claimed to be, but it wasn't seen as being related to terrorism...

As far as the Lone Gunmen thing, it's about a remote controlled plane being flown into the WTC, if I remember correctly.  I don't know whether to jump to saying it was a planned part of innoculating people to a planned conspiracy or not, but there seemed to be so many premonitions of 9/11 and its aftermath in media in the late 90's.  There's the blown up buildings in Fight Club, there's the martial law declaration after a muslim terrorist attack of that Bruce Willis and Denzel Washington movie (is it the Seige?); there was an underground hip hop album released a few months before which featured the twin towers being blown up on its cover, KRS-One's album "The Sneak Attack" of late 2000.  What to make of it?

There's a similar high wierdness similar to the LG episode in regards to the Patty Hearst/Weather Underground saga.  An English professor in college was involved with an off-off broadway comedy that was about to open during that period.  The plot?  A privileged rich heiress is kidnapped by revolutionaries and subsequently becomes one.  When the Patty Hearst thing happened, the show was cancelled and never even made it to the stage.  In another example, I'm aware of a novel that came out before the Hearst kidnapping that had as its plot basically the exact same scenario.  As I remember being told, the author was investigated by the FBI because they were absolutely certain that it could not be a coincidence.  But it was.  Wierd shit like this happens around events like these.  What to make of it?  Perhaps these are unconscious magick workings by the artists who are unaware of the morphic resonances they're conjuring?  Or they just somehow happened to pick up a bit of something in the air?  Or maybe it's simply that certain artists and fiction writers share similarities of thought with intelligence operation planners?  

Coincidance?
Who the fuh knows?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was about a month after 9/11 that the plane went down in Queens.  I was living in Astoria at the time and I remember a friend of mine in California calling to see if I was okay and if I wanted to leave the city and come live with her.  I forget now what the official cause was claimed to be, but it wasn&#8217;t seen as being related to terrorism&#8230;</p>
<p>As far as the Lone Gunmen thing, it&#8217;s about a remote controlled plane being flown into the WTC, if I remember correctly.  I don&#8217;t know whether to jump to saying it was a planned part of innoculating people to a planned conspiracy or not, but there seemed to be so many premonitions of 9/11 and its aftermath in media in the late 90&#8217;s.  There&#8217;s the blown up buildings in Fight Club, there&#8217;s the martial law declaration after a muslim terrorist attack of that Bruce Willis and Denzel Washington movie (is it the Seige?); there was an underground hip hop album released a few months before which featured the twin towers being blown up on its cover, KRS-One&#8217;s album &#8220;The Sneak Attack&#8221; of late 2000.  What to make of it?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a similar high wierdness similar to the LG episode in regards to the Patty Hearst/Weather Underground saga.  An English professor in college was involved with an off-off broadway comedy that was about to open during that period.  The plot?  A privileged rich heiress is kidnapped by revolutionaries and subsequently becomes one.  When the Patty Hearst thing happened, the show was cancelled and never even made it to the stage.  In another example, I&#8217;m aware of a novel that came out before the Hearst kidnapping that had as its plot basically the exact same scenario.  As I remember being told, the author was investigated by the FBI because they were absolutely certain that it could not be a coincidence.  But it was.  Wierd shit like this happens around events like these.  What to make of it?  Perhaps these are unconscious magick workings by the artists who are unaware of the morphic resonances they&#8217;re conjuring?  Or they just somehow happened to pick up a bit of something in the air?  Or maybe it&#8217;s simply that certain artists and fiction writers share similarities of thought with intelligence operation planners?  </p>
<p>Coincidance?<br />
Who the fuh knows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Conlon</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/comment-page-1/#comment-4428</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Conlon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 12:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/#comment-4428</guid>
		<description>I heard on NPR the other day MSM (US) is attempting to disseminate the idea that there was some type of police activity in the form of a drill on the 2nd recent London bombing uhh 11 JUL 05? I think ... in all 3 or 4(?) locations, I guess implying that they prevented the events or at least I suppose the 4th? one...  You see every time you look at a news item from AP or Reuters or whatever and it's the "FAILED secound attempt" and so forth, the bias is implicit at this point.

I like how we have to hear about the details of the raids and shit through Newsday's coverage of an NYPD press conference.  And now it's homemade shit not military C4.

And what about the plane that went down over Queens or someshit like 2 days after 9/11... 

No one ever talks about that one. 

Anyway, 

I gotta go outside.

-tc

-tc
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard on NPR the other day MSM (US) is attempting to disseminate the idea that there was some type of police activity in the form of a drill on the 2nd recent London bombing uhh 11 JUL 05? I think &#8230; in all 3 or 4(?) locations, I guess implying that they prevented the events or at least I suppose the 4th? one&#8230;  You see every time you look at a news item from AP or Reuters or whatever and it&#8217;s the &#8220;FAILED secound attempt&#8221; and so forth, the bias is implicit at this point.</p>
<p>I like how we have to hear about the details of the raids and shit through Newsday&#8217;s coverage of an NYPD press conference.  And now it&#8217;s homemade shit not military C4.</p>
<p>And what about the plane that went down over Queens or someshit like 2 days after 9/11&#8230; </p>
<p>No one ever talks about that one. </p>
<p>Anyway, </p>
<p>I gotta go outside.</p>
<p>-tc</p>
<p>-tc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rg</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/comment-page-1/#comment-4427</link>
		<dc:creator>rg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 12:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/04/ultra-rovianistic-innoculation/#comment-4427</guid>
		<description>MIHOP:  made it happen on purpose

LIHOP:  let it happen on purpose</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MIHOP:  made it happen on purpose</p>
<p>LIHOP:  let it happen on purpose</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
