<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gnostic Koan #1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/16/gnostic-koan-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/16/gnostic-koan-1/</link>
	<description>public domain playground. friendly entities welcome.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Conlon</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/16/gnostic-koan-1/comment-page-1/#comment-4769</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Conlon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 22:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/16/gnostic-koan-1/#comment-4769</guid>
		<description>Again, what is the hegelian dialectic concomitant with "God's will"/Thelema.

-tc
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, what is the hegelian dialectic concomitant with &#8220;God&#8217;s will&#8221;/Thelema.</p>
<p>-tc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alistair</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/16/gnostic-koan-1/comment-page-1/#comment-4624</link>
		<dc:creator>alistair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 02:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/16/gnostic-koan-1/#comment-4624</guid>
		<description>jesuit word games. the words "god and "the devil" are semantic constructs. hallucination words. what do those terms really represent?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jesuit word games. the words &#8220;god and &#8220;the devil&#8221; are semantic constructs. hallucination words. what do those terms really represent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/16/gnostic-koan-1/comment-page-1/#comment-4610</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 20:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/16/gnostic-koan-1/#comment-4610</guid>
		<description>If you accept that God is a trickster, then yes, it would be his greatest trick.



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you accept that God is a trickster, then yes, it would be his greatest trick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Segovius</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/16/gnostic-koan-1/comment-page-1/#comment-4581</link>
		<dc:creator>Segovius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/16/gnostic-koan-1/#comment-4581</guid>
		<description>Or maybe both God and the Devil work together to convince people that there are such things as opposites - real/unreal, God/Devil, man/God - when there is only 'is-ness'.

Of course this would mean that God, the Devil and us are all the same thing - or that none of us exist. Or both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or maybe both God and the Devil work together to convince people that there are such things as opposites - real/unreal, God/Devil, man/God - when there is only &#8216;is-ness&#8217;.</p>
<p>Of course this would mean that God, the Devil and us are all the same thing - or that none of us exist. Or both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/16/gnostic-koan-1/comment-page-1/#comment-4570</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 05:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/16/gnostic-koan-1/#comment-4570</guid>
		<description>That's kind of a cool idea. That God didn't actually create people; he just convinced them they were real. And then once they believed it, they became it, only to become trapped by it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s kind of a cool idea. That God didn&#8217;t actually create people; he just convinced them they were real. And then once they believed it, they became it, only to become trapped by it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/16/gnostic-koan-1/comment-page-1/#comment-4569</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 05:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/16/gnostic-koan-1/#comment-4569</guid>
		<description>The greatest trick God ever played was convincing people that &lt;em&gt;they&lt;/em&gt; are real...and if &lt;em&gt;they&lt;/em&gt; are real, then &lt;em&gt;He&lt;/em&gt; must be real too, as something distinct, and apart. Which He's not - not really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The greatest trick God ever played was convincing people that <em>they</em> are real&#8230;and if <em>they</em> are real, then <em>He</em> must be real too, as something distinct, and apart. Which He&#8217;s not - not really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
