<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Critical Thinking Questions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/27/critical-thinking-questions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/27/critical-thinking-questions/</link>
	<description>public domain playground. friendly entities welcome.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bill</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/27/critical-thinking-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-5179</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2005 21:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/27/critical-thinking-questions/#comment-5179</guid>
		<description>So, failing to ask these questions is &lt;i&gt;uncritical&lt;/i&gt; thinking. Right?

Critical reading and thinking are two skills that future society needs in abundance. With the readily accessible information now just a google away for the least critical of thinkers, society could come to a stand still. What would result from forcing everybody to vote, for an example?

Here's a conspiracy for you. What if the NSA took over the root name servers on the 'net and redirected queries to server farms loaded with replica sites full of misinformation? All those people that you hear answering authoritatively that: â€œthey say thisâ€ or â€œthey say that.â€ would be in the power of the government. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, failing to ask these questions is <i>uncritical</i> thinking. Right?</p>
<p>Critical reading and thinking are two skills that future society needs in abundance. With the readily accessible information now just a google away for the least critical of thinkers, society could come to a stand still. What would result from forcing everybody to vote, for an example?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a conspiracy for you. What if the NSA took over the root name servers on the &#8216;net and redirected queries to server farms loaded with replica sites full of misinformation? All those people that you hear answering authoritatively that: â€œthey say thisâ€ or â€œthey say that.â€ would be in the power of the government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/27/critical-thinking-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-5166</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2005 17:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/27/critical-thinking-questions/#comment-5166</guid>
		<description>Why do you think that? I consider myself a conspiracy buff, but I know I have no idea what is really going on. I entertain multiple possible explanations for events. Sometimes I can't come up with any good explanation, but I still don't believe the mainstream explanation. Does that mean I'm not a conspiracy theorist? Is there a name for what I think? Or are we just setting up a strawman version of conspiracy theory?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you think that? I consider myself a conspiracy buff, but I know I have no idea what is really going on. I entertain multiple possible explanations for events. Sometimes I can&#8217;t come up with any good explanation, but I still don&#8217;t believe the mainstream explanation. Does that mean I&#8217;m not a conspiracy theorist? Is there a name for what I think? Or are we just setting up a strawman version of conspiracy theory?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/27/critical-thinking-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-5146</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 22:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/27/critical-thinking-questions/#comment-5146</guid>
		<description>I might add though that most conspiracy theory once it has asked and found a possible answer for them, seems to conclude that this is *the* answer, simply because it's possible and they thought of it. 

In other words, if you really want to use critical thinking skills, you have to ask yourself these questions, just as you'd ask anyone else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might add though that most conspiracy theory once it has asked and found a possible answer for them, seems to conclude that this is *the* answer, simply because it&#8217;s possible and they thought of it. </p>
<p>In other words, if you really want to use critical thinking skills, you have to ask yourself these questions, just as you&#8217;d ask anyone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/27/critical-thinking-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-5145</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 22:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/08/27/critical-thinking-questions/#comment-5145</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;How do I know you are telling me the truth? 
What is an alternate explanation for this phenomenon?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sounds like conspiracy theory to me.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>How do I know you are telling me the truth?<br />
What is an alternate explanation for this phenomenon?</p></blockquote>
<p>Sounds like conspiracy theory to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
