<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ancient &#8220;Urban Myths&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/09/19/ancient-urban-myths/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/09/19/ancient-urban-myths/</link>
	<description>public domain playground. friendly entities welcome.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/09/19/ancient-urban-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-6255</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 03:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/09/19/ancient-urban-myths/#comment-6255</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;question: what are our large brains for?

crazy speculation? detecting crazy speculation? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Although I like the speculation idea, I'd rather ask: Why are our brains the size they are? (Large being a relative concept and there being such variety in actual size.) 

I'm seriously tempted to take the Silesian approach and say "The rose is without why". But "just because" never does much for a discussion, so I'll say : to accommodate the imagination and the accumulation of memories and lived experience. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>question: what are our large brains for?</p>
<p>crazy speculation? detecting crazy speculation? </p></blockquote>
<p>Although I like the speculation idea, I&#8217;d rather ask: Why are our brains the size they are? (Large being a relative concept and there being such variety in actual size.) </p>
<p>I&#8217;m seriously tempted to take the Silesian approach and say &#8220;The rose is without why&#8221;. But &#8220;just because&#8221; never does much for a discussion, so I&#8217;ll say : to accommodate the imagination and the accumulation of memories and lived experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/09/19/ancient-urban-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-6223</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 02:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/09/19/ancient-urban-myths/#comment-6223</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Isnâ€™t the empirical realm just wonderous?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

yes it is. from your link:

&lt;blockquote&gt;"The whole idea that you need a particular brain size to do anything intelligent is completely blown away by this find," Dr Gee commented.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

question: what are our large brains for?

crazy speculation? detecting crazy speculation? 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Isnâ€™t the empirical realm just wonderous?</p></blockquote>
<p>yes it is. from your link:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The whole idea that you need a particular brain size to do anything intelligent is completely blown away by this find,&#8221; Dr Gee commented.</p></blockquote>
<p>question: what are our large brains for?</p>
<p>crazy speculation? detecting crazy speculation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whizz Click</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/09/19/ancient-urban-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-6214</link>
		<dc:creator>Whizz Click</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/09/19/ancient-urban-myths/#comment-6214</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;"If the amount of people who today grudgingly admit to experiencing strange entities firsthand is anything to go by, then in all likelihood, people back in the â€œold daysâ€ were also experiencing &lt;em&gt;something&lt;/em&gt; which formed the basis of these folklore accounts." &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes. They were experiencing/encountering Homo Floresiensis (and/or her cousins)! Isn't the empirical realm just wonderous? 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3948165.stm
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;If the amount of people who today grudgingly admit to experiencing strange entities firsthand is anything to go by, then in all likelihood, people back in the â€œold daysâ€ were also experiencing <em>something</em> which formed the basis of these folklore accounts.&#8221; </p></blockquote>
<p>Yes. They were experiencing/encountering Homo Floresiensis (and/or her cousins)! Isn&#8217;t the empirical realm just wonderous? </p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3948165.stm" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3948165.stm'>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3948165.stm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rev max</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/09/19/ancient-urban-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-6210</link>
		<dc:creator>rev max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/09/19/ancient-urban-myths/#comment-6210</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I wish that he went the route of saying that our minds are naturally polytheistic, and that we at some point made this monotheistically organized around the ego.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

FUck thats an amazing point</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I wish that he went the route of saying that our minds are naturally polytheistic, and that we at some point made this monotheistically organized around the ego.</p></blockquote>
<p>FUck thats an amazing point</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/09/19/ancient-urban-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-6205</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 15:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/09/19/ancient-urban-myths/#comment-6205</guid>
		<description>Yeah thats a cool book. I wish that he went the route of saying that our minds are naturally polytheistic, and that we at some point made this monotheistically organized around the ego. It seems like a more realistic explanation to me than that its a strictly biological brain hemisphere issue. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah thats a cool book. I wish that he went the route of saying that our minds are naturally polytheistic, and that we at some point made this monotheistically organized around the ego. It seems like a more realistic explanation to me than that its a strictly biological brain hemisphere issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rev max</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/09/19/ancient-urban-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-6198</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 07:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/09/19/ancient-urban-myths/#comment-6198</guid>
		<description>its like that jukian jaynes book about the breakdown of the bicameral mind. We lost the ability to hear the gods, to see their messengers. We are impoverished for this loss. But they are still all around us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its like that jukian jaynes book about the breakdown of the bicameral mind. We lost the ability to hear the gods, to see their messengers. We are impoverished for this loss. But they are still all around us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
