Viral Marketing, A How To
The speed with which this piece of advice has replicated itself across the web is a solid testimony to its effectiveness. It comes from Seth Godin’s blog, and answers the question: “What Makes An Idea Viral?”
For an idea to spread, it needs to be sent and received.
No one “sends” an idea unless:
a. they understand it
b. they want it to spread
c. they believe that spreading it will enhance their power (reputation, income, friendships) or their peace of mind
d. the effort necessary to send the idea is less than the benefitsNo one “gets” an idea unless:
a. the first impression demands further investigation
b. they already understand the foundation ideas necessary to get the new idea
c. they trust or respect the sender enough to invest the timeThis explains why online ideas spread so fast but why they’re often shallow. […]
Notice that ideas never spread because they are important to the originator.
Notice too that a key dynamic in the spread of the idea is the capsule that contains it. If it’s easy to swallow, tempting and complete, it’s a lot more likely to get a good start.
I’m interested in what Seth’s saying here because I’ve noticed that certain of my articles get picked up and talked about all over the web, while others languish in loneliness and nobody seems to even notice them. I think what he’s saying here about making a distinction between what’s important to you versus what’s important to your readers is really important. I might have what to me is a simply explosive idea. But I’ll put it out there and get little or no response. Meanwhile, I’ll post something which is more of a throwaway idea, and it spreads like wildfire. It’s a really interesting dynamic that anybody who’s interested in communicating their ideas (on or offline) ought to take some time to consider.
- Who Does Benjamin Stove Work For?
- Infiltration Marketing
- The Del Monte Dollar
- Benjamin Stove is GM!
- Johnny Depp: The New Face of Terror
- Prev: The World Dream Bank
- Next: Fetus Statues




![[tmbchr]™](/journal/popocculture-blog-logo.jpg)
October 2nd, 2005 at 11:08 am
The response to this post validates your suggestion, but I hope I turn out to be mistaken:)
October 3rd, 2005 at 4:31 pm
Well, I’ll tell ya…. years before I ever came anywhere near a computer or e-mail or surfing the Net, I read about viral ideas– possibly in the L.A Times Book Review. And I wholeheartedly agree with the “science” behind promoting ideas virally. But I was thinking of it in personal terms, like coughing on someone in line at the grocery market and getting them sick. I began to see that the best way to promote my ideas was to “cough” all over people in public.
I think the prevalence of “shallow ideas” quickly taking speed online stems from the fact that there is no real risk to being exposed to these types of viral ideas while online. It’s one thing to get a bug or a worm that cripples your computer… but an idea infecting you? The Internet provides insularity from that.
If someone is talking to you in the flesh and making you re-assess your ideas on certain matters, it leaves a greater impression than someone sending you a chain e-mail. The imprint is stronger in the personal encounter.
For all the cool and deep shit that goes down online, there’s still an air of frivolity to it all– I mean, how many times must bloggers hear “Man, you must have a LOT of free time” from friends and acquaintances? If you were to stand on a soapbox in the town square and talk about the things you talk about, you might be seen as a kook, but at least you’d get credit for getting your message out to the people. Not so with the Internet.
It’s frustrating, to say the least, because the Internet has the best potential to reach a mass audience out of all the current media forms.