Comments on: Madonna Pisses Off Rabbis

By: alistair

alistair — Wed, 12 Oct 2005 02:08:14 +0000

sacred is sacred. that`s what makes madonna`s art so provocative. great legs too. the truly sacred religions are the occult ones. the ones that idiots can`t find. and just because madonna rattles a few old kikes doesn`t take away from the sacred. if the sacred was that fragile we wouldn`t have much sacred left. like a virgin….doo doo doo,doodoo.

By: Jacob

Jacob — Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:25:06 +0000

yeah, but what if there are some things that are just sacred? that’s the great modern allure of religions like Judaeism and Islam, I think. there are still some things which are sacred, untouchable, and ineffable. it’s that sort of reverance thing that gives a religion true mystic power, isn’t it?

it’s that kind of sensitivity which seems to make a person truly religious.

By: alistair

alistair — Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:21:17 +0000

madonna has a history of running icons a little too hot for the comfort of some. all the power to her for it. i didn`t know that rabbis wore panties actually, i thought that was the sole domain of catholic priests and the odd judge.
madonna is an artist first. it is the field of art that synthesises and presents new perspectives. without art we would be blind and half dumb too.
it sounds like sour grapes from the rabbi`s standpoint that they haven`t got a tune in them to properly tell thier story. i have always been wary of artlessness. it is a form of sociopathology, in my opinion.

By: rev max

rev max — Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:47:21 +0000

The fact that there’s room in the spiritual marketplace for both scientology & celebrity kaballah only confirms for me that I need to start a religion too and target it at that same pool of idiots.

WHo knows, maybe i can make a name for myself by resolving the hilary duff/lindsay lohan fued.

By: anon

anon — Mon, 10 Oct 2005 15:52:15 +0000

Followers of the secret doctrine have reason to believe that Madonna’s recent tumble from a horse was intended as a warning to one who should have eyes to see not to use the name of the holy rabbi for profit.

By: scott rassbach

scott rassbach — Mon, 10 Oct 2005 15:45:18 +0000

Yah! Cultural imperialism!

Look. I’ve maintained for a long time: We take the wealth left to us by the past, and use it in ways that suit our current needs and requirements. The founding fathers are quoted out of context all the time. The Bible. Aleister Crowley. you name it, someone is using it as it was not intended. That’s the risk of putting things out in the world: Someone’s going to twist it to their own needs. And their needs are not yours.

Madonna Ester is just continuing this trend. If she wants to remain part of the community, she should either abide by its rules, or change the rules. If she doesn’t care, then she can do what she likes.

History has proved she doesn’t care.

Personally, I won’t buy her album anyway, so she’ll get no profit from me. Just my part to help her soul avoid the wrath of the heavens.