[tmbchr]™

Centaurs Were Real?



While it’s currently fashionable to badmouth American news agencies, sometimes I find foreign ones to be a lot more mystifying. Russia’s Pravda service is a great example of that, with articles like this: Centaurs Appeared After Copulation Between Humans And Animals.While I absolutely LOVE that this is in their news service, I really have to wonder just how valid this really is as a news item.

The article follows the exploits of two researchers, Paul Takon of the Australian Museum in Sydney, and anthropologist Christopher Chippendale from the University of Cambridge. The two men studied over 5,000 rock paintings, ranging in age all the way back to 32,000 years ago, looking for what they call “teriantrops” or animal-human hybrids (I’ve also seen this term spelled “therianthropes” elsewhere). Their conclusions upon conducting this research, however, seem highly questionable at best:

They arrived at a conclusion that animal men actually existed in the remote past. They believe that primitives could hardly draw what they never saw.

The operative word there is certainly “believe” because there’s certainly no factual basis to suggest that primitive people couldn’t or weren’t drawing images out of their imagination. In fact, if anything, evidence points to the opposite - that it was all out of their heads. Sure they might have seen wooly rhinos and bisons and whatnot, but they didn’t bring them down into the caves to paint from life. Hence, they were working from their imaginations.

Aside from all the wild speculation though, there were a couple things in this article that I thought were pretty interesting, like this revelation about the origin of the word centaur:

The word centaur is a compound of KEN (kenw) meaning “I kill” and TAUROS meaning “bull”, and it reveals astronomic knowledge of our ancestors. When the constellation of Sagittarius (Centaurus throwing a spear) appears in the night skies, we can no longer see Taurus, one of the Sun [zodiac] symbols.

Right after that though, they start throwing around the word “buggery” a whole lot, and even at one point make mention of what’s very clearly racist mythology:

At the end of the past century, some British researchers wrote about black women living togetehr with gorillas. Children born as a result of such contacts could even do easy work about the house and even speak. Unfortunately, researchers had no chance of seeing these creatures because the hybrids felt seriously hurt and escaped to jungle.

They also easily wave away the scientific improbability of actual cross-species fertilization, suggesting that if genetic recombination can be done in the lab, there’s no reason it can’t be done in the wild. I’m not knowledgeable enough in the reproductive sciences to really tackle that in a formidable way, so I’ll just leave that to somebody else…

In any event, I personally love the possibility that centaurs and other animal-human hybrids really do or did exist at some point in the past. But I also think it’s a big fat mistake to interpret ancient and pre-modern stories, myths and art from the perspective of modern man. Simply put, animal-human hybrids are psychologically and mythologically potent symbols. And they need not have actual physical existence to be the carriers or transmitters of psychic energy and meaning. Plus, it’s very easy for us to misread cultural signs that have since lost or changed meanings. An example from that article:

Respectable scholars - Paracelsus, Cardano and famous accoucher of the 16th century Fortunio Liceti - several times registered birth of hybrids, animal kids born by humans and human kids born by animals. Their notes mention horses, elephants, dogs and even lions.

I don’t know about Cardano and Liceti, but as far as I understand it, Paracelsus was a well-known alchemist. In other words, he was somebody whose stock in trade it was to deal in coded symbolic language which related to arcane mysteries of consciousness and spiritual transformation. And this is the same realm from which the centaur has been passed down to us today.

Although, who knows… maybe it did exist, or does exist in some alternate dimension parelleling our own. I’m certainly open to that possibility.

[via Weird Events]

, , , , , , ,





10 Reader Responses

  1. Ran Says:

    Cool article. (Your link is messed up but I was able to get around it.) The last sentence is hilarious, “that researchers have no whole centaur skeletons but lots of upper and lower parts of centaurs skeletons.”

    According to science, it’s impossible for different species to breed, but there have been science-defying anomalies. Charles Fort wrote about a cow that gave tirth to two lambs and a calf:
    http://www.resologist.net/lo109.htm

  2. Tim Boucher Says:

    oh, yeah, thats a hilarious line about the skeletons. it makes me wonder just how serious this article really is.

    i fixed the link, thanks!

  3. Daniel Says:

    Could drawings of Centaurs be the interpretation of the artist who saw a man riding the back of a horse? It would depend on the perspective of the artist and how well they saw the ‘Centaur’. Mongolian horseriders are some of the best in the world and they travelled all over the place, being nomads.

    When I was young I drew pictures of people with arms coming out of their heads where their ears should be. No such people exist that I know of, but that was my perspective, seeing tall people stoop over to pick me up looks like they have arms growing out of the side of their head.

    That said, Centaurs may possibly exist in another world or whatever, I saw a friggin Satyr in a dream.

  4. James Russell Says:

    Therianthropes would be the correct spelling. “Teriantrops” reads to me like someone transliterated the word into Russian, then it got restored to English by someone who didn’t know what the word was.

  5. Dna Says:

    Graham Hancock makes a cogent arguement for the origin of therianthropes in his book ‘Supernatural’

    In his book, he builds on David Lewis-Williams’s Neurophysical theory, which suggests that they were manifestations of non-physical beings revealed to shamans while in trance.

  6. Tim Boucher Says:

    manifestations of non-physical beings revealed to shamans while in trance.

    Makes the most sense to me out of anything…

  7. Rachel Says:

    I remember hearing rumors about an actual “humanzee” that was created in a research lab in Florida in the 1950s in a very “hush hush” experiment. Supposedly, a researcher injected his own sperm into a female chimp in the lab, and she not only conceived but actually carried the hybrid almost full-term. I’m not sure if it was shortly before or shortly after its birth, but the hybrid was eventually euthenized because of the ethical implications.

    I think I heard about this as an afterthought on a Discovery Channel special about Oliver… the famous “humanzee” that after genetic testing turned out to be just a weird kind of chimp. They interviewed some people from the lab who swore it happened, but there was obviously no good evidence.

  8. Tim Boucher Says:

    That’s a great story. Here’s some more info about humanzees, along with an alleged photo.

  9. Rev max Says:

    You might also look into polish sculptor Stanislav Szukalski, discoverer of zermatism

  10. Haeresis Says:

    I know that human/priumate embryos have been created, but for obvious reasons, all were destroyed shortly after. Of course in many cases the lines drawn between one ’species’ and the next are vanity lines.



SURROUND YOURSELF WITH STRENGTH.