<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Subjectivity of Machines &#038; God</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/11/07/the-subjectivity-of-machines-god/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/11/07/the-subjectivity-of-machines-god/</link>
	<description>public domain playground. friendly entities welcome.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: alistair</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/11/07/the-subjectivity-of-machines-god/comment-page-1/#comment-7531</link>
		<dc:creator>alistair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 03:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/11/07/the-subjectivity-of-machines-god/#comment-7531</guid>
		<description>now that we are all deep down the semantic rabbit hole together lets very quietly realise that subject and object are parts of the same thing. one is the ground for the other and vise versa. all machinery is a media that feeds information to us and ultimately we decide what the data means. on there own, machines are purely objective, every time. until you add you and me to the mix. precision is a cruel bitch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now that we are all deep down the semantic rabbit hole together lets very quietly realise that subject and object are parts of the same thing. one is the ground for the other and vise versa. all machinery is a media that feeds information to us and ultimately we decide what the data means. on there own, machines are purely objective, every time. until you add you and me to the mix. precision is a cruel bitch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/11/07/the-subjectivity-of-machines-god/comment-page-1/#comment-7515</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 22:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/11/07/the-subjectivity-of-machines-god/#comment-7515</guid>
		<description>Actually, I'd say that God is totally subjective. Objectivity sees everything AND everybody as an object.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I&#8217;d say that God is totally subjective. Objectivity sees everything AND everybody as an object.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Error 404</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/11/07/the-subjectivity-of-machines-god/comment-page-1/#comment-7504</link>
		<dc:creator>Error 404</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/11/07/the-subjectivity-of-machines-god/#comment-7504</guid>
		<description>Machines are extremely subjective.

To a thermometer, the universe is nothing but temperature, and not even some external truth about temperature, just the temperature of the sensor as an internal state that can be observed.

The objectivity is in the fact that the subjectivity of a good measuring device is known with great precision. A person, on the other hand, experiences and passes on phenomena with a subjectivity that is complex and not known to a great degree of precision.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Machines are extremely subjective.</p>
<p>To a thermometer, the universe is nothing but temperature, and not even some external truth about temperature, just the temperature of the sensor as an internal state that can be observed.</p>
<p>The objectivity is in the fact that the subjectivity of a good measuring device is known with great precision. A person, on the other hand, experiences and passes on phenomena with a subjectivity that is complex and not known to a great degree of precision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/11/07/the-subjectivity-of-machines-god/comment-page-1/#comment-7503</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/11/07/the-subjectivity-of-machines-god/#comment-7503</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Is that what god is - unlimited perspective, totally objective, without error or distortion? Is that why Heâ€™s so hard for us to understand?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

YES!  that's it!  and the only way one could actually comprehend total objectivity is if one *is* that objectivity, which would mean a single objective consciousness manifesting itself through subjective experience!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Is that what god is - unlimited perspective, totally objective, without error or distortion? Is that why Heâ€™s so hard for us to understand?</p></blockquote>
<p>YES!  that&#8217;s it!  and the only way one could actually comprehend total objectivity is if one *is* that objectivity, which would mean a single objective consciousness manifesting itself through subjective experience!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
