<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Narnia for Churches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/11/17/narnia-for-churches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/11/17/narnia-for-churches/</link>
	<description>public domain playground. friendly entities welcome.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/11/17/narnia-for-churches/comment-page-1/#comment-7815</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 23:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/11/17/narnia-for-churches/#comment-7815</guid>
		<description>Haeresis: Oh okay, yeah I know who that is. Hmm, that's interesting. I'll look more into it when I have a chance. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haeresis: Oh okay, yeah I know who that is. Hmm, that&#8217;s interesting. I&#8217;ll look more into it when I have a chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Error 404</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/11/17/narnia-for-churches/comment-page-1/#comment-7813</link>
		<dc:creator>Error 404</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 23:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/11/17/narnia-for-churches/#comment-7813</guid>
		<description>One of the things the Narnia books get slammed for is that there is a character who ends up being left behind, and wearing makeup is mentioned in the explanation as to why she isn't along on this rather significant (to avoid a major spoiler) trip. The accusation is that she's being punished for wearing makeup. But if you read the passage, the problem isn't the makeup, it's that she has decided Narnia isn't real and makeup (among other things) is what she's into now. She's not even really being punished, just not included in what she isn't interested in and therefore missing out. Anglicans are not Fundimentalists (ecept for my cousin, but she's a freak) and that faith doesn't have anything against women wearing makeup.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the things the Narnia books get slammed for is that there is a character who ends up being left behind, and wearing makeup is mentioned in the explanation as to why she isn&#8217;t along on this rather significant (to avoid a major spoiler) trip. The accusation is that she&#8217;s being punished for wearing makeup. But if you read the passage, the problem isn&#8217;t the makeup, it&#8217;s that she has decided Narnia isn&#8217;t real and makeup (among other things) is what she&#8217;s into now. She&#8217;s not even really being punished, just not included in what she isn&#8217;t interested in and therefore missing out. Anglicans are not Fundimentalists (ecept for my cousin, but she&#8217;s a freak) and that faith doesn&#8217;t have anything against women wearing makeup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haeresis</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/11/17/narnia-for-churches/comment-page-1/#comment-7812</link>
		<dc:creator>Haeresis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 23:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/11/17/narnia-for-churches/#comment-7812</guid>
		<description>I dunno if I could accept that, slomo- "Liar, Lord, or Lunatic" was a particularly putrid exercise of logic, for example.

Tim, James Dobsoin is the Head of "Focus on the Family."  Their mailing list is trumpeting the movie like it's the second coming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno if I could accept that, slomo- &#8220;Liar, Lord, or Lunatic&#8221; was a particularly putrid exercise of logic, for example.</p>
<p>Tim, James Dobsoin is the Head of &#8220;Focus on the Family.&#8221;  Their mailing list is trumpeting the movie like it&#8217;s the second coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slomo</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/11/17/narnia-for-churches/comment-page-1/#comment-7796</link>
		<dc:creator>slomo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/11/17/narnia-for-churches/#comment-7796</guid>
		<description>Slight correction:  C.S. Lewis was Anglican.  Lots of other interesting essays besides &lt;em&gt;Narnia&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Screwtape&lt;/em&gt;  (e.g. &lt;em&gt;Great Divorce&lt;/em&gt; is worth a read).  I don't agree with everything he writes, and I'm not really that much of a Christian, but his viewpoint is informed and intelligent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slight correction:  C.S. Lewis was Anglican.  Lots of other interesting essays besides <em>Narnia</em>, <em>Screwtape</em>  (e.g. <em>Great Divorce</em> is worth a read).  I don&#8217;t agree with everything he writes, and I&#8217;m not really that much of a Christian, but his viewpoint is informed and intelligent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/11/17/narnia-for-churches/comment-page-1/#comment-7767</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 23:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/11/17/narnia-for-churches/#comment-7767</guid>
		<description>Yeah I did. I've been too busy watching twin peaks to do much of any writing. plus ive been mulling it over in my head. anyway ill get back to you shortly. 

who's dobson and why does this persons endorsement ruin it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I did. I&#8217;ve been too busy watching twin peaks to do much of any writing. plus ive been mulling it over in my head. anyway ill get back to you shortly. </p>
<p>who&#8217;s dobson and why does this persons endorsement ruin it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haeresis</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/11/17/narnia-for-churches/comment-page-1/#comment-7765</link>
		<dc:creator>Haeresis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 22:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/11/17/narnia-for-churches/#comment-7765</guid>
		<description>I was all set to go see that film until it got promoted by Dobson..now I'm thinking I'll wait until video, just to avoid the 'ick' facor.

On a totally unrelated note, did you get my response to your email the other day?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was all set to go see that film until it got promoted by Dobson..now I&#8217;m thinking I&#8217;ll wait until video, just to avoid the &#8216;ick&#8217; facor.</p>
<p>On a totally unrelated note, did you get my response to your email the other day?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/11/17/narnia-for-churches/comment-page-1/#comment-7760</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 21:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/11/17/narnia-for-churches/#comment-7760</guid>
		<description>C.S. Lewis' theologically themed books are actually pretty good reading, both fiction and non-fiction. I never got into the &lt;i&gt;Narnia&lt;/i&gt; series but &lt;i&gt;The Screwtape Letters&lt;/i&gt; is one of the finest works of fantasy literature by &lt;i&gt;any&lt;/i&gt; author, ever. It is written as a correspondence of letters from an elder demon (Screwtape) to his protege. There is a lot of humor and satire in it.

No one faults Milton or Dante for their forays into fantastic religious literature, but Lewis gets slammed for it, while Tolkien (who pillages myth and religion as well as history and language) remains relatively unharmed.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C.S. Lewis&#8217; theologically themed books are actually pretty good reading, both fiction and non-fiction. I never got into the <i>Narnia</i> series but <i>The Screwtape Letters</i> is one of the finest works of fantasy literature by <i>any</i> author, ever. It is written as a correspondence of letters from an elder demon (Screwtape) to his protege. There is a lot of humor and satire in it.</p>
<p>No one faults Milton or Dante for their forays into fantastic religious literature, but Lewis gets slammed for it, while Tolkien (who pillages myth and religion as well as history and language) remains relatively unharmed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
