<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Conspiracy to Bring Down Dave Chappelle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/</link>
	<description>public domain playground. friendly entities welcome.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Who Does Benjamin Stove Work For?	- 
	Pop Occulture</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/comment-page-1/#comment-9913</link>
		<dc:creator>Who Does Benjamin Stove Work For?	- 
	Pop Occulture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 07:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/#comment-9913</guid>
		<description>[...]  the same design &#8220;feel&#8221; as that Chappelle Theory website (see my notes on that here). So I guess this type of thing is some &#8220;hot [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  the same design &#8220;feel&#8221; as that Chappelle Theory website (see my notes on that here). So I guess this type of thing is some &#8220;hot [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/comment-page-1/#comment-9070</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 09:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/#comment-9070</guid>
		<description>kOrtez... A retired public relations executive could conceivably know about whatever he wants to know about it. He could be an accomplished astrologist if he wanted, and just as conceivably a web page designer. 

As to what I think.. Ive learned enough in my days to know that anything is possible and the story isnt really that far-fetched. It does put into context alot of confusion about the cancellation and what-not. But I do not know whether to believe it or not.

However, I do think that if this story continues to circulate the internet as much as it is, eventually its gonna be brought up in an interview with somebody like Chapelle or Charley Murphy. Though I doubt they would confirm it if it was true, if there was no truth to the story I'd expect a humourous, care-free reaction. If they act nervous while trying to discredit the story, it would only give the story more credit in my eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kOrtez&#8230; A retired public relations executive could conceivably know about whatever he wants to know about it. He could be an accomplished astrologist if he wanted, and just as conceivably a web page designer. </p>
<p>As to what I think.. Ive learned enough in my days to know that anything is possible and the story isnt really that far-fetched. It does put into context alot of confusion about the cancellation and what-not. But I do not know whether to believe it or not.</p>
<p>However, I do think that if this story continues to circulate the internet as much as it is, eventually its gonna be brought up in an interview with somebody like Chapelle or Charley Murphy. Though I doubt they would confirm it if it was true, if there was no truth to the story I&#8217;d expect a humourous, care-free reaction. If they act nervous while trying to discredit the story, it would only give the story more credit in my eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/comment-page-1/#comment-9068</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 07:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/#comment-9068</guid>
		<description>The sketch about the black klan member isn't directly based on his grandfather. His grandfather looked white and had experiences where he was intimidated by other blacks who mistook him for a white man. See the side bar on this USA Today article:

http://www.usatoday.com/life/television/news/2004-03-15-chappelles-show-dvd_x.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sketch about the black klan member isn&#8217;t directly based on his grandfather. His grandfather looked white and had experiences where he was intimidated by other blacks who mistook him for a white man. See the side bar on this USA Today article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/life/television/news/2004-03-15-chappelles-show-dvd_x.htm" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.usatoday.com/life/television/news/2004-03-15-chappelles-show-dvd_x.htm'>http://www.usatoday.com/life/televisio.../2004-03-15-chappelles-show-dvd_x.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k0rtez</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/comment-page-1/#comment-9062</link>
		<dc:creator>k0rtez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 04:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/#comment-9062</guid>
		<description>a "retired public relations executive" wouldnt know crap about html, image editting or, mercy be upon them, publishing to an IIS server(yes, IIS, lol). Even if that site wasnt a sham and said person composed the print, someone else had to slap it together. Im no conspiracy freak, but having a friend who is made me look at stuff a bit more closely. That pic of Bill Cosby and The O looked like funny shadows to me a la Oswalt's head on someone else's body holding a sniper rifle. Is the Tri-Lateral Commission in on this? Does this mean no Rick James movie too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a &#8220;retired public relations executive&#8221; wouldnt know crap about html, image editting or, mercy be upon them, publishing to an IIS server(yes, IIS, lol). Even if that site wasnt a sham and said person composed the print, someone else had to slap it together. Im no conspiracy freak, but having a friend who is made me look at stuff a bit more closely. That pic of Bill Cosby and The O looked like funny shadows to me a la Oswalt&#8217;s head on someone else&#8217;s body holding a sniper rifle. Is the Tri-Lateral Commission in on this? Does this mean no Rick James movie too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/comment-page-1/#comment-9059</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 03:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/#comment-9059</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;That website was paid for, itâ€™s too nicely done.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, speaking as somebody who does web design just for the shit of it, just because you have a nice website doesn't mean its bought and paid for. But I know what you're saying. 

The best refutation of it that I saw anywhere was on the Laugh Machine site I linked to somewhere above, where somebody pointed out how the article claims that the black klan member sketch was based on his grandfather. That really is more unbelievable than all the stuff about Oprah trying to crush him in his sleep or whatever - though that is really hilarious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>That website was paid for, itâ€™s too nicely done.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, speaking as somebody who does web design just for the shit of it, just because you have a nice website doesn&#8217;t mean its bought and paid for. But I know what you&#8217;re saying. </p>
<p>The best refutation of it that I saw anywhere was on the Laugh Machine site I linked to somewhere above, where somebody pointed out how the article claims that the black klan member sketch was based on his grandfather. That really is more unbelievable than all the stuff about Oprah trying to crush him in his sleep or whatever - though that is really hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k0rtez</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/comment-page-1/#comment-9056</link>
		<dc:creator>k0rtez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 03:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/#comment-9056</guid>
		<description>That website was paid for, it's too nicely done. The crap about ppl in his bathroom and all the "someone overheard" just puts it over the top, my bs detector was screaming. I'd sooner think this was a promo stunt for the 2nd half of Season 3 than believe it as is. As an aside, the show itself was groundbreaking and the most important show on race in America since All In The Family and the Jeffersons(noted, both were also comedies). Instead, we're left with Carlos Mencia to cash in, with much less tact or substance, what Chapelle(and his writers) started.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That website was paid for, it&#8217;s too nicely done. The crap about ppl in his bathroom and all the &#8220;someone overheard&#8221; just puts it over the top, my bs detector was screaming. I&#8217;d sooner think this was a promo stunt for the 2nd half of Season 3 than believe it as is. As an aside, the show itself was groundbreaking and the most important show on race in America since All In The Family and the Jeffersons(noted, both were also comedies). Instead, we&#8217;re left with Carlos Mencia to cash in, with much less tact or substance, what Chapelle(and his writers) started.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/comment-page-1/#comment-9035</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 21:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/#comment-9035</guid>
		<description>Oh I know and agree. It's a simple matter of not being able to afford any of that shit right now. I don't have anything fundamentally against it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh I know and agree. It&#8217;s a simple matter of not being able to afford any of that shit right now. I don&#8217;t have anything fundamentally against it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/comment-page-1/#comment-9033</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 21:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/#comment-9033</guid>
		<description>Dude, you need to get cable. For every crap TV show, there's an entire day of programming devoted to the kind of investigating you do online. History Channel, Discovery Channel (and Discovery Times as well)... there's some good shit on the documentary channels!

I have cable AND TiVo at work. It has changed the way I process information from television. Those who say TV rots your brain don't realize that (thanks to the power of imagination) TV watching can be transformed into an interactive activity, if you're willing to not just sit there and passively absorb what you're being spoonfed. 

   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, you need to get cable. For every crap TV show, there&#8217;s an entire day of programming devoted to the kind of investigating you do online. History Channel, Discovery Channel (and Discovery Times as well)&#8230; there&#8217;s some good shit on the documentary channels!</p>
<p>I have cable AND TiVo at work. It has changed the way I process information from television. Those who say TV rots your brain don&#8217;t realize that (thanks to the power of imagination) TV watching can be transformed into an interactive activity, if you&#8217;re willing to not just sit there and passively absorb what you&#8217;re being spoonfed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/comment-page-1/#comment-9002</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 17:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/#comment-9002</guid>
		<description>No, that's cool Todd. I appreciate the link. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, that&#8217;s cool Todd. I appreciate the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/comment-page-1/#comment-8999</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 16:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/#comment-8999</guid>
		<description>Oh it's definitely viral marketing. It was first posted on the web by the people who built the site, Weblinc, by the founder (twice) and the PR rep - both with annotations like "Crazy" or "believe or not" - like they didn't know they built the damn thing. I lay the whole thing out on my comedy blog, Dead-Frog. Here's the link:

http://www.dead-frog.com/archives/2005/12/chappelle_theory_conspiracy_as.php

Sorry, if that last bit was too promotional.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh it&#8217;s definitely viral marketing. It was first posted on the web by the people who built the site, Weblinc, by the founder (twice) and the PR rep - both with annotations like &#8220;Crazy&#8221; or &#8220;believe or not&#8221; - like they didn&#8217;t know they built the damn thing. I lay the whole thing out on my comedy blog, Dead-Frog. Here&#8217;s the link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dead-frog.com/archives/2005/12/chappelle_theory_conspiracy_as.php" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.dead-frog.com/archives/2005/12/chappelle_theory_conspiracy_as.php'>http://www.dead-frog.com/archives/2005...12/chappelle_theory_conspiracy_as.php</a></p>
<p>Sorry, if that last bit was too promotional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haeresis</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/comment-page-1/#comment-8989</link>
		<dc:creator>Haeresis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 06:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/#comment-8989</guid>
		<description>Well, Andrew, more often than not it's the trash that's funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Andrew, more often than not it&#8217;s the trash that&#8217;s funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/comment-page-1/#comment-8988</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 05:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/#comment-8988</guid>
		<description>If this were true, we would need to consider the roles and intentions of the alleged perpetrators. the "Dark Crusaders" range from politicians, media figures and moral beacons... and combinations thereof. just as much as this may have had to do with notions of whats best for black society as it does with Chappelle's growing threat as a media mogul? could chappelle could represent a changing of the guard? does this threaten the cabal of the "Dark Crusaders"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this were true, we would need to consider the roles and intentions of the alleged perpetrators. the &#8220;Dark Crusaders&#8221; range from politicians, media figures and moral beacons&#8230; and combinations thereof. just as much as this may have had to do with notions of whats best for black society as it does with Chappelle&#8217;s growing threat as a media mogul? could chappelle could represent a changing of the guard? does this threaten the cabal of the &#8220;Dark Crusaders&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/comment-page-1/#comment-8984</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 05:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/#comment-8984</guid>
		<description>Oh, thanks for the clarification. I don't actually have cable, so I have to just go according to online sources...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, thanks for the clarification. I don&#8217;t actually have cable, so I have to just go according to online sources&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/comment-page-1/#comment-8981</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 03:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/#comment-8981</guid>
		<description>Just a few things:

1) The stand-up special wasn't new at all. It's actually quite old. Comedy Central replays stuff like that uncensored late at night.

2) "Season 3" isn't really a season like we're used to. Before fleeing, Chappelle shot a bunch of sketches. There's only (I think) 4 episodes worth of material. And no in-betweens he does with the audience. CC is thinking of getting people like Chris Rock, Chris Tucker and Martin Lawrence to perform sort of a wake for the show in between sketches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a few things:</p>
<p>1) The stand-up special wasn&#8217;t new at all. It&#8217;s actually quite old. Comedy Central replays stuff like that uncensored late at night.</p>
<p>2) &#8220;Season 3&#8243; isn&#8217;t really a season like we&#8217;re used to. Before fleeing, Chappelle shot a bunch of sketches. There&#8217;s only (I think) 4 episodes worth of material. And no in-betweens he does with the audience. CC is thinking of getting people like Chris Rock, Chris Tucker and Martin Lawrence to perform sort of a wake for the show in between sketches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/comment-page-1/#comment-8980</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 03:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/#comment-8980</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And whatâ€™s awesome about it is: it makes sense. I read a lot of strange things in the press shortly after Chappelleâ€™s â€œbreakdownâ€, and some were diparaging, such as actor Mike Eppsâ€™ comments about Chappelle&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, that's what's so great about it - is that there ARE a lot of unanswered questions and rumors that flew around about the whole thing. This does a neat job of filling in the blanks, whether its true or not. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And whatâ€™s awesome about it is: it makes sense. I read a lot of strange things in the press shortly after Chappelleâ€™s â€œbreakdownâ€, and some were diparaging, such as actor Mike Eppsâ€™ comments about Chappelle</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s what&#8217;s so great about it - is that there ARE a lot of unanswered questions and rumors that flew around about the whole thing. This does a neat job of filling in the blanks, whether its true or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/comment-page-1/#comment-8977</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 01:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/#comment-8977</guid>
		<description>it reminds me of this part in miles davis' autobiography when he talks about why he has such problems with louis armstrong and dizzy gilespi and cats like that. he thought they were just basically charicatures of themselves. entertainers first, artist second. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it reminds me of this part in miles davis&#8217; autobiography when he talks about why he has such problems with louis armstrong and dizzy gilespi and cats like that. he thought they were just basically charicatures of themselves. entertainers first, artist second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/comment-page-1/#comment-8976</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 01:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/#comment-8976</guid>
		<description>my opinion is that that show was trash.  good riddence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my opinion is that that show was trash.  good riddence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/comment-page-1/#comment-8974</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 01:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/#comment-8974</guid>
		<description>I smelled a potential CT the day that Rick James died. My scenario was that RJ had made himself look foolish in the eyes of his puppet masters, the men who made him famous. RJ made himself look bad by gamely participating in the now-famous "Charlie Murphy's True Hollywood Stories" sketch. He was silenced for allowing himself to be made into an object of ridicule.

But never in my wildest dreams would I have imagined THIS theory that was put forth! And what's awesome about it is: it makes sense. I read a lot of strange things in the press shortly after Chappelle's "breakdown", and some were diparaging, such as actor Mike Epps' comments about Chappelle (at the time, Epps and Charlie Murphy were working on a movie together)...

Just think: if this CT has any validity, it can explain Eddie Murphy's run-in with the tranny hooker that suddenly changed his career arc towards Disney movies. Disney is in bed with ABC, which is in bed with... Oprah Winfrey!

God, I love this stuff, viral marketing or not!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smelled a potential CT the day that Rick James died. My scenario was that RJ had made himself look foolish in the eyes of his puppet masters, the men who made him famous. RJ made himself look bad by gamely participating in the now-famous &#8220;Charlie Murphy&#8217;s True Hollywood Stories&#8221; sketch. He was silenced for allowing himself to be made into an object of ridicule.</p>
<p>But never in my wildest dreams would I have imagined THIS theory that was put forth! And what&#8217;s awesome about it is: it makes sense. I read a lot of strange things in the press shortly after Chappelle&#8217;s &#8220;breakdown&#8221;, and some were diparaging, such as actor Mike Epps&#8217; comments about Chappelle (at the time, Epps and Charlie Murphy were working on a movie together)&#8230;</p>
<p>Just think: if this CT has any validity, it can explain Eddie Murphy&#8217;s run-in with the tranny hooker that suddenly changed his career arc towards Disney movies. Disney is in bed with ABC, which is in bed with&#8230; Oprah Winfrey!</p>
<p>God, I love this stuff, viral marketing or not!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/comment-page-1/#comment-8973</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 01:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/#comment-8973</guid>
		<description>In any case, it's damned good viral marketing, I think. Maybe as John said, this was an effort by Comedy Central to get people excited again since Season 3 is about to get back in gear, after a lull. Maybe they just needed a way to "explain" the lull that would also generate a big groundswell of organic interest and make him look like a hero, rather than a fuck-off </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In any case, it&#8217;s damned good viral marketing, I think. Maybe as John said, this was an effort by Comedy Central to get people excited again since Season 3 is about to get back in gear, after a lull. Maybe they just needed a way to &#8220;explain&#8221; the lull that would also generate a big groundswell of organic interest and make him look like a hero, rather than a fuck-off</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/comment-page-1/#comment-8972</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/#comment-8972</guid>
		<description>i totally smell viral marketing.  but that's just me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i totally smell viral marketing.  but that&#8217;s just me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/comment-page-1/#comment-8968</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 23:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/#comment-8968</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I think the biggest gap between people like Cosby and someone like Dave Chappelle is generational, not racial. All these old black performers want to be seen as elder statesmen to the youth, but the youth knows bullshit when they see and hear it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Absolutely. I mean, what young black person looks up to Bill Cosby anymore. In my eyes, what Chappelle did was showed that it's okay to talk about these issues. Race is not this horrible untouchable thing to never talk about. Cause if that's the case, nobody ever gets anywhere. Nothing ever changes. This actually brought it out into the public eye, and showed how much was really there, and how it was okay to realize that a lot of this shit was really pretty ridiculous and shouldn't be taken seriously. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I think the biggest gap between people like Cosby and someone like Dave Chappelle is generational, not racial. All these old black performers want to be seen as elder statesmen to the youth, but the youth knows bullshit when they see and hear it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Absolutely. I mean, what young black person looks up to Bill Cosby anymore. In my eyes, what Chappelle did was showed that it&#8217;s okay to talk about these issues. Race is not this horrible untouchable thing to never talk about. Cause if that&#8217;s the case, nobody ever gets anywhere. Nothing ever changes. This actually brought it out into the public eye, and showed how much was really there, and how it was okay to realize that a lot of this shit was really pretty ridiculous and shouldn&#8217;t be taken seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/comment-page-1/#comment-8967</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 23:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/#comment-8967</guid>
		<description>holy crap, thats interesting. i swear, though, i've seen recently commercials on Comedy Central advertising season 3...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>holy crap, thats interesting. i swear, though, i&#8217;ve seen recently commercials on Comedy Central advertising season 3&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/comment-page-1/#comment-8966</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 23:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/12/19/the-conspiracy-to-bring-down-dave-chappelle/#comment-8966</guid>
		<description>This is brilliant. This is what CT means to me-- this is CT at its finest, in my opinion.

Whether it's true or not is irrelevant. Personally, I feel that Chappelle was tired and exhausted from working his ass off for Comedy Central. And a preview of some of the sketches for the aborted Third Season (excerpts of which were seen during a recent CC special) confirms that Dave was getting sick of the hype machine going into overdrive.

I think the biggest gap between people like Cosby and someone like Dave Chappelle is generational, not racial. All these old black performers want to be seen as elder statesmen to the youth, but the youth knows bullshit when they see and hear it. That's why someone like Dave Chappelle cites Richard Pryor &#38; Eddie Murphy-- NOT Bill Cosby --as his comic influence. Pryor nor Murphy would've never tried to tell Chappelle to change his content.

Speakin of the late great Pryor: Go rent Richard Pryor's short-lived TV series, now on DVD for the first time. Like Chappelle, Pryor pulled the plug early on his NBC sketch series rather than watch it grow out of his control. It's funny to see how the things that got the network so upset back then are tame by today's standards.    </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is brilliant. This is what CT means to me&#8211; this is CT at its finest, in my opinion.</p>
<p>Whether it&#8217;s true or not is irrelevant. Personally, I feel that Chappelle was tired and exhausted from working his ass off for Comedy Central. And a preview of some of the sketches for the aborted Third Season (excerpts of which were seen during a recent CC special) confirms that Dave was getting sick of the hype machine going into overdrive.</p>
<p>I think the biggest gap between people like Cosby and someone like Dave Chappelle is generational, not racial. All these old black performers want to be seen as elder statesmen to the youth, but the youth knows bullshit when they see and hear it. That&#8217;s why someone like Dave Chappelle cites Richard Pryor &amp; Eddie Murphy&#8211; NOT Bill Cosby &#8211;as his comic influence. Pryor nor Murphy would&#8217;ve never tried to tell Chappelle to change his content.</p>
<p>Speakin of the late great Pryor: Go rent Richard Pryor&#8217;s short-lived TV series, now on DVD for the first time. Like Chappelle, Pryor pulled the plug early on his NBC sketch series rather than watch it grow out of his control. It&#8217;s funny to see how the things that got the network so upset back then are tame by today&#8217;s standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
