<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rev Max Interview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/</link>
	<description>public domain playground. friendly entities welcome.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rev Max Interview by Tim Boucher &#124; Gnostic Friends Network</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-2/#comment-101181</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev Max Interview by Tim Boucher &#124; Gnostic Friends Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-101181</guid>
		<description>[...] FROM: www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FROM: <a href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/'>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eyensane</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-2/#comment-9702</link>
		<dc:creator>eyensane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 01:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9702</guid>
		<description>A very happy unbirthday....to me....to you.               I had wandered on to Rev Maxs site before I sited this one googling joseph camble,yall are awsome.AWSOME.Being that somethin had atached it self to me acouple days ago I took today off from money work to finish unrooting it. So I walked on the beach collected shells and placed them in my fairy garden and thought. About creating a world,playing dolls a child,then my mind wandered off to recreate bible stories. Which I do a lot but today with the mental fatigue it made me uneasy ,I needed this validation.?!so all yall bitches throw your hands in the air and raise the roof for the boys with ta occult flare.     Laugh tis punny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very happy unbirthday&#8230;.to me&#8230;.to you.               I had wandered on to Rev Maxs site before I sited this one googling joseph camble,yall are awsome.AWSOME.Being that somethin had atached it self to me acouple days ago I took today off from money work to finish unrooting it. So I walked on the beach collected shells and placed them in my fairy garden and thought. About creating a world,playing dolls a child,then my mind wandered off to recreate bible stories. Which I do a lot but today with the mental fatigue it made me uneasy ,I needed this validation.?!so all yall bitches throw your hands in the air and raise the roof for the boys with ta occult flare.     Laugh tis punny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemesis</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-2/#comment-9604</link>
		<dc:creator>nemesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9604</guid>
		<description>Its quite psyhadellic to to read of the trickster in african tradition from rev, i try and tell the people around me about the cross and cadduceus(spelling is terrible)+dna. It may be nonesense to them but im just glad to find out im not the only one. dont really have no firm beliefs though just ideas . All these things may just be inside my mind but why not share the insanity, everyone else does and one day none of us will have existed so who cares, whatever path gets you through i guess. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its quite psyhadellic to to read of the trickster in african tradition from rev, i try and tell the people around me about the cross and cadduceus(spelling is terrible)+dna. It may be nonesense to them but im just glad to find out im not the only one. dont really have no firm beliefs though just ideas . All these things may just be inside my mind but why not share the insanity, everyone else does and one day none of us will have existed so who cares, whatever path gets you through i guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-2/#comment-9602</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9602</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What if they dont know to which spiritual tradition (if any) they belong so there just searching to obtain some kind of understanding or correlation. I agree whith what you say but what if youre journey as only just started?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think doing what you're doing makes perfect sense: finding other people interested in it to explore and talk about these ideas and share your experiences. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What if they dont know to which spiritual tradition (if any) they belong so there just searching to obtain some kind of understanding or correlation. I agree whith what you say but what if youre journey as only just started?</p></blockquote>
<p>I think doing what you&#8217;re doing makes perfect sense: finding other people interested in it to explore and talk about these ideas and share your experiences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: channel null</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-2/#comment-9594</link>
		<dc:creator>channel null</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9594</guid>
		<description>Oh, and good interview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and good interview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rev max</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-2/#comment-9593</link>
		<dc:creator>rev max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9593</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What if they dont know to which spiritual tradition (if any) they belong so there just searching to obtain some kind of understanding or correlation. I agree whith what you say but what if youre journey as only just started?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You have to start out on your own, what else can anyone do? Read, think, explore, experiement. If nothing else thats safe and you may learn something too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What if they dont know to which spiritual tradition (if any) they belong so there just searching to obtain some kind of understanding or correlation. I agree whith what you say but what if youre journey as only just started?</p></blockquote>
<p>You have to start out on your own, what else can anyone do? Read, think, explore, experiement. If nothing else thats safe and you may learn something too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rev max</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-2/#comment-9592</link>
		<dc:creator>rev max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9592</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;n your estimate, Rev., how long did â€œyour friendâ€™sâ€ amphetamine phase last, how much did he manage a day, and how many hours of sleep did he get daily? How much work did you put into your website, art, etc., during that time?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It lasted about 2 years, 6 or so hours of sleep a night, 12-16 hours of art, writing web work a day.

WHat I discovered was that you reach a point of diminishing returns, I was absorbing an incredible amount of information and processing an enormous amount of written and visual work back out, but I was taking it all in and spitting it all back out agai so quickly none of it really got digested if that makes any sense - i didn't get any nutrition from it.

Towards the end i began to associte creativity with that sort of insomniacal mania which was a shame because one did not necessarily lead to the other - out of creative juice but the whole machine kept running at breakneck speed even though i had nothing left to say. So the process began to feel increasingly bleak, mechanical cold and souless until finally i just quit.

You can't force inspiration, its like trying to force a nosebleed, better to let things run at their own pace. Thats how I see it now with 8 years hindight.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>n your estimate, Rev., how long did â€œyour friendâ€™sâ€ amphetamine phase last, how much did he manage a day, and how many hours of sleep did he get daily? How much work did you put into your website, art, etc., during that time?</p></blockquote>
<p>It lasted about 2 years, 6 or so hours of sleep a night, 12-16 hours of art, writing web work a day.</p>
<p>WHat I discovered was that you reach a point of diminishing returns, I was absorbing an incredible amount of information and processing an enormous amount of written and visual work back out, but I was taking it all in and spitting it all back out agai so quickly none of it really got digested if that makes any sense - i didn&#8217;t get any nutrition from it.</p>
<p>Towards the end i began to associte creativity with that sort of insomniacal mania which was a shame because one did not necessarily lead to the other - out of creative juice but the whole machine kept running at breakneck speed even though i had nothing left to say. So the process began to feel increasingly bleak, mechanical cold and souless until finally i just quit.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t force inspiration, its like trying to force a nosebleed, better to let things run at their own pace. Thats how I see it now with 8 years hindight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemesis</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-2/#comment-9591</link>
		<dc:creator>nemesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9591</guid>
		<description>SHIT im sorry i meant there journey not yours, i was refering more to my journey just beginning not anyone elses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SHIT im sorry i meant there journey not yours, i was refering more to my journey just beginning not anyone elses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemesis</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9590</link>
		<dc:creator>nemesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9590</guid>
		<description>J.P.   What if they dont know to which spiritual tradition (if any) they belong so there just searching to obtain some kind of understanding or correlation. I agree whith what you say but what if youre journey as only just started?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J.P.   What if they dont know to which spiritual tradition (if any) they belong so there just searching to obtain some kind of understanding or correlation. I agree whith what you say but what if youre journey as only just started?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: channel null</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9589</link>
		<dc:creator>channel null</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 00:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9589</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I had a menage a trois once with two lesbians, does that count?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Okay, here's a question, don't feel obligated to answer, that's more practical: in your estimate, Rev., how long did "your friend's" amphetamine phase last, how much did he manage a day, and how many hours of sleep did he get daily? How much work did you put into your website, art, etc., during that time?

&lt;blockquote&gt;Yeah, I think the â€œsolitary practitionerâ€ thing is a cop-out too, for people who donâ€™t want to put their money where their mouth is. Shit or get off the pot!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I'll agree, although I'm guilty--I'm looking for friends, I'm not going to anything that resembles Wicca, that's the harder part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I had a menage a trois once with two lesbians, does that count?</p></blockquote>
<p>Okay, here&#8217;s a question, don&#8217;t feel obligated to answer, that&#8217;s more practical: in your estimate, Rev., how long did &#8220;your friend&#8217;s&#8221; amphetamine phase last, how much did he manage a day, and how many hours of sleep did he get daily? How much work did you put into your website, art, etc., during that time?</p>
<blockquote><p>Yeah, I think the â€œsolitary practitionerâ€ thing is a cop-out too, for people who donâ€™t want to put their money where their mouth is. Shit or get off the pot!</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ll agree, although I&#8217;m guilty&#8211;I&#8217;m looking for friends, I&#8217;m not going to anything that resembles Wicca, that&#8217;s the harder part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gnomely</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9585</link>
		<dc:creator>Gnomely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 00:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9585</guid>
		<description> Personally, I think spirituality is all about solitude and learning to be alone with one's self- not with Gods or spirits. Why would the spirits allow reason to grow so strong giving rise to meaterialism and skepticism. It wouldn't seem to be in the spirits interest to side with the White man over the Indian.
 On a side note after I read the interview I had a weird experience. I woke up around 3AM to go to the bathroom. Walking, I began to feel this inexplicable fear. The legend of Bloody Mary always scared me as a child I was expecting to see her image in the mirror. No big deal. I leave the bathroom in the hallway I felt like I was being watched when I turned around I swear I saw a shadow-like image of a man. I shuddered and my heart jumped out from my skin. I ran to my bed, turned my light on and started to pray Hail Mary and do signs of the cross. Probably was just my imagination but it still weirded me out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think spirituality is all about solitude and learning to be alone with one&#8217;s self- not with Gods or spirits. Why would the spirits allow reason to grow so strong giving rise to meaterialism and skepticism. It wouldn&#8217;t seem to be in the spirits interest to side with the White man over the Indian.<br />
 On a side note after I read the interview I had a weird experience. I woke up around 3AM to go to the bathroom. Walking, I began to feel this inexplicable fear. The legend of Bloody Mary always scared me as a child I was expecting to see her image in the mirror. No big deal. I leave the bathroom in the hallway I felt like I was being watched when I turned around I swear I saw a shadow-like image of a man. I shuddered and my heart jumped out from my skin. I ran to my bed, turned my light on and started to pray Hail Mary and do signs of the cross. Probably was just my imagination but it still weirded me out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rev max</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9580</link>
		<dc:creator>rev max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 21:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9580</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;iâ€™m really tired of people getting all stodgy about gnosticism &#38; what it â€œmeansâ€ and how itâ€™s built. itâ€™s like writing an academic dissertation on punk rock.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

yeah talk about missing the point!  The sufi parables are also full of this theme, someone comes with knowledge to rescue a bunch of people fropm a prison, and instead of leaving the prisoin with him they get sidetracked in an argument about whether or not it would be an auspicious time to escape, what would be the proper techniques to climb a wall, who invented wall-climbing, by what title they should call the savior, etc etc etc. The savior is eventually exhausted by all this endless jawing and debating and departs in disgust, leaving the prisoners (weeks later) exactly where he found them!

&lt;blockquote&gt;what i was getting at is that gnosticism, *real* honest to god gnosticism is about DOING it, in the best way that works for you, and getting RESULTS. if you donâ€™t get results from finding gnosis, youâ€™re doing something wrong.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It wasn''t until i did this interview for tim that I realized how heavily I had been influenced by secular authors I read before I "discovered" gnosticism

Hakim Bey
Peter Carroll
Georges Batille

...all authors I was reading right beofre I moved to San Fran, all discuss gnosticism as a phenomenon of active practice. Carroll in particular. Carroll's view of gnosticism influenced me much more more than I had realized

 &lt;blockquote&gt;i also dig what youâ€™re saying about the whole â€™solitary practitionerâ€™ thing. it can be such a frickinâ€™ modern cop-out (not always, but it can be). half the fun (and yeah, this stuff should be fun) about a spiritual tradition is doing it with other people.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, I think the "solitary practitioner" thing is a cop-out too, for people who don't want to put their money where their mouth is. Shit or get off the pot! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>iâ€™m really tired of people getting all stodgy about gnosticism &amp; what it â€œmeansâ€ and how itâ€™s built. itâ€™s like writing an academic dissertation on punk rock.</p></blockquote>
<p>yeah talk about missing the point!  The sufi parables are also full of this theme, someone comes with knowledge to rescue a bunch of people fropm a prison, and instead of leaving the prisoin with him they get sidetracked in an argument about whether or not it would be an auspicious time to escape, what would be the proper techniques to climb a wall, who invented wall-climbing, by what title they should call the savior, etc etc etc. The savior is eventually exhausted by all this endless jawing and debating and departs in disgust, leaving the prisoners (weeks later) exactly where he found them!</p>
<blockquote><p>what i was getting at is that gnosticism, *real* honest to god gnosticism is about DOING it, in the best way that works for you, and getting RESULTS. if you donâ€™t get results from finding gnosis, youâ€™re doing something wrong.</p></blockquote>
<p>It wasn&#8221;t until i did this interview for tim that I realized how heavily I had been influenced by secular authors I read before I &#8220;discovered&#8221; gnosticism</p>
<p>Hakim Bey<br />
Peter Carroll<br />
Georges Batille</p>
<p>&#8230;all authors I was reading right beofre I moved to San Fran, all discuss gnosticism as a phenomenon of active practice. Carroll in particular. Carroll&#8217;s view of gnosticism influenced me much more more than I had realized</p>
<blockquote><p>i also dig what youâ€™re saying about the whole â€™solitary practitionerâ€™ thing. it can be such a frickinâ€™ modern cop-out (not always, but it can be). half the fun (and yeah, this stuff should be fun) about a spiritual tradition is doing it with other people.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, I think the &#8220;solitary practitioner&#8221; thing is a cop-out too, for people who don&#8217;t want to put their money where their mouth is. Shit or get off the pot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9578</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 20:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9578</guid>
		<description>A good example from my life yesterday - Ethiopian restaurants. You have this one big platter and everybody shares it. Sure its messy and crazy and stuff, but it's a lot more fun in a lot of ways than sitting in a little tiny cubicle sealed off from everybody eating a solitary-eclectic power bar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good example from my life yesterday - Ethiopian restaurants. You have this one big platter and everybody shares it. Sure its messy and crazy and stuff, but it&#8217;s a lot more fun in a lot of ways than sitting in a little tiny cubicle sealed off from everybody eating a solitary-eclectic power bar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9577</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 20:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9577</guid>
		<description>oop, submitted before i was done.  what i was getting at is that gnosticism, *real* honest to god gnosticism is about DOING it, in the best way that works for you, and getting RESULTS.  if you don't get results from finding gnosis, you're doing something wrong.  i also dig what you're saying about the whole 'solitary practitioner' thing.  it can be such a frickin' modern cop-out (not always, but it can be).  half the fun (and yeah, this stuff should be fun) about a spiritual tradition is doing it with other people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oop, submitted before i was done.  what i was getting at is that gnosticism, *real* honest to god gnosticism is about DOING it, in the best way that works for you, and getting RESULTS.  if you don&#8217;t get results from finding gnosis, you&#8217;re doing something wrong.  i also dig what you&#8217;re saying about the whole &#8217;solitary practitioner&#8217; thing.  it can be such a frickin&#8217; modern cop-out (not always, but it can be).  half the fun (and yeah, this stuff should be fun) about a spiritual tradition is doing it with other people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9576</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 19:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9576</guid>
		<description>max you're my fuckin' hero, man.  i disagree w/you about the value of valentinus, et al, since they were totally into the same crazy cosmologies you're talking about, but i'm really tired of people getting all stodgy about gnosticism &#38; what it "means" and how it's built.  it's like writing an academic dissertation on punk rock. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>max you&#8217;re my fuckin&#8217; hero, man.  i disagree w/you about the value of valentinus, et al, since they were totally into the same crazy cosmologies you&#8217;re talking about, but i&#8217;m really tired of people getting all stodgy about gnosticism &amp; what it &#8220;means&#8221; and how it&#8217;s built.  it&#8217;s like writing an academic dissertation on punk rock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rev max</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9575</link>
		<dc:creator>rev max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 19:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9575</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I am wondering if the ancestral spirits, as theyâ€™re interpreted here, might come about in various faÃ§ades in other esoteric traditions. Or if they are structured in the spiritual â€œegregoreâ€ of a people over time as a metaphysical device unique unto them&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The ATRs are similar to a lot of shamanic paradigms in that the idea exists that humans have multiple souls, one part that travel onwards to a final rest  or to be reincarnted after death and another part that remains behind to guide and protect descendants.

And if this second "ghost" soul is not remebered or honored by its descendants it will eventually fade away. But if it is honered and remembered by its descendants than it will grow more and more powerful or even become a saint or a divinity in its own right until there are many many people relying on it and giving it energy, not just its descendants.

In the ATRs the idea also exists that the gods and saints are mortal too, they are very powerful and live for hundred of thousands of years but also get tired, hungry, thirsty, etc... they aren't the Supreme Being, but intermediaries between humans and the Supreme Being.

SO there is certainly and "egregore" aspect to it yes, maybe resembling what Jung talks about as archetypes or the collective unconscious. The genius or spirit of a people. 

BTW, for anyone who is interested in learning more about this stuff here are some great resources:


&lt;strong&gt;BOOKS&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0872862860/" rel="nofollow"&gt;
Macumba : The Teachings of Maria-Jose, Mother of the Gods (Paperback)&lt;/a&gt; - explain the ATR concept of energy and destiny extremely well. written from the POV of a sympathetic outsider

&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0942272722/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Spiritual Cleansings and Psychic Defenses&lt;/a&gt; (Paperback) - this guy really knows his shit, you can do the rituals he describes here and improve your life immediately, also info and advice on how to find a group and whether ATRs are right for you

&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1561840599/" rel="nofollow"&gt;
Urban Voodoo: A Beginners Guide to Afro-Caribbean Magic&lt;/a&gt; (Paperback) - A lot of people hate this book but I loved it. Not so much practical info but a great intro to the idea of it and a lot of fascinating personal stories coming from the perspective of an outsider who decided to dabble

&lt;strong&gt;SITES&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;a href="http://www.luckymojo.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.luckymojo.com&lt;/a&gt; - Cat's spell kits are fantastic she really knows her shit. I've also heard her Hoodoo Course is great. 

&lt;a href="http://www.sheps.com/ancestors/eggun.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Eggun, The Dead &lt;/a&gt; - how to make a spiritual altar to the dead and your ancestral spirits. That's the foundation.

&lt;a href="http://www.techgnosis.com/trickster.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;
Trickster at the Crossroads, by Erik Davis&lt;/a&gt; - good overview for westerners of the  the trickster god

&lt;strong&gt;COURSES
&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.shamanism.org/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Michael Harner's course in Core shamanism&lt;/a&gt; - this is THE guy to go to, or one of his students, if you want to learn shamanic journeying and feel like you need a structured approach. Nothing to do w. ATR BTW, just super-helpful &#38; life-changing.





</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I am wondering if the ancestral spirits, as theyâ€™re interpreted here, might come about in various faÃ§ades in other esoteric traditions. Or if they are structured in the spiritual â€œegregoreâ€ of a people over time as a metaphysical device unique unto them</p></blockquote>
<p>The ATRs are similar to a lot of shamanic paradigms in that the idea exists that humans have multiple souls, one part that travel onwards to a final rest  or to be reincarnted after death and another part that remains behind to guide and protect descendants.</p>
<p>And if this second &#8220;ghost&#8221; soul is not remebered or honored by its descendants it will eventually fade away. But if it is honered and remembered by its descendants than it will grow more and more powerful or even become a saint or a divinity in its own right until there are many many people relying on it and giving it energy, not just its descendants.</p>
<p>In the ATRs the idea also exists that the gods and saints are mortal too, they are very powerful and live for hundred of thousands of years but also get tired, hungry, thirsty, etc&#8230; they aren&#8217;t the Supreme Being, but intermediaries between humans and the Supreme Being.</p>
<p>SO there is certainly and &#8220;egregore&#8221; aspect to it yes, maybe resembling what Jung talks about as archetypes or the collective unconscious. The genius or spirit of a people. </p>
<p>BTW, for anyone who is interested in learning more about this stuff here are some great resources:</p>
<p><strong>BOOKS</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0872862860/" rel="nofollow"><br />
Macumba : The Teachings of Maria-Jose, Mother of the Gods (Paperback)</a> - explain the ATR concept of energy and destiny extremely well. written from the POV of a sympathetic outsider</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0942272722/" rel="nofollow">Spiritual Cleansings and Psychic Defenses</a> (Paperback) - this guy really knows his shit, you can do the rituals he describes here and improve your life immediately, also info and advice on how to find a group and whether ATRs are right for you</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1561840599/" rel="nofollow"><br />
Urban Voodoo: A Beginners Guide to Afro-Caribbean Magic</a> (Paperback) - A lot of people hate this book but I loved it. Not so much practical info but a great intro to the idea of it and a lot of fascinating personal stories coming from the perspective of an outsider who decided to dabble</p>
<p><strong>SITES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.luckymojo.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.luckymojo.com'>http://www.luckymojo.com</a> - Cat&#8217;s spell kits are fantastic she really knows her shit. I&#8217;ve also heard her Hoodoo Course is great. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.sheps.com/ancestors/eggun.html" rel="nofollow">Eggun, The Dead </a> - how to make a spiritual altar to the dead and your ancestral spirits. That&#8217;s the foundation.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techgnosis.com/trickster.html" rel="nofollow"><br />
Trickster at the Crossroads, by Erik Davis</a> - good overview for westerners of the  the trickster god</p>
<p><strong>COURSES<br />
</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.shamanism.org/" rel="nofollow">Michael Harner&#8217;s course in Core shamanism</a> - this is THE guy to go to, or one of his students, if you want to learn shamanic journeying and feel like you need a structured approach. Nothing to do w. ATR BTW, just super-helpful &amp; life-changing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rev max</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9574</link>
		<dc:creator>rev max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 18:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9574</guid>
		<description>OK hopefully this time I wont fuck up the blockquotes

&lt;blockquote&gt;For me, Iâ€™ve already made the leap, at least in terms of acceptance, and now Iâ€™m trying to see whether there is potential for interdisciplinary synergy (one of the best ways for creative progress or ingenuity) in combining western â€œknowledgeâ€ with other, more â€œprimalâ€ arts.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I wonder. The reason is, yes, there are definitely things that western medecine could learn from the shamanic use of herbs, and there are also definitely things that western psychologists could (and do actually) learn from the shamanic concepts of the soul and its connection to nature &#38; ancestral spirits

Tim was writing a couple of weeks back about whether or not the western ego structure precludes true polytheism. We see multiple personalities as a sign of fragmentation or weakness wheras in some indigenous cultures there is a more fluid concept of the self and even the idea of multiple souls, e.g. mongolian shamanism says people have 9 souls

In South AFrica traditional healers have an association and are licensed by the govt. There have certainly been articles in mental health journals in the US recently about how to work with clients (for therapists) who belong to these types of religions, e.g., voodoo &#38; santeria (don't view their beliefs as an obstacle, the journals say. Work within them instead).

But whether they could learn in the bigger picture, I dunno. I think science would have to be able to "prove" that spirits exist as more than just a psychological construct and I don't see how that could be done. Eastern ideas will face an easier time being aborbed by western medecine they have also had more time to percolate in.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Max, what are your thoughts on the current trend (particularly in the West) of less focus on family. From the traditional generational layers of family in Europe, to the â€œatomic familyâ€ of the United States, to the now, where single mothers proliferate, most children have four parents, and the general decline of what weâ€™ve interpreted as family for centuries.

Iâ€™ve little experience, theoretically or practically, with family spirits such as what you refer to, but Iâ€™ve always wondered at how this â€œdeclineâ€ of the family structure affects the connection, communication, and meaning of such spiritual encounters. Any thoughts?

Is this perhaps leading into a more transhuman approach to how we associate more tribally now, rather than carnal as would be implied by the passing of wisdom as inclined by blood rather than worth? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thats a great question. The ATRs really do take a tribal view of things, a lot of the worldview is based on traditional african ideas about clan loyalty and kinship.

 As AKG notes the specific courtship and family living arrangements can be quite varied though overall are moving away from the extended family "it takes a village" model and towards the western "nuclear family/single mom" model, mostly because AIDS is destroying the extended family, destroying the village structure, making it impossible for the extended family to help raise a child because the generation between kids and elders is being stricken down in its prime.

I would not have said this at one time but I do now believe that the western nuclear family ideal is psychologically unhrealthy and unbalanced, like monotheism it rests too much weight on too small of a surface area, it is a hothouse for all sorts of psychosexual dysfunction and neurosis

I think our culture encourages people to detach from family so that they can be weakened and lose the insights of the past, forget their roots in nature, have no ancestry to turn to and so turn instead to the purchase of shiny new objects to fill the existential void that isolated individualism creates.

As far as where the african spirits come from or how they are conceived, human life began in africa so in a sense even people who are adopted and don't know who their biological parents are can still look to these spirits for guidance and protection as they really are the trunk of the human DNA tree, humanity's oldest ancestors, the great great grandparents of us all.

In my opinion. I didn't used to think so but I now believe that aknowledgement of ancestry is an important dimension of spirituality. Its actually central to almost every single culture BUT the post-Christain west.

&lt;blockquote&gt;A lot of food for thought with this- If we accept the existance of spirits into our daily routine what kind of things do you think weâ€™d do diffrently (as individuals- or even as a culture)?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, I can't speak for anyone else, but I personally look to spirits to keep my life running smoothly, to guide and protect me and solve any problems I may have as these arise. So I have have a trememndous sense of being able to control and manipulate my environment and solve or completely avoid serious difficulties and keep my life filled with love, money and health.

I practical terms that means i pay a lot more attention to my dreams, yeah most are just neurological static but some significant percentage are actually beings trying to help or teach me so I appreciate the effort they make to communicate and try to honor that effort by taking their advice. 

When I have important decisions to make I divine - throw the bones - and if it looks like something is going to a problem then I figure out what  kind of offering I need to make or ritual to do  to smooth the problem over before it arrives at my doorstep. Sometimes thats a pain but its fun too and anyway, my life is so problem free - I really am runnin' shit in a way that I never could have believed possible - that its worth it.

I pray to my ancestors on a regular basis, make offerings to them, same with the spirits I work with.

When I first got involved it was all dramatic changes, shifts, etc. Not so much lately. I spend  less time trying to solve my own problems because I just plain have less and less serious problems anymore and more time and energy now trying to learn more and increase my power so that I can help other people too. 

Because thats what its about in the ATR paradigm, theres no such thing as a "solitary" (as in wicca), you are expected once you get to a certain level to start taking clients and building a community of your own so you can give back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK hopefully this time I wont fuck up the blockquotes</p>
<blockquote><p>For me, Iâ€™ve already made the leap, at least in terms of acceptance, and now Iâ€™m trying to see whether there is potential for interdisciplinary synergy (one of the best ways for creative progress or ingenuity) in combining western â€œknowledgeâ€ with other, more â€œprimalâ€ arts.</p></blockquote>
<p>I wonder. The reason is, yes, there are definitely things that western medecine could learn from the shamanic use of herbs, and there are also definitely things that western psychologists could (and do actually) learn from the shamanic concepts of the soul and its connection to nature &amp; ancestral spirits</p>
<p>Tim was writing a couple of weeks back about whether or not the western ego structure precludes true polytheism. We see multiple personalities as a sign of fragmentation or weakness wheras in some indigenous cultures there is a more fluid concept of the self and even the idea of multiple souls, e.g. mongolian shamanism says people have 9 souls</p>
<p>In South AFrica traditional healers have an association and are licensed by the govt. There have certainly been articles in mental health journals in the US recently about how to work with clients (for therapists) who belong to these types of religions, e.g., voodoo &amp; santeria (don&#8217;t view their beliefs as an obstacle, the journals say. Work within them instead).</p>
<p>But whether they could learn in the bigger picture, I dunno. I think science would have to be able to &#8220;prove&#8221; that spirits exist as more than just a psychological construct and I don&#8217;t see how that could be done. Eastern ideas will face an easier time being aborbed by western medecine they have also had more time to percolate in.</p>
<blockquote><p>Max, what are your thoughts on the current trend (particularly in the West) of less focus on family. From the traditional generational layers of family in Europe, to the â€œatomic familyâ€ of the United States, to the now, where single mothers proliferate, most children have four parents, and the general decline of what weâ€™ve interpreted as family for centuries.</p>
<p>Iâ€™ve little experience, theoretically or practically, with family spirits such as what you refer to, but Iâ€™ve always wondered at how this â€œdeclineâ€ of the family structure affects the connection, communication, and meaning of such spiritual encounters. Any thoughts?</p>
<p>Is this perhaps leading into a more transhuman approach to how we associate more tribally now, rather than carnal as would be implied by the passing of wisdom as inclined by blood rather than worth? </p></blockquote>
<p>Thats a great question. The ATRs really do take a tribal view of things, a lot of the worldview is based on traditional african ideas about clan loyalty and kinship.</p>
<p> As AKG notes the specific courtship and family living arrangements can be quite varied though overall are moving away from the extended family &#8220;it takes a village&#8221; model and towards the western &#8220;nuclear family/single mom&#8221; model, mostly because AIDS is destroying the extended family, destroying the village structure, making it impossible for the extended family to help raise a child because the generation between kids and elders is being stricken down in its prime.</p>
<p>I would not have said this at one time but I do now believe that the western nuclear family ideal is psychologically unhrealthy and unbalanced, like monotheism it rests too much weight on too small of a surface area, it is a hothouse for all sorts of psychosexual dysfunction and neurosis</p>
<p>I think our culture encourages people to detach from family so that they can be weakened and lose the insights of the past, forget their roots in nature, have no ancestry to turn to and so turn instead to the purchase of shiny new objects to fill the existential void that isolated individualism creates.</p>
<p>As far as where the african spirits come from or how they are conceived, human life began in africa so in a sense even people who are adopted and don&#8217;t know who their biological parents are can still look to these spirits for guidance and protection as they really are the trunk of the human DNA tree, humanity&#8217;s oldest ancestors, the great great grandparents of us all.</p>
<p>In my opinion. I didn&#8217;t used to think so but I now believe that aknowledgement of ancestry is an important dimension of spirituality. Its actually central to almost every single culture BUT the post-Christain west.</p>
<blockquote><p>A lot of food for thought with this- If we accept the existance of spirits into our daily routine what kind of things do you think weâ€™d do diffrently (as individuals- or even as a culture)?</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, I can&#8217;t speak for anyone else, but I personally look to spirits to keep my life running smoothly, to guide and protect me and solve any problems I may have as these arise. So I have have a trememndous sense of being able to control and manipulate my environment and solve or completely avoid serious difficulties and keep my life filled with love, money and health.</p>
<p>I practical terms that means i pay a lot more attention to my dreams, yeah most are just neurological static but some significant percentage are actually beings trying to help or teach me so I appreciate the effort they make to communicate and try to honor that effort by taking their advice. </p>
<p>When I have important decisions to make I divine - throw the bones - and if it looks like something is going to a problem then I figure out what  kind of offering I need to make or ritual to do  to smooth the problem over before it arrives at my doorstep. Sometimes thats a pain but its fun too and anyway, my life is so problem free - I really am runnin&#8217; shit in a way that I never could have believed possible - that its worth it.</p>
<p>I pray to my ancestors on a regular basis, make offerings to them, same with the spirits I work with.</p>
<p>When I first got involved it was all dramatic changes, shifts, etc. Not so much lately. I spend  less time trying to solve my own problems because I just plain have less and less serious problems anymore and more time and energy now trying to learn more and increase my power so that I can help other people too. </p>
<p>Because thats what its about in the ATR paradigm, theres no such thing as a &#8220;solitary&#8221; (as in wicca), you are expected once you get to a certain level to start taking clients and building a community of your own so you can give back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. K. G.</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9570</link>
		<dc:creator>A. K. G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 16:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9570</guid>
		<description>This was an excellent interview, thanks Rev. Max.
I must admit that upon reading about the "face to face" encounters I was a bit skeptical but overall moved by his words. A lot of food for thought with this- If we accept the existance of spirits into our daily routine what kind of things do you think we'd do diffrently (as individuals- or even as a culture)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was an excellent interview, thanks Rev. Max.<br />
I must admit that upon reading about the &#8220;face to face&#8221; encounters I was a bit skeptical but overall moved by his words. A lot of food for thought with this- If we accept the existance of spirits into our daily routine what kind of things do you think we&#8217;d do diffrently (as individuals- or even as a culture)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fell</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9568</link>
		<dc:creator>Fell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9568</guid>
		<description>Yeah, true. I'll have to ponder it a bit. I am wondering if the ancestral spirits, as they're interpreted here, might come about in various faÃ§ades in other esoteric traditions. Or if they are structured in the spiritual "egregore" of a people over time as a metaphysical device unique unto them; whereas other communicative beings interact with others elsewhere for different purposes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, true. I&#8217;ll have to ponder it a bit. I am wondering if the ancestral spirits, as they&#8217;re interpreted here, might come about in various faÃ§ades in other esoteric traditions. Or if they are structured in the spiritual &#8220;egregore&#8221; of a people over time as a metaphysical device unique unto them; whereas other communicative beings interact with others elsewhere for different purposes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ktulu</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9567</link>
		<dc:creator>Ktulu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9567</guid>
		<description>Fell, I'm not Rev Max, and I don't know much about ancestoral spirits, but I can say that the family structures in Africa are, and have always been, quite varied.

I remember reading about one culture in which the women ruled the family (mostly because there was no present husband/father).  In this set-up, the women lived with their brothers, and when it came time to have kids, a woman would marry a man from a completely different tribe (who she may have never had contact with before).  After the wedding, there would be an intense 3 to 7-day long mating "vacation", after which the woman would return to her tribe (or the man return to his), perhaps never to meet again.  If the woman became pregnant as a result of this event, so be it, if not, she'd seek out men within her tribe (though still married to a man she may never see again), and try to have children with them.

The whole cultural traditions seemed quite wild to me, but in a way it makes sense.  They do the whole inter-tribe marriages as a way to promote diffusion (genetic, as well as economic), and if it doesn't work, they just stick within their own tribe.

In this set-up, I'd imagine that ancestral spirit lines would be quite convoluted, but then again the standard one male-one female (living and raising children together, war and other duties aside) marriage structure is actually in the minority in global contexts.

Just a thought or two :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fell, I&#8217;m not Rev Max, and I don&#8217;t know much about ancestoral spirits, but I can say that the family structures in Africa are, and have always been, quite varied.</p>
<p>I remember reading about one culture in which the women ruled the family (mostly because there was no present husband/father).  In this set-up, the women lived with their brothers, and when it came time to have kids, a woman would marry a man from a completely different tribe (who she may have never had contact with before).  After the wedding, there would be an intense 3 to 7-day long mating &#8220;vacation&#8221;, after which the woman would return to her tribe (or the man return to his), perhaps never to meet again.  If the woman became pregnant as a result of this event, so be it, if not, she&#8217;d seek out men within her tribe (though still married to a man she may never see again), and try to have children with them.</p>
<p>The whole cultural traditions seemed quite wild to me, but in a way it makes sense.  They do the whole inter-tribe marriages as a way to promote diffusion (genetic, as well as economic), and if it doesn&#8217;t work, they just stick within their own tribe.</p>
<p>In this set-up, I&#8217;d imagine that ancestral spirit lines would be quite convoluted, but then again the standard one male-one female (living and raising children together, war and other duties aside) marriage structure is actually in the minority in global contexts.</p>
<p>Just a thought or two <img src='http://www.timboucher.com/journal/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fell</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9564</link>
		<dc:creator>Fell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 08:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9564</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The spirts of the dead play a central role in the ATRs. Your ancestral spirits are the most important spirits you have. The gods are often thought to be divinized ancestors as well. But some spirits never were human either.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Hmm, I've thought about this in the past but this reminded me:

Max, what are your thoughts on the current trend (particularly in the West) of less focus on family. From the traditional generational layers of family in Europe, to the "atomic family" of the United States, to the now, where single mothers proliferate, most children have four parents, and the general decline of what we've interpreted as family for centuries.

I've little experience, theoretically or practically, with family spirits such as what you refer to, but I've always wondered at how this "decline" of the family structure affects the connection, communication, and meaning of such spiritual encounters. Any thoughts?

Is this perhaps leading into a more transhuman approach to how we associate more tribally now, rather than carnal as would be implied by the passing of wisdom as inclined by blood rather than worth?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The spirts of the dead play a central role in the ATRs. Your ancestral spirits are the most important spirits you have. The gods are often thought to be divinized ancestors as well. But some spirits never were human either.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hmm, I&#8217;ve thought about this in the past but this reminded me:</p>
<p>Max, what are your thoughts on the current trend (particularly in the West) of less focus on family. From the traditional generational layers of family in Europe, to the &#8220;atomic family&#8221; of the United States, to the now, where single mothers proliferate, most children have four parents, and the general decline of what we&#8217;ve interpreted as family for centuries.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve little experience, theoretically or practically, with family spirits such as what you refer to, but I&#8217;ve always wondered at how this &#8220;decline&#8221; of the family structure affects the connection, communication, and meaning of such spiritual encounters. Any thoughts?</p>
<p>Is this perhaps leading into a more transhuman approach to how we associate more tribally now, rather than carnal as would be implied by the passing of wisdom as inclined by blood rather than worth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9561</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9561</guid>
		<description>Tim,
Another reference to Tom Robbins, this time by way of your own interviewee, the maximum revving, Rev Max.  (Just thinking about Robbins makes me want to play with words)  Please bump some of his books up nearer to the top of your must read list.  

Rev Max, I emailed you at secretbible dot com, looking forward to your correspondence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim,<br />
Another reference to Tom Robbins, this time by way of your own interviewee, the maximum revving, Rev Max.  (Just thinking about Robbins makes me want to play with words)  Please bump some of his books up nearer to the top of your must read list.  </p>
<p>Rev Max, I emailed you at secretbible dot com, looking forward to your correspondence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ktulu</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9560</link>
		<dc:creator>Ktulu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9560</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Your question about medicine and psychology was interesting but I canâ€™t imagine your average western rationalist being able to accept a worldview that is so heavily based on spirits and energy and things that just seem so primitive and superstitious. Its a huge mental leap to make, most people canâ€™t do it. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I definitately agree that it's a huge mental leap, but what I was focused on is whether or not there is a potential to combine the knowledge and practices of "modern, western" medicine/psychology and the knowledge and practices of ATRs, magick, and shaminism.  For me, I've already made the leap, at least in terms of acceptance, and now I'm trying to see whether there is potential for interdisciplinary synergy (one of the best ways for creative progress or ingenuity) in combining western "knowledge" with other, more "primal" arts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Your question about medicine and psychology was interesting but I canâ€™t imagine your average western rationalist being able to accept a worldview that is so heavily based on spirits and energy and things that just seem so primitive and superstitious. Its a huge mental leap to make, most people canâ€™t do it. </p></blockquote>
<p>I definitately agree that it&#8217;s a huge mental leap, but what I was focused on is whether or not there is a potential to combine the knowledge and practices of &#8220;modern, western&#8221; medicine/psychology and the knowledge and practices of ATRs, magick, and shaminism.  For me, I&#8217;ve already made the leap, at least in terms of acceptance, and now I&#8217;m trying to see whether there is potential for interdisciplinary synergy (one of the best ways for creative progress or ingenuity) in combining western &#8220;knowledge&#8221; with other, more &#8220;primal&#8221; arts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rev max</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9559</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9559</guid>
		<description>hey sorry tim, fucked up the blockquotes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey sorry tim, fucked up the blockquotes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rev max</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9558</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9558</guid>
		<description>I guess its the difference between the path of surrender and the path of the Warrior. I am reminded of Tom Robbinsâ€™ Jitterbug perfume, where he talks about the sould needed â€œendarkenmentâ€ just as much as enlightenment. In other words (or in my interpretation) to expand to the lofty heights of wisdom, love and compassion, it is necessary to also explore and expand into the carnal, physical passionate side, otherwise you arenâ€™t really developing fully. You are a top heavy and ultimately not encompassing the broader truth. &lt;blockquote&gt;

That was true in my own case but I don't know about anyone else. I like the term "endarkment" very much though. 

&lt;/blockquote&gt;This morning was visited by animal messenger, (I suspect). I would like to contact this guy and see ask him a question. Is this possible? I went to his website and was not easily able to find a contact email. &lt;blockquote&gt;

Yeah sure email me at &lt;strong&gt;friend at enemies dot com&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;You mentioned that you have witnessed spirit possession, and that spirits are an active and integral part in your (and Iâ€™m assuming most, if not all) ATR. What then is your viewpoint towards exorcisms? Are they real? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

They often are I think yes.

You mentioned angels, do you also believe in demons, and whatâ€™s the distinction between a spirit and an angel?&lt;blockquote&gt;

In the ATR paradigm angels are identified with the catholic saints who are also identified with the forces of nature, e.g., goddesses of love and fertility and wealth, gods of iron, thunder, and agriculture, tricksters, etc. Those are the "gods"

There are lots of different kinds of spirits, e.g., trees have spirits, so do mountains, so do animals, spiders... Humans are powerful spiritual beings in life and remain so after death. Ghosts can be good or malicious, the same with plants, places animals etc. 

This paradigm is basically animistic - everything is alive, everything has a spirit, a soul. Demons and spirits and angels are all part of the divine world which was created by God, just like the natural world of animals, streams, people. Everything exists for a purpose.

&lt;/blockquote&gt;Are spirits the energy of a dead human being, or was it always just a spirit?&lt;blockquote&gt;

The spirts of the dead play a central role in the ATRs. Your ancestral spirits are the most important spirits you have. The gods are often thought to be divinized ancestors as well. But some spirits never were human either.

That said there's a lot of disagreement about the origins of certain spirits, like a spirit who represents a plant in one story can also be the spirit of a rebellious slave in another story and there is no logical contradiction because we are talking about an energy that is fractalline and can replicate itself on any scale or travel to any time or place. 

So as long as the energy is good  the spell will work and we can know this spirit and work with him  - that's what matters. The mythology is important but not as important as actually doing stuff with them. That's how you learn what they're &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; like.

&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;For that matter, are they extraterrestrial (or extradimensional) in origin?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Aliens aren't really part of the mythology or the practice of ATRs. I do think they probably exist though, the &lt;a href="http://www.activemind.com/Mysterious/Topics/SETI/drake_equation.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Drake equation&lt;/a&gt; makes that seem very likely. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;Any animal spirits?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Animal spirits aren't  really part of the ATR pantheons in the same way  they are in Native American shamanism (power animals)  but I have certainly seen and spoken with animal spirits and received messages from them, etc.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Have you ever experienced a spirit possession in yourself&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes but I don't remember it.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Do you think some â€œmental illnessesâ€ are merely the result of spiritual ailments (or perhaps interactions with spirits or entities)? Do you think psychology and medecine could learn something from ATRs and other shamanistic practices?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The idea certainly isn't original to me but I do think the human mind is like a radio that can tune into different frequencies. 

Some people, for reasons which we don't understand, sometimes start getting too many stations at once, or at least more than they are used to dealing with, and seem mentally ill to others. 

I think some or even many of these people are actually  going through a personal spiritual awakening they do not understand and aren't culturally equipped to deal with (e.g., kundalini, shamanic sickness, etc.)

Others are being tormented by spirits that have either been sent to attack them by people who practice withcraft or which they have inadvertently drawn into their lives or always had with them, e.g., people who experience soul loss after being abused or traumatized  in some way as children.

Your question about medicine and psychology was interesting but I can't imagine your average western rationalist being able to accept a worldview that is so heavily based on spirits and energy and things that just seem so primitive and superstitious. Its a huge mental leap to make, most people can't do it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess its the difference between the path of surrender and the path of the Warrior. I am reminded of Tom Robbinsâ€™ Jitterbug perfume, where he talks about the sould needed â€œendarkenmentâ€ just as much as enlightenment. In other words (or in my interpretation) to expand to the lofty heights of wisdom, love and compassion, it is necessary to also explore and expand into the carnal, physical passionate side, otherwise you arenâ€™t really developing fully. You are a top heavy and ultimately not encompassing the broader truth.<br />
<blockquote>
<p>That was true in my own case but I don&#8217;t know about anyone else. I like the term &#8220;endarkment&#8221; very much though. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>This morning was visited by animal messenger, (I suspect). I would like to contact this guy and see ask him a question. Is this possible? I went to his website and was not easily able to find a contact email.<br />
<blockquote>
<p>Yeah sure email me at <strong>friend at enemies dot com</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote><p>You mentioned that you have witnessed spirit possession, and that spirits are an active and integral part in your (and Iâ€™m assuming most, if not all) ATR. What then is your viewpoint towards exorcisms? Are they real? </p></blockquote>
<p>They often are I think yes.</p>
<p>You mentioned angels, do you also believe in demons, and whatâ€™s the distinction between a spirit and an angel?<br />
<blockquote>
<p>In the ATR paradigm angels are identified with the catholic saints who are also identified with the forces of nature, e.g., goddesses of love and fertility and wealth, gods of iron, thunder, and agriculture, tricksters, etc. Those are the &#8220;gods&#8221;</p>
<p>There are lots of different kinds of spirits, e.g., trees have spirits, so do mountains, so do animals, spiders&#8230; Humans are powerful spiritual beings in life and remain so after death. Ghosts can be good or malicious, the same with plants, places animals etc. </p>
<p>This paradigm is basically animistic - everything is alive, everything has a spirit, a soul. Demons and spirits and angels are all part of the divine world which was created by God, just like the natural world of animals, streams, people. Everything exists for a purpose.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Are spirits the energy of a dead human being, or was it always just a spirit?<br />
<blockquote>
<p>The spirts of the dead play a central role in the ATRs. Your ancestral spirits are the most important spirits you have. The gods are often thought to be divinized ancestors as well. But some spirits never were human either.</p>
<p>That said there&#8217;s a lot of disagreement about the origins of certain spirits, like a spirit who represents a plant in one story can also be the spirit of a rebellious slave in another story and there is no logical contradiction because we are talking about an energy that is fractalline and can replicate itself on any scale or travel to any time or place. </p>
<p>So as long as the energy is good  the spell will work and we can know this spirit and work with him  - that&#8217;s what matters. The mythology is important but not as important as actually doing stuff with them. That&#8217;s how you learn what they&#8217;re <em>really</em> like.</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote><p>For that matter, are they extraterrestrial (or extradimensional) in origin?</p></blockquote>
<p>Aliens aren&#8217;t really part of the mythology or the practice of ATRs. I do think they probably exist though, the <a href="http://www.activemind.com/Mysterious/Topics/SETI/drake_equation.html" rel="nofollow">Drake equation</a> makes that seem very likely. </p>
<blockquote><p>Any animal spirits?</p></blockquote>
<p>Animal spirits aren&#8217;t  really part of the ATR pantheons in the same way  they are in Native American shamanism (power animals)  but I have certainly seen and spoken with animal spirits and received messages from them, etc.</p>
<blockquote><p>Have you ever experienced a spirit possession in yourself</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes but I don&#8217;t remember it.</p>
<blockquote><p>Do you think some â€œmental illnessesâ€ are merely the result of spiritual ailments (or perhaps interactions with spirits or entities)? Do you think psychology and medecine could learn something from ATRs and other shamanistic practices?</p></blockquote>
<p>The idea certainly isn&#8217;t original to me but I do think the human mind is like a radio that can tune into different frequencies. </p>
<p>Some people, for reasons which we don&#8217;t understand, sometimes start getting too many stations at once, or at least more than they are used to dealing with, and seem mentally ill to others. </p>
<p>I think some or even many of these people are actually  going through a personal spiritual awakening they do not understand and aren&#8217;t culturally equipped to deal with (e.g., kundalini, shamanic sickness, etc.)</p>
<p>Others are being tormented by spirits that have either been sent to attack them by people who practice withcraft or which they have inadvertently drawn into their lives or always had with them, e.g., people who experience soul loss after being abused or traumatized  in some way as children.</p>
<p>Your question about medicine and psychology was interesting but I can&#8217;t imagine your average western rationalist being able to accept a worldview that is so heavily based on spirits and energy and things that just seem so primitive and superstitious. Its a huge mental leap to make, most people can&#8217;t do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ktulu</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9554</link>
		<dc:creator>Ktulu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 05:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9554</guid>
		<description>Hey Rev Max,

You mentioned that you have witnessed spirit possession, and that spirits are an active and integral part in your (and I'm assuming most, if not all) ATR.  What then is your viewpoint towards exorcisms?  Are they real?  You mentioned angels, do you also believe in demons, and what's the distinction between a spirit and an angel?  Are spirits the energy of a dead human being, or was it always just a spirit?  For that matter, are they extraterrestrial (or extradimensional) in origin?  Any animal spirits?  Have you ever experienced a spirit possession in yourself, or have you only witnessed it in others?  Do you think some "mental illnesses" are merely the result of spiritual ailments (or perhaps interactions with spirits or entities)?  Do you think psychology and medecine could learn something from ATRs and other shamanistic practices?

I know that was a bunch of questions, but I found the interview quite fascinating and thought-stirring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Rev Max,</p>
<p>You mentioned that you have witnessed spirit possession, and that spirits are an active and integral part in your (and I&#8217;m assuming most, if not all) ATR.  What then is your viewpoint towards exorcisms?  Are they real?  You mentioned angels, do you also believe in demons, and what&#8217;s the distinction between a spirit and an angel?  Are spirits the energy of a dead human being, or was it always just a spirit?  For that matter, are they extraterrestrial (or extradimensional) in origin?  Any animal spirits?  Have you ever experienced a spirit possession in yourself, or have you only witnessed it in others?  Do you think some &#8220;mental illnesses&#8221; are merely the result of spiritual ailments (or perhaps interactions with spirits or entities)?  Do you think psychology and medecine could learn something from ATRs and other shamanistic practices?</p>
<p>I know that was a bunch of questions, but I found the interview quite fascinating and thought-stirring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9553</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 05:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9553</guid>
		<description>This is late to comment and while  need brooks no delay but better late than never I always say, right?

1st Great interview, as usual.

2nd Had a wild night of dreams after reading the interview.  This morning was visited by animal messenger, (I suspect).  I would like to contact this guy and see ask him a question.  Is this possible?  I went to his website and was not easily able to find a contact email.  

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is late to comment and while  need brooks no delay but better late than never I always say, right?</p>
<p>1st Great interview, as usual.</p>
<p>2nd Had a wild night of dreams after reading the interview.  This morning was visited by animal messenger, (I suspect).  I would like to contact this guy and see ask him a question.  Is this possible?  I went to his website and was not easily able to find a contact email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: limukala</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9552</link>
		<dc:creator>limukala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 05:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9552</guid>
		<description>"That makes it sound like I disapprove of Buddhism. I donâ€™t. Iâ€™m just not sure its right for everyone. Maybe not everyone needs it. Maybe some people need to buck up and grow in the other direction"

I guess its the difference between the path of surrender and the path of the Warrior.  I am reminded of Tom Robbins' Jitterbug perfume, where he talks about the sould needed "endarkenment" just as much as enlightenment.  In other words (or in my interpretation) to expand to the lofty heights of wisdom, love and compassion, it is necessary to also explore and expand into the carnal, physical passionate side, otherwise you aren't really developing fully.  You are a top heavy and ultimately not encompassing the broader truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;That makes it sound like I disapprove of Buddhism. I donâ€™t. Iâ€™m just not sure its right for everyone. Maybe not everyone needs it. Maybe some people need to buck up and grow in the other direction&#8221;</p>
<p>I guess its the difference between the path of surrender and the path of the Warrior.  I am reminded of Tom Robbins&#8217; Jitterbug perfume, where he talks about the sould needed &#8220;endarkenment&#8221; just as much as enlightenment.  In other words (or in my interpretation) to expand to the lofty heights of wisdom, love and compassion, it is necessary to also explore and expand into the carnal, physical passionate side, otherwise you aren&#8217;t really developing fully.  You are a top heavy and ultimately not encompassing the broader truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill m.</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9544</link>
		<dc:creator>bill m.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 23:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9544</guid>
		<description>JR's Post:
"To be honest I donâ€™t even know who this Rev Max person is, other than another â€˜Tim Boucher typeâ€™ who is heavily into the occult and gnostism and is trying to carve a niche and voice for themselves on the internet with their website. I guess that is starting to become the norm these days - with the bloggers taking over. People whom we really donâ€™t know other than by the words and opinions they type in their daily blog/journal entries. It seems like they are happy and content in just doing that, but to me it seems like sort of a wormish backdoors-way to get notoriety. I think itâ€™s kind of funny, because you know some of these people that youâ€™ll never see or hear in real life, are pretty damn weird, with their little reclusive â€œblog interviewsâ€ and such, lol.."""

This statement is interesting to me, cause isnt this the case in 99 percent of the stuff we read and quote on this site?  isnt the very definition of a good writer one whose works outshine what they do in 'real life'?
ESPECIALLY in all these religious writings it seems the work is way more notorious than the writer. 
Sorry if I went off topic there Tim... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JR&#8217;s Post:<br />
&#8220;To be honest I donâ€™t even know who this Rev Max person is, other than another â€˜Tim Boucher typeâ€™ who is heavily into the occult and gnostism and is trying to carve a niche and voice for themselves on the internet with their website. I guess that is starting to become the norm these days - with the bloggers taking over. People whom we really donâ€™t know other than by the words and opinions they type in their daily blog/journal entries. It seems like they are happy and content in just doing that, but to me it seems like sort of a wormish backdoors-way to get notoriety. I think itâ€™s kind of funny, because you know some of these people that youâ€™ll never see or hear in real life, are pretty damn weird, with their little reclusive â€œblog interviewsâ€ and such, lol..&#8221;"&#8221;</p>
<p>This statement is interesting to me, cause isnt this the case in 99 percent of the stuff we read and quote on this site?  isnt the very definition of a good writer one whose works outshine what they do in &#8216;real life&#8217;?<br />
ESPECIALLY in all these religious writings it seems the work is way more notorious than the writer.<br />
Sorry if I went off topic there Tim&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fell</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9543</link>
		<dc:creator>Fell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 22:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9543</guid>
		<description>That was a really good read, thanks guys!

Keeps the gears in my head turning, on things I want to present perhaps later this year. Good luck with the new endeavour, Max!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a really good read, thanks guys!</p>
<p>Keeps the gears in my head turning, on things I want to present perhaps later this year. Good luck with the new endeavour, Max!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rev max</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9541</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 22:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9541</guid>
		<description>That's sort of what I was talking about when I said that things that got to be a pain after a while. 

People would write me and argue (still do) "I just saw &lt;a href="http://www.sylvia.org/home/index.cfm" rel="nofollow"&gt;Sylvia Browne&lt;/a&gt; talk about gnosticism on Montel Williams, I can't believe you're saying this shit, blah blah blah." 

And I would write back "OK, my site shows how I interpreted gnosticism and scriptures like &lt;a href="http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/hypostas.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Hypostasis of the Archons&lt;/a&gt;, how did you read it?"

And of course, they never read Hypostasis of the Archons or any other gnostic myth, all they know about gnosticism is what some psychic said on a daytime talk show. 

FWIW, I gave the first 9 years or so of my life to Christainity, when I watch movies today like &lt;a href="http://film.guardian.co.uk/News_Story/Critic_Review/Guardian_Film_of_the_week/0,4267,899351,00.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Magdalen Sisters&lt;/a&gt; it STILL makes my blood boil 'cause I know how true it is. 

To the other poster who mentioned Buddhism and gods, this is a deep topic which I could only glancingly respond to.

I've studied Buddhism, my wife is a Buddhist, from my POV its all very obvious, simple and true - the insights of Buddhism. Existence is suffering, compassion is noble, desire is the root of disatisfaction etc.

It took  me years to see the &lt;em&gt;other&lt;/em&gt; side of the coin - sometimes its OK to take risks, to fight for what you want, to defend yourself from attack, etc. Sometimes you need to. It doesn't mean you can't still show compassion but life is meant to be lived and passionately engaged not merely contemplated.

That makes it sound like I disapprove of Buddhism. I don't. I'm just not sure its right for everyone. Maybe not everyone needs it. Maybe some people need to buck up and grow in the &lt;em&gt;other&lt;/em&gt; direction. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s sort of what I was talking about when I said that things that got to be a pain after a while. </p>
<p>People would write me and argue (still do) &#8220;I just saw <a href="http://www.sylvia.org/home/index.cfm" rel="nofollow">Sylvia Browne</a> talk about gnosticism on Montel Williams, I can&#8217;t believe you&#8217;re saying this shit, blah blah blah.&#8221; </p>
<p>And I would write back &#8220;OK, my site shows how I interpreted gnosticism and scriptures like <a href="http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/hypostas.html" rel="nofollow">Hypostasis of the Archons</a>, how did you read it?&#8221;</p>
<p>And of course, they never read Hypostasis of the Archons or any other gnostic myth, all they know about gnosticism is what some psychic said on a daytime talk show. </p>
<p>FWIW, I gave the first 9 years or so of my life to Christainity, when I watch movies today like <a href="http://film.guardian.co.uk/News_Story/Critic_Review/Guardian_Film_of_the_week/0,4267,899351,00.html" rel="nofollow">The Magdalen Sisters</a> it STILL makes my blood boil &#8217;cause I know how true it is. </p>
<p>To the other poster who mentioned Buddhism and gods, this is a deep topic which I could only glancingly respond to.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve studied Buddhism, my wife is a Buddhist, from my POV its all very obvious, simple and true - the insights of Buddhism. Existence is suffering, compassion is noble, desire is the root of disatisfaction etc.</p>
<p>It took  me years to see the <em>other</em> side of the coin - sometimes its OK to take risks, to fight for what you want, to defend yourself from attack, etc. Sometimes you need to. It doesn&#8217;t mean you can&#8217;t still show compassion but life is meant to be lived and passionately engaged not merely contemplated.</p>
<p>That makes it sound like I disapprove of Buddhism. I don&#8217;t. I&#8217;m just not sure its right for everyone. Maybe not everyone needs it. Maybe some people need to buck up and grow in the <em>other</em> direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Meanstream&#8221; Christianity	- 
	Pop Occulture</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9540</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Meanstream&#8221; Christianity	- 
	Pop Occulture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 22:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9540</guid>
		<description>[...] m Christianity. I think it was actually written as a typo by a mainstream Christian in the comments here, but it encapsulates so many things so succintly, I sa [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] m Christianity. I think it was actually written as a typo by a mainstream Christian in the comments here, but it encapsulates so many things so succintly, I sa [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9539</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 21:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9539</guid>
		<description>"Meanstream Christianity" - how did I miss that? What a great neologism. Good catch, JR!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Meanstream Christianity&#8221; - how did I miss that? What a great neologism. Good catch, JR!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.R.</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9538</link>
		<dc:creator>J.R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 21:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9538</guid>
		<description>To be honest I don't even know who this Rev Max person is, other than another 'Tim Boucher type' who is heavily into the occult and gnostism and is trying to carve a niche and voice for themselves on the internet with their website. I guess that is starting to become the norm these days -  with the bloggers taking over. People whom we really don't know other than by the words and opinions they type in their daily blog/journal entries. It seems like they are happy and content in just doing that, but to me it seems like sort of a wormish backdoors-way to get notoriety. I think it's kind of funny, because you know some of these people that you'll never see or hear in real life, are pretty damn weird, with their little reclusive "blog interviews" and such, lol..  But anyway Anna, "mean stream" christianity... Umm, I'm not sure if that was a subconscious mental slip but I agree main stream christianity is pretty darn mean. I think this pop occulture place is kind of a refuge for battered individuals to speak their minds and souls against "mean stream" christianity. As well as various other topics... Unfortunately they don't really discuss science as much as I would like, it's more or less a bunch of psuedo-philosophical rants by a bunch of no name individuals. But anyway don't get too bent out of shape over it Anna, it's just the internet. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest I don&#8217;t even know who this Rev Max person is, other than another &#8216;Tim Boucher type&#8217; who is heavily into the occult and gnostism and is trying to carve a niche and voice for themselves on the internet with their website. I guess that is starting to become the norm these days -  with the bloggers taking over. People whom we really don&#8217;t know other than by the words and opinions they type in their daily blog/journal entries. It seems like they are happy and content in just doing that, but to me it seems like sort of a wormish backdoors-way to get notoriety. I think it&#8217;s kind of funny, because you know some of these people that you&#8217;ll never see or hear in real life, are pretty damn weird, with their little reclusive &#8220;blog interviews&#8221; and such, lol..  But anyway Anna, &#8220;mean stream&#8221; christianity&#8230; Umm, I&#8217;m not sure if that was a subconscious mental slip but I agree main stream christianity is pretty darn mean. I think this pop occulture place is kind of a refuge for battered individuals to speak their minds and souls against &#8220;mean stream&#8221; christianity. As well as various other topics&#8230; Unfortunately they don&#8217;t really discuss science as much as I would like, it&#8217;s more or less a bunch of psuedo-philosophical rants by a bunch of no name individuals. But anyway don&#8217;t get too bent out of shape over it Anna, it&#8217;s just the internet. <img src='http://www.timboucher.com/journal/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9537</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 21:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9537</guid>
		<description>Anna, it's interesting to me how you would make a judgement call without having bothered to read the whole thing!

In what way did you find &lt;em&gt;his&lt;/em&gt; personal exploration of faith, religion and magic hurtful to you and &lt;em&gt;your&lt;/em&gt; chosen path through life?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anna, it&#8217;s interesting to me how you would make a judgement call without having bothered to read the whole thing!</p>
<p>In what way did you find <em>his</em> personal exploration of faith, religion and magic hurtful to you and <em>your</em> chosen path through life?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9536</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 20:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9536</guid>
		<description>It is interesting how rev max never bothered to take a peek into mean stream Christainity.  To be honest I didn't read the whole thing because it was hurtful to me after a while.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting how rev max never bothered to take a peek into mean stream Christainity.  To be honest I didn&#8217;t read the whole thing because it was hurtful to me after a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9535</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 20:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9535</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;PS. Here's a great article to read as a companion piece to Rev Max's interview. It's about a regular guy in Chicago who became involved with an ATR:

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1175/is_n5_v26/ai_13220917/print

Worth reading the whole thing in its entirety. Highly recommended&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>PS. Here&#8217;s a great article to read as a companion piece to Rev Max&#8217;s interview. It&#8217;s about a regular guy in Chicago who became involved with an ATR:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1175/is_n5_v26/ai_13220917/print" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1175/is_n5_v26/ai_13220917/print'>http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1175/is_n5_v26/ai_13220917/print</a></p>
<p>Worth reading the whole thing in its entirety. Highly recommended</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9534</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 20:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9534</guid>
		<description>Yeah that's a good way of putting it, Rev Max. Another way to think about it is like this: the classic ideal of the Buddhist monk is to go out with his begging bowl, and people donate food so he can survive. If it weren't for other people who actually work for their food, then these guys would be out of luck (or they'd find another solution). Not saying either approach is better, but there is a definite symbiosis that goes on. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah that&#8217;s a good way of putting it, Rev Max. Another way to think about it is like this: the classic ideal of the Buddhist monk is to go out with his begging bowl, and people donate food so he can survive. If it weren&#8217;t for other people who actually work for their food, then these guys would be out of luck (or they&#8217;d find another solution). Not saying either approach is better, but there is a definite symbiosis that goes on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rev max</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9533</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 20:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9533</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; The gods are all eternal scoundrels
Incapable of dissolving the suffering of impermanence.
Those who serve them and venerate them
May even in this world sink into a sea of sorrow.
We know the gods are false and have no concrete being;
Therefore the wise man believes them not
The fate of the world depends on causes and conditions
Therefore the wise man many not rely on gods.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Islam also arose as an idealistic reform movement that in principle is iconoclastic and austere: no spirits, no saints, no magic, no representative art

That's fine for the philosophers but go to the countryside of rural Morocco and that stuff flourishes

Just like it does in Southeast Asia, BTW

Philosophy and folk magic don't have to contradict each other 

Tibetan Buddhism combines the austere buddhist philosophy with Bon-Po shamanism

and all of its gods, devils, possessions, sorcery, etc.

So let the philosophers meditate

I like doing stuff


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> The gods are all eternal scoundrels<br />
Incapable of dissolving the suffering of impermanence.<br />
Those who serve them and venerate them<br />
May even in this world sink into a sea of sorrow.<br />
We know the gods are false and have no concrete being;<br />
Therefore the wise man believes them not<br />
The fate of the world depends on causes and conditions<br />
Therefore the wise man many not rely on gods.</p></blockquote>
<p>Islam also arose as an idealistic reform movement that in principle is iconoclastic and austere: no spirits, no saints, no magic, no representative art</p>
<p>That&#8217;s fine for the philosophers but go to the countryside of rural Morocco and that stuff flourishes</p>
<p>Just like it does in Southeast Asia, BTW</p>
<p>Philosophy and folk magic don&#8217;t have to contradict each other </p>
<p>Tibetan Buddhism combines the austere buddhist philosophy with Bon-Po shamanism</p>
<p>and all of its gods, devils, possessions, sorcery, etc.</p>
<p>So let the philosophers meditate</p>
<p>I like doing stuff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9532</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 19:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9532</guid>
		<description>There are lots of conversations about Buddhism &#38; Gnosticism happening over at the Palm Tree Garden Forum, which incidentally is a very active place for all types of interesting and heady gnostic exploration:

http://www.palmtreegarden.org/forum</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are lots of conversations about Buddhism &amp; Gnosticism happening over at the Palm Tree Garden Forum, which incidentally is a very active place for all types of interesting and heady gnostic exploration:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.palmtreegarden.org/forum" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.palmtreegarden.org/forum'>http://www.palmtreegarden.org/forum</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faerieland is inside</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9530</link>
		<dc:creator>Faerieland is inside</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 19:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9530</guid>
		<description> I've always wondered if gnosticism is compatiable with Buddhism. Buddhists reject all notions of a personal God or Godhead. When Rev Max talks about overthrowing the old God I was reminded of this-
 ""I am BrahmÃ¢, the Great BrahmÃ¢, the Supreme One, the Mighty, the All-seeing, the Ruler, the Lord of all, the Maker, the Creator, the Chief of all appointing to each his place, the Ancient of days, the Father of all that is and will be." (DÃ®gha NikÃ¡ya, II, 263)."
 The Buddha dismisses all these claims of MahÃ¢ BrahmÃ¢ as being due to his own delusions brought about by ignorance. He argues that MahÃ¢-BrahmÃ¢ is simply another deva, perhaps with greater karmic force than the other gods, but nonetheless a deva and therefore unenlightened and subject to the samsÃ¢ric process as determined by his karma. In such Suttas as the BrahmajÃ¢la sutta and the AggaÂ¤Â¤a Sutta the Buddha refutes the claims of Maha BrahmÃ¢ and shows him to be subject to karmic law (i.e. cosmic law). Even though long-lived MahÃ¢ BrahmÃ¢ will be eliminated in each cycle of inevitable world dissolution and re-evolution. In the Khevadda Sutta MahÃ¢ BrahmÃ¢ is forced to admit to an inquiring monk that he is unable to answer a question that is posed to him, and advises the monk to consult the Buddha. This clearly shows the BrahmÃ¢ acknowledges the superiority of the Buddha.

The Buddhist view is that gods may lead more comfortable lives and be addicted to all the sense pleasures, but in terms of wisdom might be inferior to humans. They are even represented as coming to receive instruction from monks and even lay persons. Later on with the Hindu revival and proliferation of God-cults the Buddhists were increasingly vocal against the pretensions of God and his retinue of lesser gods. Nargarjuna the Indian Buddhist philosopher of the 2nd century CE expressed a commonly shared Buddhist view when he wrote:

        The gods are all eternal scoundrels
        Incapable of dissolving the suffering of impermanence.
        Those who serve them and venerate them
        May even in this world sink into a sea of sorrow.
        We know the gods are false and have no concrete being;
        Therefore the wise man believes them not
        The fate of the world depends on causes and conditions
        Therefore the wise man many not rely on gods.

                     http://www.buddhistinformation.com/buddhist_attitude_to_god.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always wondered if gnosticism is compatiable with Buddhism. Buddhists reject all notions of a personal God or Godhead. When Rev Max talks about overthrowing the old God I was reminded of this-<br />
 &#8220;&#8221;I am BrahmÃ¢, the Great BrahmÃ¢, the Supreme One, the Mighty, the All-seeing, the Ruler, the Lord of all, the Maker, the Creator, the Chief of all appointing to each his place, the Ancient of days, the Father of all that is and will be.&#8221; (DÃ®gha NikÃ¡ya, II, 263).&#8221;<br />
 The Buddha dismisses all these claims of MahÃ¢ BrahmÃ¢ as being due to his own delusions brought about by ignorance. He argues that MahÃ¢-BrahmÃ¢ is simply another deva, perhaps with greater karmic force than the other gods, but nonetheless a deva and therefore unenlightened and subject to the samsÃ¢ric process as determined by his karma. In such Suttas as the BrahmajÃ¢la sutta and the AggaÂ¤Â¤a Sutta the Buddha refutes the claims of Maha BrahmÃ¢ and shows him to be subject to karmic law (i.e. cosmic law). Even though long-lived MahÃ¢ BrahmÃ¢ will be eliminated in each cycle of inevitable world dissolution and re-evolution. In the Khevadda Sutta MahÃ¢ BrahmÃ¢ is forced to admit to an inquiring monk that he is unable to answer a question that is posed to him, and advises the monk to consult the Buddha. This clearly shows the BrahmÃ¢ acknowledges the superiority of the Buddha.</p>
<p>The Buddhist view is that gods may lead more comfortable lives and be addicted to all the sense pleasures, but in terms of wisdom might be inferior to humans. They are even represented as coming to receive instruction from monks and even lay persons. Later on with the Hindu revival and proliferation of God-cults the Buddhists were increasingly vocal against the pretensions of God and his retinue of lesser gods. Nargarjuna the Indian Buddhist philosopher of the 2nd century CE expressed a commonly shared Buddhist view when he wrote:</p>
<p>        The gods are all eternal scoundrels<br />
        Incapable of dissolving the suffering of impermanence.<br />
        Those who serve them and venerate them<br />
        May even in this world sink into a sea of sorrow.<br />
        We know the gods are false and have no concrete being;<br />
        Therefore the wise man believes them not<br />
        The fate of the world depends on causes and conditions<br />
        Therefore the wise man many not rely on gods.</p>
<p>                     <a href="http://www.buddhistinformation.com/buddhist_attitude_to_god.htm" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.buddhistinformation.com/buddhist_attitude_to_god.htm'>http://www.buddhistinformation.com/buddhist_attitude_to_god.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemesis</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9529</link>
		<dc:creator>nemesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 18:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9529</guid>
		<description>I found that lesbian thing not as i immagined because i was confused. never could multi task......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found that lesbian thing not as i immagined because i was confused. never could multi task&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9528</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 18:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9528</guid>
		<description>Colin:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Iâ€™d like to believe, but I canâ€™t until I experience it, and I want to experience it, but at the same time when I find myself in contact with people who profess some kind of ability or insight I find my skeptical switch turning up to max.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think that's 100% healthy. What it says to me is that you have a drive and a desire, but you're listening to your intuition about what's right. Just give it time. I think that's the only missing ingredient. It's like Max said above, that the subconscious has its own timetable that you can't force...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colin:</p>
<blockquote><p>Iâ€™d like to believe, but I canâ€™t until I experience it, and I want to experience it, but at the same time when I find myself in contact with people who profess some kind of ability or insight I find my skeptical switch turning up to max.</p></blockquote>
<p>I think that&#8217;s 100% healthy. What it says to me is that you have a drive and a desire, but you&#8217;re listening to your intuition about what&#8217;s right. Just give it time. I think that&#8217;s the only missing ingredient. It&#8217;s like Max said above, that the subconscious has its own timetable that you can&#8217;t force&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9527</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 18:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9527</guid>
		<description>JR, I won't delete that comment because beneath the veil of hostility, I can tell you're exploring a serious issue for yourself - finally. So explore away! May all your queer fantasies come true!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JR, I won&#8217;t delete that comment because beneath the veil of hostility, I can tell you&#8217;re exploring a serious issue for yourself - finally. So explore away! May all your queer fantasies come true!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rev max</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9526</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 18:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9526</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;hey are any of you guys queers?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I had a menage a trois once with two lesbians, does that count?

&lt;blockquote&gt;I was going to e-mail him with some questions but realized that I probably wouldnâ€™t be able to get any answers&lt;/blockquote&gt;

My wife and I are painting our living and dining rooms today, but ask away, I'll check here later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>hey are any of you guys queers?</p></blockquote>
<p>I had a menage a trois once with two lesbians, does that count?</p>
<blockquote><p>I was going to e-mail him with some questions but realized that I probably wouldnâ€™t be able to get any answers</p></blockquote>
<p>My wife and I are painting our living and dining rooms today, but ask away, I&#8217;ll check here later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemesis</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9525</link>
		<dc:creator>nemesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 15:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9525</guid>
		<description>oh yes, the interview was a good read and the gnostic gospels is the only book ive read a few times, i felt spirited away by them and they seemed closer to how i envisaged christianity should be. like a snowball that collects all the good and dispenses with that tribal,divisionist,facist nonesense. cheers tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh yes, the interview was a good read and the gnostic gospels is the only book ive read a few times, i felt spirited away by them and they seemed closer to how i envisaged christianity should be. like a snowball that collects all the good and dispenses with that tribal,divisionist,facist nonesense. cheers tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9524</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 15:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9524</guid>
		<description>I really liked this interview. I've never really known much about Gnosticism until I read this and I've been researching it all day. I'm interested in what Max mentioned about spirits - I was going to e-mail him with some questions but realized that I probably wouldn't be able to get any answers, technically I'm not even allowed to view his website (I'm only 16 years old).

Anyway, thanks Tim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really liked this interview. I&#8217;ve never really known much about Gnosticism until I read this and I&#8217;ve been researching it all day. I&#8217;m interested in what Max mentioned about spirits - I was going to e-mail him with some questions but realized that I probably wouldn&#8217;t be able to get any answers, technically I&#8217;m not even allowed to view his website (I&#8217;m only 16 years old).</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks Tim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemesis</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9523</link>
		<dc:creator>nemesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9523</guid>
		<description>Im a giver not a taker but am i queer?I  think if i was id probably mask it with a veil of hostility towards any kind of mutual emotional bonding, After all if something makes you feel uncomfortable you really should explore why that is. I dont know you j.r. but i love you man, no honestly its ok, i think tim should allow youre posts because maybe the reason youre here is because you need to be. oh yes and that wierd feeling you get when you read this stuff well thats just a psychological defense mechanism which tells me that youre extremely ultra sensative but trapped. some people build bridges whilst some build walls. id like to say i love all you people and thanks for the pats on the back and the support but you j.r. ,i love you more than anything you cute little fluffy bunny you. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im a giver not a taker but am i queer?I  think if i was id probably mask it with a veil of hostility towards any kind of mutual emotional bonding, After all if something makes you feel uncomfortable you really should explore why that is. I dont know you j.r. but i love you man, no honestly its ok, i think tim should allow youre posts because maybe the reason youre here is because you need to be. oh yes and that wierd feeling you get when you read this stuff well thats just a psychological defense mechanism which tells me that youre extremely ultra sensative but trapped. some people build bridges whilst some build walls. id like to say i love all you people and thanks for the pats on the back and the support but you j.r. ,i love you more than anything you cute little fluffy bunny you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9522</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 13:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9522</guid>
		<description>*pats J.R. on the back*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*pats J.R. on the back*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Russell</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9521</link>
		<dc:creator>James Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 13:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9521</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;hey are any of you guys queers?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Why, are you hopeful?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>hey are any of you guys queers?</p></blockquote>
<p>Why, are you hopeful?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.R.</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9519</link>
		<dc:creator>J.R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 07:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9519</guid>
		<description>hey are any of you guys queers? Just wondering, I'm sure this post will probably get deleted, but oh well. It sort of seems like a support group in here for ultra sensitive males. Or the queerish effiminate type. Maybe queer isn't exactly the word, but it seems like everyone in here is looking for a pat on the back or something. It's kind of funny and cute in a way, but also sort of weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey are any of you guys queers? Just wondering, I&#8217;m sure this post will probably get deleted, but oh well. It sort of seems like a support group in here for ultra sensitive males. Or the queerish effiminate type. Maybe queer isn&#8217;t exactly the word, but it seems like everyone in here is looking for a pat on the back or something. It&#8217;s kind of funny and cute in a way, but also sort of weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faerieland is inside</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9518</link>
		<dc:creator>Faerieland is inside</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 07:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9518</guid>
		<description> Amazing.........
I have no desire to experience spirits or angels directly. When I was 18 at Goddard college in Vermont I had an interesting experience. Around the time I read The Little Country and Emanuel Swedenborg. My imagination was inspired. I became interested in the notion of a farieland existing, a place existing as an alternative to heaven and hell. A place of pure imagination, of infinite portals, of metaphysical invisible tubes connected to our minds and subconscious containers.  A place where at any given moment images of faerie creatures could manifest themselves in the outside world. That is how I imagined it but I really wished to see an otherworld or things from another world.
 Regardless---- on a spring night there was an electricty in the air. I remember walking around dusk and feeling something in the air. Later, I went to bed and couldn't sleep. I began to feel an unease. I had drawings in the art building which I wanted to collect because I felt something 'bad' was going to happen to them. So I got out of bed to get the drawings. (The art building was about a mile walk, and you had to walk through a wooded path to get there.)
  I step outside and instantly my vision is bombarded. The night was a kaledioscope of all these different gestural forms. They were everywhere, flying and walking around. It continued until I reached a point on the path, then the images receded and one  yellow orb started to circle around me, I began to hear laughter coming from everywhere. Soon the frenzy picked up again, images swirling all around.  All through this my brain was oddly detached.
 I make it to the art building, the visions stop. I collect what I need and step back outside and it begins all over again. I remember thinking "I don't want this" and then just like that it stopped. 
  I have never done any drugs, I have never even been drunk. After that night I decided I don't want the experience with spirits. I'll read about it instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;<br />
I have no desire to experience spirits or angels directly. When I was 18 at Goddard college in Vermont I had an interesting experience. Around the time I read The Little Country and Emanuel Swedenborg. My imagination was inspired. I became interested in the notion of a farieland existing, a place existing as an alternative to heaven and hell. A place of pure imagination, of infinite portals, of metaphysical invisible tubes connected to our minds and subconscious containers.  A place where at any given moment images of faerie creatures could manifest themselves in the outside world. That is how I imagined it but I really wished to see an otherworld or things from another world.<br />
 Regardless&#8212;- on a spring night there was an electricty in the air. I remember walking around dusk and feeling something in the air. Later, I went to bed and couldn&#8217;t sleep. I began to feel an unease. I had drawings in the art building which I wanted to collect because I felt something &#8216;bad&#8217; was going to happen to them. So I got out of bed to get the drawings. (The art building was about a mile walk, and you had to walk through a wooded path to get there.)<br />
  I step outside and instantly my vision is bombarded. The night was a kaledioscope of all these different gestural forms. They were everywhere, flying and walking around. It continued until I reached a point on the path, then the images receded and one  yellow orb started to circle around me, I began to hear laughter coming from everywhere. Soon the frenzy picked up again, images swirling all around.  All through this my brain was oddly detached.<br />
 I make it to the art building, the visions stop. I collect what I need and step back outside and it begins all over again. I remember thinking &#8220;I don&#8217;t want this&#8221; and then just like that it stopped.<br />
  I have never done any drugs, I have never even been drunk. After that night I decided I don&#8217;t want the experience with spirits. I&#8217;ll read about it instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin F.</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9517</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 03:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9517</guid>
		<description>Very interesting article!!  I was a little dubious at first, both by the length and the topic, but I was enchanted soon after starting, and thoroughly enjoyed it.  I always find it difficult to take discusions of magic seriously, and old knee-jerk reaction I'm sure, but I found myself thinking 'damn, where do I find these people?' and thinking about 'Foucault's Pendulum'.  I'd like to believe, but I can't until I experience it, and I want to experience it, but at the same time when I find myself in contact with people who profess some kind of ability or insight I find my skeptical switch turning up to max.  And so I continue with my search all alone..heheh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting article!!  I was a little dubious at first, both by the length and the topic, but I was enchanted soon after starting, and thoroughly enjoyed it.  I always find it difficult to take discusions of magic seriously, and old knee-jerk reaction I&#8217;m sure, but I found myself thinking &#8216;damn, where do I find these people?&#8217; and thinking about &#8216;Foucault&#8217;s Pendulum&#8217;.  I&#8217;d like to believe, but I can&#8217;t until I experience it, and I want to experience it, but at the same time when I find myself in contact with people who profess some kind of ability or insight I find my skeptical switch turning up to max.  And so I continue with my search all alone..heheh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9516</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 00:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9516</guid>
		<description>Funny Bill, I hadn't seen it that way until you mentioned it. Like when people cast spells or create a sigil or whatever, they are trying to influence the spirits. But the spirits in turn try to influence us by manipulating our reality in subtle ways. 

The part that creeped me out the most was the thing about the person covered in shrouds clinging to his building.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny Bill, I hadn&#8217;t seen it that way until you mentioned it. Like when people cast spells or create a sigil or whatever, they are trying to influence the spirits. But the spirits in turn try to influence us by manipulating our reality in subtle ways. </p>
<p>The part that creeped me out the most was the thing about the person covered in shrouds clinging to his building.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill m.</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9515</link>
		<dc:creator>bill m.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 00:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9515</guid>
		<description>nice interview!
it really creeped me out when he talked about how sometimes the spirits can try to contact YOU, give you a sign or something. it made me think of the my leaf covered porch which until recently was totally covered but recently the wind blew hard and somehow arranged the pile of leaves into a perfect image of a flying bird.
like a gull or something. 
i sympathize also with the time it takes to get an artistic vision out. i think the subconscious is the key; its like processor that whirs away and clocks at one speed and cant be traded in for the new model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice interview!<br />
it really creeped me out when he talked about how sometimes the spirits can try to contact YOU, give you a sign or something. it made me think of the my leaf covered porch which until recently was totally covered but recently the wind blew hard and somehow arranged the pile of leaves into a perfect image of a flying bird.<br />
like a gull or something.<br />
i sympathize also with the time it takes to get an artistic vision out. i think the subconscious is the key; its like processor that whirs away and clocks at one speed and cant be traded in for the new model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Funeral of the Real &#187; Batter my heart</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9512</link>
		<dc:creator>The Funeral of the Real &#187; Batter my heart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2006 23:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9512</guid>
		<description>[...] 		 		Home 		About 		  	     	Batter my heart 	January 7, 2006 	    	There&#8217;s a simply incredible interview at Pop Occulture with Rev. Max, proprietor of The Gnostic Fr [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 		 		Home 		About 		  	     	Batter my heart 	January 7, 2006 	    	There&#8217;s a simply incredible interview at Pop Occulture with Rev. Max, proprietor of The Gnostic Fr [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9511</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2006 22:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9511</guid>
		<description>Get over it JR. You left an asinine comment and I deleted it. Case closed. Any more comments you leave to this effect will be deleted starting from here on out with no explanations or apologies. Review my new &lt;a href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/posting-guidelines/"&gt;Posting Guidelines&lt;/a&gt; which I created on your behalf for more information. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get over it JR. You left an asinine comment and I deleted it. Case closed. Any more comments you leave to this effect will be deleted starting from here on out with no explanations or apologies. Review my new <a href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/posting-guidelines/">Posting Guidelines</a> which I created on your behalf for more information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.R.</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/07/rev-max-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-9510</link>
		<dc:creator>J.R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2006 21:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/06/rev-max-interview/#comment-9510</guid>
		<description>It looks like this Reverend Max doesn't believe in censorship. That's cool, that's a good thing.. Freedom of speech and expression are good things :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like this Reverend Max doesn&#8217;t believe in censorship. That&#8217;s cool, that&#8217;s a good thing.. Freedom of speech and expression are good things <img src='http://www.timboucher.com/journal/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
