<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Meanstream&#8221; Christianity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/</link>
	<description>public domain playground. friendly entities welcome.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: King Felix Cipher &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Threat of Universalism</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-84079</link>
		<dc:creator>King Felix Cipher &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Threat of Universalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 03:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/#comment-84079</guid>
		<description>[...] I tried asking one of them why Christians feel so threatened by this idea of universal salvation, and was informed simply that itâ€™s â€œwrong.â€ If only it were that simple. The fact of the matter is that the identity of Jesus seems to be caught up in our own identities somehow. Mainstream (meanstream) Christians think Jesus was talking to them only. Gnostic Christians say Jesus was a gnostic. Gay Christians say Jesus was a queer. Even stoners try to argue that Jesus healed using cannabis oil. Nevermind the battles around the Da Vinci Codeâ€™s portrayal of Christ. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I tried asking one of them why Christians feel so threatened by this idea of universal salvation, and was informed simply that itâ€™s â€œwrong.â€ If only it were that simple. The fact of the matter is that the identity of Jesus seems to be caught up in our own identities somehow. Mainstream (meanstream) Christians think Jesus was talking to them only. Gnostic Christians say Jesus was a gnostic. Gay Christians say Jesus was a queer. Even stoners try to argue that Jesus healed using cannabis oil. Nevermind the battles around the Da Vinci Codeâ€™s portrayal of Christ. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Haggard Resigns Over Gay Scandal - Pop Occulture Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-24391</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Haggard Resigns Over Gay Scandal - Pop Occulture Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 03:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/#comment-24391</guid>
		<description>[...] I don&#8217;t know which is bigger news, that this dude resigned, highlighting the utter hypocrisy of meanstream Christianity, or that I just got BoingBoinged. Traffic is spiking like crazy. Hopefully my server won&#8217;t crap out on me. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I don&#8217;t know which is bigger news, that this dude resigned, highlighting the utter hypocrisy of meanstream Christianity, or that I just got BoingBoinged. Traffic is spiking like crazy. Hopefully my server won&#8217;t crap out on me. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debunking Philip K. Dick	- 
	Pop Occulture</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-11208</link>
		<dc:creator>Debunking Philip K. Dick	- 
	Pop Occulture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 00:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/#comment-11208</guid>
		<description>[...] i Code. Clearly, this is because the book threatens the story-system which the majority of meanstream Christian churches adhere to, and the social, financial and powe [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] i Code. Clearly, this is because the book threatens the story-system which the majority of meanstream Christian churches adhere to, and the social, financial and powe [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonny Moonie</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-9705</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonny Moonie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 03:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/#comment-9705</guid>
		<description>granfalloon - a meaningless association of individuals, a neologism by Kurt Vonnegut

"Scam" is slang, so there aren't any old compound terms using it. I always look for the other words that are blocking when words don't come to mind easily. (I found a word for that, during my search for words on this subject: parapraxis - doing something besides normal practice, such as having a slip of the tongue or misplacing something, thought by psychoanalysts to be caused by unconscious conflicts with conscious intention.)

pious fraud - usually obvious to the knowledgeable or an inner circle at the time, becoming murkier with time as to what was actually believed

nominal religion - such as nominal Catholicism, or when a person claims to belong to a religion because a government registers everyone according to religion and collects taxes for various religious organizations (as in Germany) or provides ceremonies in various religions. When I was about to join the US Navy, I chose Pentacostal, because that's what my family was, and if I'd gone through with it and needed a funeral, the ceremony would have been for them. If everyone claiming a certain religion in a country is only nominally of that religion, then that religion is a granfalloon there.

endemic delusion - a description I came up with that seems to apply to what religion often is rather than nominal

collective hallucination

samsara - (could have been interfering with your verbal recall, because it sounds similar to "scam") properly means "together-flowing," the course of life, which is, in Hindu belief, the cycle of birth, suffering, death, and rebirth, but like other Sanskrit religious terms in English, it has a pop meaning that is derived by taking a statement of belief as a definition: Samsara is illusion. Karma (the total of one's actions) determines one's fate. Dharma (the law) is right action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>granfalloon - a meaningless association of individuals, a neologism by Kurt Vonnegut</p>
<p>&#8220;Scam&#8221; is slang, so there aren&#8217;t any old compound terms using it. I always look for the other words that are blocking when words don&#8217;t come to mind easily. (I found a word for that, during my search for words on this subject: parapraxis - doing something besides normal practice, such as having a slip of the tongue or misplacing something, thought by psychoanalysts to be caused by unconscious conflicts with conscious intention.)</p>
<p>pious fraud - usually obvious to the knowledgeable or an inner circle at the time, becoming murkier with time as to what was actually believed</p>
<p>nominal religion - such as nominal Catholicism, or when a person claims to belong to a religion because a government registers everyone according to religion and collects taxes for various religious organizations (as in Germany) or provides ceremonies in various religions. When I was about to join the US Navy, I chose Pentacostal, because that&#8217;s what my family was, and if I&#8217;d gone through with it and needed a funeral, the ceremony would have been for them. If everyone claiming a certain religion in a country is only nominally of that religion, then that religion is a granfalloon there.</p>
<p>endemic delusion - a description I came up with that seems to apply to what religion often is rather than nominal</p>
<p>collective hallucination</p>
<p>samsara - (could have been interfering with your verbal recall, because it sounds similar to &#8220;scam&#8221;) properly means &#8220;together-flowing,&#8221; the course of life, which is, in Hindu belief, the cycle of birth, suffering, death, and rebirth, but like other Sanskrit religious terms in English, it has a pop meaning that is derived by taking a statement of belief as a definition: Samsara is illusion. Karma (the total of one&#8217;s actions) determines one&#8217;s fate. Dharma (the law) is right action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Error 404</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-9623</link>
		<dc:creator>Error 404</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/#comment-9623</guid>
		<description>J. R.,
A Ponzi Scheme is a financial arrangement, a sort of company, that people invest in. They are payed back (or not) with money from later investors. The theory is the same as a chain letter, but the mechanics are different, it looks like a company. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J. R.,<br />
A Ponzi Scheme is a financial arrangement, a sort of company, that people invest in. They are payed back (or not) with money from later investors. The theory is the same as a chain letter, but the mechanics are different, it looks like a company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SubstanceM</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-9612</link>
		<dc:creator>SubstanceM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/#comment-9612</guid>
		<description>Exactly J.R - you are a loser. U got it exactly right.
I hope some day u do get around to that constructive discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly J.R - you are a loser. U got it exactly right.<br />
I hope some day u do get around to that constructive discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gnomely</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-9583</link>
		<dc:creator>Gnomely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 23:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/#comment-9583</guid>
		<description> J.R. or Mark S. should be careful:) It is now illegal to be annyoying Cheers! http://news.com.com/Create+an+e-annoyance,+go+to+jail/2010-1028_3-6022491.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J.R. or Mark S. should be careful:) It is now illegal to be annyoying Cheers! <a href="http://news.com.com/Create+an+e-annoyance,+go+to+jail/2010-1028_3-6022491.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://news.com.com/Create+an+e-annoyance,+go+to+jail/2010-1028_3-6022491.html'>http://news.com.com/Create+an+e-annoya...,+go+to+jail/2010-1028_3-6022491.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemesis</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-9582</link>
		<dc:creator>nemesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 22:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/#comment-9582</guid>
		<description>Neither do i, Sorry if i misread things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neither do i, Sorry if i misread things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.R.</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-9581</link>
		<dc:creator>J.R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 21:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/#comment-9581</guid>
		<description>No, the adjective I believe had over three syllables, that's probably why it's giving people like "Substance" a lot of trouble. Substance who is apparently predisposed to turn any potentially constructive discussion into a degenerate fight because of some kind of low self esteem issues. Perhaps brought on by his substance/drug abuse, I'm not certain. I'm not a psychologist or anything but that's what seems to be reeking through from his side of the computer. But anyway thanks for those who had the genuine interest in trying. I'm pretty sure the word was more in connotation with myth or scam, not conspiracy. Myth is a little too tame, I think this was more of a loud obnoxious description. But definitely over three syllables. Sorry substance. lol  

"Ponzi scam" hmm, that's interesting I didn't even know what that meant. I guess we can just end this discussion say it was a "Ponzi Scam." I don't want to turn this little blog into a battleground of childish egos. That gets so old. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, the adjective I believe had over three syllables, that&#8217;s probably why it&#8217;s giving people like &#8220;Substance&#8221; a lot of trouble. Substance who is apparently predisposed to turn any potentially constructive discussion into a degenerate fight because of some kind of low self esteem issues. Perhaps brought on by his substance/drug abuse, I&#8217;m not certain. I&#8217;m not a psychologist or anything but that&#8217;s what seems to be reeking through from his side of the computer. But anyway thanks for those who had the genuine interest in trying. I&#8217;m pretty sure the word was more in connotation with myth or scam, not conspiracy. Myth is a little too tame, I think this was more of a loud obnoxious description. But definitely over three syllables. Sorry substance. lol  </p>
<p>&#8220;Ponzi scam&#8221; hmm, that&#8217;s interesting I didn&#8217;t even know what that meant. I guess we can just end this discussion say it was a &#8220;Ponzi Scam.&#8221; I don&#8217;t want to turn this little blog into a battleground of childish egos. That gets so old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rev max</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-9579</link>
		<dc:creator>rev max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 20:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/#comment-9579</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I knew it was kind of a stretch thinking someone in here would be intelligent enough to figure it out.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;a href="http://redwing.hutman.net/%7Emreed/warriorshtm/ennui.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;Thus spake J.R.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I knew it was kind of a stretch thinking someone in here would be intelligent enough to figure it out.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://redwing.hutman.net/%7Emreed/warriorshtm/ennui.htm" rel="nofollow">Thus spake J.R.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemesis</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-9573</link>
		<dc:creator>nemesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 17:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/#comment-9573</guid>
		<description>anyway, mainstream+meanstream,penis+stumped? i told you to keep coming j.r. and wed get to understand were all that animosity comes from, a bit like meanstream christianity its all about streams of thought and shadow,love you man</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anyway, mainstream+meanstream,penis+stumped? i told you to keep coming j.r. and wed get to understand were all that animosity comes from, a bit like meanstream christianity its all about streams of thought and shadow,love you man</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemesis</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-9571</link>
		<dc:creator>nemesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 17:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/#comment-9571</guid>
		<description>i dont play ludo and im not clever but do you mean "origin myth"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont play ludo and im not clever but do you mean &#8220;origin myth&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prunesquallori</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-9569</link>
		<dc:creator>prunesquallori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 16:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/#comment-9569</guid>
		<description>People frequently misuse "Ponzi Scam" to mean a "big scam."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People frequently misuse &#8220;Ponzi Scam&#8221; to mean a &#8220;big scam.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SubstanceM</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-9566</link>
		<dc:creator>SubstanceM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 09:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/#comment-9566</guid>
		<description>And all little juniorz bullshit aside - like the term meanstream wit or wit'out the krustianity connected.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And all little juniorz bullshit aside - like the term meanstream wit or wit&#8217;out the krustianity connected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SubstanceM</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-9565</link>
		<dc:creator>SubstanceM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 08:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/#comment-9565</guid>
		<description>Why'ncha google it up there super dude.
Junior - yer not even funny for any length...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why&#8217;ncha google it up there super dude.<br />
Junior - yer not even funny for any length&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.R.</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-9557</link>
		<dc:creator>J.R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/#comment-9557</guid>
		<description>Ahh, no... I knew it was kind of a stretch thinking someone in here would be intelligent enough to figure it out. Oh well. Instantly denigrated to the penis remarks when they knew they were stumped. I guess there are several different types of morons in this world, some stupid, and some extremely stupid. But anyway thanks John, I'll be eternally stumped on this one. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, no&#8230; I knew it was kind of a stretch thinking someone in here would be intelligent enough to figure it out. Oh well. Instantly denigrated to the penis remarks when they knew they were stumped. I guess there are several different types of morons in this world, some stupid, and some extremely stupid. But anyway thanks John, I&#8217;ll be eternally stumped on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-9556</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/#comment-9556</guid>
		<description>micropenis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>micropenis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-9555</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 05:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/#comment-9555</guid>
		<description>J.R...

I know this isn't the word you're thinking of , but "conspiracy" comes to mind. That word has all kinds of connotations though. You've got me stumped...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J.R&#8230;</p>
<p>I know this isn&#8217;t the word you&#8217;re thinking of , but &#8220;conspiracy&#8221; comes to mind. That word has all kinds of connotations though. You&#8217;ve got me stumped&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.R.</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-9551</link>
		<dc:creator>J.R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 04:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/#comment-9551</guid>
		<description>haha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SubstanceM</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-9550</link>
		<dc:creator>SubstanceM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/#comment-9550</guid>
		<description>Yeah I think a lot of things aren't clicking.
Maybe "Operation Infinite Scam"? "Big Up Yer Scam"?
I think I remember once reading about something
on an internet site about people with beyond small penises?
It meant like "extremely small" but that wasn't it.
"Blank.. small" is the adjective. Help me out here if u can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I think a lot of things aren&#8217;t clicking.<br />
Maybe &#8220;Operation Infinite Scam&#8221;? &#8220;Big Up Yer Scam&#8221;?<br />
I think I remember once reading about something<br />
on an internet site about people with beyond small penises?<br />
It meant like &#8220;extremely small&#8221; but that wasn&#8217;t it.<br />
&#8220;Blank.. small&#8221; is the adjective. Help me out here if u can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.R.</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-9549</link>
		<dc:creator>J.R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 01:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/#comment-9549</guid>
		<description>No.. That's a little bit too technical. I remember reading it on some editorial review on a book on amazon. I think it was about christianity or what christianity has been for the past two thousand years. Oh well... It may have even been some reviewer commentary an end times prophecy movie I was checking out. I should probably write these things down when I read them so I don't forget, but sometimes they don't really start clicking in until later, which sucks. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No.. That&#8217;s a little bit too technical. I remember reading it on some editorial review on a book on amazon. I think it was about christianity or what christianity has been for the past two thousand years. Oh well&#8230; It may have even been some reviewer commentary an end times prophecy movie I was checking out. I should probably write these things down when I read them so I don&#8217;t forget, but sometimes they don&#8217;t really start clicking in until later, which sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rev max</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-9547</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/#comment-9547</guid>
		<description>pyramid scheme?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pyramid scheme?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.R.</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-9546</link>
		<dc:creator>J.R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/#comment-9546</guid>
		<description>Also, I've got a question that hopefully someone in here can answer. Perhaps one of the smarter psuedo intellects. I'm trying to think of a word or perhaps an adjective for something being a huge scam. I can't remember if it was like a synonym for scam or like a big fancy adjective before the word scam. It's like when a scam is so big and so monumental and far reaching, that the word "Scam" no longer really works, it's become way too trivial. Something like monumental scam or something, I can't remember, but it's when the word scam no longer does it any justice. It's become too big and too much of a plain in sight joke. It's not conspiracy, totally different. Like a scam, but when the scam has been blown out so large and so big for such a long amount of time, that you really can no longer call it that. Anyway that's been bugging me, I saw it some religious book somewhere, but I forgot. Thanks and I'd appreciate the help. 

Actually, I think it was like a big descriptive adjective before scam. That seemed to really make a lot of sense... A  "......" Scam.  Damn, I hate forgetting crap like this. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I&#8217;ve got a question that hopefully someone in here can answer. Perhaps one of the smarter psuedo intellects. I&#8217;m trying to think of a word or perhaps an adjective for something being a huge scam. I can&#8217;t remember if it was like a synonym for scam or like a big fancy adjective before the word scam. It&#8217;s like when a scam is so big and so monumental and far reaching, that the word &#8220;Scam&#8221; no longer really works, it&#8217;s become way too trivial. Something like monumental scam or something, I can&#8217;t remember, but it&#8217;s when the word scam no longer does it any justice. It&#8217;s become too big and too much of a plain in sight joke. It&#8217;s not conspiracy, totally different. Like a scam, but when the scam has been blown out so large and so big for such a long amount of time, that you really can no longer call it that. Anyway that&#8217;s been bugging me, I saw it some religious book somewhere, but I forgot. Thanks and I&#8217;d appreciate the help. </p>
<p>Actually, I think it was like a big descriptive adjective before scam. That seemed to really make a lot of sense&#8230; A  &#8220;&#8230;&#8230;&#8221; Scam.  Damn, I hate forgetting crap like this. <img src='http://www.timboucher.com/journal/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.R.</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-9545</link>
		<dc:creator>J.R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 23:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/01/08/meanstream-christianity/#comment-9545</guid>
		<description>That's pretty funny if that was really an actual slip up from a Christian, who just wasn't thinking. Funny how something so small and accidental as that can speak so candidly for the volumes of truth of what christianity has pretty much always been. Main stream, err uhh, I mean "Mean stream" christianity!  Thanks Anna for making that so clear for us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s pretty funny if that was really an actual slip up from a Christian, who just wasn&#8217;t thinking. Funny how something so small and accidental as that can speak so candidly for the volumes of truth of what christianity has pretty much always been. Main stream, err uhh, I mean &#8220;Mean stream&#8221; christianity!  Thanks Anna for making that so clear for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
