<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Empire Never Ends</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/</link>
	<description>public domain playground. friendly entities welcome.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: I Am Erica - Pop Occulture Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/comment-page-1/#comment-17523</link>
		<dc:creator>I Am Erica - Pop Occulture Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 19:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/#comment-17523</guid>
		<description>[...] So who, if anyone, is this mysterious &#8220;Erica&#8221; encoded into our nation&#8217;s very name? The name Erica is the feminine form of Eric, which comes from the Old Norse name &#8220;EirÃ­kr&#8221;. The component linguistic elements that make up this name are ei &#8220;ever&#8221; and rÃ­kr &#8220;ruler&#8221;. So, in essence, the name of America means &#8220;I Am The Ever Ruler.&#8221; (see these two posts for more detailed explorations of that idea) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So who, if anyone, is this mysterious &#8220;Erica&#8221; encoded into our nation&#8217;s very name? The name Erica is the feminine form of Eric, which comes from the Old Norse name &#8220;EirÃ­kr&#8221;. The component linguistic elements that make up this name are ei &#8220;ever&#8221; and rÃ­kr &#8220;ruler&#8221;. So, in essence, the name of America means &#8220;I Am The Ever Ruler.&#8221; (see these two posts for more detailed explorations of that idea) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benway</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/comment-page-1/#comment-11384</link>
		<dc:creator>Benway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 04:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/#comment-11384</guid>
		<description>Burrough's Cities of The Red Night is heartily recommended. One of his later novels, it tells of a struggle taking place in different times and places simultainiously. The boundries desolve until all are the same story. I'll have to read it again, taking into account my thoughts since I last read it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Burrough&#8217;s Cities of The Red Night is heartily recommended. One of his later novels, it tells of a struggle taking place in different times and places simultainiously. The boundries desolve until all are the same story. I&#8217;ll have to read it again, taking into account my thoughts since I last read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/comment-page-1/#comment-11373</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/#comment-11373</guid>
		<description>Now that I think of it, Vonnegut's Kilgore Trout character could very well be based upon PKD... but it probably isn't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that I think of it, Vonnegut&#8217;s Kilgore Trout character could very well be based upon PKD&#8230; but it probably isn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rev max</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/comment-page-1/#comment-11372</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/#comment-11372</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And infected he was. The real-life PKD went so far as to denounce some critics and fellow writers to the FBI.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Crystal methamphetamine abuse might have had something to do with this too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And infected he was. The real-life PKD went so far as to denounce some critics and fellow writers to the FBI.</p></blockquote>
<p>Crystal methamphetamine abuse might have had something to do with this too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/comment-page-1/#comment-11324</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 23:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/#comment-11324</guid>
		<description>The PKD link is great, Kylark-- incidentally it's one of the reasons why I like his novels but distance myself from embracing them wholly. Like Timothy Leary, PKD rides the fence in political terms: was he a snitch, or just deluded? The LA Weekly did a great piece on PKD years ago, focusing more on his speed addiction (which causes paranoia and audible voices in the head, among other things) and the damage it did to his psyche .

Also: the premise of PKD's refusal to put coded messages into his fiction... isn't that the same (or at least similar) premise as Vonnegut's "Mother Night"? I've often wondered if Vonnegut just made up that story or if it was based loosely upon true events.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The PKD link is great, Kylark&#8211; incidentally it&#8217;s one of the reasons why I like his novels but distance myself from embracing them wholly. Like Timothy Leary, PKD rides the fence in political terms: was he a snitch, or just deluded? The LA Weekly did a great piece on PKD years ago, focusing more on his speed addiction (which causes paranoia and audible voices in the head, among other things) and the damage it did to his psyche .</p>
<p>Also: the premise of PKD&#8217;s refusal to put coded messages into his fiction&#8230; isn&#8217;t that the same (or at least similar) premise as Vonnegut&#8217;s &#8220;Mother Night&#8221;? I&#8217;ve often wondered if Vonnegut just made up that story or if it was based loosely upon true events.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kylark</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/comment-page-1/#comment-11320</link>
		<dc:creator>Kylark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 21:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/#comment-11320</guid>
		<description>Rev Max addresses a question I've held in mind for a long time and haven't even begun to fully formulate, let alone answer:  how do you kill without being a killer?  PKD describes himself as eternally fighting the Black Iron Prison.  Yet this is the man who said, "to fight the Empire is to become infected by its derangement."

And infected he was.  The real-life PKD went so far as to &lt;a href="http://www.jeetheer.com/culture/dick.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;denounce some critics and fellow writers to the FBI.&lt;/a&gt;

Burroughs' parable seems to delineate a way out.  A quick, clean shot to the head to those who are fucking it up for the rest of us.  But most of us feel an instinctive revulsion to this act, a revulsion which is well-founded.

How do we resist those who wish to exercise power over us without becoming mired in eternal struggle, or worse yet, taking on the attributes of those whom we fight?

&lt;blockquote&gt;And slowly the Shits are ignored into a dull celluloid sunset.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think I understand this... sort of.  "Ignore the Empire and it will go away."  Stop feeding it with your attention.  Work on yourself first.  Like Gandhi said, "you must be the change you wish to see in others."  Is that really the solution?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rev Max addresses a question I&#8217;ve held in mind for a long time and haven&#8217;t even begun to fully formulate, let alone answer:  how do you kill without being a killer?  PKD describes himself as eternally fighting the Black Iron Prison.  Yet this is the man who said, &#8220;to fight the Empire is to become infected by its derangement.&#8221;</p>
<p>And infected he was.  The real-life PKD went so far as to <a href="http://www.jeetheer.com/culture/dick.htm" rel="nofollow">denounce some critics and fellow writers to the FBI.</a></p>
<p>Burroughs&#8217; parable seems to delineate a way out.  A quick, clean shot to the head to those who are fucking it up for the rest of us.  But most of us feel an instinctive revulsion to this act, a revulsion which is well-founded.</p>
<p>How do we resist those who wish to exercise power over us without becoming mired in eternal struggle, or worse yet, taking on the attributes of those whom we fight?</p>
<blockquote><p>And slowly the Shits are ignored into a dull celluloid sunset.</p></blockquote>
<p>I think I understand this&#8230; sort of.  &#8220;Ignore the Empire and it will go away.&#8221;  Stop feeding it with your attention.  Work on yourself first.  Like Gandhi said, &#8220;you must be the change you wish to see in others.&#8221;  Is that really the solution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/comment-page-1/#comment-11318</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 20:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/#comment-11318</guid>
		<description>Ever heard of the 30 year theory, that zeitgeists repeat themselves every 30 years or so? That means right now we are smack dab in the middle of the '70s (Watergate, Nixon) as well as the '40s (WWII, American prosperity).

I like to think that time is not only real, but that it is a circular spiral. Like a vinyl record spinning-- if you were to put a scratch in the vinyl, you would revisit that scratch in the form of an audio "pop" every 4 seconds or so, even though the music/audio is seemingly "moving forward" in straight linear time.

Occasionally, the scratch is so deep into the groove that the music/audio loops, repeating a section over and over. This is akin to a time warp.

   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever heard of the 30 year theory, that zeitgeists repeat themselves every 30 years or so? That means right now we are smack dab in the middle of the &#8217;70s (Watergate, Nixon) as well as the &#8217;40s (WWII, American prosperity).</p>
<p>I like to think that time is not only real, but that it is a circular spiral. Like a vinyl record spinning&#8211; if you were to put a scratch in the vinyl, you would revisit that scratch in the form of an audio &#8220;pop&#8221; every 4 seconds or so, even though the music/audio is seemingly &#8220;moving forward&#8221; in straight linear time.</p>
<p>Occasionally, the scratch is so deep into the groove that the music/audio loops, repeating a section over and over. This is akin to a time warp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rev max</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/comment-page-1/#comment-11315</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 19:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/#comment-11315</guid>
		<description>On a more serious note, I've often thought the same thing - that myths describe &lt;em&gt;real&lt;/em&gt; history, stripped of all the eccentric details - events that we all experience, because they exist outside of time and repeat eternally. 

We all came from Eden, we all visited Golgotha - in some plane of reality that is invisible to the 5 senses yet coterminous with this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a more serious note, I&#8217;ve often thought the same thing - that myths describe <em>real</em> history, stripped of all the eccentric details - events that we all experience, because they exist outside of time and repeat eternally. </p>
<p>We all came from Eden, we all visited Golgotha - in some plane of reality that is invisible to the 5 senses yet coterminous with this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rev max</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/comment-page-1/#comment-11314</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 19:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/#comment-11314</guid>
		<description>PKD's insights &lt;a href="http://ashejournal.com/index.php?id=32" rel="nofollow"&gt;corroborated by St. Burroughs&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;In Burroughsâ€™ mythology, the world is one of conflict between the Johnsons and the Shits.  A Shit is one who is obsessively sure of his own position at the cost of all other vantages.  Burroughs describes Shits as incapable of minding â€œtheir own business, because they have no business of their own to mind, any  more than a small pox virus has.â€(4)  This is more than a offhanded analogy.  For Burroughs, Shits are, in actuality, virus occupied hostsâ€”chronically infected by what he terms the Right virus.  â€œThe mark of a basic Shit,â€ Burroughs reminds us, â€œis that he has to be right.â€(5)

The war between the Johnsons and the Shits is an epic one that runs throughout Burroughs writing.  Though of immense proportions, like the Gnostic battle between good and evil, the cosmic war is not figured across eternity.  It has an end and, for Burroughs, that end is imaginable.  It does not come without immense conflict, however.  Burroughs tells his reader, â€œThe people in power will not disappear voluntarily.â€(6)  There is no turning back, once the battle is met.  â€œOnce you take up arms against a bunch of shits there is no way back.  Lay down your arms and they will kill you.â€(7) â€œHell hath no more vociferous fury than an endangered parasite.â€(8)  And remember: â€œThe wild boys take no prisoners.â€(9)

In discussing his mythology, Burroughs describes a classic Catch-22: â€œHe who opposes force with counterforce alone forms that which he opposes and is formed by itâ€¦  On the other hand he who does not resist force that enslaves and exterminate will be enslaved and exterminated.â€(10)  Burroughsâ€™ work begs the question, how does one resist the forces rallied against one without taking on the virally-tainted of the opposing force.  To imagine a permanent solution proves an easy flirtation.  In his essay â€œMy Own Business,â€ Burroughs writes that â€œone is tempted to seek a total solution to the problem: Mass Assassination Day.â€(11) 

In The Place of Dead Roads Burroughs imagines a scenario where the Johnson Family organizes into armed squads who fan out to hunt the virally infected.  Some Johnsons are assigned as â€œShit Spottersâ€ whose task it is to move out into cities and small towns across the country recording those who exhibit virus occupied behaviors.  Acting upon the intelligence thus gathered, sharp shooters follow-up eliminating the detected Shits.(12)  Ultimately Burroughs tempers his fantasy.  He observes, â€œProbably the most effective tactic is to alter the conditions on which the virus subsists.â€(13)

In truth, indifference will prove the end of the Shit problem.  â€œConditions change, and the virus guise is ignored and forgotten.â€(14)  Burroughs envisions the Shit position obsoleted by changes in normative culture:

This trend toward sanity has brought the last-ditch dedicated shits out into the open, screaming with rage.  Victimless crime, the assumption that what a citizen does in the privacy of his own dwelling is nonetheless someone elseâ€™s business and therefore subject to denunciation and punishment is the very lifeline of the right virus.  Cutting off this air line would have the same action as interferon, which blocks the oxygen from certain virus strains.(15)

And slowly the Shits are ignored into a dull celluloid sunset.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PKD&#8217;s insights <a href="http://ashejournal.com/index.php?id=32" rel="nofollow">corroborated by St. Burroughs</a></p>
<blockquote><p>In Burroughsâ€™ mythology, the world is one of conflict between the Johnsons and the Shits.  A Shit is one who is obsessively sure of his own position at the cost of all other vantages.  Burroughs describes Shits as incapable of minding â€œtheir own business, because they have no business of their own to mind, any  more than a small pox virus has.â€(4)  This is more than a offhanded analogy.  For Burroughs, Shits are, in actuality, virus occupied hostsâ€”chronically infected by what he terms the Right virus.  â€œThe mark of a basic Shit,â€ Burroughs reminds us, â€œis that he has to be right.â€(5)</p>
<p>The war between the Johnsons and the Shits is an epic one that runs throughout Burroughs writing.  Though of immense proportions, like the Gnostic battle between good and evil, the cosmic war is not figured across eternity.  It has an end and, for Burroughs, that end is imaginable.  It does not come without immense conflict, however.  Burroughs tells his reader, â€œThe people in power will not disappear voluntarily.â€(6)  There is no turning back, once the battle is met.  â€œOnce you take up arms against a bunch of shits there is no way back.  Lay down your arms and they will kill you.â€(7) â€œHell hath no more vociferous fury than an endangered parasite.â€(8)  And remember: â€œThe wild boys take no prisoners.â€(9)</p>
<p>In discussing his mythology, Burroughs describes a classic Catch-22: â€œHe who opposes force with counterforce alone forms that which he opposes and is formed by itâ€¦  On the other hand he who does not resist force that enslaves and exterminate will be enslaved and exterminated.â€(10)  Burroughsâ€™ work begs the question, how does one resist the forces rallied against one without taking on the virally-tainted of the opposing force.  To imagine a permanent solution proves an easy flirtation.  In his essay â€œMy Own Business,â€ Burroughs writes that â€œone is tempted to seek a total solution to the problem: Mass Assassination Day.â€(11) </p>
<p>In The Place of Dead Roads Burroughs imagines a scenario where the Johnson Family organizes into armed squads who fan out to hunt the virally infected.  Some Johnsons are assigned as â€œShit Spottersâ€ whose task it is to move out into cities and small towns across the country recording those who exhibit virus occupied behaviors.  Acting upon the intelligence thus gathered, sharp shooters follow-up eliminating the detected Shits.(12)  Ultimately Burroughs tempers his fantasy.  He observes, â€œProbably the most effective tactic is to alter the conditions on which the virus subsists.â€(13)</p>
<p>In truth, indifference will prove the end of the Shit problem.  â€œConditions change, and the virus guise is ignored and forgotten.â€(14)  Burroughs envisions the Shit position obsoleted by changes in normative culture:</p>
<p>This trend toward sanity has brought the last-ditch dedicated shits out into the open, screaming with rage.  Victimless crime, the assumption that what a citizen does in the privacy of his own dwelling is nonetheless someone elseâ€™s business and therefore subject to denunciation and punishment is the very lifeline of the right virus.  Cutting off this air line would have the same action as interferon, which blocks the oxygen from certain virus strains.(15)</p>
<p>And slowly the Shits are ignored into a dull celluloid sunset.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aditi</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/comment-page-1/#comment-11308</link>
		<dc:creator>Aditi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/#comment-11308</guid>
		<description>That's a wonderful book.  I should pick it up again; I was able to skim through it briefly a few years ago.  

Have you read his essay on The Book of Changes?  I believe it ties it nicely with a lot of the points brought up above.  

The last time I read your page you were discussing reading PKD on the bus and finding that old greeting used for Early Christians.  I believe you just have to look into these parallels and find that they do in their own minute ways run parallel to what you're trying to piece together with the bigger picture...

Oh, I just moved to Seattle and stopped by the Theosophy Library and found they have many, many old books relating to Gnosticism.  You might want to check that place out if you haven't yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a wonderful book.  I should pick it up again; I was able to skim through it briefly a few years ago.  </p>
<p>Have you read his essay on The Book of Changes?  I believe it ties it nicely with a lot of the points brought up above.  </p>
<p>The last time I read your page you were discussing reading PKD on the bus and finding that old greeting used for Early Christians.  I believe you just have to look into these parallels and find that they do in their own minute ways run parallel to what you&#8217;re trying to piece together with the bigger picture&#8230;</p>
<p>Oh, I just moved to Seattle and stopped by the Theosophy Library and found they have many, many old books relating to Gnosticism.  You might want to check that place out if you haven&#8217;t yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/comment-page-1/#comment-11306</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/#comment-11306</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;there are is a whole mythic system involving her among homeless children in Miami.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
holy wow, that is one of the wildest articles i've ever read!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>there are is a whole mythic system involving her among homeless children in Miami.</p></blockquote>
<p>holy wow, that is one of the wildest articles i&#8217;ve ever read!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prnsqlr</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/comment-page-1/#comment-11304</link>
		<dc:creator>prnsqlr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/#comment-11304</guid>
		<description>Probably my favorite post you've written!

RE: Bloody Mary, there are is &lt;a href="http://www.miaminewtimes.com/Issues/1997-06-05/news/feature_print.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;a whole mythic system&lt;/a&gt; involving her among homeless children in Miami. Only the "Bloody Mary" part reached me in the midwest as a child.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably my favorite post you&#8217;ve written!</p>
<p>RE: Bloody Mary, there are is <a href="http://www.miaminewtimes.com/Issues/1997-06-05/news/feature_print.html" rel="nofollow">a whole mythic system</a> involving her among homeless children in Miami. Only the &#8220;Bloody Mary&#8221; part reached me in the midwest as a child.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SubstanceM</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/comment-page-1/#comment-11299</link>
		<dc:creator>SubstanceM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/#comment-11299</guid>
		<description>For sure you can look at it that way - there was Empire, there will be Empire. Check Star Wars into the future - the Empire. And the Resistance. But what I love about PKD is that he is talking about how it is literal, and time doesn't exist, and the modern Empire is superimposed on the ancient "decadent" Empire. That is a way of looking at it that totally twists your mind, because HOW CAN IT BE? Time moves forward. But once you look at some of his other speculations - that time is like light and may be bent off into various rays of time from the one constant stream of time, or time may be moving backward but as in a mirror we see a reflection and it appears to move forward, and other equally thought provoking ways of viewing time, then it opens up a whole different can of worms. If there is really only ONE TIME, and it is now, then everything is held within that moment. Hence the Empire is the same as it ever was.
I like how this way of viewing time opens up so many possibilities. I like to try to marry this concept with the concept of holographic universe, because in that scenario maybe it is possible to stop and start time...FYI I have no personal experience to back that shit up :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For sure you can look at it that way - there was Empire, there will be Empire. Check Star Wars into the future - the Empire. And the Resistance. But what I love about PKD is that he is talking about how it is literal, and time doesn&#8217;t exist, and the modern Empire is superimposed on the ancient &#8220;decadent&#8221; Empire. That is a way of looking at it that totally twists your mind, because HOW CAN IT BE? Time moves forward. But once you look at some of his other speculations - that time is like light and may be bent off into various rays of time from the one constant stream of time, or time may be moving backward but as in a mirror we see a reflection and it appears to move forward, and other equally thought provoking ways of viewing time, then it opens up a whole different can of worms. If there is really only ONE TIME, and it is now, then everything is held within that moment. Hence the Empire is the same as it ever was.<br />
I like how this way of viewing time opens up so many possibilities. I like to try to marry this concept with the concept of holographic universe, because in that scenario maybe it is possible to stop and start time&#8230;FYI I have no personal experience to back that shit up <img src='http://www.timboucher.com/journal/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/comment-page-1/#comment-11284</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 06:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/#comment-11284</guid>
		<description>Well what I was thinking was more that having a Resistance is essential to the Empire. The Empire first of all needs an enemy. Initially its enemies are external, allowing it to grow. When there's no more room to grow, it feeds on itself, finding its enemies within. This in turn breaks the Empire into pieces again, which enter into a state of flux with one another. The Empire again rises like a phoenix from the ash, and continues to grow and expand, until it reaches the borders and then must turn inward again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well what I was thinking was more that having a Resistance is essential to the Empire. The Empire first of all needs an enemy. Initially its enemies are external, allowing it to grow. When there&#8217;s no more room to grow, it feeds on itself, finding its enemies within. This in turn breaks the Empire into pieces again, which enter into a state of flux with one another. The Empire again rises like a phoenix from the ash, and continues to grow and expand, until it reaches the borders and then must turn inward again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Identity in Crisis</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/comment-page-1/#comment-11282</link>
		<dc:creator>Identity in Crisis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 05:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/03/13/the-empire-never-ends/#comment-11282</guid>
		<description>"...you really do have to wonder if there hasnâ€™t been just one Empire throughout all time, expanding and splintering again and again like the long-drawn breaths of some infernal machine."

I think this really has a lot of truth to it, particularly if you take into consideration the adage that "to secure peace is to prepare for war." There's a constant give and take, and though power shifts across space and time, there is ALWAYS an Empire (Roman, British, American, Chinese, Persian, whatever) somewhere seeking to exert its influence, and always a resistance against that. When the resistance wins... it's very possible that it soon evolves into the Empire, seeking to protect itself against an Empire resurgent. It's never realized, until it's too late, that by destroying the Empire, you become it. It's the Nature of the Beast to constantly change form to survive...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;you really do have to wonder if there hasnâ€™t been just one Empire throughout all time, expanding and splintering again and again like the long-drawn breaths of some infernal machine.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think this really has a lot of truth to it, particularly if you take into consideration the adage that &#8220;to secure peace is to prepare for war.&#8221; There&#8217;s a constant give and take, and though power shifts across space and time, there is ALWAYS an Empire (Roman, British, American, Chinese, Persian, whatever) somewhere seeking to exert its influence, and always a resistance against that. When the resistance wins&#8230; it&#8217;s very possible that it soon evolves into the Empire, seeking to protect itself against an Empire resurgent. It&#8217;s never realized, until it&#8217;s too late, that by destroying the Empire, you become it. It&#8217;s the Nature of the Beast to constantly change form to survive&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
