Comments on: Digital Noise ID’s Cameras http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/05/06/digital-noise-ids-cameras/ public domain playground. friendly entities welcome. Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:13:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: alistair http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/05/06/digital-noise-ids-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-12726 alistair Mon, 08 May 2006 02:09:00 +0000 http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/05/06/digital-noise-ids-cameras/#comment-12726 and regarding the bit of paper with words on it that was signed by guys who are dead now.......check out www.adventuresinlegalland.com for an end to any thoughts of rights etc. and regarding the bit of paper with words on it that was signed by guys who are dead now…….check out http://www.adventuresinlegalland.com for an end to any thoughts of rights etc.

]]> By: alistair http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/05/06/digital-noise-ids-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-12725 alistair Mon, 08 May 2006 02:06:47 +0000 http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/05/06/digital-noise-ids-cameras/#comment-12725 my statement was niavely intended to be free of the political. so much of our new technology has that orwellian feel to it. and we play with these things as toys. in that tunnel reality we are building our own cages........... my statement was niavely intended to be free of the political. so much of our new technology has that orwellian feel to it. and we play with these things as toys. in that tunnel reality we are building our own cages………..

]]> By: slomo http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/05/06/digital-noise-ids-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-12711 slomo Sun, 07 May 2006 03:37:42 +0000 http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/05/06/digital-noise-ids-cameras/#comment-12711 Yeah. Every possible intrusive technological advance is now justified by "child pornography", that boogeyman in the closet. Most (not all) child molestation occurs by a close friend or family member (or I suppose a Catholic priest!) And if you believe <a href="http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Jeff Wells</a>, whatever paedophilia is not in those categories is practiced by elites running the assault on the constitution and the ramping up of our police state. Yeah. Every possible intrusive technological advance is now justified by “child pornography”, that boogeyman in the closet.

Most (not all) child molestation occurs by a close friend or family member (or I suppose a Catholic priest!) And if you believe Jeff Wells, whatever paedophilia is not in those categories is practiced by elites running the assault on the constitution and the ramping up of our police state.

]]> By: Kylark http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/05/06/digital-noise-ids-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-12696 Kylark Sat, 06 May 2006 20:26:42 +0000 http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/05/06/digital-noise-ids-cameras/#comment-12696 Alistair, I don't necessarily disagree with you, but what you said reminds me of a saying that's making the rounds: "Child pornography" and "terrorism" are the root passwords to the U.S. Constitution. Alistair, I don’t necessarily disagree with you, but what you said reminds me of a saying that’s making the rounds: “Child pornography” and “terrorism” are the root passwords to the U.S. Constitution.

]]> By: alistair http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/05/06/digital-noise-ids-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-12694 alistair Sat, 06 May 2006 19:39:22 +0000 http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/05/06/digital-noise-ids-cameras/#comment-12694 if it catches paedophiles i`m for it. if it catches paedophiles i`m for it.

]]>