<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alex Jones &#038; the Old World Order</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/03/alex-jones-the-old-world-order/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/03/alex-jones-the-old-world-order/</link>
	<description>public domain playground. friendly entities welcome.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sketchmonkey</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/03/alex-jones-the-old-world-order/comment-page-1/#comment-18760</link>
		<dc:creator>sketchmonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 20:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/03/alex-jones-the-old-world-order/#comment-18760</guid>
		<description>I don't have strong feelings about Alex Jones one way or another but I suspect that this sort of 'revelation' could have as much to do with the spread of disinformation &#38; suspicion, if not plain ol' parasitism, as any real relationship he might have with the aforementioned group. The fact that it is an 'honorary' designation puts up something of a red flag for me. With the high profile that Mr. Jones enjoys among the internet conspiracy types, I imagine that this group could gain alot more recognition &#38; search engine hits just by piggybacking on his name &#38; notoriety. In such a fluid &#38; inherently occult (obscure) medium as the internet, it is very easy for people to become associated with groups they may or may not have any true affiliation with. In my mind this is similar to the fact that listing a link on your blogroll doesn't necessarily mean that you endorse all that is said on that siteâ€¦</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have strong feelings about Alex Jones one way or another but I suspect that this sort of &#8216;revelation&#8217; could have as much to do with the spread of disinformation &amp; suspicion, if not plain ol&#8217; parasitism, as any real relationship he might have with the aforementioned group. The fact that it is an &#8216;honorary&#8217; designation puts up something of a red flag for me. With the high profile that Mr. Jones enjoys among the internet conspiracy types, I imagine that this group could gain alot more recognition &amp; search engine hits just by piggybacking on his name &amp; notoriety. In such a fluid &amp; inherently occult (obscure) medium as the internet, it is very easy for people to become associated with groups they may or may not have any true affiliation with. In my mind this is similar to the fact that listing a link on your blogroll doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean that you endorse all that is said on that siteâ€¦</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diego</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/03/alex-jones-the-old-world-order/comment-page-1/#comment-18759</link>
		<dc:creator>Diego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 19:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/03/alex-jones-the-old-world-order/#comment-18759</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;the enemy of my enemy is my friendâ€¦&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I reckon this is the most likely explanation, but it's interesting anyway...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>the enemy of my enemy is my friendâ€¦</p></blockquote>
<p>I reckon this is the most likely explanation, but it&#8217;s interesting anyway&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
