[tmbchr]™

Shamans of Scientism



Following in the threads of our recent conversations, I just read a good but short article (actually, I don’t think it’s the full version of the article) by Michael Shermer in Scientific American about the philosophy of science often referred to as “scientism.” He defines it as:

Scientism is a scientific worldview that encompasses natural explanations for all phenomena, eschews supernatural and paranormal speculations, and embraces empiricism and reason as the twin pillars of a philosophy of life appropriate for an Age of Science.

And he calls scientism a “bridge spanning the abyss between what physicist C. P. Snow famously called the “two cultures” of science and the arts/humanities (neither encampment being able to communicate with the other).” Later on in it, he writes, tellingly:

Scientism is courageously proffering naturalistic answers that supplant supernaturalistic ones and in the process is providing spiritual sustenance for those whose needs are not being met by these ancient cultural traditions. Second, we are, at base, a socially hierarchical primate species. We show deference to our leaders, pay respect to our elders and follow the dictates of our shamans; this being the Age of Science, it is scientism’s shamans who command our veneration. Third, because of language we are also storytelling, mythmaking primates, with scientism as the foundational stratum of our story and scientists as the premier mythmakers of our time.

If anybody knows where I can find a full copy of this article (that you don’t have to pay for), I would love to read the rest. Also, know any other good links or info on scientism? Drop it in the comments! Thanks.

, , , , ,





3 Reader Responses

  1. Rose Says:

    It’s called the public library. ;-) I would bet they carry that magazine.

  2. Tim Boucher Says:

    It’s called the public what now?

    Seriously, I never even consider going to the library any more. Funny how that works thanks to the internet. If it was a book, I might consider it, but not for a second-string article. Seems crazy to me that SciAm charges like almost eight bucks for back issues in PDF format, but I guess they can get that much…

  3. Emerson Says:

    I missed out on most o fthe prelude to this point, but I wanted to quickly offer a few cautions about taking Shermer as a spokesman for the scientific community. For the most part, those people involved in actual hard sciences who’ve been around when his name came up usually placed him as in somewhat the same position to them, as Ann Colutier is to the average Republican. Or, as I’d go a bit further in saying, somewhat like a Christian who becomes so obsessed with the message of love and forgiveness that he eventually blinds himself to it by staring so closly and heads out to kill and maim in the name of Jesus.

    But, for all that, the man speaks loudly and tells a lot of people how better they are than humans in another social group. It’s a message that’s seldom fallen on deaf ears no matter what cluster of humans is the main focus at the time.



SURROUND YOURSELF WITH STRENGTH.