<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Morality, Science, Technocracy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/07/morality-science-technocracy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/07/morality-science-technocracy/</link>
	<description>public domain playground. friendly entities welcome.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: They-Live.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Conspiracy Theory is Not a Thing</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/07/morality-science-technocracy/comment-page-1/#comment-19296</link>
		<dc:creator>They-Live.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Conspiracy Theory is Not a Thing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/07/morality-science-technocracy/#comment-19296</guid>
		<description>[...] I often find myself wanting to disagree with Pop Occulture&#8217;s Tim Boucher, although I am consistently swept along by his reasoning. The general thesis that we live in a technocratic paradigm seems pretty supportable- as are the corollaries which would logically seem to arise from it- resulting in a state of affairs in which &#8220;Technocracy exists to manage humans as though they were machines.&#8221; I also anjoy reading his essays on the blurry areas between pop culture and occult symbology. He makes some really interesting observations and does a lot of good research. But I guess what bothers me is his take on &#8220;conspiracy theory.&#8221; I often get the impression that Boucher wishes to retain the ability to distance himself from &#8220;it&#8221; as though it were an actual thing- like a physical object, or a vocation or a school of thought- to determine whether there&#8217;s any point in engaging in it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I often find myself wanting to disagree with Pop Occulture&#8217;s Tim Boucher, although I am consistently swept along by his reasoning. The general thesis that we live in a technocratic paradigm seems pretty supportable- as are the corollaries which would logically seem to arise from it- resulting in a state of affairs in which &#8220;Technocracy exists to manage humans as though they were machines.&#8221; I also anjoy reading his essays on the blurry areas between pop culture and occult symbology. He makes some really interesting observations and does a lot of good research. But I guess what bothers me is his take on &#8220;conspiracy theory.&#8221; I often get the impression that Boucher wishes to retain the ability to distance himself from &#8220;it&#8221; as though it were an actual thing- like a physical object, or a vocation or a school of thought- to determine whether there&#8217;s any point in engaging in it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
