<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Definition of the Word &#8220;Is&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/10/the-definition-of-the-word-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/10/the-definition-of-the-word-is/</link>
	<description>public domain playground. friendly entities welcome.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: hebrides</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/10/the-definition-of-the-word-is/comment-page-1/#comment-18993</link>
		<dc:creator>hebrides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 02:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/10/the-definition-of-the-word-is/#comment-18993</guid>
		<description>E-Prime is darned cool stuff.  Actually, the Psychologist Albert Ellis, founder of Rational Emotive Behavioral Therapy, wrote one of his first books, A Guide to Rational Living, completely in E-Prime.  

As far as good, simple primers on General Semantics, i remember buying a book about Religion in Astoria about five years ago (have since either lost it or given it away), which turned out to apply General Semantics to the history and evolution of religions--it was a super pleasant surprise of a book at the time.  Don't remember the name of the woman who wrote it, but she was associated with the Society for General Semantics in NY or somewhere.  I believe the title of the book was something like "Religion &#38; the New Age" (though I might not be remembering it correctly) and was from the early 70's.  If you can find that book (hopefully, it ain't too much of a needle in the haystack kind of thing), it felt like the easiest, simplest and most engaging intro to General Semantics that I coulda found.  (Damn, I wish I still had that book!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E-Prime is darned cool stuff.  Actually, the Psychologist Albert Ellis, founder of Rational Emotive Behavioral Therapy, wrote one of his first books, A Guide to Rational Living, completely in E-Prime.  </p>
<p>As far as good, simple primers on General Semantics, i remember buying a book about Religion in Astoria about five years ago (have since either lost it or given it away), which turned out to apply General Semantics to the history and evolution of religions&#8211;it was a super pleasant surprise of a book at the time.  Don&#8217;t remember the name of the woman who wrote it, but she was associated with the Society for General Semantics in NY or somewhere.  I believe the title of the book was something like &#8220;Religion &amp; the New Age&#8221; (though I might not be remembering it correctly) and was from the early 70&#8217;s.  If you can find that book (hopefully, it ain&#8217;t too much of a needle in the haystack kind of thing), it felt like the easiest, simplest and most engaging intro to General Semantics that I coulda found.  (Damn, I wish I still had that book!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: human?</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/10/the-definition-of-the-word-is/comment-page-1/#comment-18991</link>
		<dc:creator>human?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 01:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/10/the-definition-of-the-word-is/#comment-18991</guid>
		<description>word.  e prime has been fascinating me recently....

check this Robert Anton Wilson video, it def got me thinking... 


http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3436367912799615557&#38;q=Robert+Anton+Wilson&#38;hl=en</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>word.  e prime has been fascinating me recently&#8230;.</p>
<p>check this Robert Anton Wilson video, it def got me thinking&#8230; </p>
<p><a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3436367912799615557&amp;q=Robert+Anton+Wilson&amp;hl=en" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3436367912799615557&amp;q=Robert+Anton+Wilson&amp;hl=en'>http://video.google.com/videoplay?doci...7&amp;q=Robert+Anton+Wilson&amp;hl=en</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/10/the-definition-of-the-word-is/comment-page-1/#comment-18984</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 23:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/10/the-definition-of-the-word-is/#comment-18984</guid>
		<description>Oh wow, e-prime, never heard of it. I'll have to check it out! I think general semantics is fairly similar, though it's hard to find a really good solid intro to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh wow, e-prime, never heard of it. I&#8217;ll have to check it out! I think general semantics is fairly similar, though it&#8217;s hard to find a really good solid intro to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronin</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/10/the-definition-of-the-word-is/comment-page-1/#comment-18982</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 22:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/10/the-definition-of-the-word-is/#comment-18982</guid>
		<description>I know most people think that this was a low point in Clinton's career, but he became my hero with those 11 little words. I mean, the cajones on that guy...Ha!...to this day I'm in awe of his audacity...From what I understand, the way he justifies it to himself, his enemies where attempting to unjustly destroy him, so he could use every weapon in his arsenal (specifically rhetoric under oath) to fight back...Man, if I had the guts to argue the definition of the word "is" in a federal investigation...genius...

And Tim, have you come across E-prime in your readings? The basic premis of the language (actually a modification of English) is that most, if not all, confusion in English comes from the use of "be" verbs. By simply dropping "to be"...is, am, are, was, were, etc...English becomes much more accurate and descriptive. I've experimented with it on and off and have found that it really does change the way you process etic reality into language...and my writing got incredibly more sophisticated and clear. I keep dropping out of using it because it takes more effort...but thinking about it now, its definitely worth using...

Heres a solid intro:  http://www.trans4mind.com/personal_development/GeneralSemantics/KensEPrime.htm

whoa...general semantics...never noticed that before...think I need to do a little more research into e-prime...

Be good,
Ronin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know most people think that this was a low point in Clinton&#8217;s career, but he became my hero with those 11 little words. I mean, the cajones on that guy&#8230;Ha!&#8230;to this day I&#8217;m in awe of his audacity&#8230;From what I understand, the way he justifies it to himself, his enemies where attempting to unjustly destroy him, so he could use every weapon in his arsenal (specifically rhetoric under oath) to fight back&#8230;Man, if I had the guts to argue the definition of the word &#8220;is&#8221; in a federal investigation&#8230;genius&#8230;</p>
<p>And Tim, have you come across E-prime in your readings? The basic premis of the language (actually a modification of English) is that most, if not all, confusion in English comes from the use of &#8220;be&#8221; verbs. By simply dropping &#8220;to be&#8221;&#8230;is, am, are, was, were, etc&#8230;English becomes much more accurate and descriptive. I&#8217;ve experimented with it on and off and have found that it really does change the way you process etic reality into language&#8230;and my writing got incredibly more sophisticated and clear. I keep dropping out of using it because it takes more effort&#8230;but thinking about it now, its definitely worth using&#8230;</p>
<p>Heres a solid intro:  <a href="http://www.trans4mind.com/personal_development/GeneralSemantics/KensEPrime.htm" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.trans4mind.com/personal_development/GeneralSemantics/KensEPrime.htm'>http://www.trans4mind.com/personal_dev...pment/GeneralSemantics/KensEPrime.htm</a></p>
<p>whoa&#8230;general semantics&#8230;never noticed that before&#8230;think I need to do a little more research into e-prime&#8230;</p>
<p>Be good,<br />
Ronin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agnes, the Kari person</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/10/the-definition-of-the-word-is/comment-page-1/#comment-18974</link>
		<dc:creator>Agnes, the Kari person</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/10/the-definition-of-the-word-is/#comment-18974</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You might, by this point, be thinking, â€œThis guy is full of shit. What is the point of all this endless dithering?â€ &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, you know what they say.  If you don't shit, you die.  Do what you gotta do.  Just don't squeeze the Charmin.

Agnes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You might, by this point, be thinking, â€œThis guy is full of shit. What is the point of all this endless dithering?â€ </p></blockquote>
<p>Well, you know what they say.  If you don&#8217;t shit, you die.  Do what you gotta do.  Just don&#8217;t squeeze the Charmin.</p>
<p>Agnes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crystal</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/10/the-definition-of-the-word-is/comment-page-1/#comment-18973</link>
		<dc:creator>Crystal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/10/the-definition-of-the-word-is/#comment-18973</guid>
		<description>I don't have a comment that pertains specifically to this, except to say that this post is exceptionally well-written.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have a comment that pertains specifically to this, except to say that this post is exceptionally well-written.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alistair</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/10/the-definition-of-the-word-is/comment-page-1/#comment-18970</link>
		<dc:creator>alistair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/10/the-definition-of-the-word-is/#comment-18970</guid>
		<description>NOTHING runs like a deere.............
it is important to explore and point out to people how words can create little logical traps that can become serious reeores in judgement. i read yesterday that someone said many years ago the it is the job of business to mislead the public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOTHING runs like a deere&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.<br />
it is important to explore and point out to people how words can create little logical traps that can become serious reeores in judgement. i read yesterday that someone said many years ago the it is the job of business to mislead the public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
