<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two Sides to Every Story</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/29/two-sides-to-every-story/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/29/two-sides-to-every-story/</link>
	<description>public domain playground. friendly entities welcome.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/29/two-sides-to-every-story/comment-page-1/#comment-19593</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 01:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/29/two-sides-to-every-story/#comment-19593</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Think about it â€” as a Coke (or Pepsi) fan â€” how often do you have a choice, should you want such a beverage? Most of the time weâ€™re a slave to whatâ€™s put on our plate (or in the soda machine).&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Holy shit! You're right! I never realized that before. The only time you have a choice between Coke or Pepsi is when you go into an actual shop to buy soda. When you are out at a restaurant, you will order "A Coke" and the waitress will reply, "Pepsi okay?" And you say, "Sure!"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Think about it â€” as a Coke (or Pepsi) fan â€” how often do you have a choice, should you want such a beverage? Most of the time weâ€™re a slave to whatâ€™s put on our plate (or in the soda machine).</p></blockquote>
<p>Holy shit! You&#8217;re right! I never realized that before. The only time you have a choice between Coke or Pepsi is when you go into an actual shop to buy soda. When you are out at a restaurant, you will order &#8220;A Coke&#8221; and the waitress will reply, &#8220;Pepsi okay?&#8221; And you say, &#8220;Sure!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laura jane</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/29/two-sides-to-every-story/comment-page-1/#comment-19565</link>
		<dc:creator>laura jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 14:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/29/two-sides-to-every-story/#comment-19565</guid>
		<description>HILARIOUS -- skip wiley, i was just about to doubt tim's commitment to sparkle motion, but you beat me to it !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HILARIOUS &#8212; skip wiley, i was just about to doubt tim&#8217;s commitment to sparkle motion, but you beat me to it !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thebrooke</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/29/two-sides-to-every-story/comment-page-1/#comment-19507</link>
		<dc:creator>thebrooke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/29/two-sides-to-every-story/#comment-19507</guid>
		<description>Funny, because those same people probably felt quite superior back in the day, pointing out the &lt;em&gt;complete idiocy&lt;/em&gt; of Dubya telling Canada (and everyone else) "You're either with us or against us." Oh the delicious hypocrisy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, because those same people probably felt quite superior back in the day, pointing out the <em>complete idiocy</em> of Dubya telling Canada (and everyone else) &#8220;You&#8217;re either with us or against us.&#8221; Oh the delicious hypocrisy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earthman Xosha Rosp</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/29/two-sides-to-every-story/comment-page-1/#comment-19501</link>
		<dc:creator>Earthman Xosha Rosp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/29/two-sides-to-every-story/#comment-19501</guid>
		<description>This posting reminded me of a fun incendent here in the hometown of Vancouver BC.  Our premier was loudly decried and defamed and all that by our gblt community for not attending this year's pride parade.  He was called a homophobe, and accused of hating gay people, and all that...  

Because he had a task to do (I believe it was a commerce/trade meeting) that was more important than a parade, he wasn't assumed to be busy, or unavailable - no, he was anti-pride, and shoud be hated for it.  

I thought it was a very amusing side to much of N. America's dealing with minorities and special interest groups like the glbt community - if you aren't actively supporting and holding their hand all the time, if you are absent for something else - the play the guilt-and-shame card, saying you're "against them".  It has reached the point where people feel bad if they can't make this pride event, or that cultural festival.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This posting reminded me of a fun incendent here in the hometown of Vancouver BC.  Our premier was loudly decried and defamed and all that by our gblt community for not attending this year&#8217;s pride parade.  He was called a homophobe, and accused of hating gay people, and all that&#8230;  </p>
<p>Because he had a task to do (I believe it was a commerce/trade meeting) that was more important than a parade, he wasn&#8217;t assumed to be busy, or unavailable - no, he was anti-pride, and shoud be hated for it.  </p>
<p>I thought it was a very amusing side to much of N. America&#8217;s dealing with minorities and special interest groups like the glbt community - if you aren&#8217;t actively supporting and holding their hand all the time, if you are absent for something else - the play the guilt-and-shame card, saying you&#8217;re &#8220;against them&#8221;.  It has reached the point where people feel bad if they can&#8217;t make this pride event, or that cultural festival.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skip wiley</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/29/two-sides-to-every-story/comment-page-1/#comment-19499</link>
		<dc:creator>skip wiley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/29/two-sides-to-every-story/#comment-19499</guid>
		<description>I don't know Tim, after posts like this one, I doubt your commitment to sparkle motion...

It seems to me that some dark, dangerous, and chaotic unconscious force is always the winner when things get broken down into this black-or-white way of thinking.  I picture Leviathan rubbing his hands greedily, knowing the battle is going his way.

It also reminds me of Coke vs. Pepsi, the most notorious of all one-side-or-the-other battles (at least for me).  The funny part is -- whoever loses, they both win.  By that I mean, all they want is people to pick a side and become a &lt;em&gt;fan&lt;/em&gt; of soda.  Think about it -- as a Coke (or Pepsi) fan -- how often do you have a choice, should you want such a beverage?  Most of the time we're a slave to what's put on our plate (or in the soda machine).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know Tim, after posts like this one, I doubt your commitment to sparkle motion&#8230;</p>
<p>It seems to me that some dark, dangerous, and chaotic unconscious force is always the winner when things get broken down into this black-or-white way of thinking.  I picture Leviathan rubbing his hands greedily, knowing the battle is going his way.</p>
<p>It also reminds me of Coke vs. Pepsi, the most notorious of all one-side-or-the-other battles (at least for me).  The funny part is &#8212; whoever loses, they both win.  By that I mean, all they want is people to pick a side and become a <em>fan</em> of soda.  Think about it &#8212; as a Coke (or Pepsi) fan &#8212; how often do you have a choice, should you want such a beverage?  Most of the time we&#8217;re a slave to what&#8217;s put on our plate (or in the soda machine).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yves</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/29/two-sides-to-every-story/comment-page-1/#comment-19498</link>
		<dc:creator>Yves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 20:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/29/two-sides-to-every-story/#comment-19498</guid>
		<description>From my side of the Atlantic, this seems like an American thing. Over here - Europe - we seem to thrive on moral ambiguities and included middles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From my side of the Atlantic, this seems like an American thing. Over here - Europe - we seem to thrive on moral ambiguities and included middles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/29/two-sides-to-every-story/comment-page-1/#comment-19496</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/29/two-sides-to-every-story/#comment-19496</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Whether itâ€™s maliciously done or not, it seems like thereâ€™s hardly an important issue in todayâ€™s society that doesnâ€™t get drawn out according to this strict linear axis of for and against, though the terms get jumbled sometimes to make it seem like there is no negative option: pro-choice, pro-life, family values, gay rights, freedom, security, etc. Politics is simply littered with these types of simplifications, as they seemed designed to break diverse groups of opinions down to very basic emotionally-laden arguments. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

  So true! By eliminating options, politicians (or whoever really makes decsions) prevent us from actually thinking any rational thoughts.

 Sadly, it works...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Whether itâ€™s maliciously done or not, it seems like thereâ€™s hardly an important issue in todayâ€™s society that doesnâ€™t get drawn out according to this strict linear axis of for and against, though the terms get jumbled sometimes to make it seem like there is no negative option: pro-choice, pro-life, family values, gay rights, freedom, security, etc. Politics is simply littered with these types of simplifications, as they seemed designed to break diverse groups of opinions down to very basic emotionally-laden arguments. </p></blockquote>
<p>  So true! By eliminating options, politicians (or whoever really makes decsions) prevent us from actually thinking any rational thoughts.</p>
<p> Sadly, it works&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prunes</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/29/two-sides-to-every-story/comment-page-1/#comment-19491</link>
		<dc:creator>prunes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 17:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/29/two-sides-to-every-story/#comment-19491</guid>
		<description>The Crying of Lot 49
http://www.innternet.de/~peter.patti/thomaspynchon-thecryingoflot49.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Crying of Lot 49<br />
<a href="http://www.innternet.de/~peter.patti/thomaspynchon-thecryingoflot49.htm" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.innternet.de/~peter.patti/thomaspynchon-thecryingoflot49.htm'>http://www.innternet.de/~peter.patti/thomaspynchon-thecryingoflot49.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/29/two-sides-to-every-story/comment-page-1/#comment-19489</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/29/two-sides-to-every-story/#comment-19489</guid>
		<description>In case you don't have time to read the slender Pynchon novel, here's an excellent breakdown:

http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/lot49/

It is exceedingly relevant to your post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you don&#8217;t have time to read the slender Pynchon novel, here&#8217;s an excellent breakdown:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/lot49/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/lot49/'>http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/lot49/</a></p>
<p>It is exceedingly relevant to your post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/29/two-sides-to-every-story/comment-page-1/#comment-19488</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/29/two-sides-to-every-story/#comment-19488</guid>
		<description>You're in Pynchon territory now: the excluded middle, "binary" thinking, the metaphor of Maxwell's Demon applied to humanity... Read "The Crying of Lot 49" and enjoy the paranoia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re in Pynchon territory now: the excluded middle, &#8220;binary&#8221; thinking, the metaphor of Maxwell&#8217;s Demon applied to humanity&#8230; Read &#8220;The Crying of Lot 49&#8243; and enjoy the paranoia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
