Nadeau’s book was reviewed by the Economist and that rag did not even mention the main focus of the book - quantum chaos economics!!

So there’s serious denial. I call it the “Alchemy of DeNile.”

You could probably even steal a copy at that certain store you mentioned earlier, or at the other one on Lyndale and 25th or whatever it is. You know the Arise store.

What do you mean by “fire” works? What do you think people need?

I recommend Pyramid Power — I’m sitting in full-lotus. Healthcare is the #1 civilian cost and is the top political threat in China — the qigong societies.

http://springforestqigong.com

Paper money has always been enforced the military — so Archytas and Plato beat out the self-healing system of Pythagoras — using Freemasonic Technology.

The first paper money was in China and then a 10-based currency system enabled prostitution to “free” women from sacred sex bondage in Western Asia-Greece (as detailed in Professor Jack Weatherford’s new book on money).

So money is the oldest form of technology, evolved from Gold-Sun and Silver-Moon ritual sacrifice.

Technology is Tantra seen as a means to free women from domestic sex-bondage — through imperial materialism, started with the cold Femme Fatale technology of Nefertiti (read Camille Paglia’s tome, “Sexual Personae”)

These people you mention are unfortunate victims. I would consider many people to be. Why they believe in these abstract concepts of money, debt, value , is probably due to the mechanical nature of humans sometimes. Human gullibility.

Why would any one in their right mind, I mean not brain washed, work to make someone else be rich , and then get delegated into a lower class. ? Fire works ahead in America.

http://www.lawresearchgroup.com/cart/p...hp?productid=155&cat=0&page=1

Chomsky advocates revoking corporate charters — there’s nothing less “reform” than that! http://poclad.org for details.

Now on currency I recommend http://paranoiamagazine.com — they link to a book on Amazon by a dude whose uncle was part of the Pearl harbor Conspiracy.

I ordered the book — “alternative currencies for local communities” — and it’s been over a month in processing!

Madison WI had about $17,000 in script last I heard — like IthacaHours and there’s one here in Minneapolis.

Try reading his essays sometime , and The United States of Amnesia stuff.

Libertarian socialism ha that Noam supports.? Well sweet then. You are talking about a price system there buddy. A class system there buddy. A political system there buddy.
You know what , Right and Left are only made for people to be confused with . That way the power possessor’s maintain control.

U.S. Democracy is dependent on genocidal controls. ? Yes , so , this is old news that dates from 1948 or so.

Noam is a reformer that wants to reform the current system. The current fake democracy system has no future except as a collapsed , fascist , socialist state, that they call a Democracy even so.

You may not agree and think Chomsky is a demi god , but I think he is part of the problem , and not any where near as smart and aware as you think.

So be it. To me he has as much value as a Rush Limbaugh, or Al Franken.
He is just a exploiter of people who are gullible enough to believe in politics
And yes , he could have another or perhaps another two or three books in him. I am sure they will sell well , at least for now.

Chomsky is not the “darling” of the liberals. Liberals listen to Public Radio. Chomsky hates public radio!

Chomsky is a radical from the anarchist scene in NYC. Chomsky promotes libertarian socialism as syndicalism.

That’s no different than the Allende movement or even the Chavez movement with it’s birth of 200,000 cooperatives.

Chavez promoted Chomsky and that’s a great testimony to how Chomsky’s work is directly practical.

Chomsky’s main point is that U.S. democracy is dependent on genocidal imperialism.

That’s a broad and radical hypothesis driving all of his analysis — yet that basic point get’s ignored by the liberals.

People love to throw around Chomsky’s name and talk about Chomsky without even having read Chomsky!!

the Idiot Net!

Did you just watch Man of the Year too? That’s exactly the scenario that played out in the movie at one point.

No, I have never seen it!

That would be different than attacking something causing it to become stronger.

In both of these it would depend on the circumstance. If something attacks you , it makes sense to fight back with an equal or stronger force.
If you attack something for no reason , you may strengthen the thing being attacked.

Chomsky is a muddler. A believer in things other than the rationale. Therefore he fails even as a social critic. I see him more like a tea leaf reader, with a big blind ego.

Chomsky has argued recently (in “Critics of Chomsky,” 2003) that science is just a “cycling of elements” based on “abduction” — C.S. Pierce’s logic of mysticism.

So while Chomsky’s linguistics is being used by the military to convert words in our brain into computer control (as detailed in a new quantum computer book) Chomsky also has a “conspiratorial” take on science that could be seen as Freemasonry or Transhumanism.

personally, i could give two shits about chomsky, goodman, zerzan, et al *unless* you can some how make the discussion about them permanent to this post.

how about this option? the concept of containment by causation extends far beyond the stupid banalities of “liberal vs. conservative” or even “politics vs anti-politics.” it extends to the very chain of being– our actions contain the events they cause. this may be the very root of experience within the world of forms.

I corresponded with Chomsky — I told him to get “At War With Asia” back in print (this was year 2000). Chomsky told me it’s very hard for him to get books back in print because they don’t sell very well. So he probably used my email since the book got reissued within a year (by AK Press).

So it’s great that Hugo Chavez put Chomsky back on the map! That inspired me to speed read “Hegemony and Survival” and it has a great expose on how Kruschev tried to stop the Cold War.

Chomsky provides solid, detailed information as does Amy Goodman.

Sure the ultimate conspiracy analysts are Daniel Hopsicker http://madcowprod.com

Wayne Madsen http://waynemadsenreport.com

http://copvcia.com

http://earthfirst.org

http://ctrl.org (conspiracy theory research list).

people like chomskey are typical of the media in general. that`s why i prefer alan watt. he suggests solutions. he lives in the woods north of toronto far from the media centers where the bright lights are.

alan says wake up and realise that the system has been engineered for generations, going back to the freemasonic groups on the mayflower and beyond. to try to gain insight from the talking heads would be like trying to get nutrition from a train track.

i think we all know this intuitively anyway.

was arron brown on cnn before 9/11?

The first information is always wrong.

I find him to be a part of the divide and conquer aspect of the price system.
Left , right confusion. Both parties are run by the same people and have been since about 1948. This was when the military/industrial/congressional complex took over completely, and for Noam to think in terms of this being a reformable democratic system is kind of pathetic and self serving.

So he is a sort of anarchist democrat. A rich man who sells so many books that people mistakenly think are alternative.
The system loves this guy.
They consider him one of their spokespeople.
Amy Goodman is alternative because she was almost shot.? I find her reporting , and even the name of her show to be only a mouth piece for the system. Democracy now. ? Who wants Democracy any way. She is a cats paw for the powers that be.

That just means rule by the mob. Would you like any 10 Americans to decide your fate. I don`t think so.

like even sting said…..there are no political solutions. in a jamaican accent…..maybe he was trying to be ironic.

and i never found chomskey`s writing or speaking dense………just predictable. if you say the word hegemony enough times, people begin to go look it up.

Ok where was I –

Amy Goodman was almost killed in a U.S. funded massacre in East Timor. Another journalist jumped on top of her to receive the blows from military thugs while they shot peaceful demonstrators — dozens of them.

Anyway sure Chomsky and Goodman are not totally radical anti-civilization conspiracy activists (like me and other super awesome people) haha — but they are a threat to the system.

Pacifica radio has been named for removal in congress and I used Chomsky’s detailed analysis for my anti-sweatshop activism at the U of Minnesota.

I single-brainedly took on the Student Senate by refuting their arguments with excerpts from World Orders: Old and New.

Now — is Chomksy hard to read? Yes he even claims he’s “turgid” as he’s been dismissed for being. But the “FORM” of his subject requires that his writing style approach very difficult issues of ideology in an indirect manner.

He’s not nearly as bad as say “superstar” Slavoj Zizek who everyone loves because Zizek’s message is “do nothing.”

Chomsky supports syndicalism based on THE BIG STRIKE — can’t get any better than that!!

Chomsky’s latest sold out lecture in Cambridge Square had it’s main message as “under current trends nuclear exchange is inevitable.”

Hard to get more radical than that.

I would say people more radical are not much different than Chomsky — Wayne Madsen, Michael Ruppert…

John Zerzan, for example, misquoted Chomsky and misrepresented Chomsky.

Chomsky called Zerzan on it but Zerzan would not even respond to Chomsky.

Zerzan has created his own little imbred cult based on disinformation — no different than all the little Marxist cults around the U.S.: Freedom Road, RCP, ISO, etc.

Chomsky is a “social scientist” which means he’s qualified to write on any social science topic with the same standards as other social scientists.

His writing is based on academic sources, professional news reports and highly acclaimed human rights reports, etc.

So to knock down Chomky you can’t just dismiss him as some pawn of his military-funded research, etc.

Chris Knight has the best analysis of Chomsky — I’ll get the post.

I have yet to hear him say anything about anything that will contribute to change the system , beyond ways to modify the existing model with a little political tinkering.
That means politics, and there is no future solution in a political model such as we have , based on money.

He may be smart , and a good talker , but he is also annoyingly dense. I know he gets huge fees for his speaking, and I would think almost that he is the most conservative of people as a flunky for the system. I`ll take any thing that Gore Vidal writes over Noam’s stuff any day. Gore is actually smart, and of all the professional smart people , I think he may be the best.

Chomsky is clueless . He is a millionaire, he just keeps writing more pointless books.

Chomsky is part of the problem.

4 must read Noam Chomsky books on information control:

1) At War with Asia

2) Year 501: The Conquest Continues

3) World Orders: Old and New

4) Political Economy of Human Rights: The Washington Connection and Third World Fascism.

Chomsky states that Public Radio is the worst form of mind control indoctrination because of the fake, “sophisticated” debate based on a FALSE FRAMEWORK of assumptions.

And I agree with your point. Well said.