<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So I Married An Algorithm&#8230;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/</link>
	<description>public domain playground. friendly entities welcome.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: liesl</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-32936</link>
		<dc:creator>liesl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 19:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/#comment-32936</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;tim says:  if itâ€™s infinite, then every little thing has infinite copies of itself. 
if infinity yields any duplicates at all â€“ which it must, because itâ€™s infinity â€“ then it yields an infinite number of duplicates&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;

&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;speedbird says: Whatâ€™s with all this infinity stuff? Worth bearing in mind thereâ€™s at least two kindsâ€¦ the kind you get to if you just keep counting and the other kind thatâ€™s much, much biggerâ€¦&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Isn't the second kind of infinity simply nested in between the numbers in the first kind, fractally; like the irrationals and fractions are still on the same continuum, but in the equally infinite spaces between whole numbers?  (hey, isn't that kind of like dark matter too? lol) 
And, If the universe is already infinite, then how can there be infinite other universes? By definition of infinite, musn't it be all-inclusive? 
I mean, a fractal is unique at every point you zoom in on, if you zoom in far enough, so i am told.
So, wouldn't that mean that each supposed dimension/parallel U is in fact a note on the scale, a frequency on the continuum, unique and not a copy? it's own url...?  
What if the concept of a multiverse is subterfuge, a seductive "&lt;em&gt;mara&lt;/em&gt; hari" designed to keep us distracted forever in a hall of mirrors?   
How is it that the Buddha could have caused the Earth to bear witness to his enlightenment? Is it because he was in tune with everything, or because the earth was but a reflection/extension of him?  Or both. Well, I guess either way, there's still only One of us here, somehow.  blah blah blah hehe. ( too much thinking. brainsquish. switching to heartmind now. [ click ]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>tim says:  if itâ€™s infinite, then every little thing has infinite copies of itself.<br />
if infinity yields any duplicates at all â€“ which it must, because itâ€™s infinity â€“ then it yields an infinite number of duplicates</p></blockquote>
<blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote><p>speedbird says: Whatâ€™s with all this infinity stuff? Worth bearing in mind thereâ€™s at least two kindsâ€¦ the kind you get to if you just keep counting and the other kind thatâ€™s much, much biggerâ€¦</p></blockquote>
<p>Isn&#8217;t the second kind of infinity simply nested in between the numbers in the first kind, fractally; like the irrationals and fractions are still on the same continuum, but in the equally infinite spaces between whole numbers?  (hey, isn&#8217;t that kind of like dark matter too? lol)<br />
And, If the universe is already infinite, then how can there be infinite other universes? By definition of infinite, musn&#8217;t it be all-inclusive?<br />
I mean, a fractal is unique at every point you zoom in on, if you zoom in far enough, so i am told.<br />
So, wouldn&#8217;t that mean that each supposed dimension/parallel U is in fact a note on the scale, a frequency on the continuum, unique and not a copy? it&#8217;s own url&#8230;?<br />
What if the concept of a multiverse is subterfuge, a seductive &#8220;<em>mara</em> hari&#8221; designed to keep us distracted forever in a hall of mirrors?<br />
How is it that the Buddha could have caused the Earth to bear witness to his enlightenment? Is it because he was in tune with everything, or because the earth was but a reflection/extension of him?  Or both. Well, I guess either way, there&#8217;s still only One of us here, somehow.  blah blah blah hehe. ( too much thinking. brainsquish. switching to heartmind now. [ click ]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alistair</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-32935</link>
		<dc:creator>alistair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 17:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/#comment-32935</guid>
		<description>one day that console will be the pride of someone`s collection.......

every time i go to the dump i think about the piles of things freshly deposited that someone will desperately want to find a some other point in what we call time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one day that console will be the pride of someone`s collection&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>every time i go to the dump i think about the piles of things freshly deposited that someone will desperately want to find a some other point in what we call time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: speedbird</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-32914</link>
		<dc:creator>speedbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 13:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/#comment-32914</guid>
		<description>Like the Time cover. :-)

What's with all this infinity stuff? Worth bearing in mind there's at least two kinds... the kind you get to if you just keep counting and the other kind that's much, much bigger...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like the Time cover. <img src='http://www.timboucher.com/journal/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>What&#8217;s with all this infinity stuff? Worth bearing in mind there&#8217;s at least two kinds&#8230; the kind you get to if you just keep counting and the other kind that&#8217;s much, much bigger&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kylark</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-32906</link>
		<dc:creator>Kylark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 03:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/#comment-32906</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;God, buy me an old record player so I can listen to these records as you meant them to be listened to.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I'm about to bring my friend's &lt;a href="http://flickr.com/photos/maggiet/357431789/" rel="nofollow"&gt;console&lt;/a&gt; home.  If that isn't listening to records as God intended, I don't know what is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>God, buy me an old record player so I can listen to these records as you meant them to be listened to.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m about to bring my friend&#8217;s <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/maggiet/357431789/" rel="nofollow">console</a> home.  If that isn&#8217;t listening to records as God intended, I don&#8217;t know what is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liesl</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-32886</link>
		<dc:creator>liesl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 17:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/#comment-32886</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I met the person Iâ€™m going to marry. I think Iâ€™m the algorithm.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

congratulations lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I met the person Iâ€™m going to marry. I think Iâ€™m the algorithm.</p></blockquote>
<p>congratulations lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sketchmonkey</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-32849</link>
		<dc:creator>Sketchmonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 13:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/#comment-32849</guid>
		<description>Every person may be an algorithm with the potential to 'wake up' be a 'real' boy or girl... or, at the very least, a self-programming algorithm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every person may be an algorithm with the potential to &#8216;wake up&#8217; be a &#8216;real&#8217; boy or girl&#8230; or, at the very least, a self-programming algorithm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kylark</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-32824</link>
		<dc:creator>Kylark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 00:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/#comment-32824</guid>
		<description>I met the person I'm going to marry.  I think I'm the algorithm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I met the person I&#8217;m going to marry.  I think I&#8217;m the algorithm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jlhart7</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-32817</link>
		<dc:creator>jlhart7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 23:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/#comment-32817</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;EXCEPTIONOLOGY: THE RELIGION FOR ANYONE WHO HAS EVER FELT DIFFERENT. 

The secret is that youâ€™re actually not different. It sure feels like it though, huh? We used to call you folks â€œhumansâ€ but now we call you social rejects, autistics, schizophrenics, and all other kinds of fun names. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

That's the thing, exactly. Many of us feel like we're different, but we're actually not at all exceptional in the sense we think we are. 

Also, I think having sex with a robot would be a good way to avoid unwanted pregnancies. I wish I could be pro-choice so I could go have sex with chicks, but I can't seem to justify it without thinking of my own children dying for the sake of my lust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>EXCEPTIONOLOGY: THE RELIGION FOR ANYONE WHO HAS EVER FELT DIFFERENT. </p>
<p>The secret is that youâ€™re actually not different. It sure feels like it though, huh? We used to call you folks â€œhumansâ€ but now we call you social rejects, autistics, schizophrenics, and all other kinds of fun names. </p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s the thing, exactly. Many of us feel like we&#8217;re different, but we&#8217;re actually not at all exceptional in the sense we think we are. </p>
<p>Also, I think having sex with a robot would be a good way to avoid unwanted pregnancies. I wish I could be pro-choice so I could go have sex with chicks, but I can&#8217;t seem to justify it without thinking of my own children dying for the sake of my lust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-32794</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 21:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/#comment-32794</guid>
		<description>"your madness fits in nicely with my own"

that song is brilliant</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;your madness fits in nicely with my own&#8221;</p>
<p>that song is brilliant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: offthemark</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-32787</link>
		<dc:creator>offthemark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 20:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/#comment-32787</guid>
		<description>oops

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cWq3mIp4cU</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cWq3mIp4cU" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cWq3mIp4cU'>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cWq3mIp4cU</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: offthemark</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-32786</link>
		<dc:creator>offthemark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 20:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/#comment-32786</guid>
		<description>You look different every time

&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cWq3mIp4cU" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You look different every time</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cWq3mIp4cU" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-32784</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 20:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/#comment-32784</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizopolis" rel="nofollow"&gt;schizopolis&lt;/a&gt;.

especially &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eventualism" rel="nofollow"&gt;eventualism&lt;/a&gt;.  oh, that's &lt;a href="http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Eventualism" rel="nofollow"&gt;eventualism&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizopolis" rel="nofollow">schizopolis</a>.</p>
<p>especially <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eventualism" rel="nofollow">eventualism</a>.  oh, that&#8217;s <a href="http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Eventualism" rel="nofollow">eventualism</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liesl</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-32783</link>
		<dc:creator>liesl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 20:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/#comment-32783</guid>
		<description>sorry tim  i am not trying to clog your boards, but dam i just realized that link i posted didnt give the best part of the lyrics, the rap at the end, so here they are.   wow i had to actually pull out the cd jacket to get these ( and my hubby said, no lie, "how analog!" lol):

"walking with the people and we're movin like a sea, and the music in my headphones puts a rhythm to the breeze, it's got me plunging into life and i see it like a picture, motions as we move gives me a clearer description than the words i string together when i'm lookin for expression, or words i read for wisdom as i'm searching for some answers, automatic reflex, of natural detects the tide has come to where a pattern was set, so move with me....and i'm washing thru the whole, saw thru the one i fell, i plunge into myself, now i'm the story that i tell, for another grain of sand that will nurture in our shell, in our allotted place between heaven and hell" -  &lt;a href="http://webjay.org/iteminfo/17843359/d55203e8994756b11389a331fb149ee2" rel="nofollow"&gt;neneh cherry&lt;/a&gt;

ok that's all folks, i promise. over and out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry tim  i am not trying to clog your boards, but dam i just realized that link i posted didnt give the best part of the lyrics, the rap at the end, so here they are.   wow i had to actually pull out the cd jacket to get these ( and my hubby said, no lie, &#8220;how analog!&#8221; lol):</p>
<p>&#8220;walking with the people and we&#8217;re movin like a sea, and the music in my headphones puts a rhythm to the breeze, it&#8217;s got me plunging into life and i see it like a picture, motions as we move gives me a clearer description than the words i string together when i&#8217;m lookin for expression, or words i read for wisdom as i&#8217;m searching for some answers, automatic reflex, of natural detects the tide has come to where a pattern was set, so move with me&#8230;.and i&#8217;m washing thru the whole, saw thru the one i fell, i plunge into myself, now i&#8217;m the story that i tell, for another grain of sand that will nurture in our shell, in our allotted place between heaven and hell&#8221; -  <a href="http://webjay.org/iteminfo/17843359/d55203e8994756b11389a331fb149ee2" rel="nofollow">neneh cherry</a></p>
<p>ok that&#8217;s all folks, i promise. over and out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liesl</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-32778</link>
		<dc:creator>liesl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/#comment-32778</guid>
		<description>oo it did it again! the algorithm thinks i am writing code. pardon me while i test....
one more try to post the end of my message  and the link:

galaCtic con[fed]eration transmissi@n 781^3.14 end ]

&lt;a href="http://www.musicsonglyrics.com/N/nenehcherrylyrics/nenehcherrymovewithmelyrics.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;"move with me i'm strong enough to be weak in your arms, move with me i'm strong enough to be real in your arms"&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oo it did it again! the algorithm thinks i am writing code. pardon me while i test&#8230;.<br />
one more try to post the end of my message  and the link:</p>
<p>galaCtic con[fed]eration <a href="mailto:transmissi@n">transmissi@n</a> 781^3.14 end ]</p>
<p><a href="http://www.musicsonglyrics.com/N/nenehcherrylyrics/nenehcherrymovewithmelyrics.htm" rel="nofollow">&#8220;move with me i&#8217;m strong enough to be weak in your arms, move with me i&#8217;m strong enough to be real in your arms&#8221;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liesl</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-32777</link>
		<dc:creator>liesl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/#comment-32777</guid>
		<description>ooo glitch in the matrix!
galamove with me i'm strong enough to be weak in your arms, move with me i'm strong enough to be real in your arms"
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ooo glitch in the matrix!<br />
galamove with me i&#8217;m strong enough to be weak in your arms, move with me i&#8217;m strong enough to be real in your arms&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liesl</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-32776</link>
		<dc:creator>liesl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/#comment-32776</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;alistair Says:  what if the algorithm is deep enough so seem like empathy to me? would the distortion be evident&lt;/blockquote&gt;


&lt;a href="http://images.heartmath.com/email-images/iq-tip/iq-tip_1-18-07.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;empathy is a muscle that one must exercise&lt;/a&gt; or it atrophies. you can cultivate your e(mopatho)meter.
then one can tell the difference between the genuine and the copy. being able to feel sublte energies consciously helps too.  not only must we marry the algorithm, we must genuinely love it and shower it with selfless act of random kindness. empathy is remembering there is only one of us here.


&lt;blockquote&gt;p says: Who other than the Mono Logos is powerful enough to become weak, to fail in memory, to fail in ability, not by some self-imposed circumscription of ability but in being!&lt;/blockquote&gt;


ah thank you for this,  the secret ingredient in my frodo hanged man card divinitory meaning.


&lt;blockquote&gt;tim says: For the record, I think everyone has to marry an algorithm at some point. Thatâ€™s the only way to defeat the empire - by getting it into bed!&lt;/blockquote&gt;


well that is just existentially, exponentially, exception-illogically excellent then!
 [ i/we a*m @n track to c[om[plete my/our missi0n. galamove with me i'm strong enough to be weak in your arms, move with me i'm strong enough to be real in your arms"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>alistair Says:  what if the algorithm is deep enough so seem like empathy to me? would the distortion be evident</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://images.heartmath.com/email-images/iq-tip/iq-tip_1-18-07.html" rel="nofollow">empathy is a muscle that one must exercise</a> or it atrophies. you can cultivate your e(mopatho)meter.<br />
then one can tell the difference between the genuine and the copy. being able to feel sublte energies consciously helps too.  not only must we marry the algorithm, we must genuinely love it and shower it with selfless act of random kindness. empathy is remembering there is only one of us here.</p>
<blockquote><p>p says: Who other than the Mono Logos is powerful enough to become weak, to fail in memory, to fail in ability, not by some self-imposed circumscription of ability but in being!</p></blockquote>
<p>ah thank you for this,  the secret ingredient in my frodo hanged man card divinitory meaning.</p>
<blockquote><p>tim says: For the record, I think everyone has to marry an algorithm at some point. Thatâ€™s the only way to defeat the empire - by getting it into bed!</p></blockquote>
<p>well that is just existentially, exponentially, exception-illogically excellent then!<br />
 [ i/we a*m @n track to c[om[plete my/our missi0n. galamove with me i&#8217;m strong enough to be weak in your arms, move with me i&#8217;m strong enough to be real in your arms&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: p</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-32770</link>
		<dc:creator>p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/#comment-32770</guid>
		<description>Hello reader. A fractional transcript of your own internal monologue has turned up in the files. 
http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/thunder.html
The derangement that obscures the memory of this is also none other than this selfsame Speech. Only the Speaker can truly say these things, can truly say &lt;i&gt;your&lt;/i&gt; things.

Who other than the Mono Logos is powerful enough to &lt;em&gt;become weak&lt;/em&gt;, to fail in memory, to fail in ability, not by some self-imposed circumscription of ability but in &lt;em&gt;being!&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello reader. A fractional transcript of your own internal monologue has turned up in the files.<br />
<a href="http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/thunder.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/thunder.html'>http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/thunder.html</a><br />
The derangement that obscures the memory of this is also none other than this selfsame Speech. Only the Speaker can truly say these things, can truly say <i>your</i> things.</p>
<p>Who other than the Mono Logos is powerful enough to <em>become weak</em>, to fail in memory, to fail in ability, not by some self-imposed circumscription of ability but in <em>being!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alistair</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-32759</link>
		<dc:creator>alistair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/#comment-32759</guid>
		<description>no need to snatch the pebble from my hand grasshopper.......there is no hand, no pebble and no grasshopper.......and no monastary.......no mountain........no..............

starbucks in the forbidden city?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no need to snatch the pebble from my hand grasshopper&#8230;&#8230;.there is no hand, no pebble and no grasshopper&#8230;&#8230;.and no monastary&#8230;&#8230;.no mountain&#8230;&#8230;..no&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>starbucks in the forbidden city?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-32743</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/#comment-32743</guid>
		<description>Oh, so that's what pataphysics is! It's also the approach of Charles Forte I think too!

For the record, I think everyone has to marry an algorithm at some point. That's the only way to defeat the empire - by getting it into bed!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mata_Hari</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, so that&#8217;s what pataphysics is! It&#8217;s also the approach of Charles Forte I think too!</p>
<p>For the record, I think everyone has to marry an algorithm at some point. That&#8217;s the only way to defeat the empire - by getting it into bed!</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mata_Hari" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mata_Hari'>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mata_Hari</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-32698</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/#comment-32698</guid>
		<description>1. The pictogram puzzles are commonly known as rebuses, and I enjoy them thoroughly.

2. Exceptionology (sorry, couldn't make the trademark avatar) is essentially 'pataphysics, which I have been crowing about for years. Alfred Jarry "invented" it and here's his definition of it:

"'Pataphysics is the science of imaginary solutions that symbolically attributes to the feature the properties of the objects described according to their virtuality."

He elaborated upon it further:

â€œâ€˜Pataphysics will examine the laws governing exceptionsâ€¦ and will describe a universe which can be, and perhaps should be, envisaged in place of the traditional one, since the laws that are supposed to have been discovered in the traditional universe are also correlations of exceptions, albeit more frequent ones, but in any case accidental data which, reduced to the status of unexceptional exceptions, possess no longer even the virtue of originality.â€</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. The pictogram puzzles are commonly known as rebuses, and I enjoy them thoroughly.</p>
<p>2. Exceptionology (sorry, couldn&#8217;t make the trademark avatar) is essentially &#8216;pataphysics, which I have been crowing about for years. Alfred Jarry &#8220;invented&#8221; it and here&#8217;s his definition of it:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8216;Pataphysics is the science of imaginary solutions that symbolically attributes to the feature the properties of the objects described according to their virtuality.&#8221;</p>
<p>He elaborated upon it further:</p>
<p>â€œâ€˜Pataphysics will examine the laws governing exceptionsâ€¦ and will describe a universe which can be, and perhaps should be, envisaged in place of the traditional one, since the laws that are supposed to have been discovered in the traditional universe are also correlations of exceptions, albeit more frequent ones, but in any case accidental data which, reduced to the status of unexceptional exceptions, possess no longer even the virtue of originality.â€</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liesl</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-32693</link>
		<dc:creator>liesl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/#comment-32693</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;'choco-tastic molecules"!?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

off with his &lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6243787.stm" rel="nofollow"&gt;head&lt;/a&gt;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8216;choco-tastic molecules&#8221;!?</p></blockquote>
<p>off with his <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6243787.stm" rel="nofollow">head</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mars s.</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-32691</link>
		<dc:creator>mars s.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/#comment-32691</guid>
		<description>But they are us. Aren't we? So, why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But they are us. Aren&#8217;t we? So, why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liesl</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-32689</link>
		<dc:creator>liesl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/#comment-32689</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;and begin unpacking the fractal hyper-dimensional cube which will be called 2012 (see how it unfolds?) and/or the Singularity.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

nice. very entertaining. give the man some money. i'll pay you for giving me that headache. that fucking rocked. merge layers. 

but now you have blogged every blog and every copy of every blog to infinitude in the mcmultiverse, what's to do? why bother? oh yes, now you have to run the church!
amen brother. how does it feel to witness the birth of a new religion, and be its head?

ok, i confess, maybe not exactly an algorithm. he's a real boy, mostly...it was a close call.
"if i only had a &lt;a href="http://http://www.heartmath.org/research/our-heart-brain.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;brain in my heart&lt;/a&gt;"
but really, what is it with aspergery  geek boys and psi(chotronic) girls making little baby syzygys, goocheegoo!  what *do* homoplasmates eat? 

&lt;blockquote&gt;Why is it that most of the comments at Pop Occulture have changed to flowery freeverse along with Tim B?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Why did attempting to caculate Pi to the final digit crash the star trek computer that had been co-opted by an evil entity?  


&lt;blockquote&gt;"The Mind is not talking to us but by means of us. Its narrative passes through us and its sorrow infuses us irrationally. As Plato discerned, there is a streak of the irrational in the World Soul." PDK&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>and begin unpacking the fractal hyper-dimensional cube which will be called 2012 (see how it unfolds?) and/or the Singularity.</p></blockquote>
<p>nice. very entertaining. give the man some money. i&#8217;ll pay you for giving me that headache. that fucking rocked. merge layers. </p>
<p>but now you have blogged every blog and every copy of every blog to infinitude in the mcmultiverse, what&#8217;s to do? why bother? oh yes, now you have to run the church!<br />
amen brother. how does it feel to witness the birth of a new religion, and be its head?</p>
<p>ok, i confess, maybe not exactly an algorithm. he&#8217;s a real boy, mostly&#8230;it was a close call.<br />
&#8220;if i only had a <a href="http://http://www.heartmath.org/research/our-heart-brain.html" rel="nofollow">brain in my heart</a>&#8221;<br />
but really, what is it with aspergery  geek boys and psi(chotronic) girls making little baby syzygys, goocheegoo!  what *do* homoplasmates eat? </p>
<blockquote><p>Why is it that most of the comments at Pop Occulture have changed to flowery freeverse along with Tim B?</p></blockquote>
<p>Why did attempting to caculate Pi to the final digit crash the star trek computer that had been co-opted by an evil entity?  </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The Mind is not talking to us but by means of us. Its narrative passes through us and its sorrow infuses us irrationally. As Plato discerned, there is a streak of the irrational in the World Soul.&#8221; PDK</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-32683</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 06:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/#comment-32683</guid>
		<description>And that's exactly what they've been doing to us all along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And that&#8217;s exactly what they&#8217;ve been doing to us all along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-32682</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 06:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/#comment-32682</guid>
		<description>Don't worry about the locusts, it's happened before. The last time Chicago was invaded by giant locusts here's what the Army did. They blasted them with the sounds of female locusts from a boat in the lake. The locusts jumped off the buildings, followed the boat and drowned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t worry about the locusts, it&#8217;s happened before. The last time Chicago was invaded by giant locusts here&#8217;s what the Army did. They blasted them with the sounds of female locusts from a boat in the lake. The locusts jumped off the buildings, followed the boat and drowned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darkshadow</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-32681</link>
		<dc:creator>Darkshadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 05:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/#comment-32681</guid>
		<description>...so that means we probably &lt;em&gt;shouldn't&lt;/em&gt; look at that, then.  Or we should.  Can we do both?  Maybe if you keep one eye closed while reading it.  Or maybe it should be the other eye.  Can you keep one ear closed and only listen with the other one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;so that means we probably <em>shouldn&#8217;t</em> look at that, then.  Or we should.  Can we do both?  Maybe if you keep one eye closed while reading it.  Or maybe it should be the other eye.  Can you keep one ear closed and only listen with the other one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-32670</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 04:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/01/18/so-i-married-an-algorithm/#comment-32670</guid>
		<description>I'm convinced that the only good way to make sense out of any of this shit is by way of applying Pascal's Wager to &lt;em&gt;other people&lt;/em&gt;...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal's_Wager</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m convinced that the only good way to make sense out of any of this shit is by way of applying Pascal&#8217;s Wager to <em>other people</em>&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal'>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal</a>&#8217;s_Wager</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
