this struggle is what makes us run.

that`s why i like jackson pollock so much. he got out of his own way enough to communicate what was going on outside of the word trap that we exist in.

synchronicity.

this morning i woke up to thinking about leopard print gloves. a woman in starbucks wears them all the time and i instantly thought of her.

i went to starbucks after work and stopped to get a bagel at the bakery and behind the counter lay a pair of leopard print gloves.

i knew instantly they were hers. i had the spidey senses going.

minutes later i walked into starbucks and she was there sitting with two friends, one of which had a pair of the same gloves on.

i said to her that she was going to think this was odd but i woke up thinking of leopard print gloves and that i knew precisely where her`s were.

she didn`t realise hers were missing until i told her where they were.

i have gotten used to coincedance over the years.

i wonder what she thought of the whole thing.

humans are a funny mixture of right and left brained approaches to experience.

i love my AI … after all, we do need some kind of structural framwork to bring creative inspiration into form, yes? like the homoplasmate needs a host….or something ? the chalice for the fire?

holding our breath underwater … hmmm…..breath…pneuma…. :
“In the Gospel of John, pneuma is linked to re-birth in water and spirit, which has been suggested to be baptism.”

pneuma…word…logos….sun…: “For the Stoics, the Logos and the Natural Order is One–a world soul in progress”

“the Logos represents the heart of the cosmic pattern and the source of existence, its emblem is the sun, the source of life and light.”

“I am…becoming more inclined towards thinking of the Logos as the “Meme of all memes” or as “Code.” … in terms of the Collective rather than the individual … So how does the Logos speak to us individually? Historically and from my own personal experience, I’ve nailed it down to two ways: through dreams and outside events–especially synchronistic events.”

sun…. leo….lion….aslan!

…. We “know” the Logos exists, because it works within and through us. And that’s why it is so *important* to begin to integrate our experiential knowledge with our empirical knowledge, because the Logos is not one over the other. The Logos, to be the Great Unity, is present both subjectively and objectively– and certainly begs for synthesis.”

Bruce Moen describes what our minds do when exploring dreamlike metaphysical realms: “in a sense the Interpreter [memorizer,"left" brain] acts as a translator, continuously and automatically bringing the Perceiver [observer, "right" brain]’s information into conscious awareness in an understandable, though not always accurate, form” [due to it having to filter through our beliefs, language, and preexisting memories.]

“the problem with the Interpreter is that if you allow it to ramble on, it begins making associations with its own associations to the point that what you’re talking to yourself about can get so far away from what you originally perceived that you have no idea that it all started with seeing a big orange CAT”

( wtf!? aslan again…? see, now that just “randomly” happened to be the example he used in the quote in the book that i looked up… )

the sungking is roaring…. happy Sunday!

However, now I think I can tune into your frequency a bit clearer. Funnily enough, I was talking to a friend of mine about tuning into other people’s frequencies so you can think like them when I first saw this update posted. Synchronicities abound.

humans are a funny mixture of right and left brained approaches to experience.

when diving in water one naturally holds one`s breath to stop from inhaling water into our lungs.

i think i managed to hold my mind long enough to not inhale too much right-brained programming int my consciousness.

or something………….

Don’t know if you wanted to know that, but I felt a need to share.

Enjoy the rest of your day, wherever you are.

I, for one, definitely will. We are seeing Blue Man Group in Everett tonight….

I like this post. You should make a pdf of all your posts since you started the new style of writing, put this as a preface and put it up on torrent sites as “Triple X Rated MindPorn”

Also just for interest’s sake this is what you seemed to be talking about to me:

direct apperception of reality unclouded by words or memories or thought associations of any kind

But like you said what you seem to be talking about isn’t what you’re talking about.

PS. Do you consider all words/thoughts (referents?) part of the AI mind you talk about? Like a new zen?

In radionic analysis, which uses gsr testing to find the frequencies used in a treatment, I have been humbled time and again to find that without engaging my mind, without knowing anything about a client, i can obtain accurate information regarding their issues. This is the same concept used in dowsing. It neccessarily bypasses the AI, which, because the information i get may appear to be unrelated and jumping all over the place, balks at this process, and keeps wanting to interfere, edit, collate, and create a meaning it can comprehend out of the data, but it never can because it’s comprehension is severely limited ). I like to call this the difference between knowing and Gnowing. AI misses 90% of the message.

From using this nonlinear way of obtaining information instead, a pattern emerges which is far more complete, complex, and informative. This type of communication is also akin to the the cereal box divining boy in Lady in the Water. Purely linear thinkers may scoff and laugh at this, but i can assure you from years of practice, as can my clients, that it really works, and yields insights of far greater breadth and depth than deductive reasoning. It literally boggles the mind. This seems like what Tim is doing in his writing these days, and why I respond so well to it, being familar as I am with that territory:

I try not to filter too much what I use as reference points, because I am finding that there is a lot richer of a signal if I expend my effort trying to get out of its way as opposed to trying to actively control it.

Rock on, Tim!
p.s. on lions: I just keep thinking, “Aslan!” [grin]

i also saw this this morning 7 thought you might either have or would like to see
http://thesecret.tv/

but i saw it at this link cause I came across it for fr33
http://movies.peekvid.com/s4233/
although part 3 didn”T load
i got the general picture

i ponder much more than i’m able to comment and contribute conversation
about your interesting posts, thanks

http://europeforvisitors.com/switzaust...ia/articles/lucerne_lion_monument.htm

Heh, fell in love for the first time under that lion’s eyes…his face is a pretty good description of the feeling, too…

circles and triangles…………..very co-incedental.

I almost think that simply listing these reference points that I have been tracking lately though is not necessarily as interesting of a read. It’s definitely not as interesting to write

I get your point but I’m not just ‘reading’ your new style I’m watching/listening to/looking at it as well. That can have it’s own rewards. The new style has been like the difference between a series of encyclopedia entries and opening an encyclopedia randomly and making connections. The new style requires more time to ‘read’ and time of a different quality. If you skim now you can’t even pretend to get your meaning.

I usually feel like Khidir beneath Momouteh but if I take the time to remember Callimas at Bahar sometimes I become like Sokath, his eyes uncovered.