<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Short Review Session</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/15/a-short-review-session/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/15/a-short-review-session/</link>
	<description>public domain playground. friendly entities welcome.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/15/a-short-review-session/comment-page-1/#comment-72668</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 21:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/15/a-short-review-session/#comment-72668</guid>
		<description>what am I, your mom?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what am I, your mom?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baumer</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/15/a-short-review-session/comment-page-1/#comment-72650</link>
		<dc:creator>baumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 19:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/15/a-short-review-session/#comment-72650</guid>
		<description>Can you do this every 6 months? 
Its always much easier to see the big picture first then look at the details.. 
trying to keep up with you and your details while piecing together the big picture can be quite exhausting..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you do this every 6 months?<br />
Its always much easier to see the big picture first then look at the details..<br />
trying to keep up with you and your details while piecing together the big picture can be quite exhausting..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/15/a-short-review-session/comment-page-1/#comment-72576</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 17:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/15/a-short-review-session/#comment-72576</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Btw, why does your site always auto populate my defunct blog no matter how many times I change it?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Try clearing your browser cache...

&lt;blockquote&gt;Now, lay out for us what youâ€™ll be doing for the next 3 weeks â€¦&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Working at my new job and living my "so-called" life</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Btw, why does your site always auto populate my defunct blog no matter how many times I change it?</p></blockquote>
<p>Try clearing your browser cache&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Now, lay out for us what youâ€™ll be doing for the next 3 weeks â€¦</p></blockquote>
<p>Working at my new job and living my &#8220;so-called&#8221; life</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: solxyz</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/15/a-short-review-session/comment-page-1/#comment-72512</link>
		<dc:creator>solxyz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 23:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/15/a-short-review-session/#comment-72512</guid>
		<description>For what its worth, I had a nice little synchronicity with this post. I stopped reading your blog a while ago, soon after you switched to doing this new thing. I saw the value in it, but I didnt have time to absorb and allow myself to be transformed by the material, or maybe it just wasnt the way I wanted to approach things at the time. Now, I was just thinking that Im in a place where Pop Occulture might have a place in my life again. I come to check in, and I find the guide. 

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what its worth, I had a nice little synchronicity with this post. I stopped reading your blog a while ago, soon after you switched to doing this new thing. I saw the value in it, but I didnt have time to absorb and allow myself to be transformed by the material, or maybe it just wasnt the way I wanted to approach things at the time. Now, I was just thinking that Im in a place where Pop Occulture might have a place in my life again. I come to check in, and I find the guide. </p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tears from Heaven</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/15/a-short-review-session/comment-page-1/#comment-72485</link>
		<dc:creator>Tears from Heaven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 19:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/15/a-short-review-session/#comment-72485</guid>
		<description>Wow. 

Yeah, I skimmed a lot of this stuff too but its good to have an opportunity to absorb it all. Its incredibly addictive. I find myself searching for the master plan, the meta myth that brings it all together into a cohesive framework....I haven't yet, at least one that doesn't require a lot of stretching.

Speaking of stretching, I was struck recently by the relationship of all the mythological stuff to our lives. What did Tim say? Having a beer with Robin Hood or something? The thing I have realized lately is that we can do this, but you have to come the myth, the myth can't come to you right now. What I am saying is that in these times robin hood, the blue fairy, snow white, aren't just going to pop up in the coffee shop ready made, you have to be willing to see them, or rather see the POTENTIAL for them in the everyday people and events of your life. And this means work, this means stretching our perception. The power to see Guinevere in that old waitress on Broadway is not possessed by the weak.

But if you we are strong enough to actually DO that work, of bridging our lives to myths, I think its infinitely worthwhile. I just flipped open an old note book in my room to the only page with any writing, and it said "Love is that which increases possibilities." (It was the only notes I took from one day of philosophy class before I dropped.) If YOU can see the possibilities in people, they can see them not just in themselves, but in others around them, starting a chain reaction.

I've got to stop making such long posts here, or start my own damn pop-occulture meta-blog. Peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. </p>
<p>Yeah, I skimmed a lot of this stuff too but its good to have an opportunity to absorb it all. Its incredibly addictive. I find myself searching for the master plan, the meta myth that brings it all together into a cohesive framework&#8230;.I haven&#8217;t yet, at least one that doesn&#8217;t require a lot of stretching.</p>
<p>Speaking of stretching, I was struck recently by the relationship of all the mythological stuff to our lives. What did Tim say? Having a beer with Robin Hood or something? The thing I have realized lately is that we can do this, but you have to come the myth, the myth can&#8217;t come to you right now. What I am saying is that in these times robin hood, the blue fairy, snow white, aren&#8217;t just going to pop up in the coffee shop ready made, you have to be willing to see them, or rather see the POTENTIAL for them in the everyday people and events of your life. And this means work, this means stretching our perception. The power to see Guinevere in that old waitress on Broadway is not possessed by the weak.</p>
<p>But if you we are strong enough to actually DO that work, of bridging our lives to myths, I think its infinitely worthwhile. I just flipped open an old note book in my room to the only page with any writing, and it said &#8220;Love is that which increases possibilities.&#8221; (It was the only notes I took from one day of philosophy class before I dropped.) If YOU can see the possibilities in people, they can see them not just in themselves, but in others around them, starting a chain reaction.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got to stop making such long posts here, or start my own damn pop-occulture meta-blog. Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Heistman</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/15/a-short-review-session/comment-page-1/#comment-72484</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Heistman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 16:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/15/a-short-review-session/#comment-72484</guid>
		<description>Btw, why does your site always auto populate my defunct blog no matter how many times I change it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Btw, why does your site always auto populate my defunct blog no matter how many times I change it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Heistman</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/15/a-short-review-session/comment-page-1/#comment-72483</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Heistman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 16:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/15/a-short-review-session/#comment-72483</guid>
		<description>I'd say I probably understood about 30% of what you were talking about, during this period of yours and this post, I kind of skimmed over bumped it up another 7 or 8 percent. 
 So thanks. 

I think I have fairly good reading comprehension, even with esoteric type subjects, and I think not eing able to get it right away kind of held my interest a lot more. 

I figured there must be something there that is profound otherwise I would get it right away. 

Turns out I was wrong (no Just kidding!)

I am still under 50 percent, but mystery is good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say I probably understood about 30% of what you were talking about, during this period of yours and this post, I kind of skimmed over bumped it up another 7 or 8 percent.<br />
 So thanks. </p>
<p>I think I have fairly good reading comprehension, even with esoteric type subjects, and I think not eing able to get it right away kind of held my interest a lot more. </p>
<p>I figured there must be something there that is profound otherwise I would get it right away. </p>
<p>Turns out I was wrong (no Just kidding!)</p>
<p>I am still under 50 percent, but mystery is good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatacharacter</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/15/a-short-review-session/comment-page-1/#comment-72383</link>
		<dc:creator>whatacharacter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 20:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/15/a-short-review-session/#comment-72383</guid>
		<description>Interesting. sophists agree that recollection is healthy for the mind, and recommend mentally taking account, at the end of the day, the steam of events which took place since morning. Good for brain's file system, and integration. Hones memory.
Now, lay out for us what you'll be doing for the next 3 weeks ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. sophists agree that recollection is healthy for the mind, and recommend mentally taking account, at the end of the day, the steam of events which took place since morning. Good for brain&#8217;s file system, and integration. Hones memory.<br />
Now, lay out for us what you&#8217;ll be doing for the next 3 weeks &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/15/a-short-review-session/comment-page-1/#comment-72375</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 17:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/15/a-short-review-session/#comment-72375</guid>
		<description>shit ill have to make these clickable later</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shit ill have to make these clickable later</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fuj</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/15/a-short-review-session/comment-page-1/#comment-72366</link>
		<dc:creator>fuj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 15:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/15/a-short-review-session/#comment-72366</guid>
		<description>(I'm not "the" internet friend btw, to avoid confusion or hurt feelings or doppelganger paranoia ;))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(I&#8217;m not &#8220;the&#8221; internet friend btw, to avoid confusion or hurt feelings or doppelganger paranoia ;))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fuj</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/15/a-short-review-session/comment-page-1/#comment-72365</link>
		<dc:creator>fuj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 15:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/15/a-short-review-session/#comment-72365</guid>
		<description>Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
