<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Qualified Prospects That Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/22/qualified-prospects-that-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/22/qualified-prospects-that-work/</link>
	<description>public domain playground. friendly entities welcome.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/22/qualified-prospects-that-work/comment-page-1/#comment-73308</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 21:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/20/qualified-prospects-that-work/#comment-73308</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But I thought you were at least 90% gnostic Tim, ergo â€¦.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don't really see myself that way. Gnosticism is a fun language, but just because I speak it occasionally doesn't mean I am it. I speak English, but I'm not &lt;em&gt;English&lt;/em&gt;.

&lt;blockquote&gt;The big philosophic-spiritual struggle for me now is reconciling the Judao-christian milieu with the perenial tradition.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There shouldn't be any challenge. It's all exactly the same thing. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;Iâ€™ve been a fairly active student of comparative religions for over 20 years now, and at one time could consider myself a biblical scholar.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Stop studying it and start living it. The Bible is a performance text, a script meant to be acted out. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;subjectivity doesnâ€™t alway synch (nor exclude, for that matter) with the catagorical level of reality. Iâ€™m sure you understand that, and struggle with it too.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don't think I know what you mean. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;but there are some who say this is misguided.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Don't listen to what these people say: find out for yourself. You have the tools!

&lt;blockquote&gt;Sorry but Jesus really never went to India, Iâ€™m almost certain.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Make him go to India then!

&lt;blockquote&gt;Somehow Christianity is unique and a fresh flavor amid the ulimate teachings of the world. It stands alone just on its revolutionary message of Love.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What about Sufism, Bhakti Yoga, etc?

&lt;blockquote&gt;Tell k about the lock metaphor that you live by Tim, then k will get it. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Huh? No, k doesn't want to hear it. No point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But I thought you were at least 90% gnostic Tim, ergo â€¦.</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t really see myself that way. Gnosticism is a fun language, but just because I speak it occasionally doesn&#8217;t mean I am it. I speak English, but I&#8217;m not <em>English</em>.</p>
<blockquote><p>The big philosophic-spiritual struggle for me now is reconciling the Judao-christian milieu with the perenial tradition.</p></blockquote>
<p>There shouldn&#8217;t be any challenge. It&#8217;s all exactly the same thing. </p>
<blockquote><p>Iâ€™ve been a fairly active student of comparative religions for over 20 years now, and at one time could consider myself a biblical scholar.</p></blockquote>
<p>Stop studying it and start living it. The Bible is a performance text, a script meant to be acted out. </p>
<blockquote><p>subjectivity doesnâ€™t alway synch (nor exclude, for that matter) with the catagorical level of reality. Iâ€™m sure you understand that, and struggle with it too.</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I know what you mean. </p>
<blockquote><p>but there are some who say this is misguided.</p></blockquote>
<p>Don&#8217;t listen to what these people say: find out for yourself. You have the tools!</p>
<blockquote><p>Sorry but Jesus really never went to India, Iâ€™m almost certain.</p></blockquote>
<p>Make him go to India then!</p>
<blockquote><p>Somehow Christianity is unique and a fresh flavor amid the ulimate teachings of the world. It stands alone just on its revolutionary message of Love.</p></blockquote>
<p>What about Sufism, Bhakti Yoga, etc?</p>
<blockquote><p>Tell k about the lock metaphor that you live by Tim, then k will get it. </p></blockquote>
<p>Huh? No, k doesn&#8217;t want to hear it. No point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brother Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/22/qualified-prospects-that-work/comment-page-1/#comment-73274</link>
		<dc:creator>Brother Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 16:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/20/qualified-prospects-that-work/#comment-73274</guid>
		<description>I watched a PBS show called "Knocking" about the Jehovas Witnesses.  Its pretty interesting.  About ks comment, hey just hang on k-Tims going to come the other side of something and then it will all click for you again.  Tell k about the lock metaphor that you live by Tim, then k will get it.  When I think of this site that way, I look past occasional - what the fucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched a PBS show called &#8220;Knocking&#8221; about the Jehovas Witnesses.  Its pretty interesting.  About ks comment, hey just hang on k-Tims going to come the other side of something and then it will all click for you again.  Tell k about the lock metaphor that you live by Tim, then k will get it.  When I think of this site that way, I look past occasional - what the fucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatacharacter</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/22/qualified-prospects-that-work/comment-page-1/#comment-73272</link>
		<dc:creator>whatacharacter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 16:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/20/qualified-prospects-that-work/#comment-73272</guid>
		<description>But I thought you were at least 90% gnostic Tim, ergo ....

The big philosophic-spiritual struggle for me now is reconciling the Judao-christian milieu with the perenial tradition. I've been a fairly active student of comparative religions for over 20 years now, and at one time could consider myself a biblical scholar. I've been over the board with this, originally being a universalist, then a hard-core (albeit non-standard) Christian. Now it's back to square one, but on a different level.

Personal revelation is great, if it affects our expansive thinking on a relational level with the cosmos. But there are still unique systems in place, and subjectivity doesn't alway synch (nor exclude, for that matter) with the catagorical level of reality. I'm sure you understand that, and struggle with it too.

Take the Kabbalah and the Tarot. I dont think it was until the 19th c. that Eliphas Levi struck the connection between the two, and it may make a nice fit, but there are some who say this is misguided.

As I said, the hebrew originators were a pretty insular bunch (dead sea scrolls fair proof of their conservative adherence). The evidence of 1st cent. gnostic literature notwithstanding, traditional christianity falls more in line with it's jewish roots, than orphic, mithraic, hermetic, or other greco-roman occult traditions. Sorry but Jesus really never went to India, I'm almost certain.

Somehow Christianity is unique and a fresh flavor amid the ulimate teachings of the world. It stands alone just on its revolutionary message of Love. It may be that god opened a door for everyone, which the elite cult-masters couldn't do with all their knocking.

This is what I'm exploring anyway .... Selah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But I thought you were at least 90% gnostic Tim, ergo &#8230;.</p>
<p>The big philosophic-spiritual struggle for me now is reconciling the Judao-christian milieu with the perenial tradition. I&#8217;ve been a fairly active student of comparative religions for over 20 years now, and at one time could consider myself a biblical scholar. I&#8217;ve been over the board with this, originally being a universalist, then a hard-core (albeit non-standard) Christian. Now it&#8217;s back to square one, but on a different level.</p>
<p>Personal revelation is great, if it affects our expansive thinking on a relational level with the cosmos. But there are still unique systems in place, and subjectivity doesn&#8217;t alway synch (nor exclude, for that matter) with the catagorical level of reality. I&#8217;m sure you understand that, and struggle with it too.</p>
<p>Take the Kabbalah and the Tarot. I dont think it was until the 19th c. that Eliphas Levi struck the connection between the two, and it may make a nice fit, but there are some who say this is misguided.</p>
<p>As I said, the hebrew originators were a pretty insular bunch (dead sea scrolls fair proof of their conservative adherence). The evidence of 1st cent. gnostic literature notwithstanding, traditional christianity falls more in line with it&#8217;s jewish roots, than orphic, mithraic, hermetic, or other greco-roman occult traditions. Sorry but Jesus really never went to India, I&#8217;m almost certain.</p>
<p>Somehow Christianity is unique and a fresh flavor amid the ulimate teachings of the world. It stands alone just on its revolutionary message of Love. It may be that god opened a door for everyone, which the elite cult-masters couldn&#8217;t do with all their knocking.</p>
<p>This is what I&#8217;m exploring anyway &#8230;. Selah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: speedbird</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/22/qualified-prospects-that-work/comment-page-1/#comment-73204</link>
		<dc:creator>speedbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 07:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/20/qualified-prospects-that-work/#comment-73204</guid>
		<description>"Larger than life, face and hands startlingly pale in a canvas as dark and narrow as a coffin, eyes fathomless as the Underworld and lips touched with blood, Proserpine seems to watch some object beyond the canvas in a mournful reverie. She holds the orb of the pomegranate, forgotten, against her breast, its golden perfection marred by the slash of crimson which bisects it, indicating that she has eaten, and thereby forfeited her soul. Doomed to remain for half the year in the Underworld, she broods, pale lady of death, watching for the reflections of the far-away sun which flickers palely on the ivy-crusted walls.
Or so we are led to believe.
But she is a woman of many faces, this Queen of the Underworld; therein lies her power and her glamour. The fruit she holds is living, red as her lips at its centre, red as a heart. Pale as incense she stands, and the square of light which frames her lovely, brooding face does not touch her skin; she shines with her own lambency, her pose weary as the ages, yet filled with the strength of her invulnerability. Her eyes never meet yours, and yet they never cease to fix a certain point just beyond your left shoulder; some other man, perhaps, doomed to the terrible bliss of her love, some other chosen man. The fruit is a gift to the chosen one; who knows what appetites, what ecstasies lie within that crimson flesh? What unearthly delights wait in those seeds to be born?"

- Joanne Harris, 'The Evil Seed'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Larger than life, face and hands startlingly pale in a canvas as dark and narrow as a coffin, eyes fathomless as the Underworld and lips touched with blood, Proserpine seems to watch some object beyond the canvas in a mournful reverie. She holds the orb of the pomegranate, forgotten, against her breast, its golden perfection marred by the slash of crimson which bisects it, indicating that she has eaten, and thereby forfeited her soul. Doomed to remain for half the year in the Underworld, she broods, pale lady of death, watching for the reflections of the far-away sun which flickers palely on the ivy-crusted walls.<br />
Or so we are led to believe.<br />
But she is a woman of many faces, this Queen of the Underworld; therein lies her power and her glamour. The fruit she holds is living, red as her lips at its centre, red as a heart. Pale as incense she stands, and the square of light which frames her lovely, brooding face does not touch her skin; she shines with her own lambency, her pose weary as the ages, yet filled with the strength of her invulnerability. Her eyes never meet yours, and yet they never cease to fix a certain point just beyond your left shoulder; some other man, perhaps, doomed to the terrible bliss of her love, some other chosen man. The fruit is a gift to the chosen one; who knows what appetites, what ecstasies lie within that crimson flesh? What unearthly delights wait in those seeds to be born?&#8221;</p>
<p>- Joanne Harris, &#8216;The Evil Seed&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/22/qualified-prospects-that-work/comment-page-1/#comment-73171</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 23:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/20/qualified-prospects-that-work/#comment-73171</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I usually find it unsettling when gnostic applications are made to hebrew scripture.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh, this isn't gnostic interpretation. This actually happened in my kitchen...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I usually find it unsettling when gnostic applications are made to hebrew scripture.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, this isn&#8217;t gnostic interpretation. This actually happened in my kitchen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatacharacter</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/22/qualified-prospects-that-work/comment-page-1/#comment-73170</link>
		<dc:creator>whatacharacter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 22:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/20/qualified-prospects-that-work/#comment-73170</guid>
		<description>mars - that's awesome. Sounds like a great creative technique like mad libs ... I'll remember that!

tim - ever hear Ministry's version of Lay Lady Lay? It's wonderful IMHO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mars - that&#8217;s awesome. Sounds like a great creative technique like mad libs &#8230; I&#8217;ll remember that!</p>
<p>tim - ever hear Ministry&#8217;s version of Lay Lady Lay? It&#8217;s wonderful IMHO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cadeveo</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/22/qualified-prospects-that-work/comment-page-1/#comment-73169</link>
		<dc:creator>cadeveo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 21:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/20/qualified-prospects-that-work/#comment-73169</guid>
		<description>'Course, they say, that ol' Egyptian god created the universe through masturbation, K.
Feel on that, won't'cha.

This one: really beautiful, Tim.  Thanks for this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Course, they say, that ol&#8217; Egyptian god created the universe through masturbation, K.<br />
Feel on that, won&#8217;t'cha.</p>
<p>This one: really beautiful, Tim.  Thanks for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/22/qualified-prospects-that-work/comment-page-1/#comment-73161</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 17:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/20/qualified-prospects-that-work/#comment-73161</guid>
		<description>Well congratulations on mastering such a big word as "masturbation" k.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well congratulations on mastering such a big word as &#8220;masturbation&#8221; k.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/22/qualified-prospects-that-work/comment-page-1/#comment-73149</link>
		<dc:creator>k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 16:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/20/qualified-prospects-that-work/#comment-73149</guid>
		<description>god i miss your old blogging style that was actually readable and thought provoking and fun. this new style of yours is just masturbation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>god i miss your old blogging style that was actually readable and thought provoking and fun. this new style of yours is just masturbation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: speedbird</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/22/qualified-prospects-that-work/comment-page-1/#comment-73137</link>
		<dc:creator>speedbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 10:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/20/qualified-prospects-that-work/#comment-73137</guid>
		<description>&#62; itâ€™s just because they were used to sharing food.

and as soon as everyone stopped having an equal share, that's when /money/ was invented...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; itâ€™s just because they were used to sharing food.</p>
<p>and as soon as everyone stopped having an equal share, that&#8217;s when /money/ was invented&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mars</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/22/qualified-prospects-that-work/comment-page-1/#comment-73102</link>
		<dc:creator>mars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 04:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/20/qualified-prospects-that-work/#comment-73102</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Know ye o human that each name you apply to me changes the face I show you. The power of naming given unto Adam in the Garden of Eden. It was up to him to decide how his life would go. He sent to you a prophet named Booger from the desert to teach you to build Lincoln Log homes. Know ye o human that each name you apply to me changes the face I show you. Name me well or not at all. Learn my true name (Rumplestiltsken) and attain power over all that is. And ye shall become as Gods.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So this section? Here? Right here. This. This is delightful. I read the rest of this post in sober minded skim mode, then burst out laughing at when I got here. The prophet Booger and the true name of Rumplestiltsken will be popping into my head the coming week any time I need a giggle. Which says what (I think) you intended to say perfectly.

Ever since I was little, I've had the off and on hobby of taking stories, poems, newspaper articles and anything else that catches my eye, and replacing certain words, phrases, names and such with entirely new content. It began as just kind of a humorous distraction--I thought it was funny. Today I do more with the technique than just switching names, and it's become more of a "magical" (for want of a better word) approach for me. The most magical, powerful, life shifting aspect about it is to rearrange things in such a way that I'm able to look at something from an angle I'd never thought of before. And the quickest way to do that is still just to make me laugh.

It's not so much that a sense of humor makes something easier to understand because it sugar coats emotionally challenging ideas, as it is humor can sometimes have the necessary energy to just talk directly to someone, without fear of being misunderstood. Even if no one "gets it," everyone still knows how to laugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Know ye o human that each name you apply to me changes the face I show you. The power of naming given unto Adam in the Garden of Eden. It was up to him to decide how his life would go. He sent to you a prophet named Booger from the desert to teach you to build Lincoln Log homes. Know ye o human that each name you apply to me changes the face I show you. Name me well or not at all. Learn my true name (Rumplestiltsken) and attain power over all that is. And ye shall become as Gods.</p></blockquote>
<p>So this section? Here? Right here. This. This is delightful. I read the rest of this post in sober minded skim mode, then burst out laughing at when I got here. The prophet Booger and the true name of Rumplestiltsken will be popping into my head the coming week any time I need a giggle. Which says what (I think) you intended to say perfectly.</p>
<p>Ever since I was little, I&#8217;ve had the off and on hobby of taking stories, poems, newspaper articles and anything else that catches my eye, and replacing certain words, phrases, names and such with entirely new content. It began as just kind of a humorous distraction&#8211;I thought it was funny. Today I do more with the technique than just switching names, and it&#8217;s become more of a &#8220;magical&#8221; (for want of a better word) approach for me. The most magical, powerful, life shifting aspect about it is to rearrange things in such a way that I&#8217;m able to look at something from an angle I&#8217;d never thought of before. And the quickest way to do that is still just to make me laugh.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not so much that a sense of humor makes something easier to understand because it sugar coats emotionally challenging ideas, as it is humor can sometimes have the necessary energy to just talk directly to someone, without fear of being misunderstood. Even if no one &#8220;gets it,&#8221; everyone still knows how to laugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatacharacter</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/22/qualified-prospects-that-work/comment-page-1/#comment-73088</link>
		<dc:creator>whatacharacter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 02:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/20/qualified-prospects-that-work/#comment-73088</guid>
		<description>I usually find it unsettling when gnostic applications are made to hebrew scripture. Now you have to answer to Paramahasa Yogananada who figured out the apple was the sexy chakra amidst our groinicular garden of eden.

The pre-babylonian captivity tribes of Israel where a pretty insular bunch, as their hellenistic jewish descendants were.

I like the purely psycho-social interpretations of the 3 temptations, which also mirrors the 3 temptations of Jesus. It gets down to breaking healthy relationships.

T 1 = Lust of the Flesh: hunger, materialism, and real food; "saw it was good to eat," "turn these stones into bread."

T 2 = Lust of the Eyes: visual appeal, the world at soul's expense; "saw it was pleasing to the eye" "all the kingdoms of the world."

T 3 = Pride of Life: flirtin with disaster but you're a god; "good to make one wise(but god is a liar, so make your own rules)", "cast thyself down"

This hammers at the basic weaknesses of humanity, and the cunning con game the adversary uses, despite something blatently obvious we still overlook (or stumble over).

I love how the devil and J get into scripture quote battles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually find it unsettling when gnostic applications are made to hebrew scripture. Now you have to answer to Paramahasa Yogananada who figured out the apple was the sexy chakra amidst our groinicular garden of eden.</p>
<p>The pre-babylonian captivity tribes of Israel where a pretty insular bunch, as their hellenistic jewish descendants were.</p>
<p>I like the purely psycho-social interpretations of the 3 temptations, which also mirrors the 3 temptations of Jesus. It gets down to breaking healthy relationships.</p>
<p>T 1 = Lust of the Flesh: hunger, materialism, and real food; &#8220;saw it was good to eat,&#8221; &#8220;turn these stones into bread.&#8221;</p>
<p>T 2 = Lust of the Eyes: visual appeal, the world at soul&#8217;s expense; &#8220;saw it was pleasing to the eye&#8221; &#8220;all the kingdoms of the world.&#8221;</p>
<p>T 3 = Pride of Life: flirtin with disaster but you&#8217;re a god; &#8220;good to make one wise(but god is a liar, so make your own rules)&#8221;, &#8220;cast thyself down&#8221;</p>
<p>This hammers at the basic weaknesses of humanity, and the cunning con game the adversary uses, despite something blatently obvious we still overlook (or stumble over).</p>
<p>I love how the devil and J get into scripture quote battles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/22/qualified-prospects-that-work/comment-page-1/#comment-73086</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 00:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/20/qualified-prospects-that-work/#comment-73086</guid>
		<description>I heard that it might not have been an apple but a pomegranate.  Not as delicious as an apple fried in bacon fat but still.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard that it might not have been an apple but a pomegranate.  Not as delicious as an apple fried in bacon fat but still&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/22/qualified-prospects-that-work/comment-page-1/#comment-73077</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 22:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/20/qualified-prospects-that-work/#comment-73077</guid>
		<description>I was looking foward to this post from the last one, and I wasn't let down. The only part that I didn't get at all was the sailor moon clip. the song, yes. clip, no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was looking foward to this post from the last one, and I wasn&#8217;t let down. The only part that I didn&#8217;t get at all was the sailor moon clip. the song, yes. clip, no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/22/qualified-prospects-that-work/comment-page-1/#comment-72945</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 20:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/05/20/qualified-prospects-that-work/#comment-72945</guid>
		<description>"For I am divided for love's sake, for the chance of union."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;For I am divided for love&#8217;s sake, for the chance of union.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuit" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuit'>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuit</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
