<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saving The Gnostic Body</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/</link>
	<description>public domain playground. friendly entities welcome.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Summer Harvest &#187; You Are A Zoo: More Gnostic Archonic Hijinx</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-2/#comment-85206</link>
		<dc:creator>Summer Harvest &#187; You Are A Zoo: More Gnostic Archonic Hijinx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 23:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-85206</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;d like to continue building upon the excellent work Tim has done with the Archons of the Body from the Secret Book of John. I&#8217;m not going to attempt to redo or re-state any of the work he&#8217;s done, but if you haven&#8217;t read his post yet, this follow-up will make far more sense once you have. Here&#8217;s the pertinent section from the Secret Book of John (SJn), which details the creation of Adam by various Archons: &#8220;And the powers began: the first one, goodness, created a bone-soul; and the second, foreknowledge, created a sinew-soul; the third, divinity, created a flesh-soul; and the fourth, the lordship, created a marrow-soul; the fifth, kingdom created a blood-soul; the sixth, envy, created a skin-soul; the seventh, understanding, created a hair-soul. And the multitude of the angels attended him and they received from the powers the seven substances of the natural (form) in order to create the proportions of the limbs and the proportion of the rump and the proper working together of each of the parts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;d like to continue building upon the excellent work Tim has done with the Archons of the Body from the Secret Book of John. I&#8217;m not going to attempt to redo or re-state any of the work he&#8217;s done, but if you haven&#8217;t read his post yet, this follow-up will make far more sense once you have. Here&#8217;s the pertinent section from the Secret Book of John (SJn), which details the creation of Adam by various Archons: &#8220;And the powers began: the first one, goodness, created a bone-soul; and the second, foreknowledge, created a sinew-soul; the third, divinity, created a flesh-soul; and the fourth, the lordship, created a marrow-soul; the fifth, kingdom created a blood-soul; the sixth, envy, created a skin-soul; the seventh, understanding, created a hair-soul. And the multitude of the angels attended him and they received from the powers the seven substances of the natural (form) in order to create the proportions of the limbs and the proportion of the rump and the proper working together of each of the parts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Summer Harvest &#187; Kimetikos: Redemption of the Gnostic Self</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-2/#comment-84861</link>
		<dc:creator>Summer Harvest &#187; Kimetikos: Redemption of the Gnostic Self</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 19:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84861</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m going to be using the blog as a sounding board for some explorations into a system of &#8220;internal alchemy&#8221; inspired by the Gnostic Secret Book of John (Herein referred to as SJn). This is related to recent posts on the Ego, and also owes a great deal to discussions between myself and Tim Boucher. It should be emphasized that I do not think that this is something the Gnostics who wrote and used the SJn historically did. Rather, it&#8217;s a modern method of Gnostic theory and praxis based on experiment and syncretism. So remember: inspired by, not created by, the Classical Gnostics. I&#8217;ll be quoting from Gnostic texts rather heavily, so I thought I should clarify this. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m going to be using the blog as a sounding board for some explorations into a system of &#8220;internal alchemy&#8221; inspired by the Gnostic Secret Book of John (Herein referred to as SJn). This is related to recent posts on the Ego, and also owes a great deal to discussions between myself and Tim Boucher. It should be emphasized that I do not think that this is something the Gnostics who wrote and used the SJn historically did. Rather, it&#8217;s a modern method of Gnostic theory and praxis based on experiment and syncretism. So remember: inspired by, not created by, the Classical Gnostics. I&#8217;ll be quoting from Gnostic texts rather heavily, so I thought I should clarify this. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwx</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-2/#comment-84353</link>
		<dc:creator>jwx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 21:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84353</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;No, we are not getting drawn into another sidelined conversation about this&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I will try and respect your vision for this board going forward Tim, and I hope that includes this bit:

I try not to leave out pondering any part of the world around us, including the state of our cultural institutions, from the sphere of work of the self.  Consideration of others/exterior consideration/in as out, out as in and so on does not stop at the individuals with whom we come into contact, but also to those who know those individuals, whom we do not have direct contact with, and outward/word and upword.  As you have already mentioned Tim, we still have to function in this world, and that includes trying to understand the social structures to which ourselves and others are tethered and how they might affect us and our loved ones.
I don't know if we can affect any true change within the overall functioning of this world, or if we are even supposed to try in any physically tangible way.  Nevertheless, I think it is useful to at least consider it as an individual and in conversation with others.

I understand that a detailed analysis of this subject is for the most part a distraction here, at least for the present.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>No, we are not getting drawn into another sidelined conversation about this</p></blockquote>
<p>I will try and respect your vision for this board going forward Tim, and I hope that includes this bit:</p>
<p>I try not to leave out pondering any part of the world around us, including the state of our cultural institutions, from the sphere of work of the self.  Consideration of others/exterior consideration/in as out, out as in and so on does not stop at the individuals with whom we come into contact, but also to those who know those individuals, whom we do not have direct contact with, and outward/word and upword.  As you have already mentioned Tim, we still have to function in this world, and that includes trying to understand the social structures to which ourselves and others are tethered and how they might affect us and our loved ones.<br />
I don&#8217;t know if we can affect any true change within the overall functioning of this world, or if we are even supposed to try in any physically tangible way.  Nevertheless, I think it is useful to at least consider it as an individual and in conversation with others.</p>
<p>I understand that a detailed analysis of this subject is for the most part a distraction here, at least for the present.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skip sievert</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84349</link>
		<dc:creator>skip sievert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 19:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84349</guid>
		<description>Sorry to upset the balance of carefully preconceived ideas here, and I attempted to add to the subject in question. 
I responded to another poster in regard to the other subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to upset the balance of carefully preconceived ideas here, and I attempted to add to the subject in question.<br />
I responded to another poster in regard to the other subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwx</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84347</link>
		<dc:creator>jwx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 17:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84347</guid>
		<description>haven't been here very long, haven't read but a few of Skip's posts, thanks for the pointer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haven&#8217;t been here very long, haven&#8217;t read but a few of Skip&#8217;s posts, thanks for the pointer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84341</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 07:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84341</guid>
		<description>No, we are not getting drawn into another sidelined conversation about this. This is Skip's whole purpose here. It has no place in a conversation about mastering oneself and consciously re-forming your habits in order to live more consciously. And I want no more of it here. Do not be baited and do not bait.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, we are not getting drawn into another sidelined conversation about this. This is Skip&#8217;s whole purpose here. It has no place in a conversation about mastering oneself and consciously re-forming your habits in order to live more consciously. And I want no more of it here. Do not be baited and do not bait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwx</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84336</link>
		<dc:creator>jwx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 03:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84336</guid>
		<description>Pathocrats always win out, and corrupt any system we form.  We don't need a new system, we need a critical mass of people that can see without the biases that the pathocrats have largely helped foist on us.  It has always been this way, I suspect.

Humans are basically good if not yoked too and hypnotized by the psychopaths at the top.

Your technocracy appears to me as another socialist system with more bells and whistles.   Again, it might work just fine for us, if people actually were able to make conscious choices, but because we cannot, a Technocracy is subject to the same  old subjectivity of mechanicalness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pathocrats always win out, and corrupt any system we form.  We don&#8217;t need a new system, we need a critical mass of people that can see without the biases that the pathocrats have largely helped foist on us.  It has always been this way, I suspect.</p>
<p>Humans are basically good if not yoked too and hypnotized by the psychopaths at the top.</p>
<p>Your technocracy appears to me as another socialist system with more bells and whistles.   Again, it might work just fine for us, if people actually were able to make conscious choices, but because we cannot, a Technocracy is subject to the same  old subjectivity of mechanicalness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84335</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 03:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84335</guid>
		<description>Skip, I'm afraid that I'm about to cut you off from advertising for Technocracy any further. As Sting said, there is no political solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skip, I&#8217;m afraid that I&#8217;m about to cut you off from advertising for Technocracy any further. As Sting said, there is no political solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skip sievert</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84334</link>
		<dc:creator>skip sievert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 03:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84334</guid>
		<description>There are a lot of ways to get down town, and down town is different things to different people.  Technocracy allows people to go downtown, whichever way they want, except violently. 

Contrary to what you think, it is not a belief system. It is not political, or religious.

Technocracy which I did not mention in the last post, is another way. I choose it because it fits with what I know about history, philosophy and religion. 

I am familiar with lots of other kinds of ideas. 

This may seem crude to you, but it not only seems sophisticated to me, it also, in my mind,  is probably the only real alternative that will work. 

Thanks for the suggestions though Ted, but I like and value my current horizons. 

I have paddled around in the back waters of ideas for many decades.

Science is simple and direct. Philosophy, Religion, Poetry, Art, are all very interesting and fun.  A good secular humane system of culture insures personal freedom, and would promote responsibility.  Technocracy will do that. 

We have to adopt a new system soon. The Adam Smith 18th century economic model, that has its roots in the 22nd B.C. Sumer tradition, with the Hammurabi codes thrown in will no longer work. 

Disaster looms. Money no longer functions as a good moderator. It insures that all choices are made wrong, and those wrong choices pile up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a lot of ways to get down town, and down town is different things to different people.  Technocracy allows people to go downtown, whichever way they want, except violently. </p>
<p>Contrary to what you think, it is not a belief system. It is not political, or religious.</p>
<p>Technocracy which I did not mention in the last post, is another way. I choose it because it fits with what I know about history, philosophy and religion. </p>
<p>I am familiar with lots of other kinds of ideas. </p>
<p>This may seem crude to you, but it not only seems sophisticated to me, it also, in my mind,  is probably the only real alternative that will work. </p>
<p>Thanks for the suggestions though Ted, but I like and value my current horizons. </p>
<p>I have paddled around in the back waters of ideas for many decades.</p>
<p>Science is simple and direct. Philosophy, Religion, Poetry, Art, are all very interesting and fun.  A good secular humane system of culture insures personal freedom, and would promote responsibility.  Technocracy will do that. </p>
<p>We have to adopt a new system soon. The Adam Smith 18th century economic model, that has its roots in the 22nd B.C. Sumer tradition, with the Hammurabi codes thrown in will no longer work. </p>
<p>Disaster looms. Money no longer functions as a good moderator. It insures that all choices are made wrong, and those wrong choices pile up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84332</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 21:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84332</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Tim actually is taking things that were once considered occult and applying them scientifically. At least that is where he seems to be going.... Breaking that algorithm in order to open our minds up to taking in new data is what this whole thing is all about.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Very succintly put, Ted!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Tim actually is taking things that were once considered occult and applying them scientifically. At least that is where he seems to be going&#8230;. Breaking that algorithm in order to open our minds up to taking in new data is what this whole thing is all about.</p></blockquote>
<p>Very succintly put, Ted!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Heistman</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84331</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Heistman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 20:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84331</guid>
		<description>Tim, 

I just blogged an entry, constructing a rough outline of how I put this all in context you may want to check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, </p>
<p>I just blogged an entry, constructing a rough outline of how I put this all in context you may want to check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Heistman</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84330</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Heistman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 20:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84330</guid>
		<description>That algorithmic thinking is more or less what everyone does, myself included. Our bodies even get caught up in these algorithms. Breaking that algorithm in order to open our minds up to taking in new data is what this whole thing is all about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That algorithmic thinking is more or less what everyone does, myself included. Our bodies even get caught up in these algorithms. Breaking that algorithm in order to open our minds up to taking in new data is what this whole thing is all about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Heistman</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84329</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Heistman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 20:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84329</guid>
		<description>Skip,
You seem to have a model of reality based on technocracy, and you kind of crudely shoehorn everything into that context, often in a really crude way without really understanding what you are doing. You dont seem to get much beyond categorizing things in really rough boxes. 

Its like you don't really get what Tim is saying other than that its related to the occult somehow, so then you go back and think how the technocracy authors you admire treated the ocult and then you present some canned response of how you think they would have replied. 

You seem really stuck in a type algorithm. 

Tim actually is taking things that were once considered occult and applying them scientifically. At least that is where he seems to be going. 

Try opening your horizons a bit. I mean this in a kind way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skip,<br />
You seem to have a model of reality based on technocracy, and you kind of crudely shoehorn everything into that context, often in a really crude way without really understanding what you are doing. You dont seem to get much beyond categorizing things in really rough boxes. </p>
<p>Its like you don&#8217;t really get what Tim is saying other than that its related to the occult somehow, so then you go back and think how the technocracy authors you admire treated the ocult and then you present some canned response of how you think they would have replied. </p>
<p>You seem really stuck in a type algorithm. </p>
<p>Tim actually is taking things that were once considered occult and applying them scientifically. At least that is where he seems to be going. </p>
<p>Try opening your horizons a bit. I mean this in a kind way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84327</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 18:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84327</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;A simple and direct method is generally the best.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Agreed. And?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A simple and direct method is generally the best.</p></blockquote>
<p>Agreed. And?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skip sievert</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84326</link>
		<dc:creator>skip sievert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 17:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84326</guid>
		<description>"There is a reason â€œKnow Thyselfâ€ was plastered above the oracle at Delphi: mystical/occult systems are designed to develop self-awareness and thereby self-mastery."

Actually that is not what was there. The full phrase was, : Know thyself as a human being and not as a God. ----   Along with another phrase, : Nothing too much. 

The period of the occult in transferring knowledge is gone now. At one time you could be skinned alive or burnt for questioning authority. Now you can post real ideas on the internet without resorting to putting on layers and layers of extraneous information. 

The occult served its purpose. Science and straight forward sharing information is a far better method to change society, than relying on outdated, confusing, and scam like concepts, to try and teach any 'truths'

The occult always promises everything, and often delivers nothing. 

Religion is occult personified. Religion is always based on bigotry. 

A simple and direct method is generally the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There is a reason â€œKnow Thyselfâ€ was plastered above the oracle at Delphi: mystical/occult systems are designed to develop self-awareness and thereby self-mastery.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually that is not what was there. The full phrase was, : Know thyself as a human being and not as a God. &#8212;-   Along with another phrase, : Nothing too much. </p>
<p>The period of the occult in transferring knowledge is gone now. At one time you could be skinned alive or burnt for questioning authority. Now you can post real ideas on the internet without resorting to putting on layers and layers of extraneous information. </p>
<p>The occult served its purpose. Science and straight forward sharing information is a far better method to change society, than relying on outdated, confusing, and scam like concepts, to try and teach any &#8216;truths&#8217;</p>
<p>The occult always promises everything, and often delivers nothing. </p>
<p>Religion is occult personified. Religion is always based on bigotry. </p>
<p>A simple and direct method is generally the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatacharacter</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84324</link>
		<dc:creator>whatacharacter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 15:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84324</guid>
		<description>ok, heh. They have &lt;a href="http://willn34.home.mindspring.com/kungfu/kungfu.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;3 schools in Seattle&lt;/a&gt; and teach a very traditional rigorous from of Tiger Crane style kung fu, and a unique Ng style tai chi. The Taiji is time intensive, as you first complete a series of stationary stretches and joint rotations which activate every muscle, then you perform step walking, then you learn the actual form of movement. The trick is that once you are taught the next excercise (or each step of the form) you then go back and start the excercises again from the begining, working back up to where you get taught the next part.

So if you go 2x a week, you must attend for 7 weeks before you even begin to learn the form! Not for the impatient or faint of heart.

But you do get to learn proper form, controlled breathing, and wear the cool black uniform :) Fresh delicious green tea is served afterwards. The ID school is like going back in time - you go up creaky wooden stairs to a large old training room surrounded by weaponry and banners. They have the honor of performing the Lion dance every new year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, heh. They have <a href="http://willn34.home.mindspring.com/kungfu/kungfu.html" rel="nofollow">3 schools in Seattle</a> and teach a very traditional rigorous from of Tiger Crane style kung fu, and a unique Ng style tai chi. The Taiji is time intensive, as you first complete a series of stationary stretches and joint rotations which activate every muscle, then you perform step walking, then you learn the actual form of movement. The trick is that once you are taught the next excercise (or each step of the form) you then go back and start the excercises again from the begining, working back up to where you get taught the next part.</p>
<p>So if you go 2x a week, you must attend for 7 weeks before you even begin to learn the form! Not for the impatient or faint of heart.</p>
<p>But you do get to learn proper form, controlled breathing, and wear the cool black uniform <img src='http://www.timboucher.com/journal/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Fresh delicious green tea is served afterwards. The ID school is like going back in time - you go up creaky wooden stairs to a large old training room surrounded by weaponry and banners. They have the honor of performing the Lion dance every new year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84319</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 09:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84319</guid>
		<description>tell me about the club now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tell me about the club now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatacharacter</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84316</link>
		<dc:creator>whatacharacter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 07:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84316</guid>
		<description>Tim, nice juicy article, with many fine integrations of the microcosm and macrocosm.
Perhaps including the element of "voice" can take you into deeper understanding of this, since you start off mentioning names. Perhaps planetary and celestial names fit into this as well, which may mirror our physiology somehow.

Of course there is much in the canonical scriptures which mention these archons of vain imaginings as well:

2 Corinthians 10:4, "For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strongholds; Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ."

but even the tongue can be our worst enemy which "setteth on fire the course of nature" in its vainity. better to be used for blessing.

those blind spots are killers to, which is another reason, as you say, why we need other people, and community to belong to. If they care, loved ones help us see - or its the blind leading the blind.

diet and breathing of course are influencial, but I think the simple stretching and toning of our bodies are central to health and wholeness. I've done Taiji for awhile (Tim I'll tell you about the Seattle Kung Fu Tai chi club sometime), and it's interesting how staying on your feet can be just as beneficial to get down on the floor Yoga, and allows for simple self-regulation of the organs, rather than specific manipulation. Not sure what's best, or if there's a difference, for the body of the western european, but some is better than none if you have time for that sort of thing (plus push hands is cool - if I ever work up to that, then sword styles too).

Anyone ever take a free yoga class or anything?

How about before sleep trying out progressive relaxation, where you lie prone, feet &#38; hands apart. Starting at one end of the body (heard it done from both ends) sense/feel the bones, sinews and skin of each small area gradually relax while moving up (or down) the body. I go feet, legs, body, hands, arms, neck, head.
Then just breath/pray and sleep.
Each area feels both heavy and light at the same time, and gives a good sense of your material structure and body awareness.

Jesus mentioned the certain breed of unclean spirits which *only* come out with "prayer and fasting."

Fasting is proper as a type of emptying, and goes for habits as well as just food.
Supplication is likewise a "pouring out."

Emptying is important for healing. This goes along with your "childs resistance to callousness." While the child remains clean and innocent due to the constant emptying, releasing, reliance upon the most high, the calloused in contrast, gets tough, and dirty and scarred, by holding on, hunkering down, and not forgiving. The salt gets bitter and the sweet becomes rancid.

And it all comes down to sacrifice, and what are we sacrificing for?
That seems to be the next question. Ya gotta serve somebody ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, nice juicy article, with many fine integrations of the microcosm and macrocosm.<br />
Perhaps including the element of &#8220;voice&#8221; can take you into deeper understanding of this, since you start off mentioning names. Perhaps planetary and celestial names fit into this as well, which may mirror our physiology somehow.</p>
<p>Of course there is much in the canonical scriptures which mention these archons of vain imaginings as well:</p>
<p>2 Corinthians 10:4, &#8220;For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strongholds; Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ.&#8221;</p>
<p>but even the tongue can be our worst enemy which &#8220;setteth on fire the course of nature&#8221; in its vainity. better to be used for blessing.</p>
<p>those blind spots are killers to, which is another reason, as you say, why we need other people, and community to belong to. If they care, loved ones help us see - or its the blind leading the blind.</p>
<p>diet and breathing of course are influencial, but I think the simple stretching and toning of our bodies are central to health and wholeness. I&#8217;ve done Taiji for awhile (Tim I&#8217;ll tell you about the Seattle Kung Fu Tai chi club sometime), and it&#8217;s interesting how staying on your feet can be just as beneficial to get down on the floor Yoga, and allows for simple self-regulation of the organs, rather than specific manipulation. Not sure what&#8217;s best, or if there&#8217;s a difference, for the body of the western european, but some is better than none if you have time for that sort of thing (plus push hands is cool - if I ever work up to that, then sword styles too).</p>
<p>Anyone ever take a free yoga class or anything?</p>
<p>How about before sleep trying out progressive relaxation, where you lie prone, feet &amp; hands apart. Starting at one end of the body (heard it done from both ends) sense/feel the bones, sinews and skin of each small area gradually relax while moving up (or down) the body. I go feet, legs, body, hands, arms, neck, head.<br />
Then just breath/pray and sleep.<br />
Each area feels both heavy and light at the same time, and gives a good sense of your material structure and body awareness.</p>
<p>Jesus mentioned the certain breed of unclean spirits which *only* come out with &#8220;prayer and fasting.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fasting is proper as a type of emptying, and goes for habits as well as just food.<br />
Supplication is likewise a &#8220;pouring out.&#8221;</p>
<p>Emptying is important for healing. This goes along with your &#8220;childs resistance to callousness.&#8221; While the child remains clean and innocent due to the constant emptying, releasing, reliance upon the most high, the calloused in contrast, gets tough, and dirty and scarred, by holding on, hunkering down, and not forgiving. The salt gets bitter and the sweet becomes rancid.</p>
<p>And it all comes down to sacrifice, and what are we sacrificing for?<br />
That seems to be the next question. Ya gotta serve somebody &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84310</link>
		<dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 04:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84310</guid>
		<description>Where is the occult in the pop? Your mind never sleeps. Synthesis,individuation,spirit,evolve. Shine forth brave souls!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is the occult in the pop? Your mind never sleeps. Synthesis,individuation,spirit,evolve. Shine forth brave souls!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwx</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84309</link>
		<dc:creator>jwx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 23:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84309</guid>
		<description>When somebody yells in anger at anyone in my vicinity, there is a little part of me, a demon/archon/subroutine, that feels guilty, that takes on a bit of embarrassed guilt feeling, and feels sorry for me/the one being yelled at.  It is a drain of my energy.

It took quite some time of observation to finally witness this,  as in me it is very subtle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When somebody yells in anger at anyone in my vicinity, there is a little part of me, a demon/archon/subroutine, that feels guilty, that takes on a bit of embarrassed guilt feeling, and feels sorry for me/the one being yelled at.  It is a drain of my energy.</p>
<p>It took quite some time of observation to finally witness this,  as in me it is very subtle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwx</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84306</link>
		<dc:creator>jwx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84306</guid>
		<description>ooooh, that key image you have in your last post just "sunk in".  I love how this stuffl works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ooooh, that key image you have in your last post just &#8220;sunk in&#8221;.  I love how this stuffl works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwx</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84305</link>
		<dc:creator>jwx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84305</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And I owe it all to Chinese ballsâ€¦ Thank You!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Haah.  Mixed jeans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And I owe it all to Chinese ballsâ€¦ Thank You!</p></blockquote>
<p>Haah.  Mixed jeans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84304</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84304</guid>
		<description>And I owe it all to Chinese balls... &lt;em&gt;Thank You!&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I owe it all to Chinese balls&#8230; <em>Thank You!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwx</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84303</link>
		<dc:creator>jwx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84303</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Gurdjieff did a lot with movement, tooâ€“ it kind of looks like a Sufi/Tai-Chi combo. Thereâ€™s a big industry surrounding it right now, but I think olâ€™ Gurdjieff had a lot of good stuff to say.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ya, I think he would laugh at the standardization (and Industrialization) of his "movements".  He knew that this type of thing would only flourish with the fluidity and liberalization of communication in his future so that people could see and understand the diversity outside of their own little isolated communities.  Tim and others are now taking this idea, the habituation of non-habituation with resulting drilling down to and then strengthening of individual essence, to levels not previously possible on a larger scale.  Perpetual resistance to godmitisation and growth through this freedom.  Elimination of rolling resistance by changing the analog spirit shape from pyramid to sphere (that always helps to jog my vision).

The folks that take the old revolutionary ideas then ossify them are just following the same old path with just a modified language surrounding it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Gurdjieff did a lot with movement, tooâ€“ it kind of looks like a Sufi/Tai-Chi combo. Thereâ€™s a big industry surrounding it right now, but I think olâ€™ Gurdjieff had a lot of good stuff to say.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Ya, I think he would laugh at the standardization (and Industrialization) of his &#8220;movements&#8221;.  He knew that this type of thing would only flourish with the fluidity and liberalization of communication in his future so that people could see and understand the diversity outside of their own little isolated communities.  Tim and others are now taking this idea, the habituation of non-habituation with resulting drilling down to and then strengthening of individual essence, to levels not previously possible on a larger scale.  Perpetual resistance to godmitisation and growth through this freedom.  Elimination of rolling resistance by changing the analog spirit shape from pyramid to sphere (that always helps to jog my vision).</p>
<p>The folks that take the old revolutionary ideas then ossify them are just following the same old path with just a modified language surrounding it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84302</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84302</guid>
		<description>One additional comment re Lash:  those of us on the PTG who have a problem with his approach don't have a problem with his theorizing and such.  The problem we have is that he tries to pass off his theories as something the historical Gnostics believed, which is quite simply not the case.  Essentially, if he took more credit for his own ideas, we'd be far kinder to his approach.  As it stands, we just find him kind of intellectually dishonest.  

Oh, that and the whole "everybody who doesn't get this is stupid" thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One additional comment re Lash:  those of us on the PTG who have a problem with his approach don&#8217;t have a problem with his theorizing and such.  The problem we have is that he tries to pass off his theories as something the historical Gnostics believed, which is quite simply not the case.  Essentially, if he took more credit for his own ideas, we&#8217;d be far kinder to his approach.  As it stands, we just find him kind of intellectually dishonest.  </p>
<p>Oh, that and the whole &#8220;everybody who doesn&#8217;t get this is stupid&#8221; thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84301</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84301</guid>
		<description>Gurdjieff did a lot with movement, too-- it kind of looks like a Sufi/Tai-Chi combo.  There's a big industry surrounding it right now, but I think ol' Gurdjieff had a lot of good stuff to say.

Here's a link:

http://www.gurdjieff-movements.net/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gurdjieff did a lot with movement, too&#8211; it kind of looks like a Sufi/Tai-Chi combo.  There&#8217;s a big industry surrounding it right now, but I think ol&#8217; Gurdjieff had a lot of good stuff to say.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gurdjieff-movements.net/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.gurdjieff-movements.net/'>http://www.gurdjieff-movements.net/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84300</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84300</guid>
		<description>Tim:  I still don't think Lash quite 'gets' it-- he's still very literalist as far as Gnostic myth.  His Sophia=Gaia approach is kind of... well... wrong, and it seems to me (based on comments from your interview, for one) that he'd consider anyone unable to achieve this kind of awareness "too stupid."  Not a big fan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim:  I still don&#8217;t think Lash quite &#8216;gets&#8217; it&#8211; he&#8217;s still very literalist as far as Gnostic myth.  His Sophia=Gaia approach is kind of&#8230; well&#8230; wrong, and it seems to me (based on comments from your interview, for one) that he&#8217;d consider anyone unable to achieve this kind of awareness &#8220;too stupid.&#8221;  Not a big fan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84299</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84299</guid>
		<description>Didn't Steiner create a system of movement as part of anthroposophy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t Steiner create a system of movement as part of anthroposophy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwx</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84298</link>
		<dc:creator>jwx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84298</guid>
		<description>another piece of the puzzle?

http://dearcomputer.nl/gir/?q=whirling+dervishes&#38;s=4&#38;b=Rip+Google%21
Google Image Ripper v.0.2.4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another piece of the puzzle?</p>
<p><a href="http://dearcomputer.nl/gir/?q=whirling+dervishes&amp;s=4&amp;b=Rip+Google%21" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://dearcomputer.nl/gir/?q=whirling+dervishes&amp;s=4&amp;b=Rip+Google%21'>http://dearcomputer.nl/gir/?q=whirling...dervishes&amp;s=4&amp;b=Rip+Google%21</a><br />
Google Image Ripper v.0.2.4</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84297</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84297</guid>
		<description>i keep meaning to get into emerson. he is going on my short list</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i keep meaning to get into emerson. he is going on my short list</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Heistman</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84296</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Heistman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84296</guid>
		<description>I think Emerson and Krishnamurti said similar things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Emerson and Krishnamurti said similar things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84295</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84295</guid>
		<description>Yes, because your body knows everything it needs to know. There's a passage in the Tao Te Ching about this, but I leant my copy to someone. He says something about how to know the universe you just need to look at your own workings. It is not mere metaphysical speculation but an active command to master your mind and body.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, because your body knows everything it needs to know. There&#8217;s a passage in the Tao Te Ching about this, but I leant my copy to someone. He says something about how to know the universe you just need to look at your own workings. It is not mere metaphysical speculation but an active command to master your mind and body.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Heistman</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84294</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Heistman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84294</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that's really cool how you are conecting all those things. I am looking foward to it and will contribute what I can.

I guess these similar experiences we've had with the preprioception stuff, just goes to show how people should trust their instincts and innate wisdom about things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s really cool how you are conecting all those things. I am looking foward to it and will contribute what I can.</p>
<p>I guess these similar experiences we&#8217;ve had with the preprioception stuff, just goes to show how people should trust their instincts and innate wisdom about things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84293</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84293</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I read the Alexander website and it looks like the Author systemetized some techniques I kind of discovered in more of a haphazard kind of hit or miss way.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, that is exactly how I feel about it: which leads me to invest greater "authority" in it, because these are things which can be universally uncovered for and by oneself!

&lt;blockquote&gt;maybe I will try to work on it and write about it also.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Definitely do so! Want to get as many people cracking this one as possible, as there really seems to be something there: something which naturally belongs to all of us. 

One of my next big written projects here will be to connect all of this to circus symbolism, and sort of the forgotten Western traditions of developing proprioceptive awareness. Circus seems to directly connect to yoga, alchemy, bardic traditions, development of the theatre and sacred drama, prophetic traditions, street performers, modern music and pop culture, etc. Will probably be a multi-part series, which I will then connect back to my whole thing about life being a musical...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I read the Alexander website and it looks like the Author systemetized some techniques I kind of discovered in more of a haphazard kind of hit or miss way.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, that is exactly how I feel about it: which leads me to invest greater &#8220;authority&#8221; in it, because these are things which can be universally uncovered for and by oneself!</p>
<blockquote><p>maybe I will try to work on it and write about it also.</p></blockquote>
<p>Definitely do so! Want to get as many people cracking this one as possible, as there really seems to be something there: something which naturally belongs to all of us. </p>
<p>One of my next big written projects here will be to connect all of this to circus symbolism, and sort of the forgotten Western traditions of developing proprioceptive awareness. Circus seems to directly connect to yoga, alchemy, bardic traditions, development of the theatre and sacred drama, prophetic traditions, street performers, modern music and pop culture, etc. Will probably be a multi-part series, which I will then connect back to my whole thing about life being a musical&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Heistman</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84292</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Heistman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84292</guid>
		<description>I guess Lash thinks the Archons are reptilian Space aliens and that Sophia=Gaia. 

A lot of people at PTG seem to hate him. I guess Lash just wrote a book of which Derrick Jensen wrote a forward, so that kind counts against him in my book, but I am still curious about him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess Lash thinks the Archons are reptilian Space aliens and that Sophia=Gaia. </p>
<p>A lot of people at PTG seem to hate him. I guess Lash just wrote a book of which Derrick Jensen wrote a forward, so that kind counts against him in my book, but I am still curious about him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Heistman</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84291</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Heistman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84291</guid>
		<description>I read the Alexander website and it looks like the Author systemetized some techniques I kind of discovered in more of a haphazard kind of hit or miss way.

I used them to work on my co-ordination, he used them initially to overcome a stuttering problem. 

I think its really fascinating. I'd like to sort out a lot of this stuff too. maybe I will try to work on it and write about it also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the Alexander website and it looks like the Author systemetized some techniques I kind of discovered in more of a haphazard kind of hit or miss way.</p>
<p>I used them to work on my co-ordination, he used them initially to overcome a stuttering problem. </p>
<p>I think its really fascinating. I&#8217;d like to sort out a lot of this stuff too. maybe I will try to work on it and write about it also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84290</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84290</guid>
		<description>I tend to think that synaesthesia is the natural functional order of the human mind, and that Asperger's points towards elements of of it as well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to think that synaesthesia is the natural functional order of the human mind, and that Asperger&#8217;s points towards elements of of it as well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84289</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84289</guid>
		<description>This may also be loosely connected to John Lash's interpretation of gnostic myth, but I haven't gone back and read it in this light:

http://www.metahistory.org/JLLBoucher.php

Also, I found another good "awareness" developing exercise last night. I am going to start compiling these all together pretty soon. They are all very simple. This one consists of putting on the television or a movie and imitating it. Whenever a facial expression appears on any of the actors, mimic that expression. Do the same thing with body movements and postures. It helps develop emotional expressiveness and the ability to more closely feel the connection between physical states and emotional states.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may also be loosely connected to John Lash&#8217;s interpretation of gnostic myth, but I haven&#8217;t gone back and read it in this light:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.metahistory.org/JLLBoucher.php" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.metahistory.org/JLLBoucher.php'>http://www.metahistory.org/JLLBoucher.php</a></p>
<p>Also, I found another good &#8220;awareness&#8221; developing exercise last night. I am going to start compiling these all together pretty soon. They are all very simple. This one consists of putting on the television or a movie and imitating it. Whenever a facial expression appears on any of the actors, mimic that expression. Do the same thing with body movements and postures. It helps develop emotional expressiveness and the ability to more closely feel the connection between physical states and emotional states.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Heistman</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84288</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Heistman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84288</guid>
		<description>I don't have aspergers but my Aunt does, I mean I don't think I do and its not certian exactly what the syndrome is describing exactly. Its the same thing with ADD /ADHD. 

But she is really interesting. She has synesthesia also, which in interesting thing in an of itself. To her All notes on the paino have a color and all numbers have a personality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have aspergers but my Aunt does, I mean I don&#8217;t think I do and its not certian exactly what the syndrome is describing exactly. Its the same thing with ADD /ADHD. </p>
<p>But she is really interesting. She has synesthesia also, which in interesting thing in an of itself. To her All notes on the paino have a color and all numbers have a personality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84287</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84287</guid>
		<description>Ted, very interesting you bring up the Asperger's link: There is an author with Asperger's I heard on NPR years ago who I enjoyed his writing and what he had to say so much I made him a website:

http://www.jonathans-stories.com/

What you are saying about habit formation and unconscious awareness rings a lot of bells, though I am not at the moment entirely sure how to sort it all out. But there is something there. 

PS, I was *never* good at sports as a child, even though I was pretty active. I feel like this had a big impact on my social development, not being able to play along well enough in all the "reindeer games"...

JP: I think this sort of interpretation also partially solves the "myth vs literal" problem people were having about the gnostic symbolism at your workshop: if these things describe proprioceptive awareness, then they are both mythically/psychologically valid AND describe literal processes within the body as well. That seems to be the premise of Sansonese's &lt;em&gt;Body of Myth&lt;/em&gt;, though I might be putting words into his mouth. I have a tendency to do that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted, very interesting you bring up the Asperger&#8217;s link: There is an author with Asperger&#8217;s I heard on NPR years ago who I enjoyed his writing and what he had to say so much I made him a website:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jonathans-stories.com/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.jonathans-stories.com/'>http://www.jonathans-stories.com/</a></p>
<p>What you are saying about habit formation and unconscious awareness rings a lot of bells, though I am not at the moment entirely sure how to sort it all out. But there is something there. </p>
<p>PS, I was *never* good at sports as a child, even though I was pretty active. I feel like this had a big impact on my social development, not being able to play along well enough in all the &#8220;reindeer games&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>JP: I think this sort of interpretation also partially solves the &#8220;myth vs literal&#8221; problem people were having about the gnostic symbolism at your workshop: if these things describe proprioceptive awareness, then they are both mythically/psychologically valid AND describe literal processes within the body as well. That seems to be the premise of Sansonese&#8217;s <em>Body of Myth</em>, though I might be putting words into his mouth. I have a tendency to do that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84283</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84283</guid>
		<description>BTW I just wanted to mention how much I also love Ghost Dog-- everybody needs to see this film.  Repeatedly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW I just wanted to mention how much I also love Ghost Dog&#8211; everybody needs to see this film.  Repeatedly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skip wiley</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84282</link>
		<dc:creator>skip wiley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84282</guid>
		<description>Haven't checked in here at all for the past few weeks, but this post and your juggling post are awesome!  Made my day.

And hey!  guess what... just 2 weeks ago I too started to learn how to juggle... and it has been a wonderful experience.  Paying attention to my increasing ability to notice the intricacies of coordination and movement has been a treat.  I have wondered how it might be helping other aspects of my life, and now these posts give me tons to think further about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t checked in here at all for the past few weeks, but this post and your juggling post are awesome!  Made my day.</p>
<p>And hey!  guess what&#8230; just 2 weeks ago I too started to learn how to juggle&#8230; and it has been a wonderful experience.  Paying attention to my increasing ability to notice the intricacies of coordination and movement has been a treat.  I have wondered how it might be helping other aspects of my life, and now these posts give me tons to think further about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84281</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84281</guid>
		<description>*fantastic* post, tim-- possibly my favorite thing you've ever written.  exactly along the lines of what i've been contemplating for the archon/body map.  i'll likely have a response on my site a bit later today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*fantastic* post, tim&#8211; possibly my favorite thing you&#8217;ve ever written.  exactly along the lines of what i&#8217;ve been contemplating for the archon/body map.  i&#8217;ll likely have a response on my site a bit later today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Heistman</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84274</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Heistman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84274</guid>
		<description>I really like this. I linked to the True blue Healer site on my blog too, because I know exactly what he is talking about and had the same experience. 

I think I have some insights into what you have compiled here, but not in a systematized way, because I have a "learning disability" that's probably genetic. My Mother and My Mother's Sister seem to have it too. 

For me it was diagnosed as ADHD, with my Aunt its diagnosed as ADD and aspergers. But what it is is that we have a hard time forming unconscious habits. It took me a long time to learn the multiplication tables, and to do math and learn how to drive. I am kind of a "spaz" in a lot of ways. I never brush my teeth the same way twice. I do lots of things slow. I had developmental delays in co-ordination. I was put in a special Gym class.  I think I caught up later. I wrestled in High school and college. I think I learned moves slower and because of that wasn't as good, though. I relied on strength and determination, cardio. but it wasn't enough to give me a winning record. My coach assumed I never wrestled in highschool, but actually I had. 

So a lot of things I do, I do like I am experiencing them for the first time, over and over again. I do have a lot of habits though. But it doesn't come as easily to me. I do notice  that in my interactions with people, even going through a drive through, I am very conscious of the other person and its hard for me to slip into an unconscious role. I notice things about all the people I pass on the street and get overstimulated. So I get nervous in crowds. 

I think I have a window into what you are saying. But I think self mastery takes things to a new level and that is where self discipline comes in. So I think its worth it. I am pretty excited about it and applaud you on compling all this stuff and being a guinea pig and leading the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like this. I linked to the True blue Healer site on my blog too, because I know exactly what he is talking about and had the same experience. </p>
<p>I think I have some insights into what you have compiled here, but not in a systematized way, because I have a &#8220;learning disability&#8221; that&#8217;s probably genetic. My Mother and My Mother&#8217;s Sister seem to have it too. </p>
<p>For me it was diagnosed as ADHD, with my Aunt its diagnosed as ADD and aspergers. But what it is is that we have a hard time forming unconscious habits. It took me a long time to learn the multiplication tables, and to do math and learn how to drive. I am kind of a &#8220;spaz&#8221; in a lot of ways. I never brush my teeth the same way twice. I do lots of things slow. I had developmental delays in co-ordination. I was put in a special Gym class.  I think I caught up later. I wrestled in High school and college. I think I learned moves slower and because of that wasn&#8217;t as good, though. I relied on strength and determination, cardio. but it wasn&#8217;t enough to give me a winning record. My coach assumed I never wrestled in highschool, but actually I had. </p>
<p>So a lot of things I do, I do like I am experiencing them for the first time, over and over again. I do have a lot of habits though. But it doesn&#8217;t come as easily to me. I do notice  that in my interactions with people, even going through a drive through, I am very conscious of the other person and its hard for me to slip into an unconscious role. I notice things about all the people I pass on the street and get overstimulated. So I get nervous in crowds. </p>
<p>I think I have a window into what you are saying. But I think self mastery takes things to a new level and that is where self discipline comes in. So I think its worth it. I am pretty excited about it and applaud you on compling all this stuff and being a guinea pig and leading the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Vroom</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84273</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Vroom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84273</guid>
		<description>Great article - I agree with your take on the Alexander Technique.  A good place to learn more about it is their main website at http://alexandertechnique.com  There's a page of resources that contains links to other articles about the AT and spirituality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article - I agree with your take on the Alexander Technique.  A good place to learn more about it is their main website at <a href="http://alexandertechnique.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://alexandertechnique.com'>http://alexandertechnique.com</a>  There&#8217;s a page of resources that contains links to other articles about the AT and spirituality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cadeveo</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84270</link>
		<dc:creator>cadeveo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 06:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84270</guid>
		<description>This post: exactly what I needed.  

You're on an amazing roll, Tim.

Congrats on the new living situation, too.

Peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post: exactly what I needed.  </p>
<p>You&#8217;re on an amazing roll, Tim.</p>
<p>Congrats on the new living situation, too.</p>
<p>Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84265</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 05:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84265</guid>
		<description>That's so awesome. I know EXACTLY what you're referring to. Check out Ghost Dog and watch the flourishes he does when he's putting away his guns. Same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s so awesome. I know EXACTLY what you&#8217;re referring to. Check out Ghost Dog and watch the flourishes he does when he&#8217;s putting away his guns. Same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwx</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84263</link>
		<dc:creator>jwx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 05:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84263</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I know exactly what you are referring to. It is a slow circular free-form rotation of all joints. Iâ€™ve started doing it too!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hah, ya.  I've started to incorporate other things too besides the joint rotations, like recently I have incorporated sumo type posturing, the extreme face contortions and posturing like the Kiwi rugby team uses to intimidate their opponents at the beginning of their games (from traditional Maori war moves) and more recently trying to imitate some of the subtle and beautiful eye, hand and finger, leg and toe movements of Balinese dance (like legong)

I find myself craving this type of movement more and more and sometimes launch  into it in places like the shower and elevator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I know exactly what you are referring to. It is a slow circular free-form rotation of all joints. Iâ€™ve started doing it too!</p></blockquote>
<p>Hah, ya.  I&#8217;ve started to incorporate other things too besides the joint rotations, like recently I have incorporated sumo type posturing, the extreme face contortions and posturing like the Kiwi rugby team uses to intimidate their opponents at the beginning of their games (from traditional Maori war moves) and more recently trying to imitate some of the subtle and beautiful eye, hand and finger, leg and toe movements of Balinese dance (like legong)</p>
<p>I find myself craving this type of movement more and more and sometimes launch  into it in places like the shower and elevator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84261</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 04:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84261</guid>
		<description>I know exactly what you are referring to. It is a slow circular free-form rotation of all joints. I've started doing it too!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvVdjMxSZxg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know exactly what you are referring to. It is a slow circular free-form rotation of all joints. I&#8217;ve started doing it too!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvVdjMxSZxg" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvVdjMxSZxg'>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvVdjMxSZxg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwx</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84260</link>
		<dc:creator>jwx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 04:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84260</guid>
		<description>another thing I have started doing in the last 6 months is Tai Chi, except I do not use any the common family of moves, I just totally make it up as I go along, it is different every time I do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another thing I have started doing in the last 6 months is Tai Chi, except I do not use any the common family of moves, I just totally make it up as I go along, it is different every time I do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwx</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84259</link>
		<dc:creator>jwx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 04:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84259</guid>
		<description>wow.  I swear I hadn't read this most recent post before I made my last comment(s).  

this is good stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow.  I swear I hadn&#8217;t read this most recent post before I made my last comment(s).  </p>
<p>this is good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84257</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 04:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84257</guid>
		<description>Marcus Aurelius Meditations: 2:16


&lt;blockquote&gt;To be a philosopher is to keep unsullied and unscathed the divine spirit within him, so that it may transcend all pleasure and all pain, take nothing in hand without purpose and nothing falsely or with dissimulation, depend not on another' actions or inactions, accept each and every dispensation as coming from the same Source as itself - and last and chief, wait with a good grace for death, as no more than a simple dissolving of the elements whereof each living thing is composed. If those elements themselves take no harm from their ceaseless forming and re-forming, why look with mistrust upon the change and dissolution of the whole? It is but Nature's way; and in the ways of Nature there is no evil to be found.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Philosopher = lover of Wisdom/Sophia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marcus Aurelius Meditations: 2:16</p>
<blockquote><p>To be a philosopher is to keep unsullied and unscathed the divine spirit within him, so that it may transcend all pleasure and all pain, take nothing in hand without purpose and nothing falsely or with dissimulation, depend not on another&#8217; actions or inactions, accept each and every dispensation as coming from the same Source as itself - and last and chief, wait with a good grace for death, as no more than a simple dissolving of the elements whereof each living thing is composed. If those elements themselves take no harm from their ceaseless forming and re-forming, why look with mistrust upon the change and dissolution of the whole? It is but Nature&#8217;s way; and in the ways of Nature there is no evil to be found.</p></blockquote>
<p>Philosopher = lover of Wisdom/Sophia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/comment-page-1/#comment-84248</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 03:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/16/saving-the-gnostic-body/#comment-84248</guid>
		<description>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tongue_twisters
http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/15/she-never-speaks-to-me-in-dreams/#comment-84249</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tongue_twisters" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tongue_twisters'>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tongue_twisters</a><br />
<a href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/15/she-never-speaks-to-me-in-dreams/#comment-84249" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/08/15/she-never-speaks-to-me-in-dreams/#comment-84249'>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007...speaks-to-me-in-dreams/#comment-84249</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
