Perceptual Field States
1-800-Dial-A-Feeling
What if I told you I had the technology which could create in you - at will - any internal state at any time? So you could experience profound joy, success, sexual exhiliration - even sorrow or fear - any time you wanted, in a completely safe environment. Would you want to play around with a technology like that? Wouldn’t you want to buy one? It would be way better than an iPod.

Sounds like science-fiction, right? It sounds like some kind of virtual reality or holodeck-type thing? Well it’s not. It is the natural way which you are supposed to be operating as a being. It is the reason we have physical bodies: because they are that sci-fi technology which allow us to experience any state at will.
Sense & Beauty
In order to make the best possible use of the technology of your body though, and how it hooks into your emotional and mental states, you need to first understand how perception works. Our bodies are perceptual instruments. Their purpose is to perceive. You can tell because of all the perceptual instruments attached to it: eyes, ears, skin, tongues, noses, etc. Each of these are considered (nowadays) as “senses” and they are usually thought of as being attached to specialized sensory organs. Each type of sensory organ is uniquely designed to enhance the experience a certain type of stimulus. Eyes are “better” at sensing light than your tongue is. [A simple exercise: Try closing your eyes and using your tongue to tell whether it is dark in the room in which you are located.] Ears are better at dealing with sound waves.
You could also think of it as each sense organ having a preference for a certain type of stimulus: your ears are built the way they are because your ears find sound to be beautiful, and your eyes find light to beautiful and infinitely intriguing. They seek it. They need it. Their purpose is to collect it. This collection process of sense organs seeking out certain types of beauty is what we call sensation. Pure sensation has no value judgement. Your ears do not decide whether or not a certain sound is beautiful. They just resonate in sympathetic vibration with the stimulus, almost having a call and response relationship with stimulus. The stimulus calls out, the sense organ responds by vibrating in a similar pattern: it is trying to recreate it.
If A Tree Falls…
The sympathetic recreated vibration of the stimulus is sent to the proprioceptive system. The way I am coming to understand proprioception is simply as: awareness of sensation. You know that Zen koan, if a tree falls in the forest and no one is there to hear it, does it make a sound? This is what that koan is getting at. It is asking the question: if you have a pain in your leg, but you are not aware that you have that pain, are you really even having that pain? What if you go to pick a steaming pot up off the stove without a potholder? If you are not aware that it is hot when you touch it, are you going to experience it as hot? This is an altogether different question from: will a steaming pot burn your hand? Although practices such as walking across hot coals, etc perhaps point to these two questions sharing a closer link than most of us probably are willing to admit into our view of reality.
Fire Is Hot!
So proprioception is the awareness that you are having a sensation. Sensation is (roughly) the sympathetic vibration of specialized organs within the body to stimuli.
Perception, then, is sort of a layer of abstraction working on top of that. As you become proprioceptively aware that you are having a sensation, perception’s job is to take a snapshot of everything that is happening in that moment and then make cause-effect relationship assumptions about the source of a sensation. In other words, it links together a sensation with what it assumes to be the stimulus which was responsible for the sensation arising.
This translates into linguistic conclusions such as “Fire is hot” or “A knife is sharp.”
Translated through our current concept system, “Fire is hot” becomes more accurately stated as:
“‘Fire’ is perceived as having a causal link to the proprioceptive awareness of the sensation of ‘heat’.”
It is easier just to say, “Fire is hot.” It saves us time and, in this case at least, it tends to be an equally accurate. Your brain thrives on simplifying things: boiling them down to the lowest common denominator. It saves computational energy. This is what your perceptual field is for. Your perceptual field could be defined as the “stage” in which sensations (and proprioceptive awareness of those sensations) can occur. More simply put (for our purposes right now), your perceptual field is loosely defined as, or at least anchored in, the physical body. Your body is where you experience sensations, yes? I am not yet talking about your reaction to those sensations - we’ll come back to that shortly.
Associations & Assumptions
Perception could simply be thought of as the processes of association which occur within your perceptual field, and which make correlative assumptions about cause and effect relationships between sensations and stimuli. Perception simply takes a snap shot of all these different factors: (1) stimuli, (2) sensation, (3) awareness of sensation. It looks at which stimuli is associated with which sensation and what the awareness of that sensation itself feels like. It looks at how these things cluster together spatial and temporal proximity (what is in the same place at the same time).
Perception still does not make value-judgements on these things. It just takes notes on how these things are clustered together, what is linked to what. And then it makes assumptions that if these things are clustered together once, then they will be clustered like that again. The more times, then, you repeat those unique clusters of the three elements (stimuli, sensation, & awareness), the more your perception is going to become habituated. Habituation partly comes from “proof”. These things actually did and do occur this way on a regular basis. Therefore, it becomes a logical consequence to predict that this cluster will in the future create the same (or similar) perceptual field state. And it is not wrong in making these associations and assumptions. Accuracy in pattern-recognition is perhaps the most vital skill in survival: the primary purpose of the biological organism.
In the most general sense, this is the logical chain which perception operates according to: “I am aware of a sensation occurring, which means that sensation must be occurring (or else I would not be aware of it), which means that a stimulus must be causing that sensation to occur.” It then takes a snapshot of all stimuli and assigns it to that predictive category to help steer future behavior: “Fire is hot.”
Repeat Or Retreat?
The steering of future behavior is where the next element of the human experience arises: emotion. Emotion is simply the assignment of value to a perceptual field state. The two possible values are: (1) repeat and (2) retreat. Perception notes all components of a perceptual field state and makes assumptions based upon those associations. Emotion answers the question: “Shall we continue this perceptual field state or terminate it?” Is it pleasant or unpleasant?

Due to certain biological parameters, we have certain sensations which we select for and against. “Fire is hot” is a perceptual assumption which is useful because it helps us prevent damage from occurring to our perceptual instruments: our sense organs and bodies in general. “Fire is hot” is immediately assigned the “retreat” emotional value. This value is instantly fed back into the perceptual system, which makes sure to cluster it together with associated stimuli, sensation and awareness. Emotion, in a sense, colors proprioceptive awareness. It trains the perceptual instruments (sense organs) to seek out perceptual field states which it would like to repeat and retreat from those which it would not.
Ordering of Perceptual Elements
I may be missing a few intermediary steps here, but I am attempting to describe an extremely stripped down way of looking at how your body, mind, perceptions and emotions work. So forgive me as I continually refine and improve upon what has been said. In any event, it is only after emotional value-assignment (repeat or retreat) where what I would consider “conscious thought” comes into play. So if we label these steps in order:
- Stimulus
- Sensation
- Awareness
- Perception (association & assumption)
- Emotion
- Thought (Cognition)
Understand that these processes all happen instantaneously though, as the perceptual field state is *always* changing. It, like T. Rex in Jurassic Park, is completely focused on change, on motion. T. Rex, supposedly, could not see its victims unless they were moving. Not sure how accurate this “movie science” is, but it is a useful metaphor for our purposes here. An other way to think about it is that your perceptual field only knows itself by cycling through different states. That is, in fact, its entire purpose. The perceptual field acts as a stage for actors (stimuli) to perform on (sensation, etc). You could think of emotion and thought then as kind of like the audience, who decides whether they like the performance and whether it relates to their life. Perception acts more like a director: you never see the director, but it is the choices of the director which determine what is happening on stage.
So-Called “Conscious” Thought
If emotion’s function is indeed to assign a repeat/retreat value to a perceptual field state, then cognition arises as a logical consequence of that. If you want to end a state, you need to figure out what caused it and eliminate that stimulus. You need to move your hand out of the fire in order for it to stop being hot. Then you need to know that dousing it with cool water will balance out the perceptual state back to normal. In areas directly related to survival of the biological organism, these choices are completely automatic. These behavioral choices are happening below the level of conscious awareness. And this is where just about all thoughts seem to have their roots (I know this is a broad statement - it is meant to be provocative).
Thoughts arise almost mechanically out of emotional value assignments to perceptual field states. This is why thoughts can tend to have such an obsessive or addictive quality to them: because they are the tip of an iceberg which begins much father down. The purpose of thoughts is to act as a problem-solving tool to investigate, predict and manipulate cause-effect chains (assumptions made on the level of perception, typically way below the level of conscious cognition) resulting in perceptual field states. It steers your behavior towards pleasurable field states and away from painful ones. And it tells itself that this is for your own good (ie, that it is “necessary” and “true”), because this tendency is directly rooted in rules required for the biological survival of the organism. But by the time you have gotten to cognition, the sixth level of awareness in our descriptive system, many associations, assumptions and value judgements have already been passed. For the most part, these things remain below the level of conscious thought. And our thoughts flow along as a logical consequence of these underlying associations, assumptions, and value judgements. This explains the feeling (the perceptual field state) of “not knowing why you did something” or acting in such a way that you get caught in behavioral patterns you cannot consciously comprehend.
FIRE OUCH!
The reason for this is simple: it is easier and faster computationally to say “fire ouch!” than to be much more precise:
“‘Fire’ is perceived as having a causal link to the proprioceptive awareness of the sensation of ‘heat’. Heat should be avoided because it damages the ability to perceive field states and therefore threatens the survival of the biological organism.”
NO FIRE OUCH! That is what you teach a very young child about to reach for the handle of a steaming pot on the stove. It is also more or less how you train dogs:
Your dog barks. You do not want it to bark (it is an unpleasant field state for you). So you yell, “NO BARK!” to the dog. But if you wait until later when the dog is no longer barking, it is going to have no idea what you are scolding it for. But it is smart enough to recognize unpleasant field states, so it will cower and slink away (retreat). In order to more effectively train a dog (or a small child, for that matter), you need to be sure that your corrective feedback is immediately associated with the stimulus which caused it. You need to create the shortcut in the dog’s perceptual system: BARK = REPRIMAND (negative state) = RETREAT. In other words, “NO BARK!” You link this behavioral filter into the dog’s perceptual system through consistent application of a repetitive stimulus:
NO BARK! NO BARK! NO BARK!
Except you do not yell it three times. You just yell it when the dog barks. You basically have to train the dog to replace its biological functional perceptual program with yours. Dogs are naturally built to do this as pack animals: they see you as the alpha (or they should, anyway), the master, and they pattern behavior after the stimulus feedback you flow back into their perceptual field. Remember what we said about the ear vibrating in resonance or in sympathy with stimulus?

Great Apes
Humans learn much the same way: we are “apes.” We mimic. We copy. We are pack animals who learn behavioral strategies to promote our survival from one another. We look for leaders, masters, models from whom to copy successful survival strategies. That is what you are doing with me by reading this (especially reading down this far). You perceive me as having a successful behavioral strategy which improves my perceptual field states and increases my chances for survival and reproduction. Or you don’t, I’m just saying is all…
The point is simply that your perceptions are much complex than most people are probably realizing. As a result of this, most people are acting largely unconsciously to rules set up automatically by associations, assumptions and value judgements of which they are not even aware. Worse than that, the people who *are* aware of these things can literally see it by your behavior when you are not aware of this stuff. And they can then lead you, like stage magicians practicing sleight of hand and larger scale illusions: they act as directors of your perception.
A Matter of National Security
Your “thoughts” are most likely of no help to you in learning any of this on your own because they are not getting to the roots of these deep-seated patterns. You have to understand that what you consider right now to be your “mind” is nothing more than a perceptual instrument in itself. It is, in a sense, no different from an eye or an ear. It is ONLY a sense organ designed to seek out a certain type of stimulus which it finds “beautiful” and which it then resonates with sympathetically. Your mind, for the most part, is governed by your perceptual system, and it is just going ahead and linking together your thought states to your emotional states, to your awareness of sensations and to stimuli. Perception and cognition seem to almost function as parallel processors, filtering the same data sets in completely different ways.
And unfortunately, perception classifies all the really important stuff you need to know consciously as a matter of “national security”. That is, the roots of how these things work are necessarily tied up in the literal survival of the biological organism. The processes and information at work are shared with (sent up to the level of) conscious thought ONLY on a “need to know” basis. If you don’t have the security clearance, you will not be let into the meeting. So what you have to do, essentially, is become a spy in this system.
Awakening the Man Inside
Luckily, you already have a “man on the inside” working for you. This deep-cover agent is actually the proprioceptive system itself. It is awareness of sensation. And it occurs at a level functionally before and below the level of associations, assumptions, value judgements and predictive steering of behavior. The way you get back in touch with you proprioceptive system is by simply becoming aware of sensations, and completely stripping them out of the context of all the things you associate with them, or which are clustered together with them by the perceptual system. What does it *really* feel like inside your hand, or when your heart beats rapidly? Just focus strictly on that, with no interpretation.
Practice this for a while and then we’ll talk more about how to dial in specific perceptual field states in your own personal sci-fi holodeck technology. Actually, we’ve been talking about that all along, but we have to go about it the long way because our understanding of our own perceptual processes is completely whacked. Hopefully though, we are moving forward, bit by bit. Please let me know your results!

![[tmbchr]™](/journal/popocculture-blog-logo.jpg)
August 23rd, 2007 at 11:37 pm
““Shall we continue this perceptual field state or terminate it?” Is it pleasant or unpleasant?…..Emotion is simply the assignment of value to a perceptual field state……they act as directors of your perception.” (No quote thingys on my screen.)
OK. I’m not going to qualify as a ninja anytime soon but here’s my story. Many years ago my Mother told me that she saw a man’s name float across her field of vision. This mixed with her emotions over miscarriages and she decided that this name is what she would’ve liked to name one of her sons.
I later wound up working with a man by this name and had an intense feeling that he was my brother, spiritually, and sometimes my interactions with him mirrored my interactions with my real brother. I had an intense dream about his interractions with his daughter, which I don’t think I generated myself, and I saw a reflection of my own childhood. When this man went through a horrible period at work, largely due to his own actions but uncalled for, I stuck by him as a friend and reinforced his good feelings about work which helped keep him employed there. All the while seeing these emotional events as some sort of confirmation that this was supposed to happen this way. Whether it was or not I don’t know.
My point is that someone orchestrated this chain of events which gave me the emotional states I needed in order to manipulate things to a desired conclusion. Things happened and instead of reacting like I usually do I reacted from behind the sunglasses of the dream, vision of the name and feeling of debt I had from help I received as a child. Instead of breaking off contact with this person (because I had a lot of problems at work for supporting him) I proudly kept at it and the problems weren’t problems at all, the fire didn’t burn. Part two is coming.
August 24th, 2007 at 12:04 am
Part two…again, no ninja stuff. It’s not as soap operaish as it seems. Tonight I was delayed leaving work by Tornado type weather. Another coworker was ill and her aggrevation was going to lead her to a decision about her Son In Law (is he no good or is he ok?). She sees clearly how this arguement in her family could break up her daughter’s marriage.
More floating words. She mentioned a word that had floated across the field of vision of an Aunt of mine that had a big impact when directed against me. The way she pronounced the word I knew I had to change her line of reasoning because it would lead to a broken family. As she described the problems I could see the exact path of destruction and we spoke for three hours about body memory, illness, plain old psychology, generational patterns, etc.
Because of the floating word thing I paid attention. We could’ve had a good time bad mouthing her Son In Law and pretending to have it all figured out. But instead we talked about what would really be best for the children. We could’ve bonded over our shared disdain but instead bonded over a multi-generational plan for the well being of others.
This may sound like nonsense to you. “So what Julia, you grew up and aren’t so quick to judge.” Ok, but what made the word float around? That was the only thing that forced me into that emotional state. I really wanted to avoid this conversation when I saw where it was headed but I knew I had to stay until this was finished and I did. My perception was that this was a monumental event and I had to play my part, say my lines, motivate emotions as mine had been motivated. This was more important to me than the Tornados and floods. So, who’s the director?
August 24th, 2007 at 12:29 am
My best guesstimate:
7. Superconscious or psychic thought
That is, once you re-open up direct access to the non-judgemental awareness mechanism designed as a failsafe in your body, something happens. You stop living automatically out of mechanisms whose sole purpose is to protect the perceptual instruments which generate field states and prevent the disintegration of that field (ie, death).
Removing the repeat/retreat mechanism (I am not talking about quelling emotions - there is nothing inherently “wrong” about them - they are a beautiful form of stimulus/sensation) and confronting the reality of your decisions heretofore having been dictated by strict survival/reproduction algorithms, basically, I *think* you open up a level of thought which is “truer”. Because you rearrange how you value things emotionally. Repeat or retreat is not just a protector of the individual self’s integrity, but can then be applied as a means of judging and preserving field state integrity of other beings.
How is that for starters? Feels fairly solid at the moment. I think the key lies in retraining yourself to assign emotional values to things in new ways. I would guess that these intuitive flashes of insight come then from the perceptual mechanism whose job is to analyze perceptual clusters and derive meaningful patterns out of them. Just like with your “normal” or mundane thoughts, which arise out of emotional valuing of field states, these thoughts arise because some part of your perceptual system recognized some element which matches a pattern which it believes to be important, but it does not necessarily know why. So it brings it to your conscious attention: almost like a secretary would who screens your phone calls. The perceptual secretary system tells you the name of the person on the other line and simply, “He says it’s urgent!”
Do you have her take a message or do you accept the call and find out what he wants? Depending on what you choose to do, you seed new patterns into the perceptual secretary system: new rules to govern and evaluate behavior and intra-office communication.
August 24th, 2007 at 6:51 am
It’s good. If I can apply this to my body I’ll be a ninja someday. For now I’ll just have to try to be a good friend.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:04 am
julia, you are a ninja already……….
the floaty-word thing is a gift. i have some technical ideas about how it came to operate, but wow, what a pattern interrupt.
it allows you to resist the pig-parent judgement that we are all conditioned to react with, and instead you can access a deeper intuitive sense of understanding about life,nature and process.
is it really important to “know” how and why these words appear?
August 24th, 2007 at 10:07 am
I get a bit lost in this. It doesn’t help that ‘proprioception’ is a specific word for the ’sixth’ sense that tells you where your limbs are, that allows you to put your finger on your nose with closed eyes. Skilled athletes have a lot of that. (Bad dancers don’t.)
But I agree that there’s a good few steps between sense data and assignment of meaning. Below ‘reasoning’ and ‘assigning meaning’ is ‘paying attention’. Apparently the mind only has one ‘attention’ channel… studies with people listening to two voices at once reveals they can only ever extract information from one at a time. Below ‘paying attention’ is ‘awareness’ - the opening of the quiet mind to all possible sense data… is this what you’re on about? Quietening the mind to be aware ain’t a simple matter.
August 24th, 2007 at 11:13 am
Yeah, I guess not. I had a dream about me, my Mom and my Great Aunt once. We were all Lakes that fed into each other but also competed for resources and space. When I tried to apply logic and reasoning to the interpretation of this dream it fell apart and I felt like the thing that had given me the dream was disappointed that I had thought so little of this gift that I would try to disect it like that.
Yea, I’m a ninja, oh yeah, oh yeah, ninja-rific.
http://icanhascheezburger.com/2007/02/06/im-in-ur-gras/
August 24th, 2007 at 12:25 pm
Franz Bardon’s Initiation into Hermetics (and Bardon-influenced writers) recommend several exercises to develop the proprioceptive sense independently of the physical body. The goal is an awareness of the ‘astral body’, the medium between the physical and the spiritual.
For example:
http://bardon.dnsalias.net/Self-HealingArchaeous.html
I have not yet seriously attempted these kinds of exercises.
August 24th, 2007 at 1:08 pm
Actually, it IS a simple matter. Not just that, but it can be accomplished on an almost mechanical level simply by re-training your patterns of activity and body awareness intensively.
P: That is the next step I was going to take all this: that spirit enters into perceptual field, and the link to Rupert Sheldrake’s morphogenetic fields…
Alistair, I wouldn’t mind hearing your interpretation of where the floaty words come from, as mine was more just a shot in the dark. I do agree however, that it ultimately *doesn’t matter* and it is gift and ought to be treated as such.
August 25th, 2007 at 5:12 am
> Actually, it IS a simple matter.
Well, yeah, Ok, but only once you’ve done it a few times. At first there’s a kind of consciousness bootstrap problem to be overcome… thinking about thinking. The problem of being wrapped up in one’s own thoughts.
August 26th, 2007 at 5:13 am
Actually the way to teach a dog not to bark is to queue barking. Get the dog to bark on command and then stop. So when it barks on its own you give the command to stop.
The same thing works for teaching a police dog to bite. You get it to bite on command and let go on command.
So a well trained protection dog is far less likely to bite without being commanded to.
I guess the application of this with what you are working on would be to be able to queue negative responses to stimu scaslus at will, then correct them.
Like make yourself afraid on queue and then correct your response.
August 26th, 2007 at 5:15 am
stimu scaslus= stimulus + stupid keyboard
August 26th, 2007 at 12:59 pm
ok, the where the floaty words come from……….
if you are asked to spell the word stop, the first thing most people do is see a stop sign in thier mind, and then they read the sign. s.t.o.p.
the image is installed.
i use that example to show people in session work how thier minds show them images below the level ofcoscious awareness.
after a while the mechanism is unconscious. like driving a car or waking up and going to work…….
the floaty word thing works like a pattern interrupt visually that allows the mind to reason instead of react.
an intuitive, right-brain visual pattern interrupt.
i get auditory ones all the time that wake me out of my waking slumber to do the right thing.
August 26th, 2007 at 3:36 pm
Ted, that makes so much sense!
Alistair, have you given much thought to synchronicity and hemisphere communication? I was planning on writing about this soon.
August 26th, 2007 at 5:03 pm
http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2007/08/...0823153030&dcitc=w19-502-ak-0000
August 26th, 2007 at 5:56 pm
[…] I haven’t become a materialist. It is more that I have accepted the body as the locus of our perceptual experiences. Maybe not the source, but it is certainly the crucible in which the treasure is formed. […]
August 26th, 2007 at 8:38 pm
hemisphere communication….like deja vu?
the trickster?
skinwalker ranch?
i noticed that you are in a phase of moving away from “external” event realities toward the body as the locus of our experiece.
i think that whatever is going is a neuro-chemical brain state thingy that is a factory for reality that we can manipulate.
futher, i think that bibles and korans and the like have contained methodologies for getting it to work correctly, but mad kings and popes have censored the works so that all we do is go to church on sunday and listen to stories.
the work does tend to re-compile it`s self though eventually.
a hundred monkeys at a hundred typewriters eventually type out the complete works of w. shakespeare.
August 27th, 2007 at 2:51 pm
[…] It sounds a bit like what I have been referring to under the umbrella term, “proprioception,” which I have been using to refer to something like “awareness of sensation”. Not perhaps the most scientific explanation, but it has helped me understand quite a great deal from a practical experiential standpoint. […]