<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Summer&#8217;s Last Great Watermelon Smashup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/09/summers-last-great-watermelon-smashup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/09/summers-last-great-watermelon-smashup/</link>
	<description>public domain playground. friendly entities welcome.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shadow</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/09/summers-last-great-watermelon-smashup/comment-page-1/#comment-84842</link>
		<dc:creator>Shadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 20:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/09/summers-last-great-watermelon-smashup/#comment-84842</guid>
		<description>Svenson, being an asshole reveals a lot more about the asshole, than it does about the person on the receiving end. This is the one trinket of knowledge that i use to defend myself against Thier slings and arrows, and to store away for the future should attack be necessary( for me attack is used to enlighten, very rarely to maim further). You will find with introspection that it takes a lot to become a king, and the refusal to take hints on board and or being mentally retarded does not bestow upon one sovereign status. Actually, i've just thought of a method by which one can gauge ones level of sovereignty...Cut all your social ties, except with those who you absolutely 100% know is in your corner( what i mean by that is people who are willing to give to you as much as within their power the whole truth and nothing but the truth). Literally cast yourself out into the wilderness and subsist off slain emus like the prophets of old. In that purgatory you will spend your time burning away your impurities and transmute yourself into gold, i.e. attain spiritual power. When the time is right, you descend into the villages below to test your progress, i.e. try to attain material and social power. Try then to identify, the sychophants and the flatterers, the false kings, idols and gods. Try to identify those who tremble before you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Svenson, being an asshole reveals a lot more about the asshole, than it does about the person on the receiving end. This is the one trinket of knowledge that i use to defend myself against Thier slings and arrows, and to store away for the future should attack be necessary( for me attack is used to enlighten, very rarely to maim further). You will find with introspection that it takes a lot to become a king, and the refusal to take hints on board and or being mentally retarded does not bestow upon one sovereign status. Actually, i&#8217;ve just thought of a method by which one can gauge ones level of sovereignty&#8230;Cut all your social ties, except with those who you absolutely 100% know is in your corner( what i mean by that is people who are willing to give to you as much as within their power the whole truth and nothing but the truth). Literally cast yourself out into the wilderness and subsist off slain emus like the prophets of old. In that purgatory you will spend your time burning away your impurities and transmute yourself into gold, i.e. attain spiritual power. When the time is right, you descend into the villages below to test your progress, i.e. try to attain material and social power. Try then to identify, the sychophants and the flatterers, the false kings, idols and gods. Try to identify those who tremble before you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/09/summers-last-great-watermelon-smashup/comment-page-1/#comment-84834</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 02:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/09/summers-last-great-watermelon-smashup/#comment-84834</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;When you are actually forced to abandon hints and say what you mean, you have to really look at yourself.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Perfect. Other people say what I mean so much better than I can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>When you are actually forced to abandon hints and say what you mean, you have to really look at yourself.</p></blockquote>
<p>Perfect. Other people say what I mean so much better than I can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Svenson</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/09/summers-last-great-watermelon-smashup/comment-page-1/#comment-84832</link>
		<dc:creator>Svenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/09/summers-last-great-watermelon-smashup/#comment-84832</guid>
		<description>Crowley said something:

 59. Beware therefore! Love all, lest perchance is a King concealed! Say you so? Fool! If he be a King, thou canst not hurt him.

60. Therefore strike hard &#38; low, and to hell with them, master! 

I've learned alot at my job working with mentally disabled people. In our society, we tend to think of people who "can't take a hint" as being worse off somehow than those who can, but being with these people in the world tells me its not the case at all. They ignore all nuance and hints, and are treated as more, not less, powerful for it. I started to do the same, ignoring "hints" anybody drops and I found it works. 
The thing about a king is that they are soveriegn, meaning they just don't give a shit. And the thing about hints and nuance is that they are about plausible deniability, a cover people use because they are afraid. Its in this cowardly cave of not being able to say what you want that makes the assholism grow. When you are actually forced to abandon hints and say what you mean, you have to really look at yourself. If I have to tell a DD person they stink and to take a shower, the thing that makes it seem cruel is the opinion I have, that they should [i]already know[/i], that they should have the same opinions of me. If a DD person is singing, and it sounds terrible, by commenting on it openly I would be forced to confront my own arrogant assumption that its being done to entertain me, rather than because it makes the other person feel happy.
So yes, we should be an asshole. But we shouldn't kid ourselves that its for the benefit of the other person, the truth is its for the benefit of ourselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crowley said something:</p>
<p> 59. Beware therefore! Love all, lest perchance is a King concealed! Say you so? Fool! If he be a King, thou canst not hurt him.</p>
<p>60. Therefore strike hard &amp; low, and to hell with them, master! </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve learned alot at my job working with mentally disabled people. In our society, we tend to think of people who &#8220;can&#8217;t take a hint&#8221; as being worse off somehow than those who can, but being with these people in the world tells me its not the case at all. They ignore all nuance and hints, and are treated as more, not less, powerful for it. I started to do the same, ignoring &#8220;hints&#8221; anybody drops and I found it works.<br />
The thing about a king is that they are soveriegn, meaning they just don&#8217;t give a shit. And the thing about hints and nuance is that they are about plausible deniability, a cover people use because they are afraid. Its in this cowardly cave of not being able to say what you want that makes the assholism grow. When you are actually forced to abandon hints and say what you mean, you have to really look at yourself. If I have to tell a DD person they stink and to take a shower, the thing that makes it seem cruel is the opinion I have, that they should [i]already know[/i], that they should have the same opinions of me. If a DD person is singing, and it sounds terrible, by commenting on it openly I would be forced to confront my own arrogant assumption that its being done to entertain me, rather than because it makes the other person feel happy.<br />
So yes, we should be an asshole. But we shouldn&#8217;t kid ourselves that its for the benefit of the other person, the truth is its for the benefit of ourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shadow</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/09/summers-last-great-watermelon-smashup/comment-page-1/#comment-84830</link>
		<dc:creator>Shadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 21:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/09/summers-last-great-watermelon-smashup/#comment-84830</guid>
		<description>thats not what he's saying &lt;em&gt;assuming&lt;/em&gt; that his assumption was that its the natural state of human beings to be filled with mean thoughts, so i guess if thats the case, then the category of insensitive asshole would be made null and void. I think that is what his saying but i disagree..i think all human beings are born innately good..well assuming there wasn't some sort of demonic intervention..what happens is mean thoughts get passed around like a virus, at least this is what seems to be the case in my experience. The projecting of hidden thoughts and feelings on other people and wounding them and yourself in the process happens in the presence of 2 conditions:
 
(1) you identify those thoughts as somehow something innate to you 
(2) you have some sort of moral guilt over the having of these thoughts and actively repress them.

Now while getting shit of your chest will undoubtedly save you from wounding yourself, i guess whether it avoids wounding the other all depends upon whether the second party believes that assholism is innate to human nature. If so then, if that second party has any sense of self-worth and half a brain - then no harm done...he/she would mentally note...ASSHOLE...and move on to the next one..However, for those who believe otherwise, and believe in the inherent purity of the human vessel, maybe can even see the cause and effects of where it all went wrong...it becomes harder to let go...they would suffer for other's sins as they do their own...perhaps, unhealthily taking their sins upon them in addition to their own...thats why i love the quote by plato i put up before...its like a code of conduct for how to drop the extreme cases of assholism, deal gracefully with those who are only social assholes, and perhaps slowly reduce my own assholism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats not what he&#8217;s saying <em>assuming</em> that his assumption was that its the natural state of human beings to be filled with mean thoughts, so i guess if thats the case, then the category of insensitive asshole would be made null and void. I think that is what his saying but i disagree..i think all human beings are born innately good..well assuming there wasn&#8217;t some sort of demonic intervention..what happens is mean thoughts get passed around like a virus, at least this is what seems to be the case in my experience. The projecting of hidden thoughts and feelings on other people and wounding them and yourself in the process happens in the presence of 2 conditions:</p>
<p>(1) you identify those thoughts as somehow something innate to you<br />
(2) you have some sort of moral guilt over the having of these thoughts and actively repress them.</p>
<p>Now while getting shit of your chest will undoubtedly save you from wounding yourself, i guess whether it avoids wounding the other all depends upon whether the second party believes that assholism is innate to human nature. If so then, if that second party has any sense of self-worth and half a brain - then no harm done&#8230;he/she would mentally note&#8230;ASSHOLE&#8230;and move on to the next one..However, for those who believe otherwise, and believe in the inherent purity of the human vessel, maybe can even see the cause and effects of where it all went wrong&#8230;it becomes harder to let go&#8230;they would suffer for other&#8217;s sins as they do their own&#8230;perhaps, unhealthily taking their sins upon them in addition to their own&#8230;thats why i love the quote by plato i put up before&#8230;its like a code of conduct for how to drop the extreme cases of assholism, deal gracefully with those who are only social assholes, and perhaps slowly reduce my own assholism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/09/summers-last-great-watermelon-smashup/comment-page-1/#comment-84828</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/09/summers-last-great-watermelon-smashup/#comment-84828</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;that being an insensitive asshole (which i think is interchangeable with the word â€œhonestâ€ in that article)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Obviously, this is not what he is saying - although I appreciate the distinction you are making. What he is talking about is expressing the Real Truth, so that you are not constantly projecting your hidden thoughts and feelings on other people and wounding them and yourself in the process. If you're at least up front about "being an asshole" then you're giving people access to your real self (as well as giving yourself the opportunity to simply let those things go and move on) and empowering other people to use their Free Will. Nobody wants to hang out with an asshole. Shit will quickly clear itself out. 

Wrote more about this myself the other day:

http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/07/towards-a-more-sophisticated-gangsterism/

PS. Brit, if you see this, drop me your email address. I couldn't find it on your site and your comments seemed to be broken! I have a gift for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>that being an insensitive asshole (which i think is interchangeable with the word â€œhonestâ€ in that article)</p></blockquote>
<p>Obviously, this is not what he is saying - although I appreciate the distinction you are making. What he is talking about is expressing the Real Truth, so that you are not constantly projecting your hidden thoughts and feelings on other people and wounding them and yourself in the process. If you&#8217;re at least up front about &#8220;being an asshole&#8221; then you&#8217;re giving people access to your real self (as well as giving yourself the opportunity to simply let those things go and move on) and empowering other people to use their Free Will. Nobody wants to hang out with an asshole. Shit will quickly clear itself out. </p>
<p>Wrote more about this myself the other day:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/07/towards-a-more-sophisticated-gangsterism/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/07/towards-a-more-sophisticated-gangsterism/'>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007...rds-a-more-sophisticated-gangsterism/</a></p>
<p>PS. Brit, if you see this, drop me your email address. I couldn&#8217;t find it on your site and your comments seemed to be broken! I have a gift for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shadow</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/09/summers-last-great-watermelon-smashup/comment-page-1/#comment-84827</link>
		<dc:creator>Shadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/09/summers-last-great-watermelon-smashup/#comment-84827</guid>
		<description>To the quote above..and this is very applicable to the problems i've found myself facing over the years being a "nice" and "spritual" person, I would agree that one should let go when the relationship if it is no longer of any use to one or the other party. There is no point in flogging a dead horse after all. However, i don't think that being an insensitive asshole(which i think is interchangeable with the word "honest" in that article) would be the way to go. God knows the world has enough angry drunks and road ragers as it is. Also, its most likely that those mean thoughts about other people are the aspects in others we hide from ourselves...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the quote above..and this is very applicable to the problems i&#8217;ve found myself facing over the years being a &#8220;nice&#8221; and &#8220;spritual&#8221; person, I would agree that one should let go when the relationship if it is no longer of any use to one or the other party. There is no point in flogging a dead horse after all. However, i don&#8217;t think that being an insensitive asshole(which i think is interchangeable with the word &#8220;honest&#8221; in that article) would be the way to go. God knows the world has enough angry drunks and road ragers as it is. Also, its most likely that those mean thoughts about other people are the aspects in others we hide from ourselves&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shadow</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/09/summers-last-great-watermelon-smashup/comment-page-1/#comment-84826</link>
		<dc:creator>Shadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/09/summers-last-great-watermelon-smashup/#comment-84826</guid>
		<description>This quote has given me great comfort since i discovered it, especially when my aesthetic instincts(or mascohistic perversions. take your pick) smell the encroach of an inauthentic mode of being before my rational mind does: 

"Those who belong to this small class have tasted how sweet and blessed a posession philosophy is, and have also seen enough of the madness of the multitude; and they know that no politician is honest, nor is there any champion of justice at whose side they may fight and be saved. Such an one may be compared to a man who has fallen among wild beasts-- he will not join in the wickedness of his fellows, but neither is he able singly to resist all their fierce natures, and therefore seeing that he would be of no use to the State or to his friends, and reflecting that he would have to throw away his life without doing any good either to himself or others, he holds his peace, and goes his own way. He is like one who, in the storm of dust and sleet which the driving wind hurries along, retires under the shelter of a wall; and seeing the rest of mankind full of wickedness, he is content, if only he can live his own life and be pure from evil or unrighteousness, and depart in peace and good-will, with bright hopes." - Plato

As David Icke says, people don't set up inquiries that could destroy them. Which is why when someone does, you can be sure of one of 2 things: they are either fools or genuine truth seekers, and i think in this day and age the one often implies the other...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This quote has given me great comfort since i discovered it, especially when my aesthetic instincts(or mascohistic perversions. take your pick) smell the encroach of an inauthentic mode of being before my rational mind does: </p>
<p>&#8220;Those who belong to this small class have tasted how sweet and blessed a posession philosophy is, and have also seen enough of the madness of the multitude; and they know that no politician is honest, nor is there any champion of justice at whose side they may fight and be saved. Such an one may be compared to a man who has fallen among wild beasts&#8211; he will not join in the wickedness of his fellows, but neither is he able singly to resist all their fierce natures, and therefore seeing that he would be of no use to the State or to his friends, and reflecting that he would have to throw away his life without doing any good either to himself or others, he holds his peace, and goes his own way. He is like one who, in the storm of dust and sleet which the driving wind hurries along, retires under the shelter of a wall; and seeing the rest of mankind full of wickedness, he is content, if only he can live his own life and be pure from evil or unrighteousness, and depart in peace and good-will, with bright hopes.&#8221; - Plato</p>
<p>As David Icke says, people don&#8217;t set up inquiries that could destroy them. Which is why when someone does, you can be sure of one of 2 things: they are either fools or genuine truth seekers, and i think in this day and age the one often implies the other&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/09/summers-last-great-watermelon-smashup/comment-page-1/#comment-84825</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/09/summers-last-great-watermelon-smashup/#comment-84825</guid>
		<description>Great comments guys!

This is so super awesome:

http://britwolfson.com/2007/09/06/honesty-is-the-fastest-policy-to-enlightenment/

(found by way of Ted)

&lt;blockquote&gt;You have mean thoughts about your lover, your family, your friends, and random people on the street every single day of your life. Deny this and well, maybe itâ€™s time to read someone elseâ€™s blog. So you have all these mean thoughts going on all the time and often, you have the same mean thoughts about the same person regularly. Like, your voice is so annoying when you sing that I have to leave the room. Stuff like that. Well, hereâ€™s a novel idea. Tell the person your meanest thoughts about them. Tell them all the things you donâ€™t like about them. Just get it all out on the table.

And you know what you find. You find itâ€™s fucking scary. You find itâ€™s the scariest thing you have ever done in your life, especially if you are a â€œniceâ€ or â€œspiritualâ€ person. And the reason that itâ€™s scary is that this willingness to be honest signals a willingness to let go of the person. You are finally accepting them as they are. Rather than accepting a part of them and hiding your hatred of all of their annoying parts, you are actually taking them in at face value. They actually know exactly what you think of them. And they are then in a more empowered place to choose how they want the relationship to continue, or to change, or to disappear.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comments guys!</p>
<p>This is so super awesome:</p>
<p><a href="http://britwolfson.com/2007/09/06/honesty-is-the-fastest-policy-to-enlightenment/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://britwolfson.com/2007/09/06/honesty-is-the-fastest-policy-to-enlightenment/'>http://britwolfson.com/2007/09/06/hone...-the-fastest-policy-to-enlightenment/</a></p>
<p>(found by way of Ted)</p>
<blockquote><p>You have mean thoughts about your lover, your family, your friends, and random people on the street every single day of your life. Deny this and well, maybe itâ€™s time to read someone elseâ€™s blog. So you have all these mean thoughts going on all the time and often, you have the same mean thoughts about the same person regularly. Like, your voice is so annoying when you sing that I have to leave the room. Stuff like that. Well, hereâ€™s a novel idea. Tell the person your meanest thoughts about them. Tell them all the things you donâ€™t like about them. Just get it all out on the table.</p>
<p>And you know what you find. You find itâ€™s fucking scary. You find itâ€™s the scariest thing you have ever done in your life, especially if you are a â€œniceâ€ or â€œspiritualâ€ person. And the reason that itâ€™s scary is that this willingness to be honest signals a willingness to let go of the person. You are finally accepting them as they are. Rather than accepting a part of them and hiding your hatred of all of their annoying parts, you are actually taking them in at face value. They actually know exactly what you think of them. And they are then in a more empowered place to choose how they want the relationship to continue, or to change, or to disappear.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Heistman</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/09/summers-last-great-watermelon-smashup/comment-page-1/#comment-84824</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Heistman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/09/summers-last-great-watermelon-smashup/#comment-84824</guid>
		<description>I'd watch your pumpkins around this guy a month from now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d watch your pumpkins around this guy a month from now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Svenson</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/09/summers-last-great-watermelon-smashup/comment-page-1/#comment-84822</link>
		<dc:creator>Svenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 08:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/09/summers-last-great-watermelon-smashup/#comment-84822</guid>
		<description>WE all deserve public humilation. Its the worst thing we can imagine, so we quietly shy away from it and go to church on Sunday to bow down before the image of God being publicly humiliated on a cross. 
We deserve what we get. I was watching the Republican presidential debates today, and it hit me, (via Guliani) what an incredibly demeaning and humiliating thing it is to run for president. People are going for your every personal weakness, and its all fair game while you try to maintain a shred of dignity and talk about insignificant things like your record as a leader.
We are all running for president. That is what we live, desparately trying to announce our record of services and good deeds while the world studies our genitals under a microscope, for evidence of evil. 
And we are all hopelessly attracted to scandal. Not real scandal, the kind that involves vast sums of money and is very complex, but the kind that involves cocks and pussies and wide stances in bathroom stalls and watermelons. We are not only attracted to hearing of these scandals, we are attracted to creating them, to being the center of attention, to finally having our facades destroyed and being publicly humiliated for being what we really are. This desparate desire leads us to do irrational things, like smashing watermelons against walls. It is those who must clean up the melon who must decide whether it is truly important to give the smasher what he wants in public humiliation, or to step beyond all the nonsense and recognize the perpetrator as a  desparate hungry fool, and refuse to give him what he really wants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WE all deserve public humilation. Its the worst thing we can imagine, so we quietly shy away from it and go to church on Sunday to bow down before the image of God being publicly humiliated on a cross.<br />
We deserve what we get. I was watching the Republican presidential debates today, and it hit me, (via Guliani) what an incredibly demeaning and humiliating thing it is to run for president. People are going for your every personal weakness, and its all fair game while you try to maintain a shred of dignity and talk about insignificant things like your record as a leader.<br />
We are all running for president. That is what we live, desparately trying to announce our record of services and good deeds while the world studies our genitals under a microscope, for evidence of evil.<br />
And we are all hopelessly attracted to scandal. Not real scandal, the kind that involves vast sums of money and is very complex, but the kind that involves cocks and pussies and wide stances in bathroom stalls and watermelons. We are not only attracted to hearing of these scandals, we are attracted to creating them, to being the center of attention, to finally having our facades destroyed and being publicly humiliated for being what we really are. This desparate desire leads us to do irrational things, like smashing watermelons against walls. It is those who must clean up the melon who must decide whether it is truly important to give the smasher what he wants in public humiliation, or to step beyond all the nonsense and recognize the perpetrator as a  desparate hungry fool, and refuse to give him what he really wants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shadow</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/09/summers-last-great-watermelon-smashup/comment-page-1/#comment-84821</link>
		<dc:creator>Shadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 06:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/09/summers-last-great-watermelon-smashup/#comment-84821</guid>
		<description>I went to a party a few years ago. Back then i was in an awful transition period. Looking back, i guess a part of me wanted to justify the reason why i didn't like those people by doing something that would incur their ridicule. I am not a hateful person after all, why do i hate them so? it must be because they never accepted who i am in the first place because i am a freak...so in order to prove this theory right, i did something to prove i was a freak....but little did i know i was Wrong and they were Right...they did accept me for who i was because i was acting like a fool so they would treat me like a fool right?...but in realising this, the cartesian point of realisation came to me that their Right was the greater Wrong because forming quick judgements in the face of aberrant behaviour is an incorrect response. The correct response is wonderment at the complexity that human beings are capable of. Quick praise or condemnation is intellectual or moral arrogance. But then again, much chaos and in the hearts and mind of these Shits and consequent sin was the the price of my discovery, so you know, i may just be an evil genius/selfish prick..In my defence though, you can't make an omelet without smashing a few eggs...or in this a paticular case...a watermelon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to a party a few years ago. Back then i was in an awful transition period. Looking back, i guess a part of me wanted to justify the reason why i didn&#8217;t like those people by doing something that would incur their ridicule. I am not a hateful person after all, why do i hate them so? it must be because they never accepted who i am in the first place because i am a freak&#8230;so in order to prove this theory right, i did something to prove i was a freak&#8230;.but little did i know i was Wrong and they were Right&#8230;they did accept me for who i was because i was acting like a fool so they would treat me like a fool right?&#8230;but in realising this, the cartesian point of realisation came to me that their Right was the greater Wrong because forming quick judgements in the face of aberrant behaviour is an incorrect response. The correct response is wonderment at the complexity that human beings are capable of. Quick praise or condemnation is intellectual or moral arrogance. But then again, much chaos and in the hearts and mind of these Shits and consequent sin was the the price of my discovery, so you know, i may just be an evil genius/selfish prick..In my defence though, you can&#8217;t make an omelet without smashing a few eggs&#8230;or in this a paticular case&#8230;a watermelon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/09/summers-last-great-watermelon-smashup/comment-page-1/#comment-84820</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 04:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/09/summers-last-great-watermelon-smashup/#comment-84820</guid>
		<description>Funny post. I know it was a watermelon, but you probably should have expected that kind of thing from a noise show anyway. He probably thought it was pretty goddamn "rock n roll" to blast a big piece of fruit against a wall. Who cleaned it up?

By the way, I only recently found this blog but I like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny post. I know it was a watermelon, but you probably should have expected that kind of thing from a noise show anyway. He probably thought it was pretty goddamn &#8220;rock n roll&#8221; to blast a big piece of fruit against a wall. Who cleaned it up?</p>
<p>By the way, I only recently found this blog but I like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/09/summers-last-great-watermelon-smashup/comment-page-1/#comment-84816</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 01:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/09/09/summers-last-great-watermelon-smashup/#comment-84816</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Garden_of_Jane_Delawney_%28album%29" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Garden of Jane Delawney&lt;/a&gt;, by 70's British psychedelic folk rockers, &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trees_%28folk_band%29" rel="nofollow"&gt;Trees&lt;/a&gt;. The first track is my favorite: absolutely beautiful.

http://www.sendspace.com/file/1jm6ne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Garden_of_Jane_Delawney_%28album%29" rel="nofollow">The Garden of Jane Delawney</a>, by 70&#8217;s British psychedelic folk rockers, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trees_%28folk_band%29" rel="nofollow">Trees</a>. The first track is my favorite: absolutely beautiful.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sendspace.com/file/1jm6ne" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.sendspace.com/file/1jm6ne'>http://www.sendspace.com/file/1jm6ne</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
