[tmbchr]™

Celebrity Protection Zones



Think of Los Angeles as a city-state based around protecting its business interests: entertainment money. Their laws are pitched so as to create a (somewhat) more favorable setting for those kinds of businesses to flourish. I think we’ll see a lot more of this kind of thing as nations balkanize into interest regions centered around various types of shared value communities and legal systems which spring up to protect and preserve them:

If you are a celebrity with a nose for trouble, here’s some advice: Stay within city limits or risk having your mug shot broadcast around the world.

Unlike Malibu, Santa Monica or Glendale, where law enforcement agencies release booking photos, the city of Los Angeles refuses to fork them over unless investigators decide a picture will help with a criminal investigation or they feel the public is in danger.







1 Reader Responses

  1. Tim Boucher Says:

    Tangentially related to privacy and controlling data flows:

    The Transparent Society: Will Technology Force us to Choose Between Privacy and Freedom?

    1. One party believes that another group is inherently dangerous, and its potential to do harm is exacerbated by secrecy. Therefore accountability must be forced upon that group through enhanced flow of information.

    2. Opponents argue that some vital good will be threatened by this heightened candor, and hence want the proposed data flow shut down.

    And:

    Say Everything: “As younger people reveal their private lives on the Internet, the older generation looks on with alarm and misapprehension not seen since the early days of rock and roll. The future belongs to the uninhibited.”



SURROUND YOURSELF WITH STRENGTH.