I worked as a computer consultant with AT&T from 98-01.
After fixing their 2000 issues on the HR systems, next order of business was the “secret” project. Secret meaning we couldn’t tell the salaried AT&T folks about it.
Essentially the AT&T project entailed coding the employees into one of these business divisions: Local & Long distance, wireless phone, internet, r&d, and one other one I can’t remember. The plan was to split off each of these businesses, with wireless being the one spun off first (layoffs/realignments and employee benefit changes coming later with our analysis lending a hand).
Hell broke loose when AT&T spun off Wireless. The going price of the wireless stock was $20, which the employees were granted based on the stock options or stock benefits they received as group ownership (some just buying at the start), but within a month and all the way for the next 6 months, the stock never hit above $15.
AT&T is a very well run organization, probably the best I’ve worked at, with a strong focus on planning being ones of the keys. However, they will work the system with long range planning that’s *confusing* in certain eyes. “All your bases are belong to us”.
However, they will work the system with long range planning that’s *confusing* in certain eyes.
I totally know what you’re saying: certain plans look foolish when viewed at the improper scale. In fact, making your plans look foolish is, in itself, a highly important element of strategy. Sun Tzu calls war the “art of deception” after all.
Public Domain Where Applicable, Copy Left Where Not, Universal Free Realms Everyware Else for 2009 and for forever.the timboucher experience. No rights reserved.
2 Comments
I worked as a computer consultant with AT&T from 98-01.
After fixing their 2000 issues on the HR systems, next order of business was the “secret” project. Secret meaning we couldn’t tell the salaried AT&T folks about it.
Essentially the AT&T project entailed coding the employees into one of these business divisions: Local & Long distance, wireless phone, internet, r&d, and one other one I can’t remember. The plan was to split off each of these businesses, with wireless being the one spun off first (layoffs/realignments and employee benefit changes coming later with our analysis lending a hand).
Hell broke loose when AT&T spun off Wireless. The going price of the wireless stock was $20, which the employees were granted based on the stock options or stock benefits they received as group ownership (some just buying at the start), but within a month and all the way for the next 6 months, the stock never hit above $15.
AT&T is a very well run organization, probably the best I’ve worked at, with a strong focus on planning being ones of the keys. However, they will work the system with long range planning that’s *confusing* in certain eyes. “All your bases are belong to us”.
I totally know what you’re saying: certain plans look foolish when viewed at the improper scale. In fact, making your plans look foolish is, in itself, a highly important element of strategy. Sun Tzu calls war the “art of deception” after all.