<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&#038;T: The T-1000 of Corporations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/10/24/att-the-t-1000-of-corporations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/10/24/att-the-t-1000-of-corporations/</link>
	<description>public domain playground. friendly entities welcome.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boucher</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/10/24/att-the-t-1000-of-corporations/comment-page-1/#comment-86410</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/10/24/att-the-t-1000-of-corporations/#comment-86410</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;However, they will work the system with long range planning thatâ€™s *confusing* in certain eyes.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I totally know what you're saying: certain plans look foolish when viewed at the improper scale. In fact, making your plans look foolish is, in itself, a highly important element of strategy. Sun Tzu calls war the "art of deception" after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>However, they will work the system with long range planning thatâ€™s *confusing* in certain eyes.</p></blockquote>
<p>I totally know what you&#8217;re saying: certain plans look foolish when viewed at the improper scale. In fact, making your plans look foolish is, in itself, a highly important element of strategy. Sun Tzu calls war the &#8220;art of deception&#8221; after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jet</title>
		<link>http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/10/24/att-the-t-1000-of-corporations/comment-page-1/#comment-86409</link>
		<dc:creator>jet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2007/10/24/att-the-t-1000-of-corporations/#comment-86409</guid>
		<description>I worked as a computer consultant with AT&#38;T from 98-01.  

After fixing their 2000 issues on the HR systems, next order of business was the "secret" project.  Secret meaning we couldn't tell the salaried AT&#38;T folks about it.  

Essentially the AT&#38;T project entailed coding the employees into one of these business divisions:  Local &#38; Long distance, wireless phone, internet, r&#38;d, and one other one I can't remember.  The plan was to split off each of these businesses, with wireless being the one spun off first (layoffs/realignments and employee benefit changes coming later with our analysis lending a hand).  
Hell broke loose when AT&#38;T spun off Wireless.  The going price of the wireless stock was $20, which the employees were granted based on the stock options or stock benefits they received as group ownership (some just buying at the start), but within a month and all the way for the next 6 months, the stock never hit above $15.  

AT&#38;T is a very well run organization, probably the best I've worked at, with a strong focus on planning being ones of the keys.  However, they will work the system with long range planning that's *confusing* in certain eyes.  "All your bases are belong to us".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I worked as a computer consultant with AT&amp;T from 98-01.  </p>
<p>After fixing their 2000 issues on the HR systems, next order of business was the &#8220;secret&#8221; project.  Secret meaning we couldn&#8217;t tell the salaried AT&amp;T folks about it.  </p>
<p>Essentially the AT&amp;T project entailed coding the employees into one of these business divisions:  Local &amp; Long distance, wireless phone, internet, r&amp;d, and one other one I can&#8217;t remember.  The plan was to split off each of these businesses, with wireless being the one spun off first (layoffs/realignments and employee benefit changes coming later with our analysis lending a hand).<br />
Hell broke loose when AT&amp;T spun off Wireless.  The going price of the wireless stock was $20, which the employees were granted based on the stock options or stock benefits they received as group ownership (some just buying at the start), but within a month and all the way for the next 6 months, the stock never hit above $15.  </p>
<p>AT&amp;T is a very well run organization, probably the best I&#8217;ve worked at, with a strong focus on planning being ones of the keys.  However, they will work the system with long range planning that&#8217;s *confusing* in certain eyes.  &#8220;All your bases are belong to us&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
