These two terms are quite interesting, wouldn’t you say?
Cultural diplomacy is a part of diplomacy. It alludes to a new way of making diplomacy by involving new non governmental and non professional actors in the making of diplomacy. In the frame of globalization, culture plays a major role in the definition of identity and in the relations between people. Joseph Nye points out the importance of having a soft power besides a hard power. When classical diplomacy fails, a better knowledge can help bridging the gap between different cultures. Cultural diplomacy becomes a subject of academic studies based on historical essays on the United States, Europe, and the Cold War.
And:
In politics , it describes someone who informally explains the views of a government and also can relay messages back to a government. Unlike a spokesperson, an interlocutor often has no formal position within a government or any formal authority to speak on its behalf, and even when he does, everything an interlocutor says is his own personal opinion and not the official view of anyone. Because an interlocutor does not express an official view, communications between interlocutors are often useful at conveying information and ideas.
- END -
ASSOCIATED CONTENT BY TIM BOUCHER (Auto-Generated)
- Diplomats & Trade Goods
- Positive Effects of Coming Economic Depression!
- Last year they called it ubiquitous surveillance
- Text, Subtext & Context
- Detect Context Automatically; Traversing Reference Point Nodes, Associative Search

One Trackback
[...] Interestingly, interlocutor is also a term in cultural diplomacy. [...]