Those Poor Misunderstood Illuminati
The Illuminati, I’m prepared to say, are woefully misunderstood. How exactly it all happened, I’m not sure. But somewhere along the line, public perception of the mysterious group and Illuminism, the philosophical ideal behind it, got ridiculously entangled with just about every kind of conspiracy theory out there. Untangling all those strands is a project for another time, but what I’d like to do here is offer my own unique perspective on what the Illuminati were/are all about.
I’ve only recently come to this theoretical explanation of Illuminism, and I’m more than open to being corrected and further “enlightened” on the subject, but here goes. The points which fired off these connections for me come from the Wikipedia description of Minsky’s Society of Mind:
Society of Mind
The society of mind theory views the human mind and any other naturally evolved cognitive systems as a vast society of individually simple processes known as agents. These processes are the fundamental thinking entities from which minds are built, and together produce the many abilities we attribute to minds.
Compare to Jane Robert’s ‘Seth teachings’ about the mind:
“Each personality contains an inner civilization of the self which he yearns to govern … The ego rises from the civilization of the psyche just as a leader rises from the masses of the people; appointed, chosen, or taking control according to an inner politics first existing within the greater inner mind.â€
Of Gods, Demons & Men
Mix into that some Jungian psychology, by way of Erich Von Neumann:
Originally, consciousness did not possess enough free libido to perform any activity - plowing, harvesting, hunting, waging war, etc - of its own “free will,†and was obliged to invoke the help of the god who “understood†these things. By means of ceremonial invocation, the ego activated the “help of the god†and thus conducted the flow of libido from the unconscious to the conscious system. The progressive development of consciousness assimilates the functional gods, who go on living as qualities and capacities of the conscious individual who plows, harvests, hunts and wages war as and when he pleases.
Throw in some Aleister Crowley for good measure:
The spirits of the Goetia are portions of the human brain.
Their seals therefore represent … methods of stimulating or regulating those particular spots, (through the eye).
And then there’s the Gurdjieff parable of The Horse, Carriage and Driver, of which this is a depiction of the disharmonious state of the ordinary mind {See also: Ruiz’ mitote mind}:
The state of drunkenness depicts the typical condition of our human minds. It stands for kind of imagining perception, which is based on sensory perception, past trauma, future expectations, the constant flow of mental images and how we identify ourselves by our job, relationships, possessions, monetary value etc. In our “drunkenness” we mechanically shift from one sub-personality to the next, reacting to perceived influence that affect the image of our personal sovereignty. We are under the illusion that we are masters of ourselves and of our destiny, when in fact these three basic components of our being are not at all in harmonious relationship with each other. Body, emotion, and mind are kept out of balance and unsynchronized as the illusion of control flip-flops form one component to another.
Multi-Agent Mind
So what trends are we seeing across these traditions? We are seeing a depiction of the human mind as being composed of a multitude of components, agents, segments, gods, sub-personalities, demons, drives, etc. In just about all the esoteric systems referenced above, the individual is lead through a process - usually symbolic - which enables them to gain control over these many - often conflicting - voices and impulses within the mind. Jung directly talked about this as well with a practice he called active imagination, wherein he would identify these individual impulses within his own mind, objectify them as character/entities, and then intentionally interact with them as though they were external to him.
The Jane Roberts quote is, I think, one of the best in this group for explaining how that concept bridges into the Illuminati. Again: “The ego rises from the civilization of the psyche just as a leader rises from the masses of the people; appointed, chosen, or taking control according to an inner politics first existing within the greater inner mind.”
Inner Union
From what I have read of Illuminati philosophy and writings, they *seem* to be pointing to the same thing: an inner process whereby the individual’s mind is liberated from disharmony through the yoking (yoga) together of these warring groups. For the Illuminati, their symbolic container for this process was a striving against the control of centralized religion over the lives of men. The flowering of this trend among learned individuals who went through the process of Self-Actualization within approximately the context outlined above brought to us nothing less than the Age of Enlightenment, Natural Law, the Industrial Revolution, the Modern Age, and the founding of the United States of America {See also: Freemasonry}.
As a result, they actually seem to have set the clock back to principles which flourished in Ancient Greece, Rome and the Near East. From writings connected to the Illuminati (supposedly):
Natural Law Restored (Dr. Bronner’s Moral ABC)
Jesus Christ established no new religion; he would only set religion and reason in their ancient rights. For this purpose he would unite men in a common bond. He would fit them for this by spreading a just morality, by enlightening the understanding, and by assisting the mind to shake off all prejudices. He would teach all men, in the first place, to govern themselves. Rulers would then be needless, and equality and liberty would take place without any revolution, by the natural and gentle operation of reason and expediency.
It’s actually quite a beautiful, elegant philosophy - as I understand it, anyway. What I see as happening is something like this - and this is based solely on my own experiences and corresponding research I have done:
How It Works (Tentative Explanation)
- On account of cultural conditioning, the natural mind is thrown out of balance by growing up and “learning” and conforming to societal standards. Cultures whitewash authentic sense data with mental, physical and emotional habits which promote the healthy functioning of the social order, and bend the individual to fit within that particular system.
- In most (many? These are all just estimates…) cases, this results in a personality which is easily manipulable by whatever the dominant power is culturally. Cultural leaders can use symbols which human nervous systems have been imprinted with in order to motivate specific types of behavior. Depending on how well and judiciously that’s done, there may arise a conflict: the individual is not a happy, healthy, functioning member of society. They become alienated, listless, confused, disoriented, thrown out of intent/action harmony. Their mind enters into a state of chaos.
- The chaos and pain becomes so great or overwhelming that it must be beaten, or death may ensue {See: rockstar suicides}. Various esoteric systems exist to overcome this chaos. The simplest, most direct, and effective one I’ve seen is Miguel Ruiz’s Four Agreements. His system is all about analyzing the agreements and assumptions which govern our behavior, and seeing how they bring conflict into our lives, and writing with ourselves new agreements about how we can be {See also: Gathertogetherin musical, script-writing}
- As this process begins to work, the individual feels an extraordinary burst or explosion of creative energy. This has to do with the fact that much of our psychic energy is used to build and maintain walls between ourselves, our experiences, emotions, etc. When those walls are removed, the authentic human is revealed - illuminated, enlightened, whatever you want to call it.
- This state seems to be characterized by a higher-order functioning of the mind, organization and creative ability. This is where “genius” comes from: people who are able to make super-human leaps in knowledge and understanding, because the habitual routines of culture have been stripped away from their perceptions, so that they can see things as they actually are, and envision how they could become. This is also where prophets seem to come from - people who have a direct hotline to “God”.
- Also typical to this state of mind seems to be a leap to another level of interacting with people: you begin to withdraw your projections of what other people seem to be and allow them to simply be as they really are. You become 100x more honest, more effective, and better able to communicate. This makes you become completely up front about your expectations with other people, and leads you into areas like social contracts, agreements governing interactions between people, voluntary associations, etc. In other words, all the things that the United States was actually founded on: Illuminati and Freemasonic ideals that men can and should govern themselves, that they have the right to do that and that society exists as an agreement which we can amend as needed. Like I said, I think it’s a beautiful philosophy and I frankly don’t see what is supposed to be so damned scary and conspiratorial about it.
The take-away point I’m trying to make with all that: that one who has mastered oneself has achieved a harmonious union within their mind and inner experience, which they then bring to bear on their interactions with other people. The “virus” spreads from person to person by example, by effective and authentic communication, by teaching and by agreement. And before you know it, you have a whole bunch of sovereign individuals running around, making agreements with one another, creating cool projects and enhancing the experience of everyone their shared value community.
And if that’s what it means to be a member of the Illuminati, then totally sign me up - because that’s the way life should be as far as I can tell!
PS. While we’re at it, here’s an ad for a nice Illuminati-influence media adventure franchise, which is so overt and corny in its symbolism that it actually makes me a feel a little swell of ridiculous national pride:
- END -
ASSOCIATED CONTENT @TMBCHR (Auto-Generated)
- Are the Illuminati Gnostics?
- Hermetic Order of the Silver Twilight
- Tips for Nomads
- Your New Motto
- SOCIAL ISOLATION NETWORK

17 Comments
Well, hell man! I have to digest this between the eye post and will be (potentially) away before your 5 freaking day rule…I wanted to get this in:
I think you fucking got it!
And so well put! (I’m thinking, if a guy as sharp as Tim sees it the way I’ve come to see it, we might be on to right Path…)
THIS is so often overlooked nowadays, neglected, belittled…
and how can it NOT lead to this?? These two points hit me hard when I finally understood what this means. It has changed my outlook on EVERYTHING. That and having a baby on the way in 10 short weeks, my new understanding of marriage, and friendship and running my business, what it means to be a member of a community and etc.
You could throw alchemy into the mix, which I suppose is what Jung did. The alchemical marriage…
Re: Point numero #3, what I find effective is a conscious “shift” of energy, or hmmm…a pushing ever so gently (a little shove, a nudge–not too hard at least in my case the risk of boiling over in alchemical speak…) into a more appropriate direction.
And so, I can relate to your “what the hell happened to me” post.
This might sound weird to some people here, and I’m not inclined to say more about it, but a few RS Clymer books is really what it took to get me on track, and from there the rest is intentional, honest, as you sow so shall you reap, simple, natural living, perseverance and patience and practice.
and then, the whole “neediness” thing falls away. Not to say one doesn’t have needs and desires. Needs are different than being needy. Reciprocity is at play in all of this.
At least this is my TASTE of it…I am still way too much of a distracted knucklehead at times.
I love you, man, for this and so many other posts!
hmmm…that Jane quote kicks ass.
but not in the way one might think. Just flat out giving and sharing. Neediness is a type of congestion.
Hey, I love you too! That’s awesome because you can hear the genuine nature of what you’re saying come through.
This I love:
Wicked!
Yes, with absolutely no expectation of any return. Caritas. Universal Love Value.
PS. It seems shady as fuck to me that Illuminati has somehow come to = New World Order. The two philosophies have gotten inextricably intertwined.
I think the way the NWO interlocutors frame the subject is that “Bankers Are Evil” because bankers advocate the old-system: private ownership of wealth. Then they pull in cultural historical divides between classes, continue associating the Jews with finance (because the Christians used them to do their dirty work in Medieval Times, as a sort of untouchable caste)… blah blah blah modern conspiracy theory in a nutshell unravels.
This is my take on how groups and individuals become corrupted and eventually oppose their original purpose. The quick summary is keep your friends close and your enemies closer. There’s some theory I don’t know the name of about people/groups/nations coming to resemble their strogest competitors.
I start a secret society. Somebody figures it out. (Joe didn’t do that on his own, he doesn’t care, Julia had a hand in this. She couldn’t have figured out X, Brian told her. They do all go to the same restaurant on Thursdays. Hmm.) The priesthood/aristocracy/secret police value this info but I might value my secrecy more. I can’t pay blackmail for the rest of my life so, being clever, I form an alliance. I learn new tricks from my new partners and they learn my weaknesses and exploit them. I need increasingly secret secrets to compete. Just knowing some of these things makes me guilty for not telling the authorities. Now I have become corrupted. I have to ignore heinous situations in order to keep what I value and pass it along to future generations.
I think the biggest reason for the success of the American Revolution was the distance of America from Europe. The plotters were under surveilance by people whose reports didn’t make to the Crown for over a month. Social pressures were for progress because England had blocked progress. (For example, we were not allowed to import certain tools and tool making machines.) Those pressures overrode the patriotism most citizens felt for England, at the time a money/resource leech on this continent like all other European powers. Plus the Founding Fathers were extraordinary men. That always helps.
Tim, I think this may be your most incredible post yet, and it has the ring of truth. I read it earlier and I’ve been thinking about it all day.
The main I’m obsessing on is this: So you’ve got this group that had to be born in secrecy do to religious persecution, but it eventually rises to such prominence and power that it creates all these revolutions of thoughts and even begins the United states, a place so tolerant of diverse thought and religions that it spawns many imitators, and eventually becomes a place where even a group like the Church of Satan can operate openly…Yet something is missing: Why didn’t the illuminati come out of the closet when the coast was clear? Why weren’t these ideas integrated into our mainstream cultural beliefs?
To me, this is THE question. Its simply huge. Its not about the power of the illuminati or whatever so much as it is about the huge gaping hole in our culture where illuminism should be. I mean, what is it? Its a system that prescribes morality like religion, connects us to the universe like spirituality, and adheres to reason like science, in a unified way. Yet when I look at our culture I see no such thing, just a gaping chasm. On one side you have retard religion that denies the basic facts of science, and on the other you have completly amoral science that fixates on what COULD be done without any framework to suggest what SHOULD be done…And where is the illumism, to guide the science with ethical principles and direct the religious ideas of right and wrong in a way that makes sense in this industrial scientific world? Its simply not there. So now the very liberties that were established by these people in the Bill of Rights, like the 4th ammendment, and being stripped away from us. Why? Because of the fear that adherants of retard religion will attain the fruits of amoral science. (Jihadis with Nukes) But where is the middle ground? Where is the illumism to deradicalize the religions, and guide the scientists not do make things like WMDs in the first place?
Its like an egg that won’t hatch or a baby that refuses to be born; when its young and forming, it makes sense that it be hidden away in the womb, that it be secret. But eventually, when its strong enough, and its safe, it needs to come out into the light of the sun. This hasn’t happened with illuminism, and I don’t know why. I don’t even care to speculate right now why that is. But all I know is that its needed…we need an open illuminati NOW!
(By the way, speaking of openness and clarity, I love the new start page on your site, which suggest to me both)
Some big ideas here!
The whole ’society of mind’ idea rings true… I sense that entities like this exist. Some may be personal, some may be societal and archetypal. I don’t see them as angels or demons per se.
The question, I think, is when you’re aware of these things, what do you do about them? Some would attempt to destroy them, I’m sure. Or if you believe Osbert Sitwell’s take on the fall of Babylon, the Babylonians worshipped them and this division of the divine into many little bits directly resulted in the division of Belshazzar’s kingdom (shortly after the incident with the writing on the wall). A middle way, then, is to be advised…
I agree, genius often seems to be just about seeing clearly.
Why are these things hidden? Why no happy blending of the spiritual and the material? Why no clarity of vision?
I don’t know for sure, but it’s seemed to me for a while now that Something big, bad and ugly is actively doing the hiding, and to simply confront that head on might be a bad idea.
…so I read the phrase Multi-Agent Mind and this:
…active imagination, wherein he would identify these individual impulses within his own mind, objectify them as character/entities, and then intentionally interact with them as though they were external to him.
…seems like the synopsis of the Matrix Trilogy.
…appointed, chosen, or taking control according to an inner politics first existing within the greater inner mind.
Yep. Neo = the Source, of course. There is no spoon, of course.
Everyone’s made of little green glyphs!
Belabouring cultural metaphors? Priceless.
ha! there should be 2 more pretty blue boxes in there somewhere.
Svenson, you’re not kidding; that’s totally THE question.
and speedbird with the illumination. it makes perfect sense… it’s a graphic novel:
1) superhero hides from people and villain for own safety
2) villian hides from people and hero for same reason
3) villian impersonates hero, makes people think hero is bad
4) people work with villian to help protect themselves from hero
5) people wonder where the fuck are the all the heroes?
how does the hero escape this trick? confront the villian head on, ugly be damned.
and if this is one of those po-mo stories where the hero is dead? remember, remember the 5th of november!
> how does the hero escape this trick? confront the villian head on, ugly be damned.
Yeah, you’re probably right!
… Classic archetype stuff
But surely first the hero has to defeat his inner demons or something like that, right? Hero has to lose faith in self, reach rock bottom, get chucked out of his apatrment, /grow a beard/… then some sort of realisation will be achieved… ?
You’re talking bout Tim?
Yes, the dark knight of the soul and all that. Then this:
Magic. All we need are numbers and we’ve got our own damn illuminati. And the beauty of it is that all we really have to do is be nice.
So nice that we can’t possibly be demonised, so numerous that ‘they’ can’t possibly hide us all!
Wow, that’s a good take.
So how did the illuminism/freemasonic vision of equality, fraternity, science, and freedom get schismed, anyway?
And after this dissolution, shouldn’t there be a potential for coagulation and transmutation into a more perfected form of illuminism?
> You’re talking bout Tim?
Er… no, not deliberately. But then I remembered the photo on the front page of this site and thought a big ‘oops’. Nothing personal, honest!
I wrote ‘defeat his inner demons’ back there…
but I think rather it’s ‘make peace with’, and they ain’t demons, there more like the inhabitants of the society of mind.
And then it’s more like a videogame, cos at that point the end-of-level baddie will become apparent…
They were: it’s called media! These ideas are anything but hidden. But they do have a competitor who has equally powerful media backing.
Open-source Illuminism!
Solomon bound them to build his temple.
Simply because our perception has been clouded, not because these things are really hidden. They are everywhere you look.
No societal change can occur until each man or woman corrects first himself.
Yes! Be good to one another. Put others first. Get out of your own damn way.
Hey, I resemble the beard remark!
Alliances must be made, pacts drawn up, oaths of fealty uttered in the dark basements of the heart and mind.
The end-level boss is paranoia, who draws you into the last trap, the “Don’t be paranoid” trap which is a negative command forcing you into oblivion. Must be replaced with a positive command, a la Rob Breszny: “The universe is conspiring to help me.”
The other danger that arises: the Devil induces you to sin by flattering you and making you feel powerful, and therefore induces fear of losing that power. Hence Jesus’ command to give away all your possessions is a practical one: empty yourself of all delusions of and striving towards power at every turn and in every action you take. The Sufis say he who sleeps on the floor cannot fall out of bed.
Their not hidden to people like you who read between the lines with media, but try this: Right down the core tenents of illuminism and show them to people. See how many recognize them as something they take for granted and have learned from media like TV. I would be surprised to see that many have.
> Alliances must be made, pacts drawn up, oaths of fealty uttered in the dark basements of the heart and mind.
I’m not sure there are any true binding incantations, only trust…
> our perception has been clouded
I agree completely…
> The end-level boss is paranoia
Now that’s interesting. I’m going to have to go away and think about that one.
One Trackback
[...] Let’s say, hypothetically, that you have suddenly become enlightened somehow or other. Now what? [...]