True Art Has No Author

LOVE Skip’s comment here:

One of my teachers back in school talked about some art movement (or was it his own personal belief) that “true art” — or whatever — should have no need for the artist’s name to be ascribed to it. “The right doing of what needs to be done,” the quote I attached to the memory.


- END -

ASSOCIATED CONTENT @TMBCHR (Auto-Generated)

This entry was written by happy thanksgiving, y'all!, posted on March 6, 2008 at 12:03 pm.

permalink.

RSS feed for this post.

Comments are closed, but you can leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

2 Comments

  1. nitro2k01
    Posted March 8, 2008 at 9:33 pm | Permalink

    I can agree with statement. The art I mostly consume is music, and for the most skilled artists, I can immediately recognize their style.
    (Note: I’m not don’t hesitating a second to call musicians artists)

  2. Russellji
    Posted March 9, 2008 at 3:57 am | Permalink

    Reminds me a bit of U.G. Krishnamurti:-

    “My teaching, if that is the word you want to use, has no copyright. You are free to reproduce, distribute, interpret, misinterpret, distort, garble, do what you like, even claim authorship, without my consent or the permission of anybody.”

One Trackback

  1. By Understanding The Psalms of King David - [tmbchr]â„¢ on March 6, 2008 at 12:58 pm

    [...] The authorship of the Book of Psalms in the Old Testament is classically attributed to King David. They consist of poetic lamentations and exaltations for all of Life’s ups and downs, and thankfulness simply for the fullness of Life’s experience. [...]

Public Domain Where Applicable, Copy Left Where Not, Universal Free Realms Everyware Else for 2009 and for forever.the timboucher experience. No rights reserved.