[tmbchr]™

The current scoop about frank sinatra CD



I don’t get what this latest wave of spam attacks is. Well, I don’t consider it attacks so much ever since I gave the contents of this web domain to the Public Domain. I actually consider it a form of authorized usage, and actual proof that you can make a living, ie generate value, by chopping up and re-using my content in various waves. The latest trend I’ve noticed with them, though, is this: chunking out blocks of contiguous content, pasting them into a post title which is unrelated, and then having a second page title which is unrelated on a third dimension. And then the fourth layer is the previous posts (clustering of sequentially-ordered nodes), which all seem unrelated on any other level, simply, than “product names” perhaps.

This type of keyword genetics is relatively foreign to me, though it builds upon previous types which tended to have related keywords in at least 3 out of 4 of those axes as described above. This one seems to be going for more of a cutting strategy, which I tend to believe would flatten out expression of meaning in a search engine.







4 Reader Responses

  1. ian Says:

    This was the last of the recent posts I got around to reading today (on my lunch break), and as soon as I closed my browser, I got an email from my boss with
    this link.

    Seeing your general dislike of Google, and the common(ish) theme of generating value by reusing content, I thought I might as well come back and share. The key phrase in the article was “If you use it to load Google Docs and write a book, then the book belongs to Google.”

  2. Big Elk Says:

    Your link is empty, yo!

  3. ian Says:

    Well damn.

    Here is again, in it’s full glory:

    http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/why-google-browser/story.aspx?guid={7EEC2F03-A7B7-42CC-AD1B-3B1B21AD3257}&dist=msr_1

    just in case

  4. ian Says:

    Guess the link’s too long. Cut and paste the whole thing and it will work.



SURROUND YOURSELF WITH STRENGTH.