http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2008/09/13/the-scientific-rationale-behind-total-surveillance/ public domain playground. friendly entities welcome. Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:15:59 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2008/09/13/the-scientific-rationale-behind-total-surveillance/comment-page-1/#comment-112004 Big Elk Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:30:19 +0000 http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2008/09/13/the-scientific-rationale-behind-total-surveillance/#comment-112004 wisdom of insecurity wisdom of insecurity

]]> http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2008/09/13/the-scientific-rationale-behind-total-surveillance/comment-page-1/#comment-112003 Sean Sun, 14 Sep 2008 15:49:24 +0000 http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2008/09/13/the-scientific-rationale-behind-total-surveillance/#comment-112003 Hey wait, WHICH Alan Watt's book? Hey wait, WHICH Alan Watt’s book?

]]> http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2008/09/13/the-scientific-rationale-behind-total-surveillance/comment-page-1/#comment-111985 MickeyR Sun, 14 Sep 2008 03:58:47 +0000 http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2008/09/13/the-scientific-rationale-behind-total-surveillance/#comment-111985 Also brings to mind something from a William Burroughs audio piece. "Is Control controlled by it's need to control? Answer: Yes." Also brings to mind something from a William Burroughs audio piece. “Is Control controlled by it’s need to control? Answer: Yes.”

]]> http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2008/09/13/the-scientific-rationale-behind-total-surveillance/comment-page-1/#comment-111984 The Necromancer Sat, 13 Sep 2008 22:00:43 +0000 http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2008/09/13/the-scientific-rationale-behind-total-surveillance/#comment-111984 Makes me think of that guy Laplace in the 18th century who thought you could predict all possible outcomes in an ideal Newtonian system. Forget Alan Watts, haven't any of these MIT dudes ever heard of vitalism? Obsolete, perhaps, but not sure of that...Besides, I'm with the Copenhagen boys -- the universe at the quantum level will always be ultimately unpredictable and illusive. Control is an illusion! Makes me think of that guy Laplace in the 18th century who thought you could predict all possible outcomes in an ideal Newtonian system. Forget Alan Watts, haven’t any of these MIT dudes ever heard of vitalism? Obsolete, perhaps, but not sure of that…Besides, I’m with the Copenhagen boys — the universe at the quantum level will always be ultimately unpredictable and illusive. Control is an illusion!

]]>