F#! Wealth Re-Distribution

Aren’t people harping on that statement still in the media? I heard that on the news or somthin. I think we’re going to have bigger fish to fry/this would be an easy way to pull over wealth re-distribution: forced population re-distribution, because of natural, ecological or other factors. Then you just take their land and money. Seems like an easy scenario to cook up in this bioterrorist-plagued world of ours. Be on the lookout for eminent domain style land snatch-ups, annexations of weaker states with the public attempt to make it look like you’re helping to correct their failed state or region.


- END -

ASSOCIATED CONTENT @TMBCHR (Auto-Generated)

This entry was written by happy thanksgiving, y'all!, posted on October 30, 2008 at 12:57 am.

permalink.

RSS feed for this post.

Comments are closed, but you can leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

3 Comments

  1. Bret
    Posted October 30, 2008 at 11:52 am | Permalink

    They would be snatching urban areas first then

  2. Big Elk
    Posted October 30, 2008 at 3:33 pm | Permalink

    You know it sister! Move the ’survivors’ out to camps… Send in mercenaries to flush out hangers-on… They already did with Katrina. The model’s all right there.

    Some relevant links for thoughtfood

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_transfer
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diaspora
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_detention
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Displaced_persons_camp
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_refugees

  3. Big Elk
    Posted October 31, 2008 at 9:51 am | Permalink

    California to cut water deliveries to cities, farms

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081031/ap_on_re_us/california_water#full

Public Domain Where Applicable, Copy Left Where Not, Universal Free Realms Everyware Else for 2009 and for forever.the timboucher experience. No rights reserved.