I have a theory that roughly coincides with this description of the Akashic Record, namely that the Pharaohs didn’t just enter the tomb world when they became mummies, but that they were part of a shamanic spiritual tradition in which they could transit between worlds in waking life. I don’t have any actual proof though, but its a fun line of conjecture:
“It is possible for one to be on the brink between life and death, to peer into the spiritual realm, to peer into the anti-matter realm, and to see that realm enough to read things that are not discernible when fully in the physical realm. This Awareness indicates that as entities move into a sleep state they are approaching that anti-matter realm and are closer to that anti-matter realm than are those who are fully into the awakened state, that which you call consciousness. This Awareness indicates that entities who enter into these near death experiences, they are reading the Akashic Record or spirit record, reflecting and seeing their lives unfolding in a kind of a backward motion, whereby they look and see themselves in what may be likened unto a mental movie and they can quickly discern all of the mistakes and errors.”
- END -
ASSOCIATED CONTENT @TMBCHR (Auto-Generated)
- “States” of Consciousness
- Legal DMT
- Raising Consciousness
- Hold Your Breath Until You Pass Out
- Sharing dreams
16 Comments
http://www.crystalinks.com/akashicrecords.html
This line of thought intrigues me.
I always felt that the DMT experience was the access of the noosphere. Gaining access to the universal library of symbols is a refreshing and changing force.
Are you proposing, in some way, that the kings were shaman-kings? Bringing back knowledge from the edge to help them rule…pulling data from the ancestors to better strengthen their rule?
Yeah, pretty much!
http://highintelligence.com/OS%20012%20basic.html
The people into that Merkaba stuff, that give workshops, a Guy calling himself Melchizedek and his bunch, that’s there theory also.
They give “Flower of Life” seminars. There is a Book “Nothing in this book is true, but its exactly the way tings are” the author is involved with them.
You should check it out. My impression of them is that they are kind of suspect, but have gotten hold of some legit esoteric truth and are “ka-chinging” it.
But anyway I think its definately true. The pyramids were a Mystery school.
And that’s kind of how it works. It had big sensory deprivation chambers and other stuff in it. They aren’t really tombs, more like Universities.
So were the Caves with the Cave paintings. They were mystery schools too. The cave men didn’t live there. They went there for sensory deprivation so they could achieve out of body experiences.
That’s the whole point of existence on Earth to reach Godhood. That’s the whole point of having aristocratic classes. They are to be the graduating class.
I guess what bugs me about this Melchizedek guy is that he writes like he is trying to explain something to a four year old.
So you get a several magnitudes dumbed down version of what seems like the truth. Plus he claims to be a the Actual Melchizadek or something.
But I’m convinced that’s how it was. Resources were allocated to to get these ruling Egyptian familes to reach Immortality. It was a big deal. It should be a big deal. its the purpose of existence.
Most of the Egyptology in the History books are a cover up.
This definitely rings true with my way of looking at things!
This is so not uncommon that you have to look at why it occurs… In my mind, when you venture deep deep deep into the realms of the archetypes and universal truths, you become possessed by them, and they use you as an agent of their expression into the world of forms. You, in a certain sense, literally do *become* that thing, though there can be many expressions, many avatars of a given energetic thoughtform
I havent written about it yet, but I recently had a dream that was about this same thing still going on today, and dark rituals and practices which support it. The dream even gave me a family name / legacy to look into. The Hanovers.
Hanover is a royal house. The House of Hanover. They used to be the British Royal Family, but now its a different family or something like that.
Nowadays they just seem like a bunch of effete debauched inbreds. There is some prince that keeps getting photographed urinating in public.
Could be something to it though, maybe there is some underground branch of the family out of the public eye.
This Drunvalo Melchizedek guy and his bunch might not be all bad.
I don’t want to be overcritical. But I feel like, you can’t just take peoples word for stuff. You know like a “just so” story? I think that’s what these Zen masters are getting at. You can’t just tell people stuff. Like “This is what enlightenment is. Remember it. There will be a quiz”
Zen masters obviously don’t do that.
Because you have to discover the truth for yourself. So this Drunvalo guy has all this info on sacred geometry and alternative history that kind of rings true, but I can’t just take his word for it. Plus he writes like “Sacred Geometry for Dummies, child version”
Its a good intention maybe, but when you dumb info down it gets degraded. But I’m convinced he’s not totally full of crap. Its just that I would rather read his source material.
It seems like his source material must be the real secret shit.
Sacred Geometry is the shit. Seriously. Its a really big deal. Plato thought it was a big deal. Pythagoras, DaVinci, Kabbalists etc etc.
you can illustrate the six days of creation with multiplying circles. This is an ancient, ancient illustration that predicted How cells form in the Womb, turning a zygote into a fetus.
The zygote follows the pattern of the six days of creation.
You can unlock all the patterns of the Universe with sacred geometry. I’m convinced.
But you aren’t going to get anything from Drunvalo’s foot notes. See what I am getting at? Because he’s 400, 000 years old or whatever.
See how that is annoying?
Long story short, I bought this guy Drunvalo’s book on the “Flower of Life” and it opened my eyes to sacred geometry but I ended up selling it to a used bookstore because of the annoying things I mentioned.
I am looking for a good book on sacred geometry, without all the BS.
This link looks really promising:
http://www.constructingtheuniverse.com/
cHECK OUT THESE MANDALAS!
http://www.constructingtheuniverse.com/Chartres%20Window.html
The mathematical purity of the sacred space geometry is hard to replicate.
I dig the Grant Morrison approach to The Crack — hardly an original idea, I just liked his treatment the most. The Universe is a very turbulent place, and we see sacred geometry in sanctuary space because you need to “clear out” some reality in order to actually create these idealized symmetries and ratios.
The metaphor of space comes to mind. Most of what we need to be paying attention to here on Earth is coming at us on a relatively flat circular plane. Assuming we could just float into space at will, though, it might be useful to consider that everyone who make the mistake of shooting off into the cosmos would have, more or less, the same experience.
I think they would assume they were all converging on the same central point, rather than moving outwards into the same ubiquitous and life-hostile space. I think we’ve got a lot of overloaded mystics and acid casualties floating in a geosynchronous orbit with the rest of us.
Basically, the sacred and perfected geometry seems inherently dead to me. I wonder if that’s some sort of truth-phobia on my part? I’m definitely open to that…but since I first got into Alex Grey after high school, the infinite harmony space has really alienated me. The organic has a much more gnarled and mutant feel to it.
Probably just a simple matter of personal magnetic bias settings or somesuch.
Twelve trains of thought. Four paragraphs. Two sentence fragments. No survivors.
This incoherent rant was paid for by Sodalicious, the open source beverage tech.
Ted, I’ve actually read part of that book, constructing the u, worthwhile!