Perceiving Centers, A Beginning

First stab at putting these thoughts into a specific shape which I’ve been dwelling with for quite some time. It’s not meant to be a hard and fast set of axioms so much as its been a handy guidebook for me to navigate experiences:

  1. A human being is one example of a perceiving center.
  2. Within animism, panpsychism & hylozoism, it might be said that all things, all points of view are perceiving centers.
  3. A perceiving center is a field of potentiality, a perceptual field.
  4. A perceptual field may be filled or activated through, with or by experiences.
  5. When occupied by experience, a perceptual field takes on states: perceptual field states or experiential states.
  6. The available field states with which a particular entity or perceiving center may be occupied are determined by the characteristics of the entity. In humans, it seems to be our body, sensory organs and nervous system which determine what specific bands of the experiential synaesthetic spectrum which we are able to perceive and the manner in which we are able to perceive it.
  7. Other entities with differing perceptual instruments will, necessarily, have access to different bands of the experiential spectrum, thereby achieving field states differently than humans.
  8. As experiential field states modulate from one to the next, a perceiving center experiences what we think of as the passage of time.

And that’s as far as I’ve gotten… Now some cool pictures!

geocentric-mandala-perceiving-center.jpg

geocentric-mandala-perceiving-center01.png

geocentric-mandala-perceiving-center02.jpg

geocentric-mandala-perceiving-center03.jpg

geocentric-mandala-perceiving-center04.gif

geocentric-mandala-perceiving-center05.jpg

geocentric-mandala-perceiving-center06.jpg

And a couple miscellaneous links. One from September of 2008 where I wrote that the notion of an “operating system” would eventually be replaced by the more robust “ontological system”, and something that crossed my mind before falling asleep last night: traditional angelic hierarchies - how do these relate to AI and ubiquitous computing metaphors?


- END -

ASSOCIATED CONTENT @TMBCHR (Auto-Generated)

5 Comments

  1. Posted January 15, 2009 at 12:42 pm | Permalink

    The logical next steps in this conversation:

    * Transmission of field states from one perceiving center to the next.

    * How do you define when one field state ends and the next begins?

    * How do you define where one perceiving center ends and another begins?

  2. Posted January 15, 2009 at 12:46 pm | Permalink

    http://thecultureclub.wordpress.com/20...omantic-conception-of-the-individual/

    Blake was not interested in strict representational ‘correctness’ but was more concerned with bringing out imaginatively what an experience meant to him. In this Blake is characteristically Romantic, believing in the centrality of the imagination, and that an artist must reject the past and find his own way of doing things from within himself. He said, ‘I must create my own system or be enslaved by another man’s.’

  3. Posted January 15, 2009 at 1:40 pm | Permalink

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gestalt_psychology

  4. Posted January 15, 2009 at 3:41 pm | Permalink

    On field states and perceiving centers:
    http://reclusland.tumblr.com/private/63619439/86aMlwW9Gh83xg9tMw1zah8t

    (at least the first part, about Purusha and Prakriti…)

  5. Posted January 18, 2009 at 6:44 pm | Permalink

    Related to perceptual states and computing

    http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2008/12/04/stateless-living/

Public Domain Where Applicable, Copy Left Where Not, Universal Free Realms Everyware Else for 2009 and for forever.the timboucher experience. No rights reserved.